autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Dennis's hairbrained ideas

To: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
Subject: RE: Dennis's hairbrained ideas
From: Jamie Sculerati <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 22:06:31 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Kevin McCormick wrote:

> Seems to me you you'd have to run it in SSC trim - i.e. roll cage, alignment
> specs, tires sizes...
> If you did that, then the provision exists for the car to run in it's
> 'normal' class (ES in this case.)

If Paul is refering to the "trunk kits" allowed in some Touring road race
classes (I'm not sure if the old Show Stock classes adopted these), then
no -- there was a note in FASTRAK a few months back specifically
prohibiting these in the Solo II Stock classes.

Granted, 1998 FASTRAKs became obsolete 26 days ago, but I'd expect to find
it in the '99 rules.

Jamie
'92 Prelude
http://mindspring.com/~jsculerati/sdr/




> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Hagger [mailto:paulhag@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 3:37 PM
> > To: Team.Net
> > Subject: RE: Dennis's hairbrained ideas
> > 
> > This reminds me...  has anyone considered running a Mazda Protege
> > equipped with one of those SSC-allowance packages.  Would it 
> > be classed
> > in Stock?
> > 
> > In case I am not making myself clear: to level the playing 
> > field and allow
> > more cars to play in Street Stock Road Racing the SCCA has 
> > allowed each
> > manufacturer to specify a package of options, approved by the SCCA, to
> > improve the performance of the car.  I think the Protege gets to run
> > Eibach springs, for example.
> > 
> > As these cars are eligible for Street Stock Road Racing, is 
> > it true that
> > they are also eligible for Solo II Stock Class competition?
> > 
> > -paul
> > DS '95 ACR Neon sedan
> > 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>