[Spits] Spitfires Digest, Vol 7, Issue 48

[Hans]

Stuart,
Thank you for your very helpful info.. In my case the compression ratio  is
increased from 7.5 to 9. I just heard from a fellow Spit owner who has  done
this and had a very noticeable increase in performance of his 1977 spit ( and
also his 1991 Land Rover) He has of course switched to high octane fuel with
relatively little change in timing to avoid detonation. He also had his EGR
and  engine rebuilt. He has past smog test twice since.
Actually, I already have a 61 TR3A  with a rebuilt TR4 engine and, of course,
its performance is much better, but that Spit is such a blast to drive.

Hans

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Stuart Greenwood <sagreenwood at att.net> wrote:
> NOx production in the combustion chamber is dependant on flame temperature
and combustion pressure.
> Increasing the compression ratio will have little effect on the flame
temperature but it will ncrease the combustion pressure which will increase
NOx.
> I have no experience with reciprocating engines but in a gas turbine engine
the NOx increases by the square root of the pressure. Assuming that this is
the case in a recip, then going from ,say 9 :1 compression ratio ro 10 :1 will
increase the Nox by 5.5%
> The EGR valve system is calibrated to admit sufficient exhaust gas into the
combustion chamber to reduce the NOx to whatever the regulations require. This
calibration is done with the standard compression ratio for the engine. If you
increase the compression ratio the calibration will not be correct.
> despite the above I think that since the California smog test is done at
very low power settings I would be surprised if increasing the compression
ratio had any significant effect on NOx readings.
> However when  you raise the compression ratio you will get detonation unless
you retard the ignition, because the best fuel you can get in Ca is 91 Octane,
and this will reduce power. So don't think that you can get the engine back to
MkIII power levels.
> I suggest if you want more power sell the Spit and buy a TR !
>
>
>
> Stuart A Greenwood
> 71 MK I Stag 71 MK IV Spitfire
>
> From: "spitfires-request at autox.team.net" <spitfires-request at autox.team.net>
> To: spitfires at autox.team.net
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:00 AM
> Subject: Spitfires Digest, Vol 7, Issue 48
>
> Send Spitfires mailing list submissions to
>     spitfires at autox.team.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     spitfires-request at autox.team.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     spitfires-owner at autox.team.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Spitfires digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. High compression pistons and smog test (Hans)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:14:21 -0700
> From: Hans <sukaspit at gmail.com>
> To: spitfires at autox.team.net
> Subject: [Spits] High compression pistons and smog test
> Message-ID: <356B6E8E-7020-4D5B-A0DF-9188CA7C22E8 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I am rebuilding my California  1976 spitfire's engine and considering using
> Moss's HC flat top pistons instead of the LC (dished) ones. I have been
told
> that I risk failing the NOx  smog test max requirement. I understand that
this
> is due to the combustion chamber's temperature potentially exceeding 2500
> degrees , which generates NOx. Assuming the EGR to function perfectly and
the
> fuel mixture to a bit rich, is this still potentially a high risk problem?
> There must be a few a guys out there that have been tempted to do this to
get
> the nearly 20 extra  hp. That is so badly needed.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spitfires mailing list
> Spitfires at autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires
>
>
> End of Spitfires Digest, Vol 7, Issue 48
> ****************************************