This was too good not to share . . .
>
>The following is a status report from a business unit to their Y2K
>> coordinator.
>>
>> "Our staff has completed the 3 years of work on time and on budget.
>> We have gone through every line of code in every program in every
>> system. We have analyzed all databases, all data files, including
>> backups and historic archives, and modified all data to reflect the
>> change.
>>
>> We are proud to report that we have completed the "Y-to-K" date change
>> mission, and have now implemented all changes to all programs and all
>> data to reflect the following new standards:
>>
>> Januark, Februark, March, April, Mak, June, Julk, August, September,
>> October, November, December
>>
>> and....
>>
>> Sundak, Mondak, Tuesdak, Wednesdak, Thursdak, Fridak, Saturdak
>>
>> I trust that this is satisfactory, because, to be honest, none of this
>> Y to K problem has made any sense to me. But I understand it is a
>> global problem, and our team is glad to help in any way possible. And
>> what does the year 2000 have to do with it? Speaking of which, what do
>> you think we ought to do next year when the two digit year rolls over
>> from 99 to 00?
>>
>> We'll await your direction."
And for autocross content . . . oh well (maybe Honda S2000)
Dick Rasmussen
CM 85
85 Van Diemen RF-85 Formula Ford
|