[Spridgets] FW: US Today Poll on Gun Ownership (Kathryn Bales) - NO LBC Content

[robertduquette at sympatico.ca]

They've been after me up here for a long time.  They whittle away.



Brad, I thought you were pretty much a vegetarian?  Are you just trying to
keep others eating meat because you know that this planet couldn't sustain all
these people if they converted to vegetarianism?  :)





Robert Duquette
Ottawa ON Canada
1965 RHD BRG Austin-Healey Sprite ( project )
1967 RHD MG Midget ( aka: Miss Marple )
1955 Austin-Healey 100 BN1 ( aka: Carmen )





> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:35:57 -0600
> From: tequila.brad at gmail.com
> To: spridgets at autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Spridgets] FW: US Today Poll on Gun Ownership (Kathryn Bales)
- NO LBC Content
>
> I have never smoked, but I was ALWAYS against a smoking ban, because it
will
> only be a matter of time that they come after something I care about.
> "Food" for thought. PETA is gaining political ground every day. What would
> you folks think, if they successfully lobbied for the rights of ALL
animals,
> and our government banned eating beef, pork, and chicken? NEVER you say,
> don't EVER put major stupidity past OUR government.
> Remember, it is only a matter of time, before they come for you...
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Billy Zoom <billyzoom at billyzoom.com> wrote:
>
> > The question was "Does the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
> > guarantee the rights of Americans to own guns". It was NOT do you think
it
> > SHOULD guarantee the rights of Americans to own guns, or would you LIKE
it
> > to guarantee the rights of Americans to own guns.
> > Loose interpretations of the Constitution and legislating from the bench
is
> > as bad for car owners as it is for gun owners. If we give them this, what
> > will they come after next? There are legitimate ways to change the
> > constitution. There are no legitimate ways to sidestep the constitution.
> > BZ