| To: | Greg Locke <glocke@ihug.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters] |
| From: | Victor Hughes <v.hughes@student.canberra.edu.au> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:34:20 +1100 |
Greg Are you talking about engines like they fitted to the Isuzu Gemini - they had a single OHC 1600 in Australia but I'm sure that a twin cam of either 1800 or 2 litres was available in other markets. I know some importers bring these in from Japan Vic Greg Locke wrote: > > > One thing is that isuzu used almost the same identicle engine mount > placement as the years went by, so the later twin cam engines of which there > are plenty, fit without too much trouble. > > Greg |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Should I or shouldn't I?, CANISDOG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Should I or shouldn't I?, J Arzt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters], Victor Hughes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters], Greg Locke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |