[Spridgets] OT - New cars & 'global warming' question

Larry Daniels ladaniels at sbcglobal.net
Wed Dec 30 15:57:14 MST 2009


Oh, boy.  Fun with numbers.

I guess it's true what they say about statistics.



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Lester" <oldsaabguy at comcast.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:00 AM
To: "Spridgets List" <spridgets at autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] OT - New cars & 'global warming' question

Ok, so I'm reading it right now..

I'll go point by point until I tire, I'll use big round numbers as  
they are easier to type:

Contacted 10,000 experts from academia and government research centers  
around the world from American Geological Institute's Directory of  
Geoscience Departments which lists OVER 100,000 (Data from 2004)  So  
they contacted 10% of "scientists"

Emailed them invitations and only those invited could participate  
which translates into "hand picked"
and only 3000 took the survey so we are now down to 3%.  Just to  
review that's THREE PERCENT of scientists "agreed"

The first question is an possible 'yes' answer, as it excludes the  
mini ice age from 1600's to mid 1800's.  In science speak, it's a bad  
question. But still showed only 90% approval.

The second question, "..has human activity been a significant  
factor.." and only 82% responded positively.  So now we're down to  
LESS THAN 3% of "scientists" and only 2400 of the hand picked folks  
believe it.

Very important missing info, how many climatologists are in the  
group?  The publication, Eos:transactions etc., is NOT PEER REVIEWED,  
it's a weekly newsletter and it only goes to 50,000 earth scientists  
which encompass geology to hurricane research!!

I can't access the original article.. ok, I won't pay to read it.  But  
from the info you provided it's a bogus claim.

Lester

The bugeye is outside in the weather as the damn jag takes up so much  
room and at this point is immobile ..


On Dec 28, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Larry Daniels wrote:

> I'm not a climatologist so, much like nearly everybody who expresses  
> an
> opinion on this subject, I have no personal scientific knowledge of  
> the
> subject.  I can, however, read the opinions of those who are experts  
> on
> climate (climatologists).  It seems the huge majority of those most  
> in the
> know have a different opinion on this.
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090119210532.htm
You are subscribed as ladaniels at sbcglobal.net

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets 


More information about the Spridgets mailing list