[Tigers] D. Barkers comments on TAC

[steve wick]

Not knowing all the TAC info myself, I'd just say if some of the Tiger
specific
stuff would be almost impossible or prohibitively expensive to fake, like
rebuilding
the frame, I'd let that info out but keep some of the little known but easy
to
fake details a secret. That way you have something the beginners can look for
but still have subtle things a TAC inspector would pick up in the inspection.
Hope that makes sense.

Steve (in Idaho)
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Drmoonstone at aol.com<mailto:Drmoonstone at aol.com>
  To: RMEbstein at aol.com<mailto:RMEbstein at aol.com> ;
tigers at autox.team.net<mailto:tigers at autox.team.net>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [Tigers] D. Barkers comments on TAC


  To conceal info or disseminate is the real dilemma. One can argue either
side
  of the question, that making the specifics of what makes a Tiger a Tiger or
  keeping that info secret leads to fakes. I believe that full knowledge of
the
  info may be a better approach, what do others think? Since usually it is the
  first time buyer that is most at risk why not provide the info? As
technology
  gets better and time passes better fakes will be seen what then?


  Moonstone