From srwick at hotmail.com Wed Sep 1 06:44:46 2021 From: srwick at hotmail.com (steve wick) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:44:46 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. Steve ________________________________ From: Tigers on behalf of Ron Fraser Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM To: 'Richard Bruner' Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints Richard You probably got those numbers from me. The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer translate to a paint mix. Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes available but most do not. Ron Fraser From: Richard Bruner Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM To: Ron Fraser Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints This is what I had saved from somewhere: Ditzler code: 12633 Dulux enamel: 97365 Chrysler #: 75242838 Burger code: 404.1710 ICI: 2983 On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or translate > well into the new paint codes of today. > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you want for > your car. > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in single stage > or base coat/ clear coat. > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the painter???s > preference. > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops only as far > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would not sell > them to me. > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, dry and > cure water base paint. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > via Tigers > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a complete > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used today . My > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should I do base > coat clear coat. > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new products. > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michael.s.king at gmail.com Wed Sep 1 06:53:36 2021 From: michael.s.king at gmail.com (michael king) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:53:36 +0800 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: Steve, Take off the latch panel for the bonnet covering the heater matrix in the scuttle. The underside will have the original paint. And it won't be sun faded. On Wednesday, 1 September 2021, steve wick via Tigers wrote: > I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. > My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red > back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint > shop scan the old paint. > > Steve > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Tigers on behalf of Ron Fraser < > rfraser at bluefrog.com> > *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM > *To:* 'Richard Bruner' > *Cc:* 'Lance Beauchamp' ; tigers at autox.team.net < > tigers at autox.team.net> > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] New paints > > > Richard > > You probably got those numbers from me. > > > > The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer translate > to a paint mix. > > Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes available but > most do not. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > *From:* Richard Bruner > *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM > *To:* Ron Fraser > *Cc:* 'Lance Beauchamp' ; tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] New paints > > > > This is what I had saved from somewhere: > > Ditzler code: 12633 > Dulux enamel: 97365 > Chrysler #: 75242838 > Burger code: 404.1710 > ICI: 2983 > > > On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or translate > > well into the new paint codes of today. > > > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you want for > > your car. > > > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in single stage > > or base coat/ clear coat. > > > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the painter???s > > preference. > > > > > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops only as far > > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would not sell > > them to me. > > > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, dry and > > cure water base paint. > > > > > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > > > > > > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > > via Tigers > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a complete > > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used today . My > > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should I do base > > coat clear coat. > > > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new > products. > > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > tigers at autox.team.net > > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > > http://autox.team.net/archive > > > > Unsubscribe: > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > > > > > -- Regards Michael King -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From srwick at hotmail.com Wed Sep 1 06:58:16 2021 From: srwick at hotmail.com (steve wick) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:58:16 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: I'll give that a shot. They were very thorough, and even painted inside the trunk and passenger compartment. Steve ________________________________ From: michael king Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 5:53 AM To: steve wick Cc: Ron Fraser ; Richard Bruner ; Lance Beauchamp ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints Steve, Take off the latch panel for the bonnet covering the heater matrix in the scuttle. The underside will have the original paint. And it won't be sun faded. On Wednesday, 1 September 2021, steve wick via Tigers > wrote: I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. Steve ________________________________ From: Tigers > on behalf of Ron Fraser > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM To: 'Richard Bruner' > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints Richard You probably got those numbers from me. The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer translate to a paint mix. Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes available but most do not. Ron Fraser From: Richard Bruner > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints This is what I had saved from somewhere: Ditzler code: 12633 Dulux enamel: 97365 Chrysler #: 75242838 Burger code: 404.1710 ICI: 2983 On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or translate > well into the new paint codes of today. > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you want for > your car. > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in single stage > or base coat/ clear coat. > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the painter???s > preference. > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops only as far > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would not sell > them to me. > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, dry and > cure water base paint. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > via Tigers > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a complete > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used today . My > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should I do base > coat clear coat. > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new products. > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > -- Regards Michael King -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 1 08:21:16 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <000a01d79f3c$a177b4f0$e4671ed0$@bluefrog.com> Steve Here are a couple of notes I found but I'm not sure of the dates for these comments. I also do not know if the phone #s are correct The PPG Color Library has catalogues of colors going waaaay back. If you give them the year make and model, they can look up any color and give to a modern paint number to match, as well as the original paint code in PPG paint. PPG Color Library 8:30 am to 5:30 pm (weekdays) (440) 572-6100 Strongsville, OH >From Jalopy Journal We regularly get paint codes or their modern equivalents (called offsets) for cars back into the early 30's thru the Ditzler Color Library. Have your supplier phone them at 800-647-6050. Not sure they will give info to a private citizen or if you have to be a shop but worth a try. For example, in 1931 Chev used a "Cellini Green" on wheels. Same color was used on '68 VW as "Sumatra Green". If you have the color name and/or the application they can likely help you. >From AACA Forums I have 2 modern paint codes that I believe work. Yes, it would be very nice to have a complete listing of modern paint codes for Rootes vehicles. 86 Forest Green GS280 106 Commodore Blue BS616A H Ron Fraser From: steve wick Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2021 8:45 AM To: Ron Fraser ; 'Richard Bruner' Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atwittsend at verizon.net Wed Sep 1 09:28:05 2021 From: atwittsend at verizon.net (Tom Witt) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:28:05 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <1b93cd4b-703b-b728-046a-fc1e97c687d7@verizon.net> I remember a number of years back this message board had a significant debate of what the real #86 BRG was. I recall discussion regarding paint that wasn't exposed to the elements still "aging," that a more recent repaint was therefore was more accurate as it had aged less, that any modern formulation method wasn't accurate and what REAL BRG was compared to Rootes BRG, and that Rootes got it wrong - I faintly recall one argument being (no that that mattered). Nothing wrong with striving for accuracy. It just seem like a moving target to hit and subject to the opinion of others. Wishing you the best in whatever you decide. In the end only YOU need to be content. On 9/1/2021 5:53 AM, michael king wrote: > Steve, > > Take off the latch panel for the bonnet covering the heater matrix in > the scuttle. The underside will have the original paint. And it won't > be sun faded. > > On Wednesday, 1 September 2021, steve wick via Tigers > > wrote: > > I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern > paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was > stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have > a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. > > Steve > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Tigers > on behalf of Ron Fraser > > > *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM > *To:* 'Richard Bruner' > > *Cc:* 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > > > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] New paints > > Richard > > ??????????????? You probably got those numbers from me. > > The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer > translate to a paint mix. > > Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes > available but most do not. > > Ron Fraser > > *From:* Richard Bruner > > *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM > *To:* Ron Fraser > > *Cc:* 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] New paints > > This is what I had saved from somewhere: > > Ditzler code: 12633 > Dulux enamel: 97365 > Chrysler #: 75242838 > Burger code: 404.1710 > ICI: 2983 > > > On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or > translate > > well into the new paint codes of today. > > > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you > want for > > your car. > > > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in > single stage > > or base coat/ clear coat. > > > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the > painter???s > > preference. > > > > > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops > only as far > > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would > not sell > > them to me. > > > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, > dry and > > cure water base paint. > > > > > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > > > > > > From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > > via Tigers > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a > complete > > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used > today . My > > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should > I do base > > coat clear coat. > > > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new > products. > > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > tigers at autox.team.net > > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > > > http://autox.team.net/archive > > > > Unsubscribe: > > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards > > Michael King > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/atwittsend at verizon.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From srwick at hotmail.com Wed Sep 1 10:38:11 2021 From: srwick at hotmail.com (steve wick) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:38:11 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: <1b93cd4b-703b-b728-046a-fc1e97c687d7@verizon.net> References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> <1b93cd4b-703b-b728-046a-fc1e97c687d7@verizon.net> Message-ID: Normally when I restore a car, I try to be exact with the paint, because it's just as expensive to do it right as to do it wrong. With the Tiger though, I'd be happy with close. Maybe only 1 in a 100 people I talk to even know what a Tiger is, so being a shade off won't be a big deal. With that said, I'm a big fan of Dark Blue's and Black and not so much a fan of Red. To be honest, I could paint the thing Ford Presidential Blue and be happier with it, but a little research and help from the group might make it "right" the first time. ? Steve ________________________________ From: Tigers on behalf of Tom Witt via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 8:28 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints I remember a number of years back this message board had a significant debate of what the real #86 BRG was. I recall discussion regarding paint that wasn't exposed to the elements still "aging," that a more recent repaint was therefore was more accurate as it had aged less, that any modern formulation method wasn't accurate and what REAL BRG was compared to Rootes BRG, and that Rootes got it wrong - I faintly recall one argument being (no that that mattered). Nothing wrong with striving for accuracy. It just seem like a moving target to hit and subject to the opinion of others. Wishing you the best in whatever you decide. In the end only YOU need to be content. On 9/1/2021 5:53 AM, michael king wrote: Steve, Take off the latch panel for the bonnet covering the heater matrix in the scuttle. The underside will have the original paint. And it won't be sun faded. On Wednesday, 1 September 2021, steve wick via Tigers > wrote: I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. Steve ________________________________ From: Tigers > on behalf of Ron Fraser > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM To: 'Richard Bruner' > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints Richard You probably got those numbers from me. The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer translate to a paint mix. Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes available but most do not. Ron Fraser From: Richard Bruner > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints This is what I had saved from somewhere: Ditzler code: 12633 Dulux enamel: 97365 Chrysler #: 75242838 Burger code: 404.1710 ICI: 2983 On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or translate > well into the new paint codes of today. > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you want for > your car. > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in single stage > or base coat/ clear coat. > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the painter???s > preference. > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops only as far > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would not sell > them to me. > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, dry and > cure water base paint. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > via Tigers > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a complete > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used today . My > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should I do base > coat clear coat. > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new products. > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > -- Regards Michael King _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/atwittsend at verizon.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 1 18:50:01 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <002001d79f94$771e2740$655a75c0$@bluefrog.com> Steve and all I found a possible modern paint code for #58 Midnight Blue ? BS364 No guarantees here ? there was a ? next to that number. I?m hoping it just might get you close to the correct paint color. Ron Fraser From: steve wick Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2021 8:45 AM To: Ron Fraser ; 'Richard Bruner' Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. Steve _____ From: Tigers > on behalf of Ron Fraser > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM To: 'Richard Bruner' > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints Richard You probably got those numbers from me. The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer translate to a paint mix. Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes available but most do not. Ron Fraser From: Richard Bruner > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints This is what I had saved from somewhere: Ditzler code: 12633 Dulux enamel: 97365 Chrysler #: 75242838 Burger code: 404.1710 ICI: 2983 On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or translate > well into the new paint codes of today. > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you want for > your car. > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in single stage > or base coat/ clear coat. > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the painter???s > preference. > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops only as far > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would not sell > them to me. > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, dry and > cure water base paint. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > via Tigers > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a complete > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used today . My > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should I do base > coat clear coat. > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new products. > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dave.barakat at icloud.com Wed Sep 1 19:19:19 2021 From: dave.barakat at icloud.com (Dave Barakat) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:19:19 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] New paints In-Reply-To: <002001d79f94$771e2740$655a75c0$@bluefrog.com> References: <000a01d79dab$dc91cc70$95b56550$@bluefrog.com> <1ecf4edcba3dfb103acbefedd7718b1c.squirrel@webmail.mokancomm.net> <001601d79db0$609c9b40$21d5d1c0$@bluefrog.com> <002001d79f94$771e2740$655a75c0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <3E0336F4-F1DE-481B-9754-8C02910D35D7@icloud.com> For what ever it is worth my blue ?66 MK 1A with original paint code 58 was repainted with an AMC color code A-11514-D and matched extremely closely. Hope that helps and doesn?t obscure your quest! > On Sep 1, 2021, at 5:50 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > Steve and all > > I found a possible modern paint code for #58 Midnight Blue ? BS364 > No guarantees here ? there was a ? next to that number. > I?m hoping it just might get you close to the correct paint color. > > Ron Fraser > > > > From: steve wick > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2021 8:45 AM > To: Ron Fraser >; 'Richard Bruner' > > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints > > I'd be interested in hearing if someone comes up with a modern paint code. My car is supposed to be Midnight Blue, but was stripped and repainted red back in the mid '70's, so I don't have a spot where I can have the paint shop scan the old paint. > > Steve > > From: Tigers > on behalf of Ron Fraser > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:04 AM > To: 'Richard Bruner' > > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > > Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints > > Richard > You probably got those numbers from me. > > The problem is that at my paint shop those old numbers no longer translate to a paint mix. > Some paint shops may have those old paint codes and mixes available but most do not. > > Ron Fraser > > From: Richard Bruner > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 10:54 AM > To: Ron Fraser > > Cc: 'Lance Beauchamp' >; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] New paints > > This is what I had saved from somewhere: > > Ditzler code: 12633 > Dulux enamel: 97365 > Chrysler #: 75242838 > Burger code: 404.1710 > ICI: 2983 > > > On Mon, August 30, 2021 9:32 am, Ron Fraser via Tigers wrote: > > Paint code 58 is Midnight Blue ??? Ditzler # 12633 > > > > > > > > The problem is that these old paint codes do not correspond or translate > > well into the new paint codes of today. > > > > 1st you need to see about getting the color match paint code you want for > > your car. > > > > If someone here has the current paint code for #58, pass it along. > > > > > > > > Any Automotive paint shop should be able to mix the paint in single stage > > or base coat/ clear coat. > > > > Single stage or BC/CC will most likely be determined by the painter???s > > preference. > > > > > > > > Water base paints are sold to Professional Spray Paint Shops only as far > > as I know. I have asked about water base paints and they would not sell > > them to me. > > > > You really need a paint booth with correct equipment to spray, dry and > > cure water base paint. > > > > > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > > > > > > From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Lance Beauchamp > > via Tigers > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 8:40 AM > > To: Tiger Club. Submission > > > Subject: [Tigers] New paints > > > > > > > > My 1964 Tiger thanks to a mishap and good insurance is getting a complete > > repaint, my question is what is now the preferred paint used today . My > > cars color is midnight blue, I believe 58 is the number. Should I do base > > coat clear coat. > > > > I hear their is water based paints now, I'm not to up on the new products. > > Any ideas are appreciated. Beau > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > tigers at autox.team.net > > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > > http://autox.team.net/archive > > > > Unsubscribe: > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/gammaman at mokancomm.net > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/dave.barakat at icloud.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deiland1 at att.net Sat Sep 4 17:33:40 2021 From: deiland1 at att.net (Daniel Eiland) Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 23:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line but they were no help. They referred me to their tax site where I could post my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just increased the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what the state tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Sat Sep 4 18:07:05 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 17:07:05 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4b885b91-8d7b-2ae6-671c-d8ae8e4fd848@comcast.net> State tax is by county and maybe city (at least in CA).? They may charge for the largest tax in the state. Gary On 9/4/2021 4:33 PM, Daniel Eiland via Tigers wrote: > FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem > with the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I > realized they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on > their chat line but they were no help. They referred me to their tax > site where I could post my issue but that is it. You have to be > careful because they just increased the tax due without saying they > were collecting more than what the state tax really is if you > calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat site said he > couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of contacting > their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is > collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is > not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did > not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? > > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Sat Sep 4 18:07:50 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 20:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I have made several purchases from JEGS in the last couple of months.? I live in Virginia which has different tax rates ranging from 5.3 to 7%.? My area is 6%.? My parts came to $42.44 not including shipping.? I was charged $2.55 in tax.? That is 6%.?My only problem with them is they list stuff and don't have it or it's been discontinued by the manufacturer.?Jim DSent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Daniel Eiland via Tigers Date: 9/4/21 7:34 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Tiger List Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line but they were no help They referred me to their tax site where I could post my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just increased the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what the state tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before?Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deiland1 at att.net Sat Sep 4 20:49:52 2021 From: deiland1 at att.net (Daniel Eiland) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 02:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <202109050007.18507vlJ128742@alph769.prodigy.net> References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> <202109050007.18507vlJ128742@alph769.prodigy.net> Message-ID: <1389350215.1560009.1630810192518@mail.yahoo.com> Just heard from someone on another car list who put in a test purchase from Columbus, Ohio and the JEGS site showed the tax on the purchase that was almost double the actual tax. Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 6:07 PM, jimdamelio wrote: I have made several purchases from JEGS in the last couple of months.? I live in Virginia which has different tax rates ranging from 5.3 to 7%.? My area is 6%.? My parts came to $42.44 not including shipping.? I was charged $2.55 in tax.? That is 6%.? My only problem with them is they list stuff and don't have it or it's been discontinued by the manufacturer.? Jim D Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Daniel Eiland via Tigers Date: 9/4/21 7:34 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Tiger List Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line but they were no help They referred me to their tax site where I could post my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just increased the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what the state tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jefferyrandall at gmail.com Sun Sep 5 05:22:15 2021 From: jefferyrandall at gmail.com (Jeffery Randall) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 07:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <1389350215.1560009.1630810192518@mail.yahoo.com> References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> <202109050007.18507vlJ128742@alph769.prodigy.net> <1389350215.1560009.1630810192518@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Contact the state Attorney General where the headquarters are, generally they will take care of such type gouging. On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:50 PM Daniel Eiland via Tigers < tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > Just heard from someone on another car list who put in a test purchase > from Columbus, Ohio and the JEGS site showed the tax on the purchase that > was almost double the actual tax. > > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 6:07 PM, jimdamelio > wrote: > I have made several purchases from JEGS in the last couple of months. I > live in Virginia which has different tax rates ranging from 5.3 to 7%. My > area is 6%. My parts came to $42.44 not including shipping. I was charged > $2.55 in tax. That is 6%. > > My only problem with them is they list stuff and don't have it or it's > been discontinued by the manufacturer. > > Jim D > > > > Sent from my Galaxy > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Daniel Eiland via Tigers > Date: 9/4/21 7:34 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: Tiger List > Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? > > FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with > the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized > they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line > but they were no help They referred me to their tax site where I could post > my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just increased > the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what the state > tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat > site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of > contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is > collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is not. > Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did not > purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? > > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jefferyrandall at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark44124 at gmail.com Sun Sep 5 08:47:16 2021 From: mark44124 at gmail.com (Mark Rense) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I buy exclusively from Summit. No tax issues, price match for everything, stock quantities are accurate and next day delivery for my zip code. Plus their customer service has bent over backwards for me on a couple occasions. I?ve built at least ten engines using Summit as the main parts source. Bugz On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:34 PM Daniel Eiland via Tigers < tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with > the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized > they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line > but they were no help. They referred me to their tax site where I could > post my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just > increased the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what > the state tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on > their chat site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the > option of contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the > company is collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when > it is not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did > not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? > > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mark44124 at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Sun Sep 5 09:39:27 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 11:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <1389350215.1560009.1630810192518@mail.yahoo.com> References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> <202109050007.18507vlJ128742@alph769.prodigy.net> <1389350215.1560009.1630810192518@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <001401d7a26c$36ccad30$a4660790$@bluefrog.com> Jim The big problem is the supply chain is all FUBAR. Some products are 5 to 10 weeks delay if you?re lucky. Dan Your problem is that your asking a legal question to a phone operator and I guarantee they do not have a lawyer on staff there. There was a time when I noticed that companies were charging tax on postage and handling. Taxing postage is not legal. I think I wrote a complaint to the Post Office General. I then noticed that companies changed the wording to handling and shipping ? all taxable because they took the word postage out. You have to look at any order to check the shipping and handling charge ? they could be OK or down right outrageous these days. Unfortunately, it?s buyer beware out there, fortunately there is a cancel or delete button. I was ordering an exhaust system on Rock Auto one time and Rock Auto red flagged the main pipe ? the supplier wanted to charge $300 shipping for an $80 part. Thank you Rock Auto for the heads up, I noticed the high charge too ? that part was purchased elsewhere. As for who to report this to; I would say you need to report it to your State?s Attorney General. We the people have little influence in these matters to a company but put a State?s Legal team behind something like this, the company will have to take notice. If a company is over charging Tax ? your State wants to know. I?m not a lawyer so just my opinion on the subject. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of Daniel Eiland via Tigers Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2021 10:50 PM To: jimdamelio at verizon.net; jimdamelio ; Tiger List Subject: Re: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? Just heard from someone on another car list who put in a test purchase from Columbus, Ohio and the JEGS site showed the tax on the purchase that was almost double the actual tax. Sent from AT &T Yahoo Mail on Android On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 6:07 PM, jimdamelio > wrote: I have made several purchases from JEGS in the last couple of months. I live in Virginia which has different tax rates ranging from 5.3 to 7%. My area is 6%. My parts came to $42.44 not including shipping. I was charged $2.55 in tax. That is 6%. My only problem with them is they list stuff and don't have it or it's been discontinued by the manufacturer. Jim D Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: Daniel Eiland via Tigers > Date: 9/4/21 7:34 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Tiger List > Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line but they were no help They referred me to their tax site where I could post my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just increased the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what the state tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? Sent from AT &T Yahoo Mail on Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rollright at aol.com Sun Sep 5 11:23:46 2021 From: rollright at aol.com (James Armstrong) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir References: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460@mail.yahoo.com> Hello, I just finished looking at:?1) Sunbeam Specialties (Rick has the genuine cap)2) Bay US3) Ebay.co.UK4)Sunbeam Alpine West Midlands??I can't find a source for a new Girling stock plastic brake fluid reservoir??Any suggestions ??Jim ArmstrongMk 1A382002083 LRXFECode 86TAC # 0763 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Mon Sep 6 07:01:57 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir In-Reply-To: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <001401d7a31f$608372e0$218a58a0$@bluefrog.com> Brake Parts (classicsunbeam.com) I see one listed here. