[Tigers] Mk II engine valve size
Ron Fraser
rfraser at bluefrog.com
Wed Jan 10 19:41:24 MST 2018
Mayf
Thank you for the information.
This is exactly why I ask if anyone has measured the valve size to clear up
this discrepancy.
I don't want to guess which size is correct I want everyone to know which
is correct from a direct measurement.
The Shop Manual lists 1.67" - is this a typo or is it correct??
Ron Fraser
From: Larry Mayfield [mailto:drmayf at mayfco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:39 PM
To: 'Ron Fraser' <rfraser at bluefrog.com>
Subject: RE: [Tigers] Mk II engine valve size
Ron, an aside. I have an old ford book that lists the different sizes for
some things. One was valves. It includes the valve diameters for the 289
200Hp , and 302 220 hp versions.. Both were 1.780 inches for the intake and
1.45 for the exhaust. Not what you asked, but pretty likely they didn't
change for a dinky order like the MKII quantities. Now the book is a ford
publication for muscle cars as well.
mayf
From: Tigers [mailto:tigers-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Ron Fraser
via Tigers
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:26 AM
To: tigers at Autox.Team.Net <mailto:tigers at Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: [Tigers] Mk II engine valve size
Has anyone measured the intake valve diameter in their Mk II 289?
The Mk II head should be C6OE-M - let me know if you have a different head
casting number.
I have 1 source that indicates 1.78" and 2 sources the indicate 1.67".
I would like to clear up this fact.
Thanks for your help
Ron Fraser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20180110/92330849/attachment.html>
More information about the Tigers
mailing list