<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Clyde,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>You know that I’m in the same situation and am looking for alternatives. I’ve been fighting the low ground clearance issue with my headers for years. Mine came from SS.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>JVP<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><img width=225 height=63 style='width:2.3472in;height:.6597in' id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D6C99D.F7D554D0"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><br> 16048 Copen Meadow Dr<br> North Potomac, MD 20878<br> Cell - 410-599-5475<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> Email - <a href="mailto:jvparlanti@gmail.com"><span style='color:blue'>jvparlanti@gmail.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> Tigers <tigers-bounces@autox.team.net> <b>On Behalf Of </b>clyde mclaughlin via Tigers<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 3, 2020 5:03 PM<br><b>To:</b> tigers@autox.team.net<br><b>Subject:</b> [Tigers] tiger headers<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>Im curious if the latest headers from any suppliers have way better fit particularly with the cyl #3 and cyl #7 tubes. I have had two different sets of headers and both set have these tubes lower than they need to be and always drag if clearance is less than optimal. They are lower than the center of the front suspension cross member. I don't know the supplier of the sets I have had. Would be interested in comments on header brands and fit relative to ground clearance, before I go back to manifolds Thanks, Clyde <o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></div></div></body></html>