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Armstrong via Tigers Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2021 1:24 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir Hello, I just finished looking at: 1) Sunbeam Specialties (Rick has the genuine cap) 2) Bay US 3) Ebay.co.UK 4)Sunbeam Alpine West Midlands I can't find a source for a new Girling stock plastic brake fluid reservoir Any suggestions ? Jim Armstrong Mk 1A 382002083 LRXFE Code 86 TAC # 0763 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deiland1 at att.net Mon Sep 6 08:42:42 2021 From: deiland1 at att.net (Daniel Eiland) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <71387797.1723982.1630939362918@mail.yahoo.com> I too have purchased a lot of parts from Summet and from JEGS and have never had an issue with either company.? As I posted, this was an FYI, in order to warn people to confirm that the tax charge is correct. I have notified JEGS of the issue and I will just have to be patient while they look into the issue. Their office that handles this is only open M-F and it is a holiday today so I don't expect them to be there today. Although most of us have probably bought parts from these companies in the past without issues, this issue only goes to show that we should be more diligent and check the bill before hitting pay. Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 9:11 PM, Mark Rense wrote: _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/deiland1 at att.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rollright at aol.com Mon Sep 6 11:24:24 2021 From: rollright at aol.com (James Armstrong) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 17:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir In-Reply-To: <001401d7a31f$608372e0$218a58a0$@bluefrog.com> References: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460@mail.yahoo.com> <001401d7a31f$608372e0$218a58a0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <56243805.1745085.1630949064990@mail.yahoo.com> Thanks Ron?BTW: have the old Victoria British parts showed up yet on Moss's site? I've looked but haven't seen them?Jim Armstrong??In a message dated 9/6/2021 9:02:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, rfraser at bluefrog.com writes:? Brake Parts (classicsunbeam.com) ? I see one listed here. ? Ron Fraser ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Armstrong via Tigers Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2021 1:24 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir ? Hello, I just finished looking at:? 1) Sunbeam Specialties (Rick has the genuine cap) 2) Bay US 3) Ebay.co.UK 4)Sunbeam Alpine West Midlands ? ? I can't find a source for a new Girling stock plastic brake fluid reservoir? ? Any suggestions ? ? Jim Armstrong Mk 1A 382002083 LRXFE Code 86 TAC # 0763 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sabre2tgr at gmail.com Mon Sep 6 11:59:22 2021 From: sabre2tgr at gmail.com (Stu) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir In-Reply-To: <56243805.1745085.1630949064990@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460@mail.yahoo.com> <001401d7a31f$608372e0$218a58a0$@bluefrog.com> <56243805.1745085.1630949064990@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Agreed, I think Moss is only interested only in MG, Triumph, Morris, etc, the British Leyland related stuff. And Miatas too, but that doesn't help us much. Stu On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:25 PM James Armstrong via Tigers < tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > Thanks Ron > > BTW: have the old Victoria British parts showed up yet on Moss's site? > I've looked but haven't seen them > > Jim Armstrong > > > In a message dated 9/6/2021 9:02:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, > rfraser at bluefrog.com writes: > > > Brake Parts (classicsunbeam.com) > > > > > I see one listed here. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > *From:* Tigers *On Behalf Of *James > Armstrong via Tigers > *Sent:* Sunday, September 05, 2021 1:24 PM > *To:* tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir > > > > Hello, > > I just finished looking at: > > 1) Sunbeam Specialties (Rick has the genuine cap) > > 2) Bay US > > 3) Ebay.co.UK > > 4)Sunbeam Alpine West Midlands > > > > > > I can't find a source for a new *Girling* stock plastic brake fluid > reservoir > > > > Any suggestions ? > > > > Jim Armstrong > > Mk 1A > > 382002083 LRXFE > > Code 86 > > TAC # 0763 > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/sabre2tgr at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Mon Sep 6 12:58:12 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir In-Reply-To: <56243805.1745085.1630949064990@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1449151614.1601456.1630862626460@mail.yahoo.com> <001401d7a31f$608372e0$218a58a0$@bluefrog.com> <56243805.1745085.1630949064990@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <002901d7a351$24c94e50$6e5beaf0$@bluefrog.com> Jim I have no idea if Moss is going to add Sunbeam to their list. Very little info is available. VB was part of LMC Trucks so the question is did they only sell the inventory or the building too. You would have to write Moss and ask if they intend to support Sunbeam parts. Support our known Sunbeam Parts Dealers 1st Ron Fraser From: James Armstrong Sent: Monday, September 06, 2021 1:24 PM To: rfraser at bluefrog.com Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir Thanks Ron BTW: have the old Victoria British parts showed up yet on Moss's site? I've looked but haven't seen them Jim Armstrong In a message dated 9/6/2021 9:02:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, rfraser at bluefrog.com writes: Brake Parts (classicsunbeam.com) I see one listed here. Ron Fraser From: Tigers > On Behalf Of James Armstrong via Tigers Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2021 1:24 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir Hello, I just finished looking at: 1) Sunbeam Specialties (Rick has the genuine cap) 2) Bay US 3) Ebay.co.UK 4)Sunbeam Alpine West Midlands I can't find a source for a new Girling stock plastic brake fluid reservoir Any suggestions ? Jim Armstrong Mk 1A 382002083 LRXFE Code 86 TAC # 0763 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From drmayf at mayfco.com Mon Sep 6 12:59:08 2021 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (Larry Mayfield) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:59:08 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <002901d7a351$47b37260$d71a5720$@mayfco.com> Ditto, Larry TWFS 210.779 mph exit speed From: Tigers On Behalf Of Mark Rense Sent: Sunday, September 5, 2021 7:47 AM To: Tiger List Serve Subject: Re: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? I buy exclusively from Summit. No tax issues, price match for everything, stock quantities are accurate and next day delivery for my zip code. Plus their customer service has bent over backwards for me on a couple occasions. I?ve built at least ten engines using Summit as the main parts source. Bugz On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:34 PM Daniel Eiland via Tigers > wrote: FYI, I went to JEGS website to order some parts and noticed a problem with the tax calculation on the bill. When I looked into it further I realized they had added an extra dollar to the state tax. I went on their chat line but they were no help. They referred me to their tax site where I could post my issue but that is it. You have to be careful because they just increased the tax due without saying they were collecting more than what the state tax really is if you calculate it out yourself. The person on their chat site said he couldn't correct the issue and only left me the option of contacting their email site to their tax office. I imagine the company is collecting millions of dollars under the premise of taxes when it is not. Not sure who to report this practice too. Needless-to-say I did not purchase the parts. Anyone else noticed this practice before? Sent from AT &T Yahoo Mail on Android _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mark44124 at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rsdslp at juno.com Wed Sep 8 10:40:51 2021 From: rsdslp at juno.com (rsdslp at juno.com) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 09:40:51 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <24e5e20e-768d-40e9-beb4-1922a519b474@email.android.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jbbrown1980 at gmail.com Wed Sep 8 11:07:41 2021 From: jbbrown1980 at gmail.com (Joe Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir In-Reply-To: <24e5e20e-768d-40e9-beb4-1922a519b474@email.android.com> References: <24e5e20e-768d-40e9-beb4-1922a519b474@email.android.com> Message-ID: So I wonder what happened to all of the Sunbeam stuff they had. Do we have another source for windshields? Thanks, Joe On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:51 AM rsdslp--- via Tigers wrote: > Moss also recently purchased XKs Unlimited and managed to screw up the > Jaguar parts listing too. Seems like they are following the Microsoft model > of buying out all potential competition then screwing up the product. > > On Sep 6, 2021 10:59 AM, Stu wrote: > > Agreed, I think Moss is only interested only in MG, Triumph, Morris, etc, > the British Leyland related stuff. And Miatas too, but that doesn't help > us much. > > Stu > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:25 PM James Armstrong via Tigers < > tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > > Thanks Ron > > BTW: have the old Victoria British parts showed up yet on Moss's site? > I've looked but haven't seen them > > Jim Armstrong > > > In a message dated 9/6/2021 9:02:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, > rfraser at bluefrog.com writes: > > > Brake Parts (classicsunbeam.com) > > > > > I see one listed here. > > > > Ron Fraser > > > > *From:* Tigers *On Behalf Of *James > Armstrong via Tigers > *Sent:* Sunday, September 05, 2021 1:24 PM > *To:* tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir > > > > Hello, > > I just finished looking at: > > 1) Sunbeam Specialties (Rick has the genuine cap) > > 2) Bay US > > 3) Ebay.co.UK > > 4)Sunbeam Alpine West Midlands > > > > > > I can't find a source for a new *Girling* stock plastic brake fluid > reservoir > > > > Any suggestions ? > > > > Jim Armstrong > > Mk 1A > > 382002083 LRXFE > > Code 86 > > TAC # 0763 > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/sabre2tgr at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atwittsend at verizon.net Wed Sep 8 16:51:31 2021 From: atwittsend at verizon.net (Tom Witt) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:51:31 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir (Moss Motors... windshields) In-Reply-To: References: <24e5e20e-768d-40e9-beb4-1922a519b474@email.android.com> Message-ID: <0b4a86da-f269-197c-aafc-241287c4bd22@verizon.net> Joe Brown:/"Do we have another source for windshields?"/ This is a looming problem for not just Tigers, but the collector car world as a whole. Most people don't consider the need..., until they have the need. My understanding is windshields are made in batches..., as there is need. So, if the volume is not there to spark the manufacturer to? do a "run" availability dwindles. I mean who wants to manufacture a fragile, large product and then sit on it for years until YOU need it? About 8 years ago I was looking for a windshield for my 1964 Studebaker Daytona. There was ONE vendor in the mid-west (I'm west coast) that had ONE windshield in stock. When I asked if they were going to get more the owner replied, "Not likely." That windshield would have cost me over $600+ delivered. In the end I bought a used windshield that had scratches and? bull's-eye but at least it wasn't broken. In fact to cover myself I bought two at $100 each. I then spent 10 hours making a cradle to securely fit both windshields in my son's Honda Civic as it was a 400 mile trip from where they were. And as it was these were station wagon windshields that the seller cut a 1/2" section out to fit the sedan.? So, yea, sometimes it comes to measures such as that. In this day and age of lasers and CNC you would think that windshield reproduction might be more practical. Or that modern plastics could replace glass as a means of making windshields available and reasonably priced. I saw on Wheeler Dealer how they cut a windshield for a Saab out of a late model Impala windshield. But the wraparound nature of the Tiger windshield negates that route. I didn't mean to ramble but least anyone be taken by surprise somewhere down the road ... . Hopefully not but the way businesses are changing you never know. // -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jay.laifman at gmail.com Wed Sep 8 16:58:39 2021 From: jay.laifman at gmail.com (Jay) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:58:39 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir (Moss Motors... windshields) In-Reply-To: <0b4a86da-f269-197c-aafc-241287c4bd22@verizon.net> References: <24e5e20e-768d-40e9-beb4-1922a519b474@email.android.com> <0b4a86da-f269-197c-aafc-241287c4bd22@verizon.net> Message-ID: <4290F686-FF4C-403F-AE3C-01582E4AE1CB@gmail.com> FWIW, Moss did contact Sunbeam Specialties to see if they would buy the VB Sunbeam stuff, and they declined. Not sure if anything happened after that. But, I really don?t care because VB stuff has proven to be bad time and time again. So I hope it doesn?t end up with our better suppliers. On the windshield, I bought a new windshield about 24 years ago. I still have it on the car. But it did not fit the same. The glass was a tad thinner than original. I could put the original on and everything would fit, including the rubber and the stainless steel. But when I put on the new one, it did not sit the same and the stainless would not fit right. I ended up having to trim the stainless to fit. Believe me, I went through it many times, back and forth, trying to solve it differently. Fortunately it was ?only? my Alpine. Just something to think about when looking for replacement glass. My original Alpine glass was scratched and slightly delaminating. The ?new? glass is still fine. But, I don?t know that I would file down any stainless at this point. On the other hand, it seems beggars can?t be choosers. > On Sep 8, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Tom Witt via Tigers wrote: > > Joe Brown: "Do we have another source for windshields?" > > This is a looming problem for not just Tigers, but the collector car world as a whole. Most people don't consider the need..., until they have the need. My understanding is windshields are made in batches..., as there is need. So, if the volume is not there to spark the manufacturer to do a "run" availability dwindles. I mean who wants to manufacture a fragile, large product and then sit on it for years until YOU need it? > > About 8 years ago I was looking for a windshield for my 1964 Studebaker Daytona. There was ONE vendor in the mid-west (I'm west coast) that had ONE windshield in stock. When I asked if they were going to get more the owner replied, "Not likely." That windshield would have cost me over $600+ delivered. In the end I bought a used windshield that had scratches and bull's-eye but at least it wasn't broken. In fact to cover myself I bought two at $100 each. I then spent 10 hours making a cradle to securely fit both windshields in my son's Honda Civic as it was a 400 mile trip from where they were. And as it was these were station wagon windshields that the seller cut a 1/2" section out to fit the sedan. So, yea, sometimes it comes to measures such as that. > > In this day and age of lasers and CNC you would think that windshield reproduction might be more practical. Or that modern plastics could replace glass as a means of making windshields available and reasonably priced. I saw on Wheeler Dealer how they cut a windshield for a Saab out of a late model Impala windshield. But the wraparound nature of the Tiger windshield negates that route. I didn't mean to ramble but least anyone be taken by surprise somewhere down the road ... . Hopefully not but the way businesses are changing you never know. > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jay.laifman at gmail.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tigers at embarqmail.com Wed Sep 8 19:48:33 2021 From: Tigers at embarqmail.com (Will Seay) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 21:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir (Moss Motors... windshields) In-Reply-To: <4290F686-FF4C-403F-AE3C-01582E4AE1CB@gmail.com> References: <24e5e20e-768d-40e9-beb4-1922a519b474@email.android.com> <0b4a86da-f269-197c-aafc-241287c4bd22@verizon.net> <4290F686-FF4C-403F-AE3C-01582E4AE1CB@gmail.com> Message-ID: I know this isn't *just* about windshields but these guys claim to have windshields in stock and ready to ship: Rootesparts Will - 382001570 Tigers at embarqmail.com On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 6:58 PM Jay wrote: > FWIW, Moss did contact Sunbeam Specialties to see if they would buy the VB > Sunbeam stuff, and they declined. Not sure if anything happened after > that. But, I really don?t care because VB stuff has proven to be bad time > and time again. So I hope it doesn?t end up with our better suppliers. > > On the windshield, I bought a new windshield about 24 years ago. I still > have it on the car. But it did not fit the same. The glass was a tad > thinner than original. I could put the original on and everything would > fit, including the rubber and the stainless steel. But when I put on the > new one, it did not sit the same and the stainless would not fit right. I > ended up having to trim the stainless to fit. Believe me, I went through > it many times, back and forth, trying to solve it differently. Fortunately > it was ?only? my Alpine. > > Just something to think about when looking for replacement glass. My > original Alpine glass was scratched and slightly delaminating. The ?new? > glass is still fine. But, I don?t know that I would file down any > stainless at this point. On the other hand, it seems beggars can?t be > choosers. > > > > On Sep 8, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Tom Witt via Tigers > wrote: > > Joe Brown:* "Do we have another source for windshields?"* > > This is a looming problem for not just Tigers, but the collector car world > as a whole. Most people don't consider the need..., until they have the > need. My understanding is windshields are made in batches..., as there is > need. So, if the volume is not there to spark the manufacturer to do a > "run" availability dwindles. I mean who wants to manufacture a fragile, > large product and then sit on it for years until YOU need it? > > About 8 years ago I was looking for a windshield for my 1964 Studebaker > Daytona. There was ONE vendor in the mid-west (I'm west coast) that had ONE > windshield in stock. When I asked if they were going to get more the owner > replied, "Not likely." That windshield would have cost me over $600+ > delivered. In the end I bought a used windshield that had scratches and > bull's-eye but at least it wasn't broken. In fact to cover myself I bought > two at $100 each. I then spent 10 hours making a cradle to securely fit > both windshields in my son's Honda Civic as it was a 400 mile trip from > where they were. And as it was these were station wagon windshields that > the seller cut a 1/2" section out to fit the sedan. So, yea, sometimes it > comes to measures such as that. > > In this day and age of lasers and CNC you would think that windshield > reproduction might be more practical. Or that modern plastics could replace > glass as a means of making windshields available and reasonably priced. I > saw on Wheeler Dealer how they cut a windshield for a Saab out of a late > model Impala windshield. But the wraparound nature of the Tiger windshield > negates that route. I didn't mean to ramble but least anyone be taken by > surprise somewhere down the road ... . Hopefully not but the way businesses > are changing you never know. > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jay.laifman at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jbsyv at yahoo.com Thu Sep 9 02:34:36 2021 From: jbsyv at yahoo.com (Jim Buster) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 01:34:36 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Girling brake master reservoir (Moss Motors... windshields) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2D5A8E3E-B591-46B1-AEEF-CB2FB585ED4B@yahoo.com> Regarding windshields, I got mine from Pilkington a couple of years ago and the rubber from Rick. The thickness of the glass seems good. YMMV > On Sep 8, 2021, at 6:54 PM, Will Seay via Tigers wrote: > > ? > I know this isn't just about windshields but these guys claim to have windshields in stock and ready to ship: > Rootesparts > > Will - 382001570 > Tigers at embarqmail.com > > >> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 6:58 PM Jay wrote: >> FWIW, Moss did contact Sunbeam Specialties to see if they would buy the VB Sunbeam stuff, and they declined. Not sure if anything happened after that. But, I really don?t care because VB stuff has proven to be bad time and time again. So I hope it doesn?t end up with our better suppliers. >> >> On the windshield, I bought a new windshield about 24 years ago. I still have it on the car. But it did not fit the same. The glass was a tad thinner than original. I could put the original on and everything would fit, including the rubber and the stainless steel. But when I put on the new one, it did not sit the same and the stainless would not fit right. I ended up having to trim the stainless to fit. Believe me, I went through it many times, back and forth, trying to solve it differently. Fortunately it was ?only? my Alpine. >> >> Just something to think about when looking for replacement glass. My original Alpine glass was scratched and slightly delaminating. The ?new? glass is still fine. But, I don?t know that I would file down any stainless at this point. On the other hand, it seems beggars can?t be choosers. >> >> >> >>> On Sep 8, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Tom Witt via Tigers wrote: >>> >>> Joe Brown: "Do we have another source for windshields?" >>> >>> This is a looming problem for not just Tigers, but the collector car world as a whole. Most people don't consider the need..., until they have the need. My understanding is windshields are made in batches..., as there is need. So, if the volume is not there to spark the manufacturer to do a "run" availability dwindles. I mean who wants to manufacture a fragile, large product and then sit on it for years until YOU need it? >>> >>> About 8 years ago I was looking for a windshield for my 1964 Studebaker Daytona. There was ONE vendor in the mid-west (I'm west coast) that had ONE windshield in stock. When I asked if they were going to get more the owner replied, "Not likely." That windshield would have cost me over $600+ delivered. In the end I bought a used windshield that had scratches and bull's-eye but at least it wasn't broken. In fact to cover myself I bought two at $100 each. I then spent 10 hours making a cradle to securely fit both windshields in my son's Honda Civic as it was a 400 mile trip from where they were. And as it was these were station wagon windshields that the seller cut a 1/2" section out to fit the sedan. So, yea, sometimes it comes to measures such as that. >>> >>> In this day and age of lasers and CNC you would think that windshield reproduction might be more practical. Or that modern plastics could replace glass as a means of making windshields available and reasonably priced. I saw on Wheeler Dealer how they cut a windshield for a Saab out of a late model Impala windshield. But the wraparound nature of the Tiger windshield negates that route. I didn't mean to ramble but least anyone be taken by surprise somewhere down the road ... . Hopefully not but the way businesses are changing you never know. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> tigers at autox.team.net >>> >>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >>> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >>> >>> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jay.laifman at gmail.com >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com >> >> > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbsyv at yahoo.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Thu Sep 9 12:50:19 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size Message-ID: Does anyone know the dimensions and design for the correct LAT lug nuts.? I know they are 7/16 - 20, but I need to know the length of the hex head and total length. I have several with different head designs and length that came with my wheels.? I would like to know what is correct.? I know the washer is 1-1/16 x 11/16 x 1/8Jim DSent from my Galaxy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20210909_144125_resized.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 430220 bytes Desc: not available URL: From deiland1 at att.net Thu Sep 9 14:07:01 2021 From: deiland1 at att.net (Daniel Eiland) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] FYI: Is JEGS overcharging taxes? In-Reply-To: <002901d7a351$47b37260$d71a5720$@mayfco.com> References: <982424261.1534462.1630798420423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <982424261.1534462.1630798420423@mail.yahoo.com> <002901d7a351$47b37260$d71a5720$@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <1342359961.2466341.1631218021651@mail.yahoo.com> In Texas the sales tax is 6.25% and the counties can add up to 2% on top of the state for a maximum sales tax of 8.25%. So, in Texas the sales tax will vary from a minimum of 6.25% to a maximum sales tax of 8.25% depending on what county you are in. I finally got in touch with a JEGS sales rep who explained that they have been charging tax on the total cost of the sale plus the cost of shipping since 2019, when the laws changed. They have standard shipping costs up to $200 and purchases over $200 ship free. I've probably never paid shipping on any of my past orders so this topic has never come up before. Based on what they are telling me, they charged me 8.25% tax on the total cost of the sale plus the shipping. This would be correct based on how they handle taxes. Dan Eiland? Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:01 PM, Larry Mayfield via Tigers wrote: tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/deiland1 at att.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From drmayf at mayfco.com Fri Sep 10 12:51:06 2021 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (Larry Mayfield) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:51:06 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size In-Reply-To: <20210909185106.C1713A0DB5@autox.team.net> References: <20210909185106.C1713A0DB5@autox.team.net> Message-ID: <000401d7a674$d1b49950$751dcbf0$@mayfco.com> I have a set of lat wheel with lugs I purchased in or about 1968 from Mr. R.G. Wheatley in SoCal. The lug nuts from that is certainly different that any of these. These look like they are aftermarket non LAT lug nuts. Attached is a photo of what I believe to be very original since I bought them back in the day from a place that was selling Sunbeam cars etc. The shank and the very top or end is the same diameter with the hex machined area. A large non detachable washer is on the lug. Larry Aka mayf Aka drmayf TWFS 210.779 mph Bonneville exit speed, But less than top speed, lol (only running at 6200 rpm, redline was at 7000) but ran out out of course, lol? Estimated top speed would have been around 238 mph??way too fast for an old geezer like myself?driving a 90 inch wheel base car? From: Tigers On Behalf Of jimdamelio via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:50 AM To: tigers at Autox.Team.Net Subject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size Does anyone know the dimensions and design for the correct LAT lug nuts. I know they are 7/16 - 20, but I need to know the length of the hex head and total length. I have several with different head designs and length that came with my wheels. I would like to know what is correct. I know the washer is 1-1/16 x 11/16 x 1/8 Jim D Sent from my Galaxy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20210910_113739.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 781799 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jbbrown1980 at gmail.com Fri Sep 10 13:37:03 2021 From: jbbrown1980 at gmail.com (Joe Brown) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size In-Reply-To: <000401d7a674$d1b49950$751dcbf0$@mayfco.com> References: <20210909185106.C1713A0DB5@autox.team.net> <000401d7a674$d1b49950$751dcbf0$@mayfco.com> Message-ID: Hi, The lug nuts in Larry's photo seem to match up with what I have. I bought my car from the original owner and it had the original LAT70 wheels. I upgraded my wheels but I kept the old ones along with the lug nuts. So I pulled one out and made some measurements that I rounded off to the nearest 1/100". [image: Lug Nut.jpg] Have Fun, Joe Brown On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:53 PM Larry Mayfield via Tigers < tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > I have a set of lat wheel with lugs I purchased in or about 1968 from Mr. > R.G. Wheatley in SoCal. The lug nuts from that is certainly different that > any of these. These look like they are aftermarket non LAT lug nuts. > Attached is a photo of what I believe to be very original since I bought > them back in the day from a place that was selling Sunbeam cars etc. The > shank and the very top or end is the same diameter with the hex machined > area. A large non detachable washer is on the lug. > > > > Larry > > Aka mayf > > Aka drmayf > > TWFS 210.779 mph Bonneville exit speed, > > But less than top speed, lol (only running at 6200 rpm, redline was at > 7000) but ran out out of course, lol? > > Estimated top speed would have been around 238 mph??way too fast for an > old geezer like myself?driving a 90 inch wheel base car? > > > > *From:* Tigers *On Behalf Of *jimdamelio > via Tigers > *Sent:* Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:50 AM > *To:* tigers at Autox.Team.Net > *Subject:* [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size > > > > Does anyone know the dimensions and design for the correct LAT lug nuts. > I know they are 7/16 - 20, but I need to know the length of the hex head > and total length. I have several with different head designs and length > that came with my wheels. I would like to know what is correct. I know > the washer is 1-1/16 x 11/16 x 1/8 > > > > Jim D > > > > > > Sent from my Galaxy > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Lug Nut.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 26001 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Fri Sep 10 14:08:53 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size In-Reply-To: <000401d7a674$d1b49950$751dcbf0$@mayfco.com> Message-ID: Thanks for responding Larry.? I wasn't sure if any of mine were correct.? Looking at what's available now, it seems the style you have are more readily available.? Now to find them with the attached washer.Jim DSent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Larry Mayfield Date: 9/10/21 2:51 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'jimdamelio' , 'Tiger List Serve' Subject: RE: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size I have a set of lat wheel with lugs I purchased in or about 1968 from Mr. R.G. Wheatley? in SoCal. The lug nuts from that is certainly different that any of these. These look like they are aftermarket non LAT lug nuts. ?Attached is a photo of what I believe to be very original since I bought them back in the day from a place that was selling Sunbeam cars etc. The shank and the very top or end is the same diameter with the hex machined area. A large non detachable washer is on the lug. ?LarryAka mayfAka drmayfTWFS 210.779 mph Bonneville exit speed, But less than top speed, lol (only running at 6200 rpm, redline was at 7000) but ran out out of course, lol?Estimated top speed would have been around 238 mph??way too fast for an old geezer like myself?driving a 90 inch wheel base car??From: Tigers On Behalf Of jimdamelio via TigersSent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:50 AMTo: tigers at Autox.Team.NetSubject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size?Does anyone know the dimensions and design for the correct LAT lug nuts.? I know they are 7/16 - 20, but I need to know the length of the hex head and total length. I have several with different head designs and length that came with my wheels.? I would like to know what is correct.? I know the washer is 1-1/16 x 11/16 x 1/8?Jim D??Sent from my Galaxy? