Guy R Day
grday at btinternet.com
Mon Sep 20 01:40:13 MDT 2010
Speed is a function of time AND distance.
You cannot accept the time is accurate - as that relates to the variance in
signal distance - although I accept if you are locking onto one satellite
that production of that time signal will be a constant, (although the
reception of it may not) you still have the error with the time factor in
the satellite distance component. The processors do not anticipate and
correct, they deal with the data provided, not imagined or predicted data.
0-60mph of 8.3s suggests a distance of shortly over 365ft (111m) and around
1/3rd g acceleration. Quite respectable, no problem with that (remove the
spare wheel, take a seat out and dispose of other junk in the trunk etc and
improve on the figure <smile>).
Now start messing with the figures provided and the distance can be 109 to
113m if you are within the 2m error distance. You may well be outside the
error factor as that is a mean, so let us say the variance is really 4m,
that is 107 to 115m. You have inaccuracy built in to the device by the very
nature of its limitations. The signal you receive varies with the motion of
the vehicle and the reception of the signal. It is not just the strength of
the signal but the reflections and bounces of it as well that are used and
in a moving car etc etc.
You know your ordinary speedo in the car shows a definitive figure but you
also know that is not accurate. The figure produced by the device (speedo
or gps setup) may show a definitive figure with fractions of a second but
that does not mean it is an accurate figure. The accuracy falls under the
maxim of 'you can fool some of the people most of the time etc....' <smile>
Some of the GPS devices tested for use in skid testing would not even show
it being used on the right road (about 60m away) and the manufacturers
supplied them knowing they were to be used for accurate measurement in a
series of 30-0 and 40-0mph skid testing sessions.
For a figure used by the guy in the street they are as good as anything else
they use. For an accurate figure they cannot be trusted. Check it against
a Vericom 4000 or similar - but make sure that device is nailed in the
correct position within the car and not just slung on the dash - yet another
source of inaccuracy!
The question was, 'is GPS accurate?' The answer is no. Had the question
been, 'is a GPS a useable bit of kit suitable for use by the man in the
street?', the answer is yes.
There is, of course one other problem - what happens when the GPS signal is
lost altogether? What is the signal like in the high rise areas of your
cities - or down in a tunnel or cwm? <smile>?
Guy R Day
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Soave"
To: "Bugeye" ; "Spridget" ; "Larry & Sandi Miller" ; "Guy R Day" Sent:
Monday, September 20, 2010 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] GPS
--- On Sun, 9/19/10, Guy R Day wrote:
> Ron, Explain why
Most are accurate to 2m or so, the time part is dead nuts, processors are
plenty quick enough to anticipate and correct, and I think that the speeds
of a 0 - 60 run, that's plenty accurate. This week many of the cars at Targa
Newfoundland were using GPS as a supplement to their Terratrip rally
More information about the Spridgets