autox-cm
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FF2000 performance analysis

To: "Dr. Bob Woods" <Woods@mae.uta.edu>,
Subject: Re: FF2000 performance analysis
From: Jim and Rose Ann <garryj@localnet.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:08:06 -0500
Well .... all cars have a class in Solo II.   It's just that some are 
competitively classed and other aren't.   The vast majority of 
uncompetitively classed cars are in those straits because they would be 
too fast for the lower class and too slow for the higher class, thus 
they are conservatively classed into the faster class.

In Mod classes, on the surface it looks good to just add/subtract 
weight, etc, to even out a vehicle's performance so that more cars can 
be placed within the various class structure.   However, there are other 
factors to deal with.  In the case of C Modified, the main factor is 
that it is a primarily GCR legal class except for some safety issues.   
Thus, any investment in a car in C Mod can be rationalized beyond just 
making the car fast for C Mod.   The car can then be sold for road 
racing and the only changes the road racer has to make are to suspension 
tuning and gears.   This is a strong, stable class with no shortage of 
cars for interested participants.  Anyone wanting to get into this class 
has a wide choice of chassis and vehicles to choose from.  

If someone really desired to race a F2000 in Solo II, they can do so in 
B Mod where the car is capable in GCR form of trophying toward the 
bottom of the trophies.    Furthermore, the Solo II BM rules allow 
changes to be made to the F2000 which would make it competitive for a 
top trophy in that class.   And if we are prepared to ADD weight to the 
F2000 to run in C Mod, then we should be prepared to REDUCE weight for 
the F2000 for B Mod (along with the other changes already allowed for 
BM).  There is no need to run the car in CM and potentially upset the 
stability of a healthy class.  

Jim

Sam & Greg Scharnberg wrote:

> Just in the Formula Car and Sports Racer group, I would guess that we 
> could come up with an easy 25.
>
> Great to have your input.
>
> Greg Scharnberg
> 82 Ralt RT5 - BM
> 95 Citation SF - FC
>
> At 09:54 PM 1/3/2004 -0600, Dr. Bob Woods wrote:
>
>> snip---------------
>> Are there other cars without a class?
>> snip--------------
>> -Dr. Bob

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/autox-cm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>