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Fri Sep 10 14:10:36 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Thanks Joe.? That will help a lot.Jim DSent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Joe Brown Date: 9/10/21 3:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Larry Mayfield Cc: jimdamelio , Tiger List Serve Subject: Re: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size Hi,The lug nuts in Larry's photo seem to match up with what I have.? I bought my car from the original owner and it had the original LAT70 wheels.? I upgraded my wheels but I kept the old ones along with the lug nuts.? So I pulled one out and made some measurements that I rounded off to the nearest 1/100".Have Fun,Joe BrownOn Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:53 PM Larry Mayfield via Tigers wrote:I have a set of lat wheel with lugs I purchased in or about 1968 from Mr. R.G. Wheatley? in SoCal. The lug nuts from that is certainly different that any of these. These look like they are aftermarket non LAT lug nuts.? Attached is a photo of what I believe to be very original since I bought them back in the day from a place that was selling Sunbeam cars etc. The shank and the very top or end is the same diameter with the hex machined area. A large non detachable washer is on the lug. ?LarryAka mayfAka drmayfTWFS 210779 mph Bonneville exit speed, But less than top speed, lol (only running at 6200 rpm, redline was at 7000) but ran out out of course, lol?Estimated top speed would have been around 238 mph??way too fast for an old geezer like myself?driving a 90 inch wheel base car??From: Tigers On Behalf Of jimdamelio via TigersSent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:50 AMTo: tigers at Autox.Team.NetSubject: [Tigers] LAT Lug Nut Size?Does anyone know the dimensions and design for the correct LAT lug nuts.? I know they are 7/16 - 20, but I need to know the length of the hex head and total length. I have several with different head designs and length that came with my wheels.? I would like to know what is correct.? I know the washer is 1-1/16 x 11/16 x 1/8?Jim D??Sent from my Galaxy?_______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Lug Nut.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 26001 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dsmtjoy at cox.net Wed Sep 15 12:00:56 2021 From: dsmtjoy at cox.net (Darrell Mountjoy) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:00:56 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Tigers Digest Message-ID: <0cf801d7aa5b$ad16afd0$07440f70$@cox.net> All, It has come to my attention that automotive journalist, Ethan Jupp, has recently suggested in his article of Sept 14th, 2021 titled: Seven Sportscars to See at the 2021 [Goodwood] Revival, my car, Sunbeam Lister Tiger ADU 180B, will be on the grid at Goodwood. http://www.goodwood.com/grr/event-coverage/goodwood-revival/2021/9/seven-spo rtscars-to-see-at-2021-revival/?fbcclidlwAR0y5p1NcmQK1FQlelRN6ljz15xQuzJr-94 CrqmqWqZaQlczw4wWgLlrSnQ . This information is false. I can only assume what he is referring to is, which in addition to my sister race car, Tony Eckford's ADU 179B Sunbeam Lister Tiger (as a regular at the event), that Mr. Jupp is referring to Richard Squire's recent acquisition of the 7734 KV car, the "mule" used by Rootes Group during test week at Le Mans in April before the June 1964 24 Heures du Mans event. If, in fact, Tony and Richard's cars are both entered in the 2021 Goodwood Revival this coming weekend, I wish them, their drivers and the cars the best of luck. Darrell Mountjoy Caretaker of ADU 180B From coolvt at aol.com Fri Sep 17 13:29:13 2021 From: coolvt at aol.com (coolvt at aol.com) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 19:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Real or a Dream? References: <1714981284.1658006.1631906955096.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1714981284.1658006.1631906955096@mail.yahoo.com> ? Subject: Future of Fossil Fuel to save the world!!! ? To:?The attached video is about the future of Fossil Fuel.? It is a MUST watch !!?The Company:? ?????? Carbon EngineeringFounded:? ?????????????? About 2010The Technology:? ??? Direct Air CaptureThe Head Office:? ?? 609 Granville Street, Ste 430?? ???? Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1G6??? ? ? ?? ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Joke Central" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jokecentral+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jokecentral/CAPW%3DJQms5yjdMKsomcGkr8Vo%2BfMOCSEz5Cm0KKNjfA2LF3AmhA%40mail.gmail.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT001031.mp4 Type: video/mp4 Size: 6119565 bytes Desc: not available URL: From coolvt at aol.com Sun Sep 19 08:18:40 2021 From: coolvt at aol.com (coolvt at aol.com) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 14:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender References: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> Has anyone found a good replacement for the "Battery Tender" ?? ?I've had failure on a? 15 yr. old model and a 6 yr. old model fail.? ?Mark L -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jay.laifman at gmail.com Sun Sep 19 15:03:48 2021 From: jay.laifman at gmail.com (Jay Laifman) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 14:03:48 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender In-Reply-To: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> References: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I have three of them. No failures. But then, I'm one of those guys who hasn't had a Pertronix failure either. Maybe they're both flukes. ? On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:19 AM coolvt--- via Tigers wrote: > > > *Has anyone found a good replacement for the "Battery Tender" ? I've had > failure on a 15 yr. old model and a 6 yr. old model fail. Mark L* > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jay.laifman at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From coolvt at aol.com Sun Sep 19 16:20:08 2021 From: coolvt at aol.com (coolvt at aol.com) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender In-Reply-To: References: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1149741425.2086931.1632090008848@mail.yahoo.com> I've had 2 out of 5 fail.? But, as I reported, one was 15 yrs old.....so might have to expect it. In a message dated 9/19/2021 5:04:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, jay.laifman at gmail.com writes:?I have three of them.? No failures.? But then, I'm one of those guys who hasn't had a Pertronix failure either.? Maybe they're both flukes.?? On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:19 AM coolvt--- via Tigers wrote: Has anyone found a good replacement for the "Battery Tender" ?? ?I've had failure on a? 15 yr. old model and a 6 yr. old model fail.? ?Mark L _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jay.laifman at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Sun Sep 19 17:40:37 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender In-Reply-To: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> References: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <001101d7adaf$c045f050$40d1d0f0$@bluefrog.com> Mark I only have Schumacher battery charges ? 1 is a 2/10/50 amp and the other is a 1.5A trickle charge with no problems. I do see Schumacher has Battery Tender style and size chargers available but I have no experience with them. Any chance Battery Tender has a service or replacement policy for the failed chargers? I see a number of YouTube videos on how to fix a failed Battery Tender ? looks like the heat of operation kills the capacitor for most of them. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of coolvt--- via Tigers Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 10:19 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender Has anyone found a good replacement for the "Battery Tender" ? I've had failure on a 15 yr. old model and a 6 yr. old model fail. Mark L -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From coolvt at aol.com Sun Sep 19 17:53:57 2021 From: coolvt at aol.com (coolvt at aol.com) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 23:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender In-Reply-To: <001101d7adaf$c045f050$40d1d0f0$@bluefrog.com> References: <102842770.2002941.1632061120381.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <102842770.2002941.1632061120381@mail.yahoo.com> <001101d7adaf$c045f050$40d1d0f0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <1551280678.2104023.1632095637665@mail.yahoo.com> I think BT has a 5 year warranty, but I'm beyond that on both failed units. Will check on Schumacher.? Think that what I have for a 48 volt charger? (golf cart bztteries ). Mark?In a message dated 9/19/2021 7:40:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, rfraser at bluefrog.com writes:? Mark ??????????????? I only have Schumacher battery charges ? 1 is a 2/10/50 amp and the other is a 1.5A trickle charge with no problems. I do see Schumacher has Battery Tender style and size chargers available but I have no experience with them. ? Any chance Battery Tender has a service or replacement policy for the failed chargers? ? I see a number of YouTube videos on how to fix a failed Battery Tender ? looks like the heat of operation kills the capacitor for most of them. ? Ron Fraser ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of coolvt--- via Tigers Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 10:19 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tender ? Has anyone found a good replacement for the "Battery Tender" ?? ?I've had failure on a? 15 yr. old model and a 6 yr. old model fail.? ?Mark L -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lon at sedona.net Sun Sep 19 20:32:59 2021 From: lon at sedona.net (Lon Walters) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:32:59 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tenders Message-ID: <000001d7adc7$d451d970$7cf58c50$@sedona.net> Granite. Had mine for over 15 years. Full line of tenders. Good folks. At all major car events from Auctions to SEMA. Been flawless. Lon ---- From coolvt at aol.com Sun Sep 19 20:45:00 2021 From: coolvt at aol.com (coolvt at aol.com) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Battery Tenders In-Reply-To: <000001d7adc7$d451d970$7cf58c50$@sedona.net> References: <000001d7adc7$d451d970$7cf58c50$@sedona.net> Message-ID: <1419513324.2134439.1632105900382@mail.yahoo.com> Thank you.Will look at them. In a message dated 9/19/2021 10:35:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, tigers at autox.team.net writes:?Granite. Had mine for over 15 years.? Full line of tenders. Good folks. Atall major car events from Auctions to SEMA. Been flawless.?Lon??----_______________________________________________?tigers at autox.team.net?Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.htmlArchive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive?Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/coolvt at aol.com?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jliny5 at cox.net Mon Sep 20 12:09:50 2021 From: jliny5 at cox.net (James Lindner) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Message-ID: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad From Tigers at embarqmail.com Mon Sep 20 19:15:49 2021 From: Tigers at embarqmail.com (Will Seay) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> References: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> Message-ID: Jim, I think that what they're talking about when they say "headlight ground" is the weird double-ground connector that is used to ground the two ground leads from the light harness. I have attached a picture of one. This one is broken. It should be symmetrical with a loop on each end. These loops accept the barrel connectors from the headlight and signal/parking-light harnesses. There's one on each side and it mounts using the threaded stud from the rubber bumper for the hood. This is a pretty rare part. I checked the British Wiring website and couldn't find it. Maybe if you contact them and email the picture they can help you. Otherwise, you may have to cannibalize a parts car. Good luck.. Will - 382001570 Tigers at embarqmail.com On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:09 PM James Lindner wrote: > Hi All > Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID > concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent > event. > > At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am > starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me > down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. > > Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says > Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original > headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual > connection. > > Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment > says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal > was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were > really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make > contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include > fasteners. > > Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges > did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position > would really help. Dimensions also a help. > > I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk > hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original > fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the > judges talking about these items. > > Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and > beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any > guidance is appreciated. > I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live > with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. > > Thanks > Jim > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2XGnd.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 127431 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Mon Sep 20 19:28:48 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Moss Motors carries them. Part # 542-490$6.89 ea.Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Will Seay via Tigers Date: 9/20/21 9:16 PM (GMT-05:00) To: James Lindner Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Jim,I think that what they're talking about when they say "headlight ground" is the weird?double-ground connector?that is used to ground the two ground leads from the light harness.? I have attached a picture of one.? This one is broken.? It should be symmetrical with a loop on each end.? These loops accept the barrel connectors from the headlight and signal/parking-light harnesses.? There's one on each side and it mounts using the threaded stud from the rubber bumper for the hood.? This is a pretty rare part.? I checked the British Wiring website and couldn't find it.? Maybe if you contact them and email the picture they can help you.? Otherwise, you may have to cannibalize?a parts car.? Good luck..Will - 382001570 Tigers at embarqmail.comOn Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:09 PM James Lindner wrote:Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 542-490_1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 9937 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jliny5 at cox.net Mon Sep 20 19:38:45 2021 From: jliny5 at cox.net (James Lindner) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <92291E4F-DE08-40B7-A499-9C46636C6EDA@cox.net> Will, Jim, Ron Excellent info.Thanks. Jim Sent from my iPad > On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:16 PM, Will Seay wrote: > > ? > Jim, > I think that what they're talking about when they say "headlight ground" is the weird double-ground connector that is used to ground the two ground leads from the light harness. I have attached a picture of one. This one is broken. It should be symmetrical with a loop on each end. These loops accept the barrel connectors from the headlight and signal/parking-light harnesses. There's one on each side and it mounts using the threaded stud from the rubber bumper for the hood. This is a pretty rare part. I checked the British Wiring website and couldn't find it. Maybe if you contact them and email the picture they can help you. Otherwise, you may have to cannibalize a parts car. Good luck.. > > Will - 382001570 > Tigers at embarqmail.com > > >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:09 PM James Lindner wrote: >> Hi All >> Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. >> >> At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. >> >> Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. >> >> Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. >> >> Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. >> >> I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. >> >> Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. >> I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. >> >> Thanks >> Jim >> >> Sent from my iPad >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com >> >> > > <2XGnd.JPG> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Mon Sep 20 21:25:24 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:25:24 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] SUNI concours Message-ID: <19431ECC-4324-482E-A581-C7BDFE682A3F@comcast.net> Here are some quick pics from my less than perfect Tiger. The battery has two wood strips, one underneath (I see mine is slipping out!). Trunk buffer (I think what this is called) has slotted mounts but should be covered by a screw/washer.. mine seems to have lost a screw! Maybe they mean the gasket between the hinge and the lid on the exterior. My mount hardware is correct but I think it should be painted with the body? Hopefully these photos come through, Gary -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_3867.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 84469 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_3868.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 110351 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_3869.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 67713 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_3870.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 71351 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_3871.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 54161 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Sent from my iPhone From ora_archy at yahoo.com Mon Sep 20 21:59:06 2021 From: ora_archy at yahoo.com (Brian Glenn) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 03:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <92291E4F-DE08-40B7-A499-9C46636C6EDA@cox.net> References: <92291E4F-DE08-40B7-A499-9C46636C6EDA@cox.net> Message-ID: <765001167.94339.1632196746543@mail.yahoo.com> The book of Norman, p.160 says regarding trunk hinge gaskets."Exterior door handle, wiper bezel and deck lid hinge gaskets were oiled paper and did not show."CheersB? Brian Glenn P.O. Box 578 Julian, CA 92036-0578 714.345.9883 B9470208LRXFE GT B9471101LRXFE B9472615LRXFE B382000846LRXFE B382001212LRXFE On Monday, September 20, 2021, 06:39:06 PM PDT, James Lindner wrote: Will, Jim, Ron Excellent info.Thanks. Jim Sent from my iPad On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:16 PM, Will Seay wrote: ?Jim,I think that what they're talking about when they say "headlight ground" is the weird?double-ground connector?that is used to ground the two ground leads from the light harness.? I have attached a picture of one.? This one is broken.? It should be symmetrical with a loop on each end.? These loops accept the barrel connectors from the headlight and signal/parking-light harnesses.? There's one on each side and it mounts using the threaded stud from the rubber bumper for the hood.? This is a pretty rare part.? I checked the British Wiring website and couldn't find it.? Maybe if you contact them and email the picture they can help you.? Otherwise, you may have to cannibalize?a parts car.? Good luck.. Will - 382001570 Tigers at embarqmail.com On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:09 PM James Lindner wrote: Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com <2XGnd.JPG> _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/ora_archy at yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Mon Sep 20 22:32:45 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:32:45 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <765001167.94339.1632196746543@mail.yahoo.com> References: <765001167.94339.1632196746543@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Yup. Looking down vertically they shouldn?t show, from the side you should see them. I hand made mine in 1979, the hinges have moved and been reset many times since, so they are showing too much but are still much better than the replacement ?beaded? ones a lot of guys are running. Gary Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:00 PM, Brian Glenn via Tigers wrote: > > ? > The book of Norman, p.160 says regarding trunk hinge gaskets. > "Exterior door handle, wiper bezel and deck lid hinge gaskets were oiled paper and did not show." > Cheers > B > > Brian Glenn > P.O. Box 578 > Julian, CA 92036-0578 > 714.345.9883 > > B9470208LRXFE GT > B9471101LRXFE > B9472615LRXFE > B382000846LRXFE > B382001212LRXFE > > >> On Monday, September 20, 2021, 06:39:06 PM PDT, James Lindner wrote: >> >> >> Will, Jim, Ron >> >> Excellent info.Thanks. >> >> Jim >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:16 PM, Will Seay wrote: >>> >> ? >> Jim, >> I think that what they're talking about when they say "headlight ground" is the weird double-ground connector that is used to ground the two ground leads from the light harness. I have attached a picture of one. This one is broken. It should be symmetrical with a loop on each end. These loops accept the barrel connectors from the headlight and signal/parking-light harnesses. There's one on each side and it mounts using the threaded stud from the rubber bumper for the hood. This is a pretty rare part. I checked the British Wiring website and couldn't find it. Maybe if you contact them and email the picture they can help you. Otherwise, you may have to cannibalize a parts car. Good luck.. >> >> Will - 382001570 >> Tigers at embarqmail.com >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:09 PM James Lindner wrote: >> Hi All >> Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. >> >> At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. >> >> Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. >> >> Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. >> >> Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. >> >> I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. >> >> Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. >> I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. >> >> Thanks >> Jim >> >> Sent from my iPad >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com >> >> >> >> <2XGnd.JPG> > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/ora_archy at yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Tue Sep 21 09:38:04 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <92291E4F-DE08-40B7-A499-9C46636C6EDA@cox.net> Message-ID: Jim,This picture is of my trunk hinge taken off my Tiger in 1977.? I put the screw and nuts back on after taking it off.? The parts book shows 1/4" screws, nuts and washers.Jim DSent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: James Lindner Date: 9/20/21 9:39 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Will Seay Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Will, Jim, RonExcellent info.Thanks.JimSent from my iPadOn Sep 20, 2021, at 9:16 PM, Will Seay wrote:?Jim,I think that what they're talking about when they say "headlight ground" is the weird?double-ground connector?that is used to ground the two ground leads from the light harness.? I have attached a picture of one.? This one is broken.? It should be symmetrical with a loop on each end.? These loops accept the barrel connectors from the headlight and signal/parking-light harnesses.? There's one on each side and it mounts using the threaded stud from the rubber bumper for the hood.? This is a pretty rare part.? I checked the British Wiring website and couldn't find it.? Maybe if you contact them and email the picture they can help you.? Otherwise, you may have to cannibalize?a parts car.? Good luck..Will - 382001570 Tigers at embarqmail.comOn Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:09 PM James Lindner wrote:Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.teamnet Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com <2XGnd.JPG> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20210921_104614.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1486550 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screenshot_20210921-113442_Office.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 150719 bytes Desc: not available URL: From blance598 at gmail.com Tue Sep 21 14:34:27 2021 From: blance598 at gmail.com (Lance Beauchamp) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger front sub frame Message-ID: Is the sub frame from the tiger and alpine the same other then the rack & pinion mounts. Just not sure myself. Was there anything else different? Beau -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Tue Sep 21 15:44:07 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:44:07 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger front sub frame In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Also: It is ?notched? for the rack It doesn?t have engine mounts Tom Hall and others can modify an Alpine one for the Tiger. Gary Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 21, 2021, at 1:35 PM, Lance Beauchamp wrote: > > ? > Is the sub frame from the tiger and alpine the same other then the rack & pinion mounts. Just not sure myself. > Was there anything else different? Beau > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > From mwood24020 at aol.com Tue Sep 21 17:50:55 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger front sub frame In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <150611169.39020.1632268255085@mail.yahoo.com> I usually call it a crossmember, not sub-frame (?). But, yeah, Tom can do wonderful things regardless as to what you call it :) -----Original Message----- From: Gary To: Lance Beauchamp Cc: Tiger Club. Submission Sent: Tue, Sep 21, 2021 2:45 pm Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger front sub frame Also: It is ?notched? for the rack It doesn?t have engine mounts Tom Hall and others can modify an Alpine one for the Tiger. Gary Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 21, 2021, at 1:35 PM, Lance Beauchamp wrote: > > ? > Is the sub frame from the tiger and alpine the same other then the rack & pinion mounts.? Just not sure myself. > Was there anything else different?? ? Beau? > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From h2otor at aol.com Tue Sep 21 21:52:56 2021 From: h2otor at aol.com (John Watertor) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Two terminal ground connector References: <607174831.512229.1632282776085.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <607174831.512229.1632282776085@mail.yahoo.com> New two terminal ground terminals are available from "moss motors official site". part number 08-990 cost $6.89 each. I bought several for my Tiger and XKE after the original ones broke several years ago and before Jaguar XK's Unlimited was bought out by Moss Motors.John Watertor? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 22 07:49:38 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> References: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> Message-ID: <000001d7afb8$b07638a0$1162a9e0$@bluefrog.com> I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions. I learned many new things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger. The hose fitting and the ink stamp. The ink stamp is mostly off white in color with touches of red or pink. I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter hoses or am I wrong again. Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it. Is black the correct original color? More questions: Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - somewhere is the big question. It would be very nice to know these answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know. Pictures, dimensions, type of wood There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the Alpine Parts List, Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts Lists with each part. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_4983.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 451942 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_4985 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 157873 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dan_doornbos at hotmail.com Wed Sep 22 08:57:21 2021 From: dan_doornbos at hotmail.com (daniel doornbos) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:57:21 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Sub Frame or Cross member Message-ID: FYI: I Have one of Mike H's mustang II cross members in my tiger. I have the original complete cross-member outside the car that I'm willing to part with if anyone has an interest. It has been tweaked from the front-end crash that took my car off the road before I bought it. There are small creases at the frame mounting points that I think could be repaired with a bit of cutting, metal fabrication, and welding. dan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 22 11:33:16 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <000001d7afb8$b07638a0$1162a9e0$@bluefrog.com> References: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> <000001d7afb8$b07638a0$1162a9e0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <001101d7afd7$ee21a210$ca64e630$@bluefrog.com> Here is a picture of the wood piece mounted to the body in my Tiger for the battery - I don't know for sure if it is original. 10.75" L x 1.5" W x .400" thick The plywood piece below the battery is not original. I have 2 pieces of plywood under the battery tray making it near level. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:50 AM To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions. I learned many new things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger. The hose fitting and the ink stamp. The ink stamp is mostly off white in color with touches of red or pink. I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter hoses or am I wrong again. Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it. Is black the correct original color? More questions: Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - somewhere is the big question. It would be very nice to know these answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know. Pictures, dimensions, type of wood There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the Alpine Parts List, Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts Lists with each part. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_5000.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 356365 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 22 11:38:35 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <001101d7afd7$ee21a210$ca64e630$@bluefrog.com> References: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> <000001d7afb8$b07638a0$1162a9e0$@bluefrog.com> <001101d7afd7$ee21a210$ca64e630$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> Found a picture of the Battery breather >From - Sunbeam Tiger - Doug's Cars (dougscars.com) Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:33 PM To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Here is a picture of the wood piece mounted to the body in my Tiger for the battery - I don't know for sure if it is original. 10.75" L x 1.5" W x .400" thick The plywood piece below the battery is not original. I have 2 pieces of plywood under the battery tray making it near level. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:50 AM To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions. I learned many new things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger. The hose fitting and the ink stamp. The ink stamp is mostly off white in color with touches of red or pink. I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter hoses or am I wrong again. Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it. Is black the correct original color? More questions: Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - somewhere is the big question. It would be very nice to know these answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know. Pictures, dimensions, type of wood There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the Alpine Parts List, Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts Lists with each part. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: battery.png Type: image/png Size: 1950427 bytes Desc: not available URL: From douglasalyle at yahoo.com Wed Sep 22 11:53:47 2021 From: douglasalyle at yahoo.com (Douglas Lyle) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> References: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> <000001d7afb8$b07638a0$1162a9e0$@bluefrog.com> <001101d7afd7$ee21a210$ca64e630$@bluefrog.com> <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <915664345.284622.1632333227848@mail.yahoo.com> Hey that looks familiar.??? I no longer have that car but somewhere I have another one of those tubes.?? I'll try and dig it up.?? Doug On Wednesday, September 22, 2021, 10:41:23 AM PDT, Ron Fraser wrote: Found a picture of the Battery breather >From - Sunbeam Tiger - Doug's Cars (dougscars.com) Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:33 PM To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Here is a picture of the wood piece mounted to the body in my Tiger for the battery - I don't know for sure if it is original. 10.75" L x 1.5" W x .400" thick The plywood piece below the battery is not original. I have 2 pieces of plywood under the battery tray making it near level. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:50 AM To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions.? I learned many new things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger.? The hose fitting and the ink stamp.? The ink stamp is mostly off white in color with touches of red or pink. I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter hoses or am I wrong again. Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it.? Is black the correct original color? More questions: Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - somewhere is the big question.? It would be very nice to know these answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know.? ? Pictures, dimensions, type of wood There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the? Alpine Parts List, Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts Lists with each part. