<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>That’s true.  On my smallmouth I converted it to a cable-operated system – see pics from 2 different cars.  The pedal conversion is really neat…..<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Andrew Uprichard<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Jackson, Michigan<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Triumphs [mailto:triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Jim Wallace<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, January 29, 2018 3:56 PM<br><b>To:</b> triumphs@autox.team.net; bill_beecher@flash.net<br><b>Subject:</b> [TR] H6 vs HS<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt'>Bill,</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt'>The HS6 carbs would interfere with the heater hose coming out of the firewall, as there is linkage (or something) on the rear of the rear one.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt'>Jim</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt'>============</span><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#222222'><br><span style='background:white'>From: "Bill Beecher" <</span></span><a href="mailto:bill_beecher@flash.net"><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1155CC;background:white'>bill_beecher@flash.net</span></a><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#222222;background:white'>></span><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#222222'><br><br><span style='background:white'>Starting to revive a 1960 TR3A motor that has be on the shelf for a number</span><br><span style='background:white'>of years and have arrived at the SU carburettors.  I find I have complete</span><br><span style='background:white'>pairs of H6 and HS6 units that I could use so I would like to pose the</span><br><span style='background:white'>question:  Which would be preferred using the original TR3A/H6 intake</span><br><span style='background:white'>manifold?</span><br><br><span style='background:white'>I heard noise in the past that the shorter carbs on the TR3 manifold would</span><br><span style='background:white'>hamper performance.  Any truth to that?</span><br><br><span style='background:white'>Cheers,</span><br><br><span style='background:white'>Bill</span><br><br><span style='background:white'>TS75131E</span></span> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></body></html>