[TR] Stay away from California!

[auprichard at comcast.net]

I realize the outer compartment is larger and feeds the brakes, but I have
often wondered would it not be better to reverse the set up:B  that way, if
something were to pierce the canister for whatever reason, the clutch might go
out, but at least the brakes would be preserved.



Andrew Uprichard

In England, but unfortunately not enough time to enjoy it


----- Original Message -----
From: pethier at comcast.net
To: "Wbeech at flash.net" <wbeech at flash.net>
Cc: "list Triumph" <triumphs at autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:53:47 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [TR] Stay away from California!

----- "Wbeech at flash.net" <wbeech at flash.net> wrote:

> I have often wondered about this logic of two separate chambers for
> the
> fluid. B It would seem to me that to have the full capacity of the can
> available would be the safer route, especially for the brakes. B Or
> the
> greater fear that there is more exposure to failure of both systems
> should
> one system fail?

Sure. B A clutch failure taking out your brakes is no picnic. The systems on
my TR4 are completely separate, and that's the way I like it.

Of course, both the TR4 and my Seven have single-system brakes, but that's
another story.

Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA
1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L B  1979 Caterham 7
1993 Suburban B 1994 Miata C-package B 2007 Saturn Ion 3 2.4
http://www.triumphtransamerica.org.uk
http://forum.mnautox.com/forums B  http://www.flickr.com/photos/pethier
This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org


Triumphs at autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs

You are subscribed as auprichard at comcast.net

http://www.team.net/archive