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration Hi All Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/douglasalyle at yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From blance598 at gmail.com Wed Sep 22 12:04:02 2021 From: blance598 at gmail.com (Lance Beauchamp) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger front sub frame In-Reply-To: <150611169.39020.1632268255085@mail.yahoo.com> References: <150611169.39020.1632268255085@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Got it. Thank you. Beau On Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 7:51 PM Michael Wood wrote: > I usually call it a crossmember, not sub-frame (?). But, yeah, Tom can do > wonderful things regardless as to what you call it :) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary > To: Lance Beauchamp > Cc: Tiger Club. Submission > Sent: Tue, Sep 21, 2021 2:45 pm > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger front sub frame > > Also: > It is ?notched? for the rack > It doesn?t have engine mounts > > Tom Hall and others can modify an Alpine > one for the Tiger. > Gary > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 21, 2021, at 1:35 PM, Lance Beauchamp > wrote: > > > > ? > > Is the sub frame from the tiger and alpine the same other then the rack > & pinion mounts. Just not sure myself. > > Was there anything else different? Beau > > _______________________________________________ > > > > tigers at autox.team.net > > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tigers at embarqmail.com Wed Sep 22 14:19:03 2021 From: Tigers at embarqmail.com (Will Seay) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> References: <833BE50B-4F27-4658-ABC7-30F1844B125B@cox.net> <000001d7afb8$b07638a0$1162a9e0$@bluefrog.com> <001101d7afd7$ee21a210$ca64e630$@bluefrog.com> <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: More vent-hose pictures (attached) Some years ago I ran across an Ebay listing for a Sunbeam Tiger part. The pictures attached are from the listing. The seller didn't know what it was, but he described the hose as having a nick in it. The hose was incomplete, having only 5 caps. The 'nick' was where the 6th cap should attach. I messaged the seller and asked him if he had the 6th cap. Seller's response was to remove the listing. I never saw the listing again. I would have bought it, incomplete or not. Will - 382001570 Tigers at embarqmail.com On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:38 PM Ron Fraser wrote: > Found a picture of the Battery breather > From - Sunbeam Tiger - Doug's Cars (dougscars.com) > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:33 PM > To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and > configuration > > Here is a picture of the wood piece mounted to the body in my Tiger for > the battery - I don't know for sure if it is original. > > 10.75" L x 1.5" W x .400" thick > > The plywood piece below the battery is not original. > I have 2 pieces of plywood under the battery tray making it near level. > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:50 AM > To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and > configuration > > I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions. I learned many new > things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. > > Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting > pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger. > The hose fitting and the ink stamp. The ink stamp is mostly off white in > color with touches of red or pink. > > I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter > hoses or am I wrong again. > > Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine > block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it. > Is black the correct original color? > > More questions: > > Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - > somewhere is the big question. It would be very nice to know these > answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know. > Pictures, dimensions, type of wood > There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. > > Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the Alpine Parts List, > Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. > Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts > Lists with each part. > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > Hi All > Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID > concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent > event. > > At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am > starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me > down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. > > Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says > Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original > headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual > connection. > > Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment > says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal > was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were > really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make > contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include > fasteners. > > Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges > did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position > would really help. Dimensions also a help. > > I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk > hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original > fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the > judges talking about these items. > > Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and > beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any > guidance is appreciated. > I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live > with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. > > Thanks > Jim > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tigers at embarqmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: VentHose1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 289300 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: VentHose2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 304084 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 22 15:55:37 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood Message-ID: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood - what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Wed Sep 22 16:08:24 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:08:24 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> References: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? > A good question has come up. > Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? > > There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. > > Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? > > I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. > > If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? > > Ron Fraser > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jliny5 at cox.net Wed Sep 22 16:32:05 2021 From: jliny5 at cox.net (James Lindner) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration In-Reply-To: <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> References: <001d01d7afd8$ac662110$05326330$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: Far from original but I recreated the battery breather tube using a replica Lucas battery. Totally wrong clamps because I use a battery quick disconnect. Lost a 1/2 point at the concours for that -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image3.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 115214 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image0.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 101039 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image1.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 108475 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image2.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 92570 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Sent from my iPad > On Sep 22, 2021, at 1:39 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ?Found a picture of the Battery breather > From - Sunbeam Tiger - Doug's Cars (dougscars.com) > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:33 PM > To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > Here is a picture of the wood piece mounted to the body in my Tiger for the battery - I don't know for sure if it is original. > > 10.75" L x 1.5" W x .400" thick > > The plywood piece below the battery is not original. > I have 2 pieces of plywood under the battery tray making it near level. > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:50 AM > To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions. I learned many new things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. > > Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger. The hose fitting and the ink stamp. The ink stamp is mostly off white in color with touches of red or pink. > > I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter hoses or am I wrong again. > > Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it. Is black the correct original color? > > More questions: > > Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - somewhere is the big question. It would be very nice to know these answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know. Pictures, dimensions, type of wood > There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. > > Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the Alpine Parts List, Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. > Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts Lists with each part. > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > Hi All > Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. > > At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. > > Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. > > Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. > > Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. > > I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. > > Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. > I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. > > Thanks > Jim > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com > > > From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 22 16:51:39 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> References: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> Message-ID: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wjtwgoodman at aol.com Wed Sep 22 16:52:16 2021 From: wjtwgoodman at aol.com (Warren Goodman) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 197 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <577389502.279426.1632351136266@mail.yahoo.com> There's a discussion on the CAT forum. I've had a couple of original pieces and it's quarter sawn what looks to be a reddish mahogany. I've seen at least three cars with a very similar material.? Sent from the all new AOL app for Android On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 3:33 PM, tigers-request at autox.team.net wrote: Send Tigers mailing list submissions to ??? tigers at autox.team.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? tigers-request at autox.team.net You can reach the person managing the list at ??? tigers-owner at autox.team.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Tigers digest..." Today's Topics: ? 1. Trunk wood (Ron Fraser) ? 2. Re: Trunk wood (Gary) ? 3. Re: Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration ? ? ? (James Lindner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:55:37 -0400 From: "Ron Fraser" To: Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood Message-ID: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood - what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:08:24 -0700 From: Gary To: Ron Fraser Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Message-ID: <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA at comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available.? I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? A good question has come up. > Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? >? > There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. >? > Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? >? > I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. >? > If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? >? > Ron Fraser >? > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:32:05 -0400 From: James Lindner To: Ron Fraser Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and ??? configuration Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Far from original but I recreated the battery breather tube using a replica Lucas battery. Totally wrong clamps because I use a battery quick disconnect. Lost a 1/2 point at the concours for that -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image3.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 115214 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image0.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 101039 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image1.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 108475 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image2.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 92570 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Sent from my iPad > On Sep 22, 2021, at 1:39 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ?Found a picture of the Battery breather > From - Sunbeam Tiger - Doug's Cars (dougscars.com) > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:33 PM > To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > Here is a picture of the wood piece mounted to the body in my Tiger for the battery - I don't know for sure if it is original. > > 10.75" L x 1.5" W x .400" thick > > The plywood piece below the battery is not original. > I have 2 pieces of plywood under the battery tray making it near level. > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:50 AM > To: 'James Lindner' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > I see good responses and pictures to Jim's questions.? I learned many new things with this thread; thanks to all for responding. > > Jim and I responded privately about the oil filter hoses so I'm posting pictures of what I believe is an original oil filter hose from my Tiger.? The hose fitting and the ink stamp.? The ink stamp is mostly off white in color with touches of red or pink. > > I thought there was someone on this List who was making correct oil filter hoses or am I wrong again. > > Also when I was using the oil filter original parts - I painted the engine block adaptor black - this adaptor is cast steel or iron so I painted it.? Is black the correct original color? > > More questions: > > Somewhere, I believe I saw an article about the Battery Wood Spacer - somewhere is the big question.? It would be very nice to know these answers, these parts are not listed in the Parts List as far as I know.? ? Pictures, dimensions, type of wood > There is also the Battery Manifold Breather Tube c/w 6 plugs. > > Fastener descriptions can mostly be looked up in the? Alpine Parts List, Section ZY, you need all the Alpine Parts List issues for complete coverage. > Generally, there is a good description of fasteners in the Tiger Parts Lists with each part. > > Ron Fraser > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tigers On Behalf Of James Lindner > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:10 PM > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: [Tigers] Some Help Needed with Original Items and configuration > > Hi All > Just back from SUNI?great event and an awesome turnout despite COVID concerns. Kudos to Claudia and Buck Trippel for organizing an excellent event. > > At the concours, my car got 2nd place in the Stock Tiger class. I am starting to gather info to correct the minor items that in total dragged me down. Looking for some photos of the following ORIGINAL/CORRECT items. > > Headlight Ground: Not sure what exactly was wrong but the comment says Incorrect headlight ground. I could really use a photo of an original headlight ground that shows the location and a closer shot of the actual connection. > > Trunk Lid Buffers: Again, not exactly sure what I got wrong. The comment says no slot for buffers? It is in the same comment saying my trunk seal was upside down (I knew that? thought I could sneak by, but the judges were really sharp.). Are there slots in the trunk seal where the buffers make contact? If so, photos please. Also Photos of your buffers to include fasteners. > > Battery Wood Spacer: I always thought mine was original, but the judges did not think so. A photo of an original spacer in the correct position would really help. Dimensions also a help. > > I would also appreciate some photos of the fasteners that affix the trunk hinges to the body and the trunk lid. Again, I am looking for original fasteners/configuration/finish.I did not lose any points, but I heard the judges talking about these items. > > Also got dinged for my oil filter assembly being dirty generally worn and beat up. Book of Norman does not specify color of fittings and pipe. Any guidance is appreciated. > I had a few other items incorrect that I knew about and decided to live with, but in the end the total deductions did me in. > > Thanks > Jim > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/rfraser at bluefrog.com > > > ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Tigers mailing list Tigers at autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive ------------------------------ End of Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 197 *************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jim at island.net Wed Sep 22 17:36:03 2021 From: jim at island.net (Jim) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:36:03 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> References: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone > On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? > Excellent, keep us informed > > Ron > > From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM > To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Ron, > I believe there was only two wood pieces. > Only one under the battery on the inboard > side (in the depression on the floor). > I seem to remember it was plywood and my > plies had become separated and deteriorated. > Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for > his restored cars and there is a supply left. > > The next time I go there I will measure them > as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee > they are perfectly correct but I would > bet on it! > Gary Winblad > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? > A good question has come up. > Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? > > There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. > > Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? > > I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. > > If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? > > Ron Fraser > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Wed Sep 22 18:03:28 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Very goodSent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Jim via Tigers Date: 9/22/21 7:36 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ron Fraser Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing.Not sure about bottom pieceJimSent from my ShoePhoneOn Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser wrote:?Excellent, keep us informed?Ron?From: Gary Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PMTo: Ron Fraser Cc: Tigers at autox.team.netSubject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood?Ron,I believe there was only two wood pieces.Only one under the battery on the inboard?side (in the depression on the floor).I seem to remember it was plywood and myplies had become separated and deteriorated.Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced forhis restored cars and there is a supply left.?The next time I go there I will measure themas well as get them available. ?I can?t guarantee?they are perfectly correct but I wouldbet on it!Gary Winblad??Sent from my iPhoneOn Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote:???????????????? A good question has come up.Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery??There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery.?Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray??I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking.?If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions??Ron Fraser?_______________________________________________tigers at autox.team.netDonate: http://www.team.net/donate.htmlArchive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archiveUnsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net_______________________________________________tigers@autox.team.netDonate: http://www.team.net/donate.htmlArchive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archiveUnsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From orr4sale at sbcglobal.net Wed Sep 22 18:07:33 2021 From: orr4sale at sbcglobal.net (D or G at sbc) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> References: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> Message-ID: <1587048676.290428.1632355653705@mail.yahoo.com> From CAT. David https://www.catmbr.org/cat-forum/threads/stock-pieces.7471/#post-44667 On Wednesday, September 22, 2021, 03:09:36 PM PDT, Gary wrote: Ron,I believe there was only two wood pieces.Only one under the battery on the inboard?side (in the depression on the floor).I seem to remember it was plywood and myplies had become separated and deteriorated.Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced forhis restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure themas well as get them available. ?I can?t guarantee?they are perfectly correct but I wouldbet on it!Gary Winblad? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: ? ??????????????? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? ? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. ? Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? ? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. ? If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? ? Ron Fraser ? _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/orr4sale at sbcglobal.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bucktrippel at verizon.net Wed Sep 22 18:15:18 2021 From: bucktrippel at verizon.net (Buck Trippel) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:15:18 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <20210923000429.BFAB6A11B9@autox.team.net> References: <20210923000429.BFAB6A11B9@autox.team.net> Message-ID: <02c701d7b010$17ee56a0$47cb03e0$@verizon.net> Thanks to the Rootes Archive Centre Trust for both saving and disseminating those original drawings! For those of you who missed SUNI, Archive Chairman Andy Bye announced a massive breakthrough in both of those areas. After many, many years of volunteer work about 15-thousand drawings had been scanned. (I went over and scanned a few thousand of them.) Last Thursday Andy announced that within the next month that number of scans will explode and add another 160-thousand scanned drawings. The next step for all of us will be to get them organized and cataloged. We?ve already made great progress in part of the Tiger and Alpine areas but we will soon have a mountain of scans to start working on. Buck Trippel From: Tigers On Behalf Of jimdamelio via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:03 PM To: Jim ; Ron Fraser Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Very good Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: Jim via Tigers > Date: 9/22/21 7:36 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ron Fraser > Cc: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 22 18:39:09 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: References: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <008601d7b013$6cad4180$4607c480$@bluefrog.com> Jim Assume! Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. This is a great starting point for this part. Ron Fraser From: Jim Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM To: Ron Fraser Cc: Gary ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From drmayf at mayfco.com Wed Sep 22 18:54:02 2021 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (Larry Mayfield) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:54:02 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> References: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <002c01d7b015$8310d840$893288c0$@mayfco.com> Well, if the drawing is to be believed, the side piece is made from Beech wood and so mahogany just will not do at the concours judging, eh? And to top that off, will the correct Beech wood have to be grown in the UK where it was most probably, likely, sourced from? Has to be authentic, eh! Points can be lost otherwise? Kinda laughing a bit? Larry Mayfield From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:52 PM To: 'Gary' Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jim at island.net Wed Sep 22 19:49:21 2021 From: jim at island.net (jim) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:49:21 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <002c01d7b015$8310d840$893288c0$@mayfco.com> References: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> <002c01d7b015$8310d840$893288c0$@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <037701d7b01d$3a9c9740$afd5c5c0$@island.net> LOL I know a guy that would put ?Coventry? air in his tires if he could figure out a way to ship it? ! From: Tigers On Behalf Of Larry Mayfield Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:54 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' ; 'Gary' Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Well, if the drawing is to be believed, the side piece is made from Beech wood and so mahogany just will not do at the concours judging, eh? And to top that off, will the correct Beech wood have to be grown in the UK where it was most probably, likely, sourced from? Has to be authentic, eh! Points can be lost otherwise? Kinda laughing a bit? Larry Mayfield From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:52 PM To: 'Gary' > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From atwittsend at verizon.net Wed Sep 22 20:51:49 2021 From: atwittsend at verizon.net (Tom Witt) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 19:51:49 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <037701d7b01d$3a9c9740$afd5c5c0$@island.net> References: <004e01d7affc$94908e80$bdb1ab80$@bluefrog.com> <22E1AE7D-22C4-48D5-938B-3D7FE081D2CA@comcast.net> <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> <002c01d7b015$8310d840$893288c0$@mayfco.com> <037701d7b01d$3a9c9740$afd5c5c0$@island.net> Message-ID: <5684c3bc-7f0d-ec33-dff0-66d6498faf2e@verizon.net> /"LOL/ // /I know a guy that would put ?Coventry? air in his tires if he could figure out a way to ship it? !"/ I have nothing against striving for originality. But at some point there winds up being a delineation between one hyper original car and the next that likely goes to mind boggling extremes. Ironically I thought about the air in the tires too. Not only the composition of the air _at that time period_ but the added effect of the compressor oil adding hydrocarbons (anyone care to add to that). But what was a sentence for me to describe you have eloquently distilled it down to "Coventry." Works for me. On 9/22/2021 6:49 PM, jim via Tigers wrote: > > LOL > > I know a guy that would put ?Coventry? air in his tires if he could > figure out a way to ship it? ! > > *From:* Tigers *On Behalf Of *Larry > Mayfield > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:54 PM > *To:* 'Ron Fraser' ; 'Gary' > > *Cc:* Tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Well, if the drawing is to be believed, the side piece is made from > Beech wood and so mahogany just will not do at ?the concours judging, > eh? ?And to top that off, will the correct Beech ?wood have to be > grown in the UK where it was most probably, likely, sourced from? Has > to be authentic, eh! Points can be lost otherwise? > > Kinda laughing a bit? > > Larry Mayfield > > *From:* Tigers > *On Behalf Of *Ron Fraser > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:52 PM > *To:* 'Gary' > > *Cc:* Tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Excellent, keep us informed > > Ron > > *From:* Gary > > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM > *To:* Ron Fraser > > *Cc:* Tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Ron, > > I believe there was only two wood pieces. > > Only one under the battery on the inboard > > side (in the depression on the floor). > > I seem to remember it was plywood and my > > plies had become separated and deteriorated. > > Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for > > his restored cars and there is a supply left. > > The next time I go there I will measure them > > as well as get them available. ?I can?t guarantee > > they are perfectly correct but I would > > bet on it! > > Gary Winblad > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: > > ? > > ??????????????? A good question has come up. > > Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the > battery? > > There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. > > Was there originally a 2^nd piece of wood under the battery tray? > > I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly > level with no rocking. > > If there is a 2^nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? > > Ron Fraser > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/atwittsend at verizon.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From drmayf at mayfco.com Thu Sep 23 07:17:38 2021 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (Larry Mayfield) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:17:38 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood + some other thoughts from an 80 (minus 4 months now) year old geezer... Message-ID: <000201d7b07d$64fef4f0$2efcded0$@mayfco.com> Ahh, yes! Shipping would be easy, just fill a tank and ship it. But the real issue would be getting the right composition of air from Coventry ? it would have to be investigated to determine the exact amount of pollutants and other airborne contaminants that were present in the 60?s before air capture for the tank. Has to be authentic ?air?. The air could have more CO2 today and it was cooler then, after all it is about 50 or so years younger in the era the cars were assembled. All in good fun here ? I wished I had kept my car pristine, but, feckless youth had me do a bit of coach work customizing. Basis running gear is as shipped from merry olde England, however. Wishing I had some Coventry air and Beech wood ? And maybe some of that Lucas smoke to refill the electricals?. Have owned my car since 1967 (second hand at that) and the heads and intake have never been off of it. Have a 5 bolt 289, 30 over bore and ported heads with the small cc chamber and pop up pistons that I need to rebuild ? has the hipo stuff inside. Reminiscing now? I once was in a 3 car ?convoy? from Bakersfield headed back to Santa Maria. We left separately but soon got together on Highway 46. I had a tank of gas when I left, virtually empty in Paso? Corvette and Mercedes were surprised by the fact that not only did I keep up, but arrived first, lol? about 90 miles in an hour.. Passed the place where 46 junctions to go to Fresno and where Jimmy Dean bought the farm. Box Stock everything then? Drmayf Aka Larry Mayfield TWFS. Period. 210.779 mph exit speed on the salt (no, not the Tiger, lol) From: jim Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:49 PM To: 'Larry Mayfield' ; 'Ron Fraser' ; 'Gary' Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood LOL I know a guy that would put ?Coventry? air in his tires if he could figure out a way to ship it? ! From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Larry Mayfield Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:54 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' >; 'Gary' > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Well, if the drawing is to be believed, the side piece is made from Beech wood and so mahogany just will not do at the concours judging, eh? And to top that off, will the correct Beech wood have to be grown in the UK where it was most probably, likely, sourced from? Has to be authentic, eh! Points can be lost otherwise? Kinda laughing a bit? Larry Mayfield From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:52 PM To: 'Gary' > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jliny5 at cox.net Thu Sep 23 07:25:54 2021 From: jliny5 at cox.net (James Lindner) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <12DBB1A0-DE0D-4780-80E6-EEA1895CD284@cox.net> If anybody has the drawing for the bottom piece please post. Beech wood is relatively easy to acquire and some places on line will custom cut pieces. Although any of you with woodworking skills could easily do it yourself. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad > On Sep 22, 2021, at 7:36 PM, Jim via Tigers wrote: > > ?Factory drawing. > > > > Not sure about bottom piece > > Jim > > Sent from my ShoePhone > > >>> On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: >>> >> ? >> Excellent, keep us informed >> >> Ron >> >> From: Gary >> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM >> To: Ron Fraser >> Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net >> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood >> >> Ron, >> I believe there was only two wood pieces. >> Only one under the battery on the inboard >> side (in the depression on the floor). >> I seem to remember it was plywood and my >> plies had become separated and deteriorated. >> Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for >> his restored cars and there is a supply left. >> >> The next time I go there I will measure them >> as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee >> they are perfectly correct but I would >> bet on it! >> Gary Winblad >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: >> >> ? >> A good question has come up. >> Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? >> >> There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. >> >> Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? >> >> I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. >> >> If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? >> >> Ron Fraser >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net >> >> > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jliny5 at cox.