To: | "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: |
From: | "Jeffrey B. Fetner" <FETNERJ001@hawaii.rr.com> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:15:56 +0600 |
You're right Vance, there are no vacuum pipes going to the EGR. Must be a '73+ head. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com> To: <YeOldEd@aol.com>; <sadelman@woh.rr.com>; <6pack@autox.team.net> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 5:45 AM Subject: RE: > Mike: > > I stand corrected. Was the 72 a high compression engine? > > Hey, wait a minute. The EGR was disconnected. So maybe it really was a > 72 motor since in effect, the EGR isn't really there? =;-) > > Vance |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: I thought the BELT was the hard part, Peter Zaborski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | clutch fork pins, JIMMY RICHARDS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Back-to-front ring gears, Sally or Dick Taylor |
Next by Thread: | clutch fork pins, JIMMY RICHARDS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |