[Spridgets] Positive Rear Camber, why not for live axle rear suspension.

[Daniel1312 at aol.com]

Are their lap times consistently quicker?

In a message dated 10/06/07 19:56:42 GMT Daylight Time, wsthompson at thicko.com 
writes:


> Subj:RE: [Spridgets] Positive Rear Camber, why not for live axle rear 
> suspension. 
> Date:10/06/07 19:56:42 GMT Daylight Time
> From:wsthompson at thicko.com
> To:Daniel1312 at aol.com, derf247 at gmail.com, spridgets at autox.team.net
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> Some of the super serious H,G, and F Prod guys have their rear axle case cut
> and about 1 degree negative camber built in, and use a half shaft that has
> an end like those Allen wrenches that can connect slightly off angle.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spridgets-bounces at autox.team.net
> [mailto:spridgets-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Daniel1312 at aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 1:51 PM
> To: derf247 at gmail.com; spridgets at autox.team.net
> Subject: [Spridgets] Positive Rear Camber, why not for live axle rear
> suspension.
> 
> Probably because with a live axle car, body roll doesn't result in a camber 
> change at the wheel or as much of a camber change as IRS does at the wheel.
> 
> I don't claim to be a big suspension expert and don't have a handy reference
> 
> to quote.
> 
> Daniel1312