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Thu Sep 23 07:48:57 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] oil filter hose fitting Message-ID: <000701d7b081$c23f7f50$46be7df0$@bluefrog.com> I did some extra investigation on the hose fitting which I though look smooth and difficult for me to understand how it was crimped. The hose fitting or clamp, attaches the pipe to the hose, is called a Skive Crimp Socket. The original fitting was crimped with a 4 jaw crimp tool. You can just see one of the witness marks of the crimp tool in the photo. I'm not sure if Rootes had an outside vendor for these hose assemblies or if they made them all in house. Ron Fraser -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_4983.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 451942 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Thu Sep 23 08:28:39 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] oil filter hose fitting In-Reply-To: <000701d7b081$c23f7f50$46be7df0$@bluefrog.com> References: <000701d7b081$c23f7f50$46be7df0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <001e01d7b087$4dfabaf0$e9f030d0$@bluefrog.com> I cleaned up the hose fitting a little and highlighted 1 of the witness marks. A 4 jaw crimp tool for this hose fitting. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 9:49 AM To: tigers at Autox.Team.Net Subject: [Tigers] oil filter hose fitting I did some extra investigation on the hose fitting which I though look smooth and difficult for me to understand how it was crimped. The hose fitting or clamp, attaches the pipe to the hose, is called a Skive Crimp Socket. The original fitting was crimped with a 4 jaw crimp tool. You can just see one of the witness marks of the crimp tool in the photo. I'm not sure if Rootes had an outside vendor for these hose assemblies or if they made them all in house. Ron Fraser -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_5001 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 313253 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wjtwgoodman at aol.com Thu Sep 23 10:51:54 2021 From: wjtwgoodman at aol.com (Warren Goodman) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1671496414.448132.1632415914676@mail.yahoo.com> I don't believe that they would not use w/e they had about. The fact that birch ply looks to have been used for the trunk false floor is somewhat persuasive evidence.? No less than 3 pieces of not Birch have been collected in my brief 10 years of picking Craigslist etc. All three have the holes in the right places not one is Birch.? All three came from parted out or don't throw anything away types.?? Sent from the all new AOL app for Android On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 6:27 AM, tigers-request at autox.team.net wrote: Send Tigers mailing list submissions to ??? tigers at autox.team.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? tigers-request at autox.team.net You can reach the person managing the list at ??? tigers-owner at autox.team.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Tigers digest..." Today's Topics: ? 1. Re: Trunk wood + some other thoughts from an 80 (minus 4 ? ? ? months now) year old geezer... (Larry Mayfield) ? 2. Re: Trunk wood (James Lindner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:17:38 -0700 From: "Larry Mayfield" To: "'jim'" , "'Ron Fraser'" , ??? "'Gary'" Cc: Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood + some other thoughts from an 80 ??? (minus 4 months now) year old geezer... Message-ID: <000201d7b07d$64fef4f0$2efcded0$@mayfco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Ahh, yes! Shipping would be easy, just fill a tank and ship it. But the real issue would be getting the right composition of air from Coventry ? it would have to be investigated to determine the exact amount of pollutants and other airborne contaminants that were present in the 60?s? before air capture for the tank. Has to be authentic ?air?.? The air could have more CO2 today and it was cooler then,? after all it is about 50? or so years younger in the? era the cars were assembled. All in good fun here? ? I wished I had kept my car pristine,? but, feckless youth had me do a bit of coach work customizing.? Basis running gear is as shipped from merry olde England, however. Wishing I had some Coventry air and Beech wood ? And maybe some of that Lucas smoke to refill? the electricals?. Have owned my car since 1967 (second hand at that) and the heads and intake have never been off of it.? Have a 5 bolt 289, 30 over bore and ported heads with the small cc chamber and pop up pistons that? I need to rebuild ? has the hipo stuff inside. Reminiscing now? I once was in a 3 car ?convoy? from Bakersfield headed back to Santa Maria. We left separately but soon got together on Highway? 46. I had a tank of gas when I left, virtually empty in Paso?? Corvette and Mercedes were surprised by the fact that not only did I keep up, but arrived first, lol? about 90 miles in an hour.. Passed the place where 46 junctions to go to Fresno? and where Jimmy Dean bought the farm.? Box Stock everything then? Drmayf Aka Larry Mayfield TWFS. Period. 210.779 mph exit speed on the salt (no, not the Tiger, lol) From: jim Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:49 PM To: 'Larry Mayfield' ; 'Ron Fraser' ; 'Gary' Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood LOL I know a guy that would put ?Coventry? air in his tires if he could figure out a way to ship it? ! From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Larry Mayfield Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:54 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' >; 'Gary' > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Well, if the drawing is to be believed, the side piece is made from Beech wood and so mahogany just will not do at? the concours judging, eh?? And to top that off, will the correct Beech? wood have to be grown in the UK where it was most probably, likely, sourced from? Has to be authentic, eh! Points can be lost otherwise? Kinda laughing a bit? Larry Mayfield From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:52 PM To: 'Gary' > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available.? I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:25:54 -0400 From: James Lindner To: Jim Cc: Ron Fraser , tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Message-ID: <12DBB1A0-DE0D-4780-80E6-EEA1895CD284 at cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" If anybody has the drawing for the bottom piece please post. Beech wood is relatively easy to acquire and some places on line will custom cut pieces. Although any of you with woodworking skills could easily do it yourself. Thanks Jim Sent from my iPad > On Sep 22, 2021, at 7:36 PM, Jim via Tigers wrote: > > ?Factory drawing. > > > > Not sure about bottom piece > > Jim > > Sent from my ShoePhone > > >>> On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: >>> >> ? >> Excellent, keep us informed >>? >> Ron >>? >> From: Gary >> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM >> To: Ron Fraser >> Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net >> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood >>? >> Ron, >> I believe there was only two wood pieces. >> Only one under the battery on the inboard >> side (in the depression on the floor). >> I seem to remember it was plywood and my >> plies had become separated and deteriorated. >> Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for >> his restored cars and there is a supply left. >>? >> The next time I go there I will measure them >> as well as get them available.? I can?t guarantee >> they are perfectly correct but I would >> bet on it! >> Gary Winblad >>? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: >> >> ? >>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? A good question has come up. >> Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? >>? >> There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. >>? >> Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? >>? >> I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. >>? >> If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? >>? >> Ron Fraser >>? >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net >> >> > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jliny5 at cox.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Tigers mailing list Tigers at autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive ------------------------------ End of Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 *************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From larryall at pacbell.net Thu Sep 23 11:26:52 2021 From: larryall at pacbell.net (larryall) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:26:52 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 207 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: If someone can provide specific dimensions and wood species I could mill up kits at my cost. My Mk1 does not have any remnants left to use as template so I would need above specifics to create.Like I said I can produce at my cost including postage. Would prefer to ship US but could arrange for international.Also does anyone know what finish was usedSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message --------From: tigers-request at autox.team.net Date: 9/23/21 9:53 AM (GMT-08:00) To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 207 Send Tigers mailing list submissions to tigers at autox.team.netTo subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigersor, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tigers-request at autox.team.netYou can reach the person managing the list at tigers-owner at autox.team.netWhen replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specificthan "Re: Contents of Tigers digest..."Today's Topics:?? 1. Re: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 (Warren Goodman)----------------------------------------------------------------------Message: 1Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:51:54 +0000 (UTC)From: Warren Goodman To: tigers at autox.team.netSubject: Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204Message-ID: <1671496414.448132.1632415914676 at mail.yahoo.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"I don't believe that they would not use w/e they had about. The fact that birch ply looks to have been used for the trunk false floor is somewhat persuasive evidence.? No less than 3 pieces of not Birch have been collected in my brief 10 years of picking Craigslist etc. All three have the holes in the right places not one is Birch.? All three came from parted out or don't throw anything away types.??Sent from the all new AOL app for Android ? On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 6:27 AM, tigers-request at autox.team.net wrote:?? Send Tigers mailing list submissions to??? tigers at autox.team.netTo subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit??? http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigersor, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to??? tigers-request at autox.team.netYou can reach the person managing the list at??? tigers-owner at autox.team.netWhen replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specificthan "Re: Contents of Tigers digest..."Today's Topics:? 1. Re: Trunk wood + some other thoughts from an 80 (minus 4? ? ? months now) year old geezer... (Larry Mayfield)? 2. Re: Trunk wood (James Lindner)----------------------------------------------------------------------Message: 1Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:17:38 -0700From: "Larry Mayfield" To: "'jim'" , "'Ron Fraser'" ,??? "'Gary'" Cc: Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood + some other thoughts from an 80??? (minus 4 months now) year old geezer...Message-ID: <000201d7b07d$64fef4f0$2efcded0$@mayfco.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"Ahh, yes! Shipping would be easy, just fill a tank and ship it. But the real issue would be getting the right composition of air from Coventry ? it would have to be investigated to determine the exact amount of pollutants and other airborne contaminants that were present in the 60?s? before air capture for the tank. Has to be authentic ?air?.? The air could have more CO2 today and it was cooler then,? after all it is about 50? or so years younger in the? era the cars were assembled. All in good fun here? ? I wished I had kept my car pristine,? but, feckless youth had me do a bit of coach work customizing.? Basis running gear is as shipped from merry olde England, however. Wishing I had some Coventry air and Beech wood ? And maybe some of that Lucas smoke to refill? the electricals?. Have owned my car since 1967 (second hand at that) and the heads and intake have never been off of it.? Have a 5 bolt 289, 30 over bore and ported heads with the small cc chamber and pop up pistons that? I need to rebuild ? has the hipo stuff inside. Reminiscing now? I once was in a 3 car ?convoy? from Bakersfield headed back to Santa Maria. We left separately but soon got together on Highway? 46. I had a tank of gas when I left, virtually empty in Paso?? Corvette and Mercedes were surprised by the fact that not only did I keep up, but arrived first, lol? about 90 miles in an hour.. Passed the place where 46 junctions to go to Fresno? and where Jimmy Dean bought the farm.? Box Stock everything then? Drmayf Aka Larry MayfieldTWFS. Period. 210.779 mph exit speed on the salt (no, not the Tiger, lol) From: jim Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:49 PMTo: 'Larry Mayfield' ; 'Ron Fraser' ; 'Gary' Cc: Tigers at autox.team.netSubject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood LOL I know a guy that would put ?Coventry? air in his tires if he could figure out a way to ship it? ! From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Larry MayfieldSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:54 PMTo: 'Ron Fraser' >; 'Gary' >Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Well, if the drawing is to be believed, the side piece is made from Beech wood and so mahogany just will not do at? the concours judging, eh?? And to top that off, will the correct Beech? wood have to be grown in the UK where it was most probably, likely, sourced from? Has to be authentic, eh! Points can be lost otherwise? Kinda laughing a bit? Larry Mayfield From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Ron FraserSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:52 PMTo: 'Gary' >Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PMTo: Ron Fraser >Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron,I believe there was only two wood pieces.Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor).I seem to remember it was plywood and myplies had become separated and deteriorated.Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced forhis restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure themas well as get them available.? I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I wouldbet on it!Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote:?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? A good question has come up.Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.htmlArchive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archiveUnsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net-------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: ------------------------------Message: 2Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:25:54 -0400From: James Lindner To: Jim Cc: Ron Fraser , tigers at autox.team.netSubject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk woodMessage-ID: <12DBB1A0-DE0D-4780-80E6-EEA1895CD284 at cox.net>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"If anybody has the drawing for the bottom piece please post. Beech wood is relatively easy to acquire and some places on line will custom cut pieces. Although any of you with woodworking skills could easily do it yourself.ThanksJimSent from my iPad> On Sep 22, 2021, at 7:36 PM, Jim via Tigers wrote:> > ?Factory drawing.> > > > Not sure about bottom piece> > Jim> > Sent from my ShoePhone> > >>> On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser wrote:>>> >> ?>> Excellent, keep us informed>>? >> Ron>>? >> From: Gary >> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM>> To: Ron Fraser >> Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net>> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood>>? >> Ron,>> I believe there was only two wood pieces.>> Only one under the battery on the inboard >> side (in the depression on the floor).>> I seem to remember it was plywood and my>> plies had become separated and deteriorated.>> Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for>> his restored cars and there is a supply left.>>? >> The next time I go there I will measure them>> as well as get them available.? I can?t guarantee >> they are perfectly correct but I would>> bet on it!>> Gary Winblad >>? >> >> Sent from my iPhone>> >> >> On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote:>> >> ?>>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? A good question has come up.>> Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery?>>? >> There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery.>>? >> Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray?>>? >> I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking.>>? >> If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions?>>? >> Ron Fraser>>? >> _______________________________________________>> >> tigers at autox.team.net>> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html>> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive>> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net>> >> >> _______________________________________________>> >> tigers at autox.team.net>> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html>> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive>> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net>> >> > _______________________________________________> > tigers at autox.team.net> > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive> > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jliny5 at cox.net> > -------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: ------------------------------Subject: Digest Footer_______________________________________________Tigers mailing listTigers at autox.team.nethttp://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigersDonate: http://www.team.net/donate.htmlArchive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive------------------------------End of Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204***************************************? -------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: ------------------------------Subject: Digest Footer_______________________________________________Tigers mailing listTigers at autox.team.nethttp://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigersDonate: http://www.team.net/donate.htmlArchive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive------------------------------End of Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 207*************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Thu Sep 23 11:58:57 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] FW: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 References: <1671496414.448132.1632415914676@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <001101d7b0a4$ae92f270$0bb8d750$@bluefrog.com> Darn forgot to include the List again Ron Fraser From: Ron Fraser Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 1:46 PM To: 'Warren Goodman' Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 Warren Good information. Since no vendor was called out on the drawing, I can see a Wood Shop using any hard wood scrap they had for this part. Why waste a piece of wood that has no other good use but is dimensionally close and can be made into this part. More income, less waste. We have a drawing of the side wood piece. It would nice if someone can verify those dimensions on their Tiger. My part does not match those dimensions, it is longer and wider. Also what was used to fasten the wood the body. I made a guess of a screw but is that correct? 1st let verify the drawing, then let?s see if a larger part like mine is also common. My Tiger is an early B382 series Tiger with a Jensen date in Aug 1965. Curious minds want to know Ron Fraser From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Warren Goodman via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:52 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 I don't believe that they would not use w/e they had about. The fact that birch ply looks to have been used for the trunk false floor is somewhat persuasive evidence. No less than 3 pieces of not Birch have been collected in my brief 10 years of picking Craigslist etc. All three have the holes in the right places not one is Birch. All three came from parted out or don't throw anything away types. Sent from the all new AOL app for Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Thu Sep 23 13:24:41 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:24:41 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] FW: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 In-Reply-To: <001101d7b0a4$ae92f270$0bb8d750$@bluefrog.com> References: <001101d7b0a4$ae92f270$0bb8d750$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <6477242C-5BF8-4273-B0CC-E47D43AC0180@comcast.net> Ron, Closest I can measure B9470622(pretty sure its original): .86 x.38 x 10 1/4 It is now darkened and must have shrunk after all these years LOL! How many people need these? The Reisentz estate has a few, I doubt we need a new production run.? Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 23, 2021, at 10:59 AM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? > Darn forgot to include the List again > Ron Fraser > > From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 1:46 PM > To: 'Warren Goodman' > Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 > > Warren > Good information. Since no vendor was called out on the drawing, I can see a Wood Shop using any hard wood scrap they had for this part. > Why waste a piece of wood that has no other good use but is dimensionally close and can be made into this part. > > More income, less waste. > > We have a drawing of the side wood piece. It would nice if someone can verify those dimensions on their Tiger. > My part does not match those dimensions, it is longer and wider. > Also what was used to fasten the wood the body. I made a guess of a screw but is that correct? > > 1st let verify the drawing, then let?s see if a larger part like mine is also common. > My Tiger is an early B382 series Tiger with a Jensen date in Aug 1965. > > Curious minds want to know > > Ron Fraser > > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Warren Goodman via Tigers > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:52 PM > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 > > I don't believe that they would not use w/e they had about. The fact that birch ply looks to have been used for the trunk false floor is somewhat persuasive evidence. No less than 3 pieces of not Birch have been collected in my brief 10 years of picking Craigslist etc. All three have the holes in the right places not one is Birch. All three came from parted out or don't throw anything away types. > > Sent from the all new AOL app for Android > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Thu Sep 23 13:43:44 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:43:44 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger battery wood Message-ID: Here?s a quick photo, not sure how many are there. Will probably go there in a couple weeks. Buck is first, anyone else? What?s a fair price with USPS? All proceeds go to Julie. Sorry, no oil lines. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: imagejpeg_1.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 218891 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: imagejpeg_0.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 275517 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Sent from my iPhone From rfraser at bluefrog.com Thu Sep 23 14:05:17 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger battery wood In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <002901d7b0b6$54c8c820$fe5a5860$@bluefrog.com> Gary Looks like the dimensions of your side wood piece is very close - shrinkage is always normal, it's wood. "Closest I can measure B9470622(pretty sure its original): .86 x.38 x 10 1/4" Drawing indicates - 10.437" x .875" x .437" close enough for your part. It would be great to have all the dimension for the 2 piece of wood Paul used. Keep us informed Thanks Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Tigers On Behalf Of Gary Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 3:44 PM To: Tigers ; Buck Trippel Subject: [Tigers] Tiger battery wood Here?s a quick photo, not sure how many are there. Will probably go there in a couple weeks. Buck is first, anyone else? What?s a fair price with USPS? All proceeds go to Julie. Sorry, no oil lines. From jim at island.net Thu Sep 23 14:10:32 2021 From: jim at island.net (jim) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:10:32 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <008601d7b013$6cad4180$4607c480$@bluefrog.com> References: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> <008601d7b013$6cad4180$4607c480$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> Ron The very comprehensive ?bolt list? on Tigers United lists the fasteners for the side piece as 2 - #6 x ?? machine screw flat head Philips and shows nothing for a lower piece of wood For those who don?t know their Beech from their Birch, as a carpenter I DO know? lol The fine grain European Beech is on the left and lighter grain Birch on the right Both samples are sawn ( NOT plywood ) That side wood drawing actually has a part # 2231040 There are a few part #s in the parts book for the trunk that are 22310xx but not that one? kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list. That might be the case with the possible lower filler under the battery? maybe Buck has seen a drawing at the Rootes trust for one ?? Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:39 PM To: 'Jim' Cc: 'Gary' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim Assume! Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. This is a great starting point for this part. Ron Fraser From: Jim > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Gary >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 22785 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 39262 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jim at island.net Thu Sep 23 14:44:37 2021 From: jim at island.net (Jim) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:44:37 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> References: <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> Message-ID: <1E95721C-5BFF-452B-9405-232864BDE516@island.net> So.., I took my battery out to have a look? been a while !! I see a piece of 1/4? plywood that I probably made years ago ( wonder what I used for a pattern?) and see the screw holes are 9 7/16? apart and no evidence that there ever were any other holes. The piece is 3? wide and the back hole is 1 5/16? from the right side and the front hole is 1 7/16? from the right side From looking at my layout on the back of the wood, it appears like I drilled the wood to match existing trunk holes other wise if I was ?creating? holes in the trunk I would have lined them up even. So?either I?ve redone an existing incorrect piece?or I have the holy grail, or something in between. 55 year old car and all. Still a mystery. Lol Definitely need more input Jim B382000446 Sent from my ShoePhone > On Sep 23, 2021, at 1:11 PM, jim via Tigers wrote: > > ? > Ron > > The very comprehensive ?bolt list? on Tigers United lists the fasteners for the side piece as 2 - #6 x ?? machine screw flat head Philips and shows nothing for a lower piece of wood > For those who don?t know their Beech from their Birch, as a carpenter I DO know? lol > > The fine grain European Beech is on the left and lighter grain Birch on the right > Both samples are sawn ( NOT plywood ) > > > > > That side wood drawing actually has a part # 2231040 There are a few part #s in the parts book for the trunk that are 22310xx but not that one? kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list. That might be the case with the possible lower filler under the battery? maybe Buck has seen a drawing at the Rootes trust for one ?? > > Jim > B382000446 > > From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:39 PM > To: 'Jim' > Cc: 'Gary' ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Jim > Assume! > Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 > the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? > > My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. > My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. > I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. > > This is a great starting point for this part. > Ron Fraser > > From: Jim > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM > To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Gary ; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Factory drawing. > > > > > Not sure about bottom piece > > > Jim > > Sent from my ShoePhone > > > > On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? > Excellent, keep us informed > > Ron > > From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM > To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood > > Ron, > I believe there was only two wood pieces. > Only one under the battery on the inboard > side (in the depression on the floor). > I seem to remember it was plywood and my > plies had become separated and deteriorated. > Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for > his restored cars and there is a supply left. > > The next time I go there I will measure them > as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee > they are perfectly correct but I would > bet on it! > Gary Winblad > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser wrote: > > ? > A good question has come up. > Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? > > There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. > > Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? > > I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. > > If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? > > Ron Fraser > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Thu Sep 23 15:20:04 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> References: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> <008601d7b013$6cad4180$4607c480$@bluefrog.com> <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> Message-ID: <002e01d7b0c0$c756e890$5604b9b0$@bluefrog.com> Jim I question a flat head Philips. The drawing clearly shows and angle cut for the fastener; that is why my guess was a Flat Countersunk Head screw. Right now I don?t believe there are any indications of fasteners if a piece of wood was used under the battery tray. Thank you for the wood picture ? I?m not sure what I have for side wood, I do know it is stained some ? I will examine it more closely in Oct when I take the battery out. Basically we need more input to understand all the questions we have right now on this subject. ?kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list? Alpine Parts List ? Body Fittings ? Series I & II ? pg. YV11 under part D200 ? 2201875 Shim ? Toggle catch Ron Fraser From: jim Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:11 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' Cc: 'Gary' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron The very comprehensive ?bolt list? on Tigers United lists the fasteners for the side piece as 2 - #6 x ?? machine screw flat head Philips and shows nothing for a lower piece of wood For those who don?t know their Beech from their Birch, as a carpenter I DO know? lol The fine grain European Beech is on the left and lighter grain Birch on the right Both samples are sawn ( NOT plywood ) That side wood drawing actually has a part # 2231040 There are a few part #s in the parts book for the trunk that are 22310xx but not that one? kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list. That might be the case with the possible lower filler under the battery? maybe Buck has seen a drawing at the Rootes trust for one ?? Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:39 PM To: 'Jim' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim Assume! Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. This is a great starting point for this part. Ron Fraser From: Jim > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Gary >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 14477 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 12876 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jim at island.net Thu Sep 23 15:36:04 2021 From: jim at island.net (jim) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:36:04 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <002e01d7b0c0$c756e890$5604b9b0$@bluefrog.com> References: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> <008601d7b013$6cad4180$4607c480$@bluefrog.com> <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> <002e01d7b0c0$c756e890$5604b9b0$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <00ae01d7b0c3$032b7550$09825ff0$@island.net> Hi Ron Thanks for that wedge part # ? never thought to look at series I/II In my world a flat head screw ?is? countersunk ( as are oval head ) so we?re on the same page My best ?guess? now is that there may be a flat wood piece under the tray but no fasteners? Whish moe ?never messed with? guys would post pics Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:20 PM To: 'jim' Cc: 'Gary' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim I question a flat head Philips. The drawing clearly shows and angle cut for the fastener; that is why my guess was a Flat Countersunk Head screw. Right now I don?t believe there are any indications of fasteners if a piece of wood was used under the battery tray. Thank you for the wood picture ? I?m not sure what I have for side wood, I do know it is stained some ? I will examine it more closely in Oct when I take the battery out. Basically we need more input to understand all the questions we have right now on this subject. ?kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list? Alpine Parts List ? Body Fittings ? Series I & II ? pg. YV11 under part D200 ? 