[Tigers] Dynomax Turbo vs Magnaflow XL Turbo

[Bill Waite]

I'm not sure about Flowmaster 40's... but the Flowmasters I have (not sure 
of the exact model) on our Mark II are perfect.  Fairly quiet while 
cruising... but when you hit the go pedal, the sound they make is GREAT, I 
think of it as the Purrfect "Tiger Growl."

Bill Waite
Grand Rapids


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Michels" <mmichels at socal.rr.com>
To: <tigers at autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 12:41 AM
Subject: [Tigers] Dynomax Turbo vs Magnaflow XL Turbo


> listers.
>
> I'm considering two choices to replace my current Magnaflow straight 
> through
> mufflers, which were fine with the 260, but very harsh now that I have a
> heavily modified 289 producing much more percussion and twice the 
> horsepower
> The Current Magnaflows I have installed are basically oval glass packs.
>
> I'm looking at either Dynomax Turbo (which I have heard on other Tigers) 
> or
> Magnaflow XL (which I have not had a chance to hear). Both are more
> conventional chambered mufflers with perforated pipes, the Dyomax is also
> glass packed while the Magnaflow XL has no packing. I suspect the 
> Magnaflow XL
> would be a bit louder and more hollow sounding that the Dynomax Turbo, but
> both would be a bit quieter than my straight through mufflers.   BTW, I 
> once
> had Flowmaster 40s, but the novelty wore off after my first long trip.
>
> Anybody have any experience with the Magnaflow XL product?
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> You are subscribed as fordlandia at sbcglobal.net
>
> Tigers at autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
>
> http://www.team.net/archive