The 0-60 figure did catch my eye in a disappointing fashion. With all
that power and money I guess I would hope for something just a little
bit faster. Then again, I running a stock TR6 currently and I never
fail to find a grin on my face when I'm in it. So I guess 2-3 seconds
improvement most likely really feels fast.
R. Ashford Little II
www.geocities.com/ralittle2
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Beesley [mailto:Neil.Beesley@securesult.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:11 AM
To: R. Ashford Little II; 'Mark Holveck'; 'Six pack'
Subject: RE: 220 hp TR6 engine
I thought it strange that the TR5 in that article only claimed a 0-60
time
of 7.4 seconds - didn't really seem to justify all the cash spend on the
engine - not compared to the the 8.1 seconds of a stock PI TR5.
BTW other race specialists argue against the triple Webers - and suggest
fitting Lumenition or Weber EFI, which I've heard claimed outputs of
200bhp
at the flywheel.. but then you can probably buy a lot of carbs for
#5000+ !!
Regards,
Neil
CP52411
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-6pack@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-6pack@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of R. Ashford Little II
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 04:37
> To: 'Mark Holveck'; 'Six pack'
> Subject: RE: 220 hp TR6 engine
>
>
> There is a write-up in the latest issue of Thoroughbred & Classic Cars
> magazine that is about a TR5 that had been heavily modified by
> Racetorations. That car was dyno'd at 192 at the flywheel, but it's
> just money, right?
>
> R. Ashford Little II
> www.geocities.com/ralittle2
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-6pack@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-6pack@autox.team.net]
On
> Behalf Of Mark Holveck
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:48 PM
> To: Six pack
> Subject: 220 hp TR6 engine
>
> Hey all,
>
> I just joined the list a couple weeks ago, and have been listening and
> learning ever since. I thought I'd chime in on the TR6 engine mod
> conversation that's been going on.
>
> I spoke on the phone recently with a guy named Darryl, at a company
> called
> Racetorations in the UK. They do high performance TR work. I was
> asking
> him how far you could push a stock TR6 engine with all of today's
> technology. He gave me a very encouraging example of an engine he has
> done
> a couple of times:
>
> Bore the thing out to 2.67 Liters to boost the torque. Replace a lot
of
> stuff (especially the crank and pushrods) with steel so you can handle
> the
> 7000 rpm we want. STICK WITH WEBERS! I can't remember how the
> ignition's
> done. I'm pretty sure the compression ratio was near 10, maybe
> 9-something.
> $10,000 worth of just engine work if he does it all. He says you get
> 220 HP
> out of the thing, and that it runs like a dream, even driving to the
> grocery
> store.
>
> I like it because there's nothing high tech about it. Just machining,
> some
> high-strength parts, and precision. No turbos, supercharges,
> fuel-injection
> or anything. I like it because it sticks as close to the idea of the
> original engine as possible, but will blow away the the boxter sitting
> next
> to you at a light. It's like having my cake and eating too.
> (yeah, I know, it's very expensive cake, especially considering the
> necessary drivetrain and suspension upgrades)
>
> It seems like the big difference is the increased displacement I don't
> think
> I've heard anyone mention this modification yet, that's why I threw
this
> out
> here. Does anyone have any comments on this idea. I don't really
doubt
> that
> it's doable, because I believe darryl that he's done it a bunch of
> times,
> but I'm all ears. Anyone heard of this before.
>
> Look forward to hearing from you!
>
> -Mark
>
> Grew up in my dad's '72 TR6
|