2201875 Shim ? Toggle catch Ron Fraser From: jim > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:11 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron The very comprehensive ?bolt list? on Tigers United lists the fasteners for the side piece as 2 - #6 x ?? machine screw flat head Philips and shows nothing for a lower piece of wood For those who don?t know their Beech from their Birch, as a carpenter I DO know? lol The fine grain European Beech is on the left and lighter grain Birch on the right Both samples are sawn ( NOT plywood ) That side wood drawing actually has a part # 2231040 There are a few part #s in the parts book for the trunk that are 22310xx but not that one? kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list. That might be the case with the possible lower filler under the battery? maybe Buck has seen a drawing at the Rootes trust for one ?? Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:39 PM To: 'Jim' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim Assume! Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. This is a great starting point for this part. Ron Fraser From: Jim > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Gary >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 37733 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 14477 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 12876 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Thu Sep 23 16:30:50 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Trunk wood In-Reply-To: <00ae01d7b0c3$032b7550$09825ff0$@island.net> References: <006d01d7b004$682a9d60$387fd820$@bluefrog.com> <008601d7b013$6cad4180$4607c480$@bluefrog.com> <009d01d7b0b7$0fed9090$2fc8b1b0$@island.net> <002e01d7b0c0$c756e890$5604b9b0$@bluefrog.com> <00ae01d7b0c3$032b7550$09825ff0$@island.net> Message-ID: <003b01d7b0ca$aaa2d740$ffe885c0$@bluefrog.com> Jim OK, now we are talking the same language and using like dictionaries. I was coping the words from the Parts List. I was contacted today and he stated that the side wood piece on his Tiger is mounted with a nail like fasteners. He could find no slot of any kind in the head. We will have to wait as he investigates what he has for fasteners and wood. Ron Fraser From: jim Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 5:36 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' Cc: 'Gary' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Hi Ron Thanks for that wedge part # ? never thought to look at series I/II In my world a flat head screw ?is? countersunk ( as are oval head ) so we?re on the same page My best ?guess? now is that there may be a flat wood piece under the tray but no fasteners? Whish moe ?never messed with? guys would post pics Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:20 PM To: 'jim' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim I question a flat head Philips. The drawing clearly shows and angle cut for the fastener; that is why my guess was a Flat Countersunk Head screw. Right now I don?t believe there are any indications of fasteners if a piece of wood was used under the battery tray. Thank you for the wood picture ? I?m not sure what I have for side wood, I do know it is stained some ? I will examine it more closely in Oct when I take the battery out. Basically we need more input to understand all the questions we have right now on this subject. ?kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list? Alpine Parts List ? Body Fittings ? Series I & II ? pg. YV11 under part D200 ? 2201875 Shim ? Toggle catch Ron Fraser From: jim > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:11 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron The very comprehensive ?bolt list? on Tigers United lists the fasteners for the side piece as 2 - #6 x ?? machine screw flat head Philips and shows nothing for a lower piece of wood For those who don?t know their Beech from their Birch, as a carpenter I DO know? lol The fine grain European Beech is on the left and lighter grain Birch on the right Both samples are sawn ( NOT plywood ) That side wood drawing actually has a part # 2231040 There are a few part #s in the parts book for the trunk that are 22310xx but not that one? kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list. That might be the case with the possible lower filler under the battery? maybe Buck has seen a drawing at the Rootes trust for one ?? Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:39 PM To: 'Jim' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim Assume! Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. This is a great starting point for this part. Ron Fraser From: Jim > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Gary >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 37733 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 14477 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 12876 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From blance598 at gmail.com Thu Sep 23 17:26:11 2021 From: blance598 at gmail.com (Lance Beauchamp) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 19:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Fwd: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 214 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Has anyone dealt with sunbeam spares, I might have too. Specifically body replacement panels, lower front fender. Beau. My body man opened up a can of worms, now we must fix it correctly n'est pas. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2021, 6:32 PM Subject: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 214 To: Send Tigers mailing list submissions to tigers at autox.team.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tigers-request at autox.team.net You can reach the person managing the list at tigers-owner at autox.team.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Tigers digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Trunk wood (Ron Fraser) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:30:50 -0400 From: "Ron Fraser" To: "'jim'" Cc: "'Gary'" , Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Message-ID: <003b01d7b0ca$aaa2d740$ffe885c0$@bluefrog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Jim OK, now we are talking the same language and using like dictionaries. I was coping the words from the Parts List. I was contacted today and he stated that the side wood piece on his Tiger is mounted with a nail like fasteners. He could find no slot of any kind in the head. We will have to wait as he investigates what he has for fasteners and wood. Ron Fraser From: jim Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 5:36 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' Cc: 'Gary' ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Hi Ron Thanks for that wedge part # ? never thought to look at series I/II In my world a flat head screw ?is? countersunk ( as are oval head ) so we?re on the same page My best ?guess? now is that there may be a flat wood piece under the tray but no fasteners? Whish moe ?never messed with? guys would post pics Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:20 PM To: 'jim' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim I question a flat head Philips. The drawing clearly shows and angle cut for the fastener; that is why my guess was a Flat Countersunk Head screw. Right now I don?t believe there are any indications of fasteners if a piece of wood was used under the battery tray. Thank you for the wood picture ? I?m not sure what I have for side wood, I do know it is stained some ? I will examine it more closely in Oct when I take the battery out. Basically we need more input to understand all the questions we have right now on this subject. ?kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list? Alpine Parts List ? Body Fittings ? Series I & II ? pg. YV11 under part D200 ? 2201875 Shim ? Toggle catch Ron Fraser From: jim > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:11 PM To: 'Ron Fraser' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron The very comprehensive ?bolt list? on Tigers United lists the fasteners for the side piece as 2 - #6 x ?? machine screw flat head Philips and shows nothing for a lower piece of wood For those who don?t know their Beech from their Birch, as a carpenter I DO know? lol The fine grain European Beech is on the left and lighter grain Birch on the right Both samples are sawn ( NOT plywood ) That side wood drawing actually has a part # 2231040 There are a few part #s in the parts book for the trunk that are 22310xx but not that one? kinda like those wedges for the front top to windshield ? they exist? but not in any list. That might be the case with the possible lower filler under the battery? maybe Buck has seen a drawing at the Rootes trust for one ?? Jim B382000446 From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:39 PM To: 'Jim' > Cc: 'Gary' >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: RE: [Tigers] Trunk wood Jim Assume! Beech wood Drawing date ? 14.1.64 = Jan 14, 1964 and labeled Alpine 260 the holes are countersunk so probably 2 ? flat countersunk head screws x 5/8?? My part does not have those dimensions but this part drawing may have been updated by the time my Tiger was built. My part is longer, wider and the holes are not on the center line of the part, they are off set up, I?m also not sure it is the original part. I will have to take more measurements when I take the battery out at the end of the season. This is a great starting point for this part. Ron Fraser From: Jim > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:36 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Gary >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Factory drawing. Not sure about bottom piece Jim Sent from my ShoePhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Excellent, keep us informed Ron From: Gary > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 6:08 PM To: Ron Fraser > Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Trunk wood Ron, I believe there was only two wood pieces. Only one under the battery on the inboard side (in the depression on the floor). I seem to remember it was plywood and my plies had become separated and deteriorated. Paul Reisentz had the wood reproduced for his restored cars and there is a supply left. The next time I go there I will measure them as well as get them available. I can?t guarantee they are perfectly correct but I would bet on it! Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? A good question has come up. Should there be 2 pieces of wood in the trunk associated with the battery? There is 1 piece screwed to the body at the side of the battery. Was there originally a 2nd piece of wood under the battery tray? I put plywood under my battery tray to get the battery mostly level with no rocking. If there is a 2nd piece of wood ? what are the dimensions? Ron Fraser _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim at island.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20210923/63b2365b/attachment.htm > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 37733 bytes Desc: not available URL: < http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20210923/63b2365b/attachment.jpg > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 14477 bytes Desc: not available URL: < http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20210923/63b2365b/attachment-0001.jpg > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 12876 bytes Desc: not available URL: < http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20210923/63b2365b/attachment-0002.jpg > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 200166 bytes Desc: not available URL: < http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20210923/63b2365b/attachment-0003.jpg > ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Tigers mailing list Tigers at autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive ------------------------------ End of Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 214 *************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bucktrippel at verizon.net Thu Sep 23 18:05:48 2021 From: bucktrippel at verizon.net (Buck Trippel) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:05:48 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] sunbeam spares References: <048801d7b0d7$ee400830$cac01890$.ref@verizon.net> Message-ID: <048801d7b0d7$ee400830$cac01890$@verizon.net> Hi, Sunbeam Spares is great (Malcolm, Andy & Tristan) They are located near Heathrow, to the west of London. The company itself has been around for decades and is the main Sunbeam vendor in the UK. They are highly reputable. Sunbeam Tiger Alpine Spares is a different company. It's rather new. (5 years?) It specializes in providing components for turning out Algers. (And any company that would so closely copy an established competitor's name is already suspect.) Randy Willits (sp?) up in New Hampshire (?) brings in shipments of sheet metal stuff from the UK all the time. You may be able to buy something from him to avoid hefty shipping fees. (I've done that.) Buck Trippel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Thu Sep 23 18:15:06 2021 From: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net (clydemclaughlin at verizon.net) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] top wood piece References: <470510385.548234.1632442506620.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <470510385.548234.1632442506620@mail.yahoo.com> I have checked my battery top side spacer, it conforms to the dimentions previously discussed but I would wonder if when in stalled looking at the side grain the exact wood could be distinguished, it's only 7/16" wide....my 2cents..my lower piece is 13"L x31/4"Wx1/4" thick and is plywood screwed down with 2 #6x1/2 countersunk flat heads. ?Probably done years ago by Scott Woerth, may or not be absolute correct, but is not visible and supports the battery tray. ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From awtiger at cox.net Thu Sep 23 19:16:06 2021 From: awtiger at cox.net (Andy Walker) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:16:06 -0500 Subject: [Tigers] FW: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 In-Reply-To: <6477242C-5BF8-4273-B0CC-E47D43AC0180@comcast.net> References: <001101d7b0a4$ae92f270$0bb8d750$@bluefrog.com> <6477242C-5BF8-4273-B0CC-E47D43AC0180@comcast.net> Message-ID: <000001d7b0e1$c11de110$4359a330$@cox.net> Gary, I have the side wood piece but do NOT have the piece that goes under the battery tray. So, count me in at least for the bottom piece. Thanks, Andy Walker Edmond, OK B382001600LRXFE From: Tigers [mailto:tigers-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Gary Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:25 PM To: Ron Fraser Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] FW: Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 Ron, Closest I can measure B9470622(pretty sure its original): .86 x.38 x 10 1/4 It is now darkened and must have shrunk after all these years LOL! How many people need these? The Reisentz estate has a few, I doubt we need a new production run.? Gary Winblad Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2021, at 10:59 AM, Ron Fraser > wrote: ? Darn forgot to include the List again Ron Fraser From: Ron Fraser > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 1:46 PM To: 'Warren Goodman' > Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 Warren Good information. Since no vendor was called out on the drawing, I can see a Wood Shop using any hard wood scrap they had for this part. Why waste a piece of wood that has no other good use but is dimensionally close and can be made into this part. More income, less waste. We have a drawing of the side wood piece. It would nice if someone can verify those dimensions on their Tiger. My part does not match those dimensions, it is longer and wider. Also what was used to fasten the wood the body. I made a guess of a screw but is that correct? 1st let verify the drawing, then let?s see if a larger part like mine is also common. My Tiger is an early B382 series Tiger with a Jensen date in Aug 1965. Curious minds want to know Ron Fraser From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Warren Goodman via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:52 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 204 I don't believe that they would not use w/e they had about. The fact that birch ply looks to have been used for the trunk false floor is somewhat persuasive evidence. No less than 3 pieces of not Birch have been collected in my brief 10 years of picking Craigslist etc. All three have the holes in the right places not one is Birch. All three came from parted out or don't throw anything away types. Sent from the all new AOL app for Android _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Fri Sep 24 18:15:54 2021 From: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net (clydemclaughlin at verizon.net) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] battery wood pieces References: <605554394.773535.1632528954345.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <605554394.773535.1632528954345@mail.yahoo.com> I wonder if these pieces of wood were sealed, stained, or varnished or shellacked to preserve them or just put in the car in a raw state -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Fri Sep 24 18:24:39 2021 From: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net (clydemclaughlin at verizon.net) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] plywood under battery References: <1637616352.775183.1632529479432.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1637616352.775183.1632529479432@mail.yahoo.com> may car has the plywood piece screwed down like Jim's, 9 7/16" apart and are a #6 flat head counter sunk screw for straight brake not philips under the battery -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Fri Sep 24 18:44:43 2021 From: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net (clydemclaughlin at verizon.net) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] plywood under battery References: <1256359848.674420.1632530683079.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1256359848.674420.1632530683079@mail.yahoo.com> I find it interesting that Jims early MK1 and my mid runMK1a have the same spacing for screw holes holding down the plywood under the battery even ?though the wood piece is not exactly the same due to them having been replaced over the years. ?Could some have been screwed/some not?? holes are very small you would have to look close to see them especially if paint is deteriorated or some surface rust -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimdamelio at verizon.net Fri Sep 24 19:30:06 2021 From: jimdamelio at verizon.net (jimdamelio) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] plywood under battery In-Reply-To: <1256359848.674420.1632530683079@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I made the two pieces for my Tiger today out of wood I already had.? I cut the side piece out of maple as per the Rootes drawing.? For the trunk floor piece, I used 1/4" oak cut to 11-1/2 x 3. Thirteen inches would have been to long.? The battery tray is 13".? Polyurethaned both.? My car has the holes in the floor.? Didn't really care about using beech wood or whatever goes under the battery.? Sure won't be removing the battery so a judge can inspect it.? How many judges will be able to verify beech wood anyway.? I'm sure it should be European beech as apposed to American beech.Jim DSent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: clyde mclaughlin via Tigers Date: 9/24/21 8:45 PM (GMT-05:00) To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] plywood under battery I find it interesting that Jims early MK1 and my mid runMK1a have the same spacing for screw holes holding down the plywood under the battery even ?though the wood piece is not exactly the same due to them having been replaced over the years. ?Could some have been screwed/some not?? holes are very small you would have to look close to see them especially if paint is deteriorated or some surface rust -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Fri Sep 24 23:43:33 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (Gary) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:43:33 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] battery wood pieces In-Reply-To: <605554394.773535.1632528954345@mail.yahoo.com> References: <605554394.773535.1632528954345@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5C948D70-BF0D-454C-9F76-5883EB9B6710@comcast.net> Raw state, I believe. Gary Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 24, 2021, at 5:31 PM, clyde mclaughlin via Tigers wrote: > > ? > I wonder if these pieces of wood were sealed, stained, or varnished or shellacked to preserve them or just put in the car in a raw state > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Sat Sep 25 07:48:10 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] battery wood pieces In-Reply-To: <5C948D70-BF0D-454C-9F76-5883EB9B6710@comcast.net> References: <605554394.773535.1632528954345@mail.yahoo.com> <5C948D70-BF0D-454C-9F76-5883EB9B6710@comcast.net> Message-ID: <000901d7b213$fb8689a0$f2939ce0$@bluefrog.com> The drawing indicates a Finish Symbol ? 57 but we need a decoder ring to understands it?s meaning. I would think any wood product in England would have a primer coat or finish coat of some sort for protection but that costs time and money. There should be other drawings associated with drawing #2231040 that indicates vendor, hardware, assembly and the 2nd piece of wood if it is an original part. Those drawing would need to be found. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of Gary Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 1:44 AM To: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Cc: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] battery wood pieces Raw state, I believe. Gary Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2021, at 5:31 PM, clyde mclaughlin via Tigers > wrote: ? I wonder if these pieces of wood were sealed, stained, or varnished or shellacked to preserve them or just put in the car in a raw state _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Sat Sep 25 15:04:27 2021 From: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net (clydemclaughlin at verizon.net) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 21:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] wood finish References: <594822151.130626.1632603867257.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <594822151.130626.1632603867257@mail.yahoo.com> I would agree it would follow the theme, no sealant, no paint. ?just like the torch cut holes as apposed to a drill bit or chassis punched hole -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Mon Sep 27 12:16:59 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] under the battery wood Message-ID: <000601d7b3cb$dd99dbe0$98cd93a0$@bluefrog.com> I got curious today and dug deeper, under the battery tray. I found 2 paint filled holes 9 ?? apart hole diameter = .107? I also took a closer look at my side wood piece ? looks like I made that part and it looks like a polyurethane coating. The fasteners I got wrong here ? I had #6 x ?? Stainless pan head screws I bought some SS #6 x ?? flat countersunk head screws to replace them. I?ll recap this subject: Side wood There is a drawing for the side wood available #2231040. Dimensions ? 10.437? x .875? x .437? Material ? Hard wood ? Beech Finish Symbol ? 57 ? I found information stating that Finish 57 is wood preservative to resist rot and termites Bottom wood I found evidence on my trunk floor that there could be a wood piece under the battery tray but no confirming documentation yet. Dimensions ? I?ll take a WAG at them 11.5? x 2? x .437? WAG = Wild Ass Guess Fastener holes ? same as in drawing - #2231040 Material ? Hard wood = Beech Finish symbol ? 57 Fasteners ? there is no confirming documentation yet for either wood piece Ron Fraser -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_5015.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 297847 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 100_5010.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 434993 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stotews at gmail.com Mon Sep 27 13:02:14 2021 From: stotews at gmail.com (wes stote) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Front springs mk 1 Message-ID: Has anyone dealt with Coil Spring Specialties, St Mary's, KS. Wes Stote. wstote at hotmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From drmayf at mayfco.com Tue Sep 28 08:45:39 2021 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (Larry Mayfield) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:45:39 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Under Battery Tray Wood piece... Message-ID: <000201d7b477$82e98950$88bc9bf0$@mayfco.com> Ok, so I sorta hate to open this up again. Wasn't there a drawing or link to a drawing for the under battery wood piece? I ask, because in my inimitable way, I have cross filled it to some unknown location in my 'puter file system. So if one of ya has the actual dimensions as shown on that drawing or the link or a copy of the drawing can you please sent it to me? I went out yesterday and moved the battery tray on "xxxx1136" Mk I and yes, I have a screw hole but only one and it is about mid tray on the outside of the tray location. And no wood. BUT, sometime in the past I put a piece inside the tray, why I do not remember (hey, I have owned this car since Jan 1967 - lots of water under that bridge). And I have no idea as to why I did it 'cause it was many years ago. I do have the side piece however. Anyway, if you have a copy of that drawing, the one under the tray, not the one mounted to the frame rail on the side, or a link I would appreciate it. By the way, if you look at the mechanics of the how the wood is supposed to be helping, it really doesn't. If the tray sits directly on the metal floor and abuts the piece on the frame, the battery bolts that hold the bat in place keep it up against the side and firmly on the bottom. I have all of the other OEM battery box pieces and the battery in my car simply will not move when it is in place and tightened down. No movement. Oh, I moved the car out of the race car shop to my main garage a few months ago, fired it up and drove it over. Then I disconnected the ground cable from the battery. Volt meter yesterday showed 12.5 volts after all that time. I have a spare race car disconnect switch which I will put in the car to facilitate disconnecting soon. Oh, and I still have the battery vent hose in my car after all these years also. Not connected to anything because batteries with the vented caps are nonexistent where I am. Anyway, nice chatting this morning. very smokey here in Pahrump last few weeks. I live about 10 miles from an 11000ftmt and we cannot see it most days. Eyes watering most of the time. Mayf aka drmayf aka larry TWFS 210.779 mph crossing the final trap light. In 2010, Sept 16th Mile average was 204.913 mph -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Tue Sep 28 09:44:45 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Under Battery Tray Wood piece... In-Reply-To: <000201d7b477$82e98950$88bc9bf0$@mayfco.com> References: <000201d7b477$82e98950$88bc9bf0$@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <001001d7b47f$c4ef43a0$4ecdcae0$@bluefrog.com> Mayf I have not seen any documentation or drawing for the under battery tray wood. I do hope some surfaces. Interesting, you only have 1 screw hole for the wood. If you get a chance can you take a picture and send it, that would be great to document. I have plywood under my battery because my battery is too short, it needs to be higher so the battery bolts don't dig into the plywood trunk deck. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of Larry Mayfield via Tigers Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 10:46 AM To: Tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Under Battery Tray Wood piece... Ok, so I sorta hate to open this up again. Wasn't there a drawing or link to a drawing for the under battery wood piece? I ask, because in my inimitable way, I have cross filled it to some unknown location in my 'puter file system. So if one of ya has the actual dimensions as shown on that drawing or the link or a copy of the drawing can you please sent it to me? I went out yesterday and moved the battery tray on "xxxx1136" Mk I and yes, I have a screw hole but only one and it is about mid tray on the outside of the tray location. And no wood. BUT, sometime in the past I put a piece inside the tray, why I do not remember (hey, I have owned this car since Jan 1967 - lots of water under that bridge). And I have no idea as to why I did it 'cause it was many years ago. I do have the side piece however. Anyway, if you have a copy of that drawing, the one under the tray, not the one mounted to the frame rail on the side, or a link I would appreciate it. By the way, if you look at the mechanics of the how the wood is supposed to be helping, it really doesn't. If the tray sits directly on the metal floor and abuts the piece on the frame, the battery bolts that hold the bat in place keep it up against the side and firmly on the bottom. I have all of the other OEM battery box pieces and the battery in my car simply will not move when it is in place and tightened down. No movement. Oh, I moved the car out of the race car shop to my main garage a few months ago, fired it up and drove it over. Then I disconnected the ground cable from the battery. Volt meter yesterday showed 12.5 volts after all that time. I have a spare race car disconnect switch which I will put in the car to facilitate disconnecting soon. Oh, and I still have the battery vent hose in my car after all these years also. Not connected to anything because batteries with the vented caps are nonexistent where I am. Anyway, nice chatting this morning. very smokey here in Pahrump last few weeks. I live about 10 miles from an 11000ftmt and we cannot see it most days. Eyes watering most of the time. Mayf aka drmayf aka larry TWFS 210.779 mph crossing the final trap light. In 2010, Sept 16th Mile average was 204.913 mph -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From clydemclaughlin at verizon.net Tue Sep 28 19:38:12 2021 From: clydemclaughlin at verizon.net (clydemclaughlin at verizon.net) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] battery tray wood References: <1473981541.26905.1632879493573.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1473981541.26905.1632879493573@mail.yahoo.com> this is a pix of 1/4 inch plywood piece from an all original MK1A, has the two securing screw that are offset from center line, 9 inches apart, it is 2 3/4 inches wide and 13 inch long...I took these pics today from a known original car...clyde McLaughlin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20210928_123353.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 3322668 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 29 06:58:26 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 08:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] battery tray wood In-Reply-To: <1473981541.26905.1632879493573@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1473981541.26905.1632879493573.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1473981541.26905.1632879493573@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <000201d7b531$b206bd10$16143730$@bluefrog.com> Clyde Thank you for the picture. Interesting! Plywood! Not what I expected but that is the nature of these quests. We need an open mind to evaluate and understand original parts. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of clyde mclaughlin via Tigers Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:38 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] battery tray wood this is a pix of 1/4 inch plywood piece from an all original MK1A, has the two securing screw that are offset from center line, 9 inches apart, it is 2 3/4 inches wide and 13 inch long...I took these pics today from a known original car...clyde McLaughlin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jmartiniii at yahoo.com Wed Sep 29 14:53:03 2021 From: jmartiniii at yahoo.com (Joel Martin) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jay.laifman at gmail.com Wed Sep 29 14:57:30 2021 From: jay.laifman at gmail.com (Jay) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:57:30 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <99A9039B-9CFA-4708-9FFA-AEE17FD2AF22@gmail.com> I?m pretty sure they were not. I actually have one for an Alpine, still NOS. But I know that in the Alpine world, they go kind of nuts that it?s really bad for handling if they are added. I do trust some of the folks who?ve I seen make those statements. But, I don?t have any better info about it. However, some of those same folks endorse putting thicker front sway bars on. It?s my understanding that it?s all relative. So if they stiffen the front, and the overall balance was good before, then the rear should also be stiffened. But, heck, that?s just me. They claim to be the experts. Jay > On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:53 PM, Joel Martin via Tigers wrote: > > Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? > > Thanks > > Joel Martin > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jay.laifman at gmail.