[Shop-talk] Toyota Tacoma rust
Phil Nase
nases at verizon.net
Wed Jun 24 17:45:28 MDT 2009
No I don't think they left off the anti-corrosion on purpose. But I
am disappointed none the less because I am not entirely confident in a
repair that is not a routinely performed repair and that in some way
this is going to impact my selling or trade value. I've seen some
miraculous restorations of British cars but in my opinion those guys
are as much craftsmen as mechanics and a totally different type of
operation.
I am unwilling to sell it and not disclose the issue privately. I
wonder what the dealer will give me for it as is. I don't know yet
but I'd be willing to bet it won't be blue book.
Not to mention I'm not ready right now to trade and buy a new
vehicle. I wanted to keep this for at least another 2 years before
spending more money. They seem to be making the effort as this is not
a "recall" but a customer satisfaction issue. At least that's their
story. As a confirmed skeptic I would be more willing to believe they
are covering their legal ass.
I guess I will find out later this week.
Phil Nase
Quakertown, PA
http://home.comcast.net/~philnasecpa/
On Jun 24, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Randall wrote:
>> I wonder whether the local guys have the experience needed to do this
>> "factory" work.
>
> I don't see why it would be any worse on a pickup truck than on a
> Triumph;
> and the Triumph guys seem to get through it. Just unbolt everything
> including the body, then bolt it all back onto the new frame. But
> according
> to a newspaper article I found, they expect less than 2% of all
> trucks to
> exhibit the problem (which apparently is a lack of undercoating).
> http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/toyota-offers-to-buy-back-rusty-t
> acomas/
> So chances are only 1 in 50 that your truck will need a new frame.
>
> I also don't understand why you are "disappointed" with Toyota ...
> do you
> think they left off the coating on purpose? Seems to me that they
> are going
> overboard to ensure that the problem is rectified.
>
> Ironically, the defective trucks were made at the plant in Fremont,
> CA,
> which was a joint venture between Toyota and GM (according to the
> article
> above).
>
> -- Randall
More information about the Shop-talk
mailing list