Please pardon me for asking a question that I'm sure everyone here knows the
answer to, but what are the dimensions of the stock tires for the TR6. They
have such large sidewalls, I wouldn't be surprised if they were xxx/100-16
or something like that.
I really like how the stock looks with the large outer diameter of the tire.
Has anyone seen an example of a wheel/tire combo where the outer tire
diameter is the same as stock, but the sidewalls are short, thus requiring
like a 19-20" wheel or something like that? I just love the look of the big
wheels filling up the whole wheel well like they do on a stock car.
-mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-6pack@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-6pack@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Timothy Holbrook
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:13 PM
To: 6pack@autox.team.net
Subject: Fwd: Re: 16" wheels and tires
I would think that 205/55-16 or 205/60-16 is the way to go for tire
size on a 16" wheel. There's a lot of tire selection in 205/55-16
because that's an OE size on many sporty cars. I really don't think a
TR6 needs more than a 205 width tire. But that's just my opinion.
Plus I'm wondering if you would get rubbing problems in the rear with
wider tires if you had tube shocks... I run 205/65-15 on my car.
These tires are a bit shorter than stock, but I think it looks really
good. Makes it look more aggressive, without giving the car that
floating look that can happen when you go to a tire that's too short
(yielding a giant gap between the tire and the fender).
Jorge Lozano, a fellow lister, also has the Goodparts springs and 16"
Panasports. He had some rubbing problems up front, but I believe his
tires were taller than 205/55. Care to share, Jorge?
Tim Holbrook
1971 TR6
--- Chuck Arnold <Chuck.Arnold@oracle.com> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 08:24:31 -0700
> From: Chuck Arnold <Chuck.Arnold@oracle.com>
> To: Ryan Miles <rjhmile@yahoo.com>, 6pack
> <6pack-digest@autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: 16" wheels and tires
>
> Are these both front and rear springs? What is the height of the
> front
> springs before they are in the car? The ones I got from Moss were
> 9.5",
> stock is about 10.0x. My rears I got too long ago to know the
> unsprung
> height, but the rear of the car is 1" lower than the front. So I got
> advice from Bob Lang. In summary, here is what he said:
> 1. The rear should end up a little higher than the front so when
> accelerating and "squatting" the height is about neutral. To get the
> rear higher you can lower the front [to some extrent] or add spacers
> to
> the rear [TRF sells 1/2, 3/4, 1 inch spacers, around $22/pair].
> 2. To lower the front:
> a. Shorter springs [but the ones I have are the shortest I could
> get];
> b. Do not use the rubber or plastic caps on the top and bottom of
> the springs, will give up to 1/2 inch lower [I shaved mine, but am
> now
> going to remove and see where we are]
> c. Lower the perch the spring sits on in the lower A arm by
> making a
> spacer to sit between the arm and the bracket [the one held by 6
> bolts]. Note, the inner most ones are studs and only about 1/4"
> spacer
> can be inserted and still get a nut on the studs; the studs could be
> replaced by a bolt to get more length]. I am going to investigate
> doing
> this.
>
> You will also have to pay attention to the camber resulting from
> shorter
> tires and may have to add shims in the front and flip/change brackets
> on
> the rear trailing arm.
>
> The 45/205/16s are almost two inches shorter than the 205/65/15s I
> had
> on the front. They are 23.25 diameter. I got 205/45s all the way
> around. In retrospect I wish I had gotten the wider [225/50/16's] on
> the rear. They would be 24.86 in diameter. This would have made the
> back about a half inch higher than the front without spacers which
> would
> have been perfect. As you stated, the 225 look too big for the
> front,
> but they would fit well in the rear I think. Note, stock diameter is
> about 25.25, so no matter what you do the speedo will be off [mine is
> way off due to the tranny I have anyway, so I get mph from the rpms
> --
> got a little cheat sheet pasted to the speedo showing speed by rpm by
> gear].
>
> The 205/45/16's look very short. Can hardly wait to get them on the
> track. Got to get the brakes right and the suspension geometry
> worked
> out first.
>
> Hope that helps.
> Chuck
>
> Ryan Miles wrote:
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > I have Richard Good's springs which are supposed to lower the
> car
> > 1 to 1 1/2 inches, and I have no idea what size tires to get so
> that
> > the car dosen't look bad. You are the only other person I have seen
> > with a lowered car and 16" panasports. How do the 205/45/16's look?
> I
> > was worried that a 45 series would look too small... What do you
> > think? Right now I have the 16's on my TR6 which has stock
> suspension,
> > and my tire size is 225/60/16. These appear to be a little too wide
> in
> > the front, but about perfect in the back. I think I will probably
> try
> > 215's next, I justhavn't decided on the sidewall yet.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ryan Miles
> > Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
>
> [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
> name of Chuck.Arnold.vcf]
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
|