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jmartiniii at yahoo.com Wed Sep 29 15:02:44 2021 From: jmartiniii at yahoo.com (Joel Martin) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment References: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> I have 289 HP heads with screw in studs.? What is the cold adjustment they should be - no roller rockers and torque settings for the heads.?? Do you have to loosen the motor mounts to get the valve covers off, lower or raise?? I would think lower to get the valve covers off.? With 5,000 miles since car has been redone, it is time for some sorting out.? The first 5,000 miles required very little and has been a blast up to 60 mph and curves so far. I have changed the oil 2 times during the 5,000 miles and? what a pain it is to replace the filter with the stock set up.? If anyone could explain their process for oil filter change, that works 'easier' it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 29 15:21:00 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment In-Reply-To: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <000f01d7b577$e76d88d0$b6489a70$@bluefrog.com> Joel I believe the valve adjustment depends on which cam you have. Valve covers ? I can get the stock valve covers off with a bit of a fight. Oil filter ? I have the Motorsport right angle adaptor off the block and a Fram 3600 filter Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of Joel Martin via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 5:03 PM To: Tiger List Serve Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment I have 289 HP heads with screw in studs. What is the cold adjustment they should be - no roller rockers and torque settings for the heads.? Do you have to loosen the motor mounts to get the valve covers off, lower or raise? I would think lower to get the valve covers off. With 5,000 miles since car has been redone, it is time for some sorting out. The first 5,000 miles required very little and has been a blast up to 60 mph and curves so far. I have changed the oil 2 times during the 5,000 miles and what a pain it is to replace the filter with the stock set up. If anyone could explain their process for oil filter change, that works 'easier' it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sabre2tgr at gmail.com Wed Sep 29 15:59:05 2021 From: sabre2tgr at gmail.com (Stu) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: FWIW, my previous owner put a much heavier sway bar on the front, which I only discovered when I tried to replace its rubber bushings. During some spirited parade laps on a road course the thing understeered like a pig, I wondered if the front tires were going to get ripped off their rims. The PO had also put helper leafs on the rear springs, but I took them off because of the overly stiff ride. Maybe these would have stiffened the rear to match the front, but the stiffer front bar alone doesn't work. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:54 PM Joel Martin via Tigers < tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option > or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures > of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? > > Thanks > > Joel Martin > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/sabre2tgr at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 29 17:09:09 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] FW: Lifter adjustment In-Reply-To: References: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> <000f01d7b577$e76d88d0$b6489a70$@bluefrog.com> Message-ID: <002001d7b587$031fff40$095ffdc0$@bluefrog.com> From: Jeffery Randall Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:44 PM To: Ron Fraser Subject: Re: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment Generally the valve lash is .010 intake and .012 exhaust cold. On a 271 hp Ford solid lifter cam. The 90 degree Ford Motorsports adaptor is a game changer literally, well worth the price. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:21 PM Ron Fraser > wrote: Joel I believe the valve adjustment depends on which cam you have. Valve covers ? I can get the stock valve covers off with a bit of a fight. Oil filter ? I have the Motorsport right angle adaptor off the block and a Fram 3600 filter Ron Fraser From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Joel Martin via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 5:03 PM To: Tiger List Serve > Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment I have 289 HP heads with screw in studs. What is the cold adjustment they should be - no roller rockers and torque settings for the heads.? Do you have to loosen the motor mounts to get the valve covers off, lower or raise? I would think lower to get the valve covers off. With 5,000 miles since car has been redone, it is time for some sorting out. The first 5,000 miles required very little and has been a blast up to 60 mph and curves so far. I have changed the oil 2 times during the 5,000 miles and what a pain it is to replace the filter with the stock set up. If anyone could explain their process for oil filter change, that works 'easier' it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Joel Martin _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jefferyrandall at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Wed Sep 29 17:15:42 2021 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <002501d7b587$ed484d70$c7d8e850$@bluefrog.com> Joel A rear sway bar was not original to the Tiger and I don?t see one listed as an LAT. Ron Fraser From: Tigers On Behalf Of Joel Martin via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 4:53 PM To: Tiger List Serve Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From drmayf at mayfco.com Wed Sep 29 18:44:00 2021 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (Larry Mayfield) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:44:00 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment In-Reply-To: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <007301d7b594$445caaf0$cd1600d0$@mayfco.com> Well, depends on what kind of lifters you have. Hydraulics, same as oem. Solid lifters and cam, need a few through clearance. High performance hydraulic, look to the cam maker for adjustment instructions. mayf From: Tigers On Behalf Of Joel Martin via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 2:03 PM To: Tiger List Serve Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment I have 289 HP heads with screw in studs. What is the cold adjustment they should be - no roller rockers and torque settings for the heads.? Do you have to loosen the motor mounts to get the valve covers off, lower or raise? I would think lower to get the valve covers off. With 5,000 miles since car has been redone, it is time for some sorting out. The first 5,000 miles required very little and has been a blast up to 60 mph and curves so far. I have changed the oil 2 times during the 5,000 miles and what a pain it is to replace the filter with the stock set up. If anyone could explain their process for oil filter change, that works 'easier' it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Wed Sep 29 19:27:49 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin_______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Wed Sep 29 19:42:36 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1786377791.264064.1632966156239@mail.yahoo.com> Should have added, the most common bar used is an Addco that has funky clamps and extensions. My car had one when I bought it, I 86'ed it soon after buying. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers To: tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 6:31 pm Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin_______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From MTaylor at ea.com Thu Sep 30 08:07:49 2021 From: MTaylor at ea.com (Taylor, Matthew) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:07:49 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I don't know about "total grip capability," but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I've driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It's possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From srwick at hotmail.com Thu Sep 30 08:49:54 2021 From: srwick at hotmail.com (steve wick) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:49:54 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On a slightly different note, my Tiger is missing the panhard bar and mounting bracket. I've looked off and on for several years and never found one. I know I can get a reinforced bracket that welds in, but don't run my car hard and prefer "factory". If anyone has a bar and bracket laying around and wants to sell, or if I could get pictures and measurements of both so I could replicate them, please email me off list. I have a Mk1 with the bracket on the right side. Thanks guys. Steve ________________________________ From: Tigers on behalf of Taylor, Matthew via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 7:07 AM To: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Thu Sep 30 09:21:35 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (GARY WINBLAD) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart. The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary > On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers wrote: > > > > I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. > > > Matthew > > > From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar > > > > Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. > > > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm > Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar > > Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? > > > > Thanks > > > > Joel Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 09:41:25 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> Message-ID: <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: Taylor, Matthew ; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers ; Michael Wood Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart.? The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary? On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers wrote: I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin ? _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jbbrown1980 at gmail.com Thu Sep 30 09:54:51 2021 From: jbbrown1980 at gmail.com (Joe Brown) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I would also like pictures or drawings. Thanks, Joe Brown On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:50 AM steve wick via Tigers wrote: > On a slightly different note, my Tiger is missing the panhard bar and > mounting bracket. I've looked off and on for several years and never found > one. I know I can get a reinforced bracket that welds in, but don't run my > car hard and prefer "factory". If anyone has a bar and bracket laying > around and wants to sell, or if I could get pictures and measurements of > both so I could replicate them, please email me off list. I have a Mk1 with > the bracket on the right side. Thanks guys. > > Steve > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Tigers on behalf of Taylor, > Matthew via Tigers > *Sent:* Thursday, September 30, 2021 7:07 AM > *To:* Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net < > tigers at autox.team.net> > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar > > > I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive > his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I?ve driven and > autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway > bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to > the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is > much faster than the other. It?s possible that one could be faster than > the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a > second based on my autocross experiences. > > > > Matthew > > > > *From:* Tigers *On Behalf Of *Michael > Wood via Tigers > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM > *To:* tigers at autox.team.net > *Subject:* Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar > > > > Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've > yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct > angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) > that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. > > > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm > Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar > > Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option > or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures > of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? > > > > Thanks > > > > Joel Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 10:01:14 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1155974949.319030.1633017674972@mail.yahoo.com> If you guys are going to put Panhard bars back on, I'd suggest getting one of Tom Hall's kits which helps with the bar angle and addresses mount area issues.? tigerengineering.net Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Brown To: steve wick Cc: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net ; Taylor, Matthew Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:55 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I would also like pictures or drawings. Thanks,Joe Brown On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:50 AM steve wick via Tigers wrote: On a slightly different note, my Tiger is missing the panhard bar and mounting bracket. I've looked off and on for several years and never found one. I know I can get a reinforced bracket that welds in, but don't run my car hard and prefer "factory". If anyone has a bar and bracket laying around and wants to sell, or if I could get pictures and measurements of both so I could replicate them, please email me off list. I have a Mk1 with the bracket on the right side. Thanks?guys. Steve From: Tigers on behalf of Taylor, Matthew via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 7:07 AM To: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar? I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. ? Matthew ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin ? _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From MTaylor at ea.com Thu Sep 30 10:49:09 2021 From: MTaylor at ea.com (Taylor, Matthew) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:49:09 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options. I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1? front sway bar. I don?t think he has a rear bar but I?m not positive. And Gary, the set up isn?t that hard. 100% stock rear springs. Slightly stiffer front springs. Matthew From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD > To: Taylor, Matthew >; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers >; Michael Wood > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart. The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers > wrote: I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 11:02:42 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> No, my car had less HP at the time (260 with 4bbl and headers) and stock front suspension. We all ran together in SCCA F Stock.? But, I did have KONI's, optimized alignment, limited slip and bolt on TMC traction bars. That all changed when I went to the 302/5spd combo further down the road. Also, I don't believe a rear bar or the motors your Dad and Stan were running were factory options and none of us were technically stock legal (but, the faster Camaro and Mustang drivers didn't care lol) But I might be misremembering, it was a long time ago :) No doubt, a rear bar can be made to work correctly, just look at Buck's race car. Of course, they also run BIG front springs and bar! The real point I'm making is that installing an off the shelf Addco bar on a stock suspension car has not been optimal in my experience.?? -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ; garywinblad at comcast.net ; tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 9:49 am Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar #yiv7269323203 #yiv7269323203 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv7269323203 #yiv7269323203 p.yiv7269323203MsoNormal, #yiv7269323203 li.yiv7269323203MsoNormal, #yiv7269323203 div.yiv7269323203MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv7269323203 a:link, #yiv7269323203 span.yiv7269323203MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7269323203 p.yiv7269323203msonormal, #yiv7269323203 li.yiv7269323203msonormal, #yiv7269323203 div.yiv7269323203msonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv7269323203 span.yiv7269323203EmailStyle22 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv7269323203 .yiv7269323203MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv7269323203 div.yiv7269323203WordSection1 {}#yiv7269323203 I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options.? I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1? front sway bar.? I don?t think he has a rear bar but I?m not positive. ? And Gary, the set up isn?t that hard.? 100% stock rear springs.? Slightly stiffer front springs. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: Taylor, Matthew ; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers ; Michael Wood Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart.? The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary? On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers wrote: ? ? I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. ? Matthew ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 11:20:52 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1827209463.401732.1633022453025@mail.yahoo.com> Should have added, the TMC rear sway bars did get an LAT number way down the road, but were never a Rootes or factory offered piece. In any case, at that time (and now), the sanctioning body we were running with, SCCA, deemed LAT options as aftermarket, not factory. So, semantics, perhaps. In any case, there are a lot of moving pieces (literally lol) in any suspension discussion. I'm just sharing my experience, which includes lots of testing and SCCA national level autocross success? :) -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers To: MTaylor at ea.com ; garywinblad at comcast.net ; tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:07 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar No, my car had less HP at the time (260 with 4bbl and headers) and stock front suspension. We all ran together in SCCA F Stock.? But, I did have KONI's, optimized alignment, limited slip and bolt on TMC traction bars. That all changed when I went to the 302/5spd combo further down the road. Also, I don't believe a rear bar or the motors your Dad and Stan were running were factory options and none of us were technically stock legal (but, the faster Camaro and Mustang drivers didn't care lol) But I might be misremembering, it was a long time ago :) No doubt, a rear bar can be made to work correctly, just look at Buck's race car. Of course, they also run BIG front springs and bar! The real point I'm making is that installing an off the shelf Addco bar on a stock suspension car has not been optimal in my experience.?? -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ; garywinblad at comcast.net ; tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 9:49 am Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar #yiv5822410889 -- filtered {}#yiv5822410889 filtered {}#yiv5822410889 filtered {}#yiv5822410889 p.yiv5822410889MsoNormal, #yiv5822410889 li.yiv5822410889MsoNormal, #yiv5822410889 div.yiv5822410889MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv5822410889 a:link, #yiv5822410889 span.yiv5822410889MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5822410889 p.yiv5822410889msonormal, #yiv5822410889 li.yiv5822410889msonormal, #yiv5822410889 div.yiv5822410889msonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv5822410889 span.yiv5822410889EmailStyle22 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv5822410889 .yiv5822410889MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv5822410889 filtered {}#yiv5822410889 div.yiv5822410889WordSection1 {}#yiv5822410889 I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options.? I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1? front sway bar.? I don?t think he has a rear bar but I?m not positive. ? And Gary, the set up isn?t that hard.? 100% stock rear springs.? Slightly stiffer front springs. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew ; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: Taylor, Matthew ; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers ; Michael Wood Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart.? The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary? On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers wrote: ? ? I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. ? Matthew ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dan_doornbos at hotmail.com Thu Sep 30 11:23:53 2021 From: dan_doornbos at hotmail.com (daniel doornbos) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:23:53 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar Message-ID: I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked. And I looked at the DIY weld kits. But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly. For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages. I do recognize that welded options will also work well. My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar. But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space. In the end, I went with a custom-built from https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ It was a premium price but they were great to work with. Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. dan [https://static.wixstatic.com/media/83f66c_8948818df64147b8890ea40d7129c2d5~mv2_d_3264_2448_s_4_2.jpg/v1/fill/w_252] Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NC Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction. www.carolinaswaybar.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jliny5 at cox.net Thu Sep 30 12:16:26 2021 From: jliny5 at cox.net (James Lindner) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] battery tray wood In-Reply-To: <1473981541.26905.1632879493573@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1473981541.26905.1632879493573@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hello I found a place on line that carries beech wood and will cut it to exact specs to match our battery tray wood. The name of the place is Ocooch Hardwoods in WI. http://ocoochhardwoods.com/ Here is the quote they sent me. Item Price Quantity Subtotal 1/4" Beech 2.75" wide 13" long $1.38 1 $1.38 7/16" Beech 0.875" wide 10.4375 long $1.40 1 $1.40 Total: $2.78 Shipping: $9.47 Tax: $0 Grand Total: $12.25 Compared to price, Shipping is a bit steep, but in general pretty reasonable. I did not have them drill holes, I will take care of that. I just placed an order Jim Sent from my iPad > On Sep 28, 2021, at 9:44 PM, clyde mclaughlin via Tigers wrote: > > ? > this is a pix of 1/4 inch plywood piece from an all original MK1A, has the two securing screw that are offset from center line, 9 inches apart, it is 2 3/4 inches wide and 13 inch long...I took these pics today from a known original car...clyde McLaughlin > > > > > > <20210928_123353.jpg> > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jliny5 at cox.net > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 12:34:20 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <595454312.417583.1633026860450@mail.yahoo.com> No doubt, a custom made rear bar, preferably adjustable, can be helpful, particularly with a modified front end. Agree, the aftermarket stuff available is not worth buying. Tiger guys tend to just do what others have done before them, I'm afraid. Not a lot of testing or work goes into many decisions and, because most of the cars don't work as well as they could, no one can tell the difference.? -----Original Message----- From: daniel doornbos via Tigers To: tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:24 am Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar #yiv1305004813 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked.? And I looked at the DIY weld kits.? But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly.? For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages.? ?? I do recognize that welded options will also work well.? My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar.? But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space.? ?In the end, I went with a custom-built from?https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/?It was a premium price but they were great to work with.? Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. dan | | Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NCCarolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction.www.carolinaswaybar.com | _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 12:38:48 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: <595454312.417583.1633026860450@mail.yahoo.com> References: <595454312.417583.1633026860450@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2050614079.413725.1633027128242@mail.yahoo.com> Well...that was meant to go directly to Dan lol Looks like I've outed myself. But, that's been my experience, YMMV. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers To: tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 11:35 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar No doubt, a custom made rear bar, preferably adjustable, can be helpful, particularly with a modified front end. Agree, the aftermarket stuff available is not worth buying. Tiger guys tend to just do what others have done before them, I'm afraid. Not a lot of testing or work goes into many decisions and, because most of the cars don't work as well as they could, no one can tell the difference.? -----Original Message----- From: daniel doornbos via Tigers To: tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:24 am Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar #yiv2119575773 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked.? And I looked at the DIY weld kits.? But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly.? For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages.? ?? I do recognize that welded options will also work well.? My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar.? But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space.? ?In the end, I went with a custom-built from?https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/?It was a premium price but they were great to work with.? Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. dan | | Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NCCarolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction.www.carolinaswaybar.com | _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Thu Sep 30 12:45:27 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (GARY WINBLAD) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:45:27 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: <2050614079.413725.1633027128242@mail.yahoo.com> References: <595454312.417583.1633026860450@mail.yahoo.com> <2050614079.413725.1633027128242@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <119571188.402651.1633027527126@connect.xfinity.com> Its all good advice we all learn from you, thanks Mike. Gary > On 09/30/2021 2:38 PM Michael Wood via Tigers wrote: > > > Well...that was meant to go directly to Dan lol > > Looks like I've outed myself. But, that's been my experience, YMMV. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Wood via Tigers > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 11:35 am > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar > > No doubt, a custom made rear bar, preferably adjustable, can be helpful, particularly with a modified front end. Agree, the aftermarket stuff available is not worth buying. Tiger guys tend to just do what others have done before them, I'm afraid. Not a lot of testing or work goes into many decisions and, because most of the cars don't work as well as they could, no one can tell the difference. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: daniel doornbos via Tigers > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:24 am > Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar > > I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked. And I looked at the DIY weld kits. But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly. For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages. > > I do recognize that welded options will also work well. My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar. But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space. In the end, I went with a custom-built from https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ It was a premium price but they were great to work with. > > Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. > > dan https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ > > > Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NC https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ > > > Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction. > > > www.carolinaswaybar.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net mailto:tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net mailto:tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jim at island.net Thu Sep 30 12:45:51 2021 From: jim at island.net (jim) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:51 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <037701d7b62b$64626d20$2d274760$@island.net> My car came with a home made 1 1/8? front bar so understeered a lot! I got an addco rear bar but couldn?t figure out how to mount it so I made my own mounted in front of the rear end and welded a couple tabs on the side of the plate that the u-bolts go through to hold the lower links. The brackets that I made are very strong ( 6-3/8? bolts per side) and you?d have to rip the car apart before they would let go! The calculations say it?s only giving me about 75 lbs./inch with 12? arms and a 34? ?? solid bar. It makes quite a difference which between the 3 adjustment holes though. I got the bar. arms etc. from Speedway Engineering ( $200 ) and it was pretty reasonable actually biggest job was to make the brackets! On another note, I have the ?Stock? mounting for my panhard rod I?m not sure if it?s causing this ( I think likely ) but I notice in hard cornering that the car will understeer some on left turns and oversteer on right turns !! Anyone else notice that effect ? I have quite a bit of ?ackerman? correction in the front suspension also Jim B382000446 From: Tigers On Behalf Of daniel doornbos via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:24 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked. And I looked at the DIY weld kits. But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly. For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages. I do recognize that welded options will also work well. My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar. But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space. In the end, I went with a custom-built from https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ It was a premium price but they were great to work with. Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. dan Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NC Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction. www.carolinaswaybar.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1951791 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 12:53:33 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: <119571188.402651.1633027527126@connect.xfinity.com> References: <595454312.417583.1633026860450@mail.yahoo.com> <2050614079.413725.1633027128242@mail.yahoo.com> <119571188.402651.1633027527126@connect.xfinity.com> Message-ID: <576012055.352602.1633028013654@mail.yahoo.com> Thanks, Gary. I sometimes can be a little...umm...opinionated? I guess that's always been part of Tigering :) But, I do spend a fair amount of time on suspension stuff and have done a good amount of testing. Still, I certainly don't know it all and am always open to learning more. -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: Michael Wood ; Michael Wood via Tigers wrote: Well...that was meant to go directly to Dan lol Looks like I've outed myself. But, that's been my experience, YMMV. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers To: tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 11:35 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar No doubt, a custom made rear bar, preferably adjustable, can be helpful, particularly with a modified front end. Agree, the aftermarket stuff available is not worth buying. Tiger guys tend to just do what others have done before them, I'm afraid. Not a lot of testing or work goes into many decisions and, because most of the cars don't work as well as they could, no one can tell the difference.? -----Original Message----- From: daniel doornbos via Tigers To: tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:24 am Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked.? And I looked at the DIY weld kits.? But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly.? For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages.? ?? I do recognize that welded options will also work well.? My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar.? But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space.? ?In the end, I went with a custom-built from?https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/?It was a premium price but they were great to work with.? Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. dan | | Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NC Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction. www.carolinaswaybar.com | _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tkparker1941 at gmail.com Thu Sep 30 13:23:01 2021 From: tkparker1941 at gmail.com (Tom Parker) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Lifter adjustment In-Reply-To: <007301d7b594$445caaf0$cd1600d0$@mayfco.com> References: <1818438260.222515.1632949364253.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1818438260.222515.1632949364253@mail.yahoo.com> <007301d7b594$445caaf0$cd1600d0$@mayfco.com> Message-ID: Joel, 1) listen to the experts, and the shop manual re valve lash, 2) unless there's stuff in the way you can unbolt the transmission crossmember and drop the transmission tail down with a floor jack enough to remove the valve covers. That should give you clearance to remove the valve covers if they're anything close to stock. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:47 PM Larry Mayfield via Tigers < tigers at autox.team.net> wrote: > Well, depends on what kind of lifters you have. Hydraulics, same as oem. > Solid lifters and cam, need a few through clearance. High performance > hydraulic, look to the cam maker for adjustment instructions. > > > > mayf > > > > *From:* Tigers *On Behalf Of *Joel Martin > via Tigers > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 29, 2021 2:03 PM > *To:* Tiger List Serve > *Subject:* [Tigers] Lifter adjustment > > > > I have 289 HP heads with screw in studs. What is the cold adjustment they > should be - no roller rockers and torque settings for the heads.? Do you > have to loosen the motor mounts to get the valve covers off, lower or > raise? I would think lower to get the valve covers off. With 5,000 miles > since car has been redone, it is time for some sorting out. The first > 5,000 miles required very little and has been a blast up to 60 mph and > curves so far. > > > > I have changed the oil 2 times during the 5,000 miles and what a pain it > is to replace the filter with the stock set up. If anyone could explain > their process for oil filter change, that works 'easier' it would be > greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > > > Joel Martin > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/tkparker1941 at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From garywinblad at comcast.net Thu Sep 30 14:06:02 2021 From: garywinblad at comcast.net (GARY WINBLAD) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: <037701d7b62b$64626d20$2d274760$@island.net> References: <037701d7b62b$64626d20$2d274760$@island.net> Message-ID: <656416718.410142.1633032362334@connect.xfinity.com> Jim, Nice installation! My analysis is get rid of that stock panhard rod. Put your shocks on full soft and drive down the freeway. As you go over slight dips an bumps the rear end will steer the Tiger downright dangerously. The stock rod is too short and is mounted not parallel to the ground. To get the stability back in the rear axle you get some springs with small bushings in the front, I got Dale's springs. SO much better! Gary > On 09/30/2021 2:45 PM jim via Tigers wrote: > > > > My car came with a home made 1 1/8? front bar so understeered a lot! I got an addco rear bar but couldn?t figure out how to mount it so I made my own? mounted in front of the rear end and welded a couple tabs on the side of the plate that the u-bolts go through to hold the lower links. The brackets that I made are very strong ( 6-3/8? bolts per side) and you?d have to rip the car apart before they would let go! The calculations say it?s only giving me about 75 lbs./inch with 12? arms and a 34? ?? solid bar. It makes quite a difference which between the 3 adjustment holes though. I got the bar. arms etc. from Speedway Engineering ( $200 ) and it was pretty reasonable actually? biggest job was to make the brackets! > > On another note, I have the ?Stock? mounting for my panhard rod ?I?m not sure if it?s causing this ( I think likely ) but I notice in hard cornering that the car will understeer some on left turns and oversteer on right turns !! Anyone else notice that effect ? I have quite a bit of ?ackerman? correction in the front suspension also > > [A close-up of a car engine Description automatically generated with low confidence] > > Jim > > B382000446 > > > > > From: Tigers On Behalf Of daniel doornbos via Tigers > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:24 AM > To: tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar > > > I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked. And I looked at the DIY weld kits. But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly. For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages. > > > > I do recognize that welded options will also work well. My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar. But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space. In the end, I went with a custom-built from https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ It was a premium price but they were great to work with. > > > > Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. > > > > dan https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ > > Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NC https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/ > > Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction. > > www.carolinaswaybar.com http://www.carolinaswaybar.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1951791 bytes Desc: not available URL: From srwick at hotmail.com Thu Sep 30 15:00:09 2021 From: srwick at hotmail.com (steve wick) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:00:09 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <1155974949.319030.1633017674972@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <1155974949.319030.1633017674972@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I've emailed Tom in the past, and he does make a nice kit. My car had the "typical" ripped frame rail in addition to the parts being missing. Without knowing about Tom's kit in 2008, what I did was make a plate with coupling nuts welded to the surface of it in the proper locations, opened up the hole in the inner frame rail a little more and welded the plate to the inside of the outer frame half. I then made a flat plate with holes that fit over, but flush with the end of the coupling nuts and butt welded that to the inner frame rail half and the outside circumference of the coupling nuts. It looks like an undamaged flat frame section with threaded bosses for the panhard bar bracket bolts to go into, but is reinforced and connected to both sides of the frame rail. That's why I was looking for just the bracket and bar, but either I was unaware of or had forgotten about the angle/alignment issue. It sounds like what I should just do at this point is put my car up on the lift and custom build a bracket and bar, located so the bar is parallel with the ground and not at an angle. Steve ________________________________ From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 9:01 AM To: jbbrown1980 at gmail.com ; srwick at hotmail.com Cc: tigers at autox.team.net ; MTaylor at ea.com Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar If you guys are going to put Panhard bars back on, I'd suggest getting one of Tom Hall's kits which helps with the bar angle and addresses mount area issues. tigerengineering.net Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Brown To: steve wick Cc: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net ; Taylor, Matthew Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:55 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I would also like pictures or drawings. Thanks, Joe Brown On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:50 AM steve wick via Tigers > wrote: On a slightly different note, my Tiger is missing the panhard bar and mounting bracket. I've looked off and on for several years and never found one. I know I can get a reinforced bracket that welds in, but don't run my car hard and prefer "factory". If anyone has a bar and bracket laying around and wants to sell, or if I could get pictures and measurements of both so I could replicate them, please email me off list. I have a Mk1 with the bracket on the right side. Thanks guys. Steve ________________________________ From: Tigers > on behalf of Taylor, Matthew via Tigers > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 7:07 AM To: Michael Wood >; tigers at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From MTaylor at ea.com Thu Sep 30 15:20:43 2021 From: MTaylor at ea.com (Taylor, Matthew) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:20:43 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <1827209463.401732.1633022453025@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> <1827209463.401732.1633022453025@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I believe that was LAT 40? Also, don't forget that all factory options were legal in SCCA in 1965 and in the AHRA in at least 1965-1967 (I don't know if anything changed after that in the AHRA). But that was back when things really mattered for the factory efforts and when the Tiger was a World and National champ in the AHRA and should have been National champ the NHRA but that is another story. Matthew From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:21 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net; Taylor, Matthew ; garywinblad at comcast.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Should have added, the TMC rear sway bars did get an LAT number way down the road, but were never a Rootes or factory offered piece. In any case, at that time (and now), the sanctioning body we were running with, SCCA, deemed LAT options as aftermarket, not factory. So, semantics, perhaps. In any case, there are a lot of moving pieces (literally lol) in any suspension discussion. I'm just sharing my experience, which includes lots of testing and SCCA national level autocross success :) -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers > To: MTaylor at ea.com >; garywinblad at comcast.net >; tigers at autox.team.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:07 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar No, my car had less HP at the time (260 with 4bbl and headers) and stock front suspension. We all ran together in SCCA F Stock. But, I did have KONI's, optimized alignment, limited slip and bolt on TMC traction bars. That all changed when I went to the 302/5spd combo further down the road. Also, I don't believe a rear bar or the motors your Dad and Stan were running were factory options and none of us were technically stock legal (but, the faster Camaro and Mustang drivers didn't care lol) But I might be misremembering, it was a long time ago :) No doubt, a rear bar can be made to work correctly, just look at Buck's race car. Of course, they also run BIG front springs and bar! The real point I'm making is that installing an off the shelf Addco bar on a stock suspension car has not been optimal in my experience. -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew > To: Michael Wood >; garywinblad at comcast.net >; tigers at autox.team.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 9:49 am Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options. I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1" front sway bar. I don't think he has a rear bar but I'm not positive. And Gary, the set up isn't that hard. 100% stock rear springs. Slightly stiffer front springs. Matthew From: Michael Wood > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD > To: Taylor, Matthew >; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers >; Michael Wood > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart. The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers > wrote: I don't know about "total grip capability," but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I've driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It's possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 16:01:45 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <1155974949.319030.1633017674972@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <283777019.467420.1633039305559@mail.yahoo.com> I think what you're suggesting would work better than trying to replicate the stock set up.?Mike -----Original Message----- From: steve wick To: jbbrown1980 at gmail.com ; Michael Wood Cc: tigers at autox.team.net ; MTaylor at ea.com Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 2:00 pm Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar #yiv2295268496 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}I've emailed Tom in the past, and he does make a nice kit. My car had the "typical" ripped frame rail in addition to the parts being missing. Without knowing about Tom's kit in 2008, what I did was make a plate with coupling nuts welded to the surface of it in the proper locations, opened up the hole in the inner frame rail a little more and welded the plate to the inside of the outer frame half. I then made a flat plate with holes that fit over, but flush with the end of the coupling nuts and butt welded that to the inner frame rail half and the outside circumference of the coupling nuts. It looks like an undamaged flat frame section with threaded bosses for the panhard bar bracket bolts to go into, but is reinforced and connected to both sides of the frame rail. That's why I was looking for just the bracket and bar, but either I was unaware of or had forgotten about the angle/alignment issue. It sounds like what I should just do at this point is put my car up on the lift and custom build a bracket and bar, located so the bar is parallel with the ground and not at an angle. Steve From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 9:01 AM To: jbbrown1980 at gmail.com ; srwick at hotmail.com Cc: tigers at autox.team.net ; MTaylor at ea.com Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar?If you guys are going to put Panhard bars back on, I'd suggest getting one of Tom Hall's kits which helps with the bar angle and addresses mount area issues.? tigerengineering.net Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Brown To: steve wick Cc: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net ; Taylor, Matthew Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:55 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I would also like pictures or drawings. Thanks,Joe Brown On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:50 AM steve wick via Tigers wrote: On a slightly different note, my Tiger is missing the panhard bar and mounting bracket. I've looked off and on for several years and never found one. I know I can get a reinforced bracket that welds in, but don't run my car hard and prefer "factory". If anyone has a bar and bracket laying around and wants to sell, or if I could get pictures and measurements of both so I could replicate them, please email me off list. I have a Mk1 with the bracket on the right side. Thanks?guys. Steve From: Tigers on behalf of Taylor, Matthew via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 7:07 AM To: Michael Wood ;tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar? I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. ? Matthew ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin ? _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jbbrown1980 at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 16:04:00 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> <1827209463.401732.1633022453025@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2099852968.464198.1633039440146@mail.yahoo.com> Yep, Sunbeam got screwed by the SCCA (and Ford's money) when it came to the LAT options. Other hand, I'll bet if the HSC car was scrutinized back in the day, they'd have found a lot more than a few LAT listed items... ;) Mike? -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net ; garywinblad at comcast.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 2:20 pm Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar #yiv2278680282 #yiv2278680282 -- _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv2278680282 #yiv2278680282 p.yiv2278680282MsoNormal, #yiv2278680282 li.yiv2278680282MsoNormal, #yiv2278680282 div.yiv2278680282MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv2278680282 a:link, #yiv2278680282 span.yiv2278680282MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2278680282 p.yiv2278680282msonormal, #yiv2278680282 li.yiv2278680282msonormal, #yiv2278680282 div.yiv2278680282msonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv2278680282 p.yiv2278680282msonormal1, #yiv2278680282 li.yiv2278680282msonormal1, #yiv2278680282 div.yiv2278680282msonormal1 {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv2278680282 span.yiv2278680282EmailStyle30 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv2278680282 .yiv2278680282MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv2278680282 div.yiv2278680282WordSection1 {}#yiv2278680282 I believe that was LAT 40?? ? Also, don?t forget that all factory options were legal in SCCA in 1965 and in the AHRA in at least 1965-1967 (I don?t know if anything changed after that in the AHRA).? But that was back when things really mattered for the factory efforts and when the Tiger was a World and National champ in the AHRA and should have been National champ the NHRA but that is another story. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:21 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net; Taylor, Matthew ; garywinblad at comcast.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Should have added, the TMC rear sway bars did get an LAT number way down the road, but were never a Rootes or factory offered piece. In any case, at that time (and now), the sanctioning body we were running with, SCCA, deemed LAT options as aftermarket, not factory. So, semantics, perhaps. ? In any case, there are a lot of moving pieces (literally lol) in any suspension discussion. I'm just sharing my experience, which includes lots of testing and SCCA national level autocross success? :) ? ? ? ? -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers To: MTaylor at ea.com ;garywinblad at comcast.net ;tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:07 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar No, my car had less HP at the time (260 with 4bbl and headers) and stock front suspension. We all ran together in SCCA F Stock.? But, I did have KONI's, optimized alignment, limited slip and bolt on TMC traction bars. That all changed when I went to the 302/5spd combo further down the road. Also, I don't believe a rear bar or the motors your Dad and Stan were running were factory options and none of us were technically stock legal (but, the faster Camaro and Mustang drivers didn't care lol) But I might be misremembering, it was a long time ago :) ? No doubt, a rear bar can be made to work correctly, just look at Buck's race car. Of course, they also run BIG front springs and bar! The real point I'm making is that installing an off the shelf Addco bar on a stock suspension car has not been optimal in my experience.?? ? -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ; garywinblad at comcast.net ;tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 9:49 am Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options.? I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1? front sway bar.? I don?t think he has a rear bar but I?m not positive. ? And Gary, the set up isn?t that hard.? 100% stock rear springs.? Slightly stiffer front springs. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew ;tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: Taylor, Matthew ; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers ; Michael Wood Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart.? The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary? On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers wrote: ? ? I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. ? Matthew ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 19:13:18 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 01:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar In-Reply-To: <656416718.410142.1633032362334@connect.xfinity.com> References: <037701d7b62b$64626d20$2d274760$@island.net> <656416718.410142.1633032362334@connect.xfinity.com> Message-ID: <1920235182.426346.1633050798507@mail.yahoo.com> I wish Dale still had some of those springs for sale!! I talked to him about making more, but his guy went out of business.?Mike -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: jim ; jim via Tigers ; daniel doornbos Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 1:09 pm Subject: Re: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar Jim, Nice installation! My analysis is get rid of that stock panhard rod. Put your shocks on full soft and drive down the freeway.? As you go over slight dips an bumps the rear end will steer the Tiger downright dangerously.? The stock rod is too short and is mounted not parallel to the ground. To get the stability back in the rear axle you get some springs with small bushings in the front, I got Dale's springs. SO much better! Gary On 09/30/2021 2:45 PM jim via Tigers wrote: My car came with a home made 1 1/8? front bar so understeered a lot!? I got an addco rear bar but couldn?t figure out how to mount it so I made my own? mounted in front of the rear end and welded a couple tabs on the side of the plate that the u-bolts go through to hold the lower links. The brackets that I made are very strong ?( 6-3/8? bolts per side) and you?d have to rip the car apart before they would let go!? The calculations say it?s only giving me about 75 lbs./inch with 12? arms and a 34? ??? solid bar. It makes quite a difference which between the 3? adjustment holes though. I got the bar. arms etc. from Speedway Engineering ( $200 ) and it was pretty reasonable actually? biggest job was to make the brackets! On another note, I have the ?Stock? mounting for my panhard rod ?I?m not sure if it?s causing this ( I think likely ) but I notice in hard cornering that the car will understeer some on left turns and oversteer on right turns !! Anyone else notice that effect ? I have quite a bit of ?ackerman? correction in the front suspension also Jim B382000446 From: Tigers On Behalf Of daniel doornbos via Tigers Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:24 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: [Tigers] Rear Sway Bar I couldn't find an aftermarket rear sway bar for the Tiger I liked.? And I looked at the DIY weld kits.? But after reading and finding that bending and welding impact metal spring rate and you should temper the bar post fabrication to get it to work correctly.? For the rear end and space I needed to put in bends around the pumpkin and linkages.? ?? ? I do recognize that welded options will also work well.? My Mustang II front end from Mike H has a welded bar.? But for the rear packaging, I needed too many bends and couldn't locate a straight bar type in the space.? ?In the end, I went with a custom-built from?https://www.carolinaswaybar.com/?It was a premium price but they were great to work with.? ? Maybe in the next decade I'll get enough motivation to finish and drive the car to see how good my choices were. ? dan | | Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing - Newland, NC Carolina Swaybar Manufacturing designs and creates the best swaybars on the market today. Industry leading R&D, commitment to customer satisfaction. www.carolinaswaybar.com | _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/garywinblad at comcast.net _______________________________________________ tigers at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020 at aol.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1951791 bytes Desc: not available URL: From MTaylor at ea.com Thu Sep 30 19:21:34 2021 From: MTaylor at ea.com (Taylor, Matthew) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 01:21:34 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: <2099852968.464198.1633039440146@mail.yahoo.com> References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> <1827209463.401732.1633022453025@mail.yahoo.com> <2099852968.464198.1633039440146@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: It wasn?t just Ford. The Tiger was beating all of the Corvettes too and Chevy knew the Tiger was the car to beat in the championships in 1965 (thus the wreck). And I would bet they would find a lot of things on all of the cars. They were all doing whatever they could to get an advantage. Matthew From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 3:04 PM To: Taylor, Matthew ; tigers at autox.team.net; garywinblad at comcast.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Sunbeam got screwed by the SCCA (and Ford's money) when it came to the LAT options. Other hand, I'll bet if the HSC car was scrutinized back in the day, they'd have found a lot more than a few LAT listed items... ;) Mike -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew > To: Michael Wood >; tigers at autox.team.net >; garywinblad at comcast.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 2:20 pm Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I believe that was LAT 40? Also, don?t forget that all factory options were legal in SCCA in 1965 and in the AHRA in at least 1965-1967 (I don?t know if anything changed after that in the AHRA). But that was back when things really mattered for the factory efforts and when the Tiger was a World and National champ in the AHRA and should have been National champ the NHRA but that is another story. Matthew From: Michael Wood > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:21 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net; Taylor, Matthew >; garywinblad at comcast.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Should have added, the TMC rear sway bars did get an LAT number way down the road, but were never a Rootes or factory offered piece. In any case, at that time (and now), the sanctioning body we were running with, SCCA, deemed LAT options as aftermarket, not factory. So, semantics, perhaps. In any case, there are a lot of moving pieces (literally lol) in any suspension discussion. I'm just sharing my experience, which includes lots of testing and SCCA national level autocross success :) -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers > To: MTaylor at ea.com >; garywinblad at comcast.net >; tigers at autox.team.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:07 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar No, my car had less HP at the time (260 with 4bbl and headers) and stock front suspension. We all ran together in SCCA F Stock. But, I did have KONI's, optimized alignment, limited slip and bolt on TMC traction bars. That all changed when I went to the 302/5spd combo further down the road. Also, I don't believe a rear bar or the motors your Dad and Stan were running were factory options and none of us were technically stock legal (but, the faster Camaro and Mustang drivers didn't care lol) But I might be misremembering, it was a long time ago :) No doubt, a rear bar can be made to work correctly, just look at Buck's race car. Of course, they also run BIG front springs and bar! The real point I'm making is that installing an off the shelf Addco bar on a stock suspension car has not been optimal in my experience. -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew > To: Michael Wood >; garywinblad at comcast.net >; tigers at autox.team.net > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 9:49 am Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options. I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1? front sway bar. I don?t think he has a rear bar but I?m not positive. And Gary, the set up isn?t that hard. 100% stock rear springs. Slightly stiffer front springs. Matthew From: Michael Wood > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew >; tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD > To: Taylor, Matthew >; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers >; Michael Wood > Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart. The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers > wrote: I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great. I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different. A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other. It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. Matthew From: Tigers > On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers > To: Tiger List Serve > Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? Thanks Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mwood24020 at aol.com Thu Sep 30 19:40:44 2021 From: mwood24020 at aol.com (Michael Wood) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 01:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar In-Reply-To: References: <996316830.213765.1632948783698.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <996316830.213765.1632948783698@mail.yahoo.com> <1855474640.220733.1632965269778@mail.yahoo.com> <320369447.379999.1633015295672@connect.xfinity.com> <778565932.314285.1633016485212@mail.yahoo.com> <1998131658.397972.1633021362320@mail.yahoo.com> <1827209463.401732.1633022453025@mail.yahoo.com> <2099852968.464198.1633039440146@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1103790242.496066.1633052444102@mail.yahoo.com> Agree 100%. The difference was factory cheating, with associated dollars, versus Doane's ingenuity :) -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net ; garywinblad at comcast.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 6:21 pm Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar It wasn?t just Ford.? The Tiger was beating all of the Corvettes too and Chevy knew the Tiger was the car to beat in the championships in 1965 (thus the wreck).? And I would bet they would find a lot of things on all of the cars.? They were all doing whatever they could to get an advantage. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 3:04 PM To: Taylor, Matthew ; tigers at autox.team.net; garywinblad at comcast.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Yep, Sunbeam got screwed by the SCCA (and Ford's money) when it came to the LAT options. Other hand, I'll bet if the HSC car was scrutinized back in the day, they'd have found a lot more than a few LAT listed items... ;) ? Mike? -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ; tigers at autox.team.net ;garywinblad at comcast.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 2:20 pm Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I believe that was LAT 40?? ? Also, don?t forget that all factory options were legal in SCCA in 1965 and in the AHRA in at least 1965-1967 (I don?t know if anything changed after that in the AHRA).? But that was back when things really mattered for the factory efforts and when the Tiger was a World and National champ in the AHRA and should have been National champ the NHRA but that is another story. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:21 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net; Taylor, Matthew ;garywinblad at comcast.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Should have added, the TMC rear sway bars did get an LAT number way down the road, but were never a Rootes or factory offered piece. In any case, at that time (and now), the sanctioning body we were running with, SCCA, deemed LAT options as aftermarket, not factory. So, semantics, perhaps. ? In any case, there are a lot of moving pieces (literally lol) in any suspension discussion. I'm just sharing my experience, which includes lots of testing and SCCA national level autocross success? :) ? ? ? ? -----Original Message----- From: Michael Wood via Tigers To: MTaylor at ea.com ;garywinblad at comcast.net ;tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 10:07 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar No, my car had less HP at the time (260 with 4bbl and headers) and stock front suspension. We all ran together in SCCA F Stock.? But, I did have KONI's, optimized alignment, limited slip and bolt on TMC traction bars. That all changed when I went to the 302/5spd combo further down the road. Also, I don't believe a rear bar or the motors your Dad and Stan were running were factory options and none of us were technically stock legal (but, the faster Camaro and Mustang drivers didn't care lol) But I might be misremembering, it was a long time ago :) ? No doubt, a rear bar can be made to work correctly, just look at Buck's race car. Of course, they also run BIG front springs and bar! The real point I'm making is that installing an off the shelf Addco bar on a stock suspension car has not been optimal in my experience.?? ? -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Matthew To: Michael Wood ;garywinblad at comcast.net ;tigers at autox.team.net Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 9:49 am Subject: RE: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I was just comparing two stock Tigers with factory options.? I think you were a bit more modified and Stan runs a 1? front sway bar.? I don?t think he has a rear bar but I?m not positive. ? And Gary, the set up isn?t that hard.? 100% stock rear springs.? Slightly stiffer front springs. ? Matthew ? From: Michael Wood Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 8:41 AM To: garywinblad at comcast.net; Taylor, Matthew ;tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Yep, Terry and Stan were the bogey when I first started autocrossing my Tiger, both of them were fantastic drivers with tons of experience, But, I ended up getting past them both and I think set up had a lot to do with it. Effectively giving up rear grip to make the car more neutral or "tossable" I don't think makes sense. But, end of day, what you (big "you") are most comfortable with in terms of set up is key and, you're right, for most drivers that will be more important in terms of time on course than ultimate grip :) -----Original Message----- From: GARY WINBLAD To: Taylor, Matthew ; Taylor, Matthew via Tigers ; Michael Wood Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2021 8:21 am Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar I have seen your dad(a long time ago), him and his car are VERY fast. It seems to be set up very hard like a go-cart.? The rear bar makes it loose and he steers it (wags the tail) around the cones with power and his posi. Very impressive and fast. Gary? On 09/30/2021 10:07 AM Taylor, Matthew via Tigers wrote: ? ? I don?t know about ?total grip capability,? but you have seen my dad drive his Tiger with the rear sway bar and it works great.? I?ve driven and autocrossed Tigers that are set up properly with or without the rear sway bar and they both handle great but different.? A good driver can adjust to the differences and take advantages of the differences, but I doubt one is much faster than the other.? It?s possible that one could be faster than the other depending on the type of course, but it would be fractions of a second based on my autocross experiences. ? Matthew ? From: Tigers On Behalf Of Michael Wood via Tigers Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar ? Like said, any rear bar on a Tiger is an aftermarket solution...and I've yet to see one (not counting custom fabricated with heim joints, correct angles, adjustability etc used in conjunction with front end improvements) that made any sense or was additive to total grip capability.? ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joel Martin via Tigers To: Tiger List Serve Sent: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 1:54 pm Subject: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Sway bar Was a rear sway bar originally fitted on the Tiger or was it a LAT option or not?? Size, mounting points? Either way could someone post some pictures of how they were suppose to be mounted and installed? ? Thanks ? Joel Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: