From ejrussell at mebtel.net Sun Feb 1 08:55:57 2009 From: ejrussell at mebtel.net (Eric J Russell) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] resistance (tong type) spot welders References: <4804EB02.5050509@b2systems.com> <002e01c89f3a$392ae090$ae10c263@ejrussell> <48052472.3020006@b2systems.com> Message-ID: I was browsing through some old emails and stumbled on this one. Mike, any updates on your project? Did you use the H-F spot welder? Eric Russell Mebane, NC http://home.mebtel.net/~ejrussell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Rambour" To: "Eric J Russell" Cc: "shop-talk" Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] resistance (tong type) spot welders > Eric, > > Perfect, thank you for the response, its what I was hoping for. I > was hoping someone here had actually used the HF one, sounds like it > will work good enough for me. > > I am in Santa Barbara, Calif. and thanks for the offer of the loan, > bet that once I get all the sheet metal bent and in place I only > need the welder for 3 or 4 days but you are right, shipping it will > cost more than buying one and having it for other uses in the > future. > > Oh and since I was asked why don't I buy the firewall and floor > panels with the quote "since they are made for most cars". I am > putting together a 1934 Singer Le Mans, you don't call too many > people and buy those parts. The original firewall was a mixture of > wood and aluminum and the trans tunnel was made of "I sure don't > know", the floor is just plywood. I don't have most of those parts > so I am building a proper firewall with no flammable wood and then a > nice trans tunnel, I will still use plywood for the floors. I had > hoped to get to the UK this year for Singer national so I could take > LOTS of pics since I have not seen another one of these here in the > U.S. but I wont get there this year and don't want to wait anymore, > so I will guess it best as I can and no one in the U.S. will know > its wrong anyway (this list excepted of course). > > mike > > Eric J Russell wrote: >> I bought the H-F unit to spot weld on the sills & pillars for my >> MGA. >> >> It works adequately for my purpose. I made a few test welds using >> scraps of sheet metal then tested them to destruction. They were >> hard enough to destroy to satisfy me. BTW, I also used 'weld >> through' primer between the pieces. It does burn away the primer in >> the heat affected zone but didn't seem to adversely affect the spot >> welds. Keep in mind the unit is quite heavy - a factor if you must >> contort into odd positions or make long reaches to make the welds. >> Also, the sheet metal should fit together well in order to make >> good spot welds. Don't use the tong's clamping force to draw the >> parts into contact. >> >> H-F does sell a set of 'extended reach' tongs. They are not >> available in the retail stores though. And now I can't find them on >> their web page. >> >> Where are you in cyberspace? You are welcome to borrow mine but it >> is probably not worth shipping vs buying one on sale at H-F. >> >> Eric Russell >> Mebane, NC >> http://home.mebtel.net/~ejrussell >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Rambour" >>> >>> I was looking at a tong type resistance spot welder, >>> >>> Looking for suggestions, will the HF unit work for one job ? will >>> I be >>> sorry I got it ? From jamesf at groupwbench.org Sun Feb 1 09:32:25 2009 From: jamesf at groupwbench.org (Jim Franklin) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dishwasher motor (was Epoxy recommendation) Message-ID: I JB Welded the plasitc sheath onto the motor shaft and that's when I discovered the hairline crack running down the length of the sheath. But it held well. However in the process of all that the 2 shouldered rubber grommet/washer things fell off and I can't figure out how they go back on. Each orientation leaks. So I bought a new motor from RepairClinic.com, because they had a page on the problem and fix of my particular DW. The old motor is 3 amps and about the size of an econobox starter. What arrived is a generic, one size fits all motor that clips into a sump that replaces my DW's sump. The motor is .65 amps and weighs about 3 oz. It doesn't feel like there's any metal in it at all. Should I even bother putting it in? I looks like it'd have trouble powering a goldfish tank. Are looks deceiving, and a motor that draws 1/6 the power can really do the job? thanks, jim From dhlocker at comcast.net Sun Feb 1 18:23:02 2009 From: dhlocker at comcast.net (Donald H Locker) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dishwasher motor (was Epoxy recommendation) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49864AF6.4040708@comcast.net> I think you'll have to do the experiment and let us all know. Donald. Jim Franklin wrote: > I JB Welded the plasitc sheath onto the motor shaft and that's when I > discovered the hairline crack running down the length of the sheath. But > it held well. However in the process of all that the 2 shouldered rubber > grommet/washer things fell off and I can't figure out how they go back > on. Each orientation leaks. So I bought a new motor from > RepairClinic.com, because they had a page on the problem and fix of my > particular DW. > > The old motor is 3 amps and about the size of an econobox starter. What > arrived is a generic, one size fits all motor that clips into a sump > that replaces my DW's sump. The motor is .65 amps and weighs about 3 oz. > It doesn't feel like there's any metal in it at all. Should I even > bother putting it in? I looks like it'd have trouble powering a goldfish > tank. Are looks deceiving, and a motor that draws 1/6 the power can > really do the job? > > thanks, > jim_______________________________________________ From jamesf at groupwbench.org Sun Feb 1 20:06:00 2009 From: jamesf at groupwbench.org (Jim Franklin) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dishwasher motor (was Epoxy recommendation) In-Reply-To: <49864AF6.4040708@comcast.net> References: <49864AF6.4040708@comcast.net> Message-ID: <39935A4B-8F0B-4FA6-9344-F1E3231C1B7F@groupwbench.org> Well, I decided to try the last combination of washer orientation, and it appears that was the ticket. Once I gently removed the macerator housing, I could see how it's shaft mated with the washer that contacted it, and it made a lot more sense. So the epoxied shaft and greased other bits seems to be working well. I did a load of dishes and not only did it not leak, but it ran more quietly than it has in a while. I'm hoping for an easy return of the hamster-powered replacement motor. jim On Feb 1, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Donald H Locker wrote: > I think you'll have to do the experiment and let us all know. > > Donald. > > Jim Franklin wrote: >> I JB Welded the plasitc sheath onto the motor shaft and that's when >> I discovered the hairline crack running down the length of the >> sheath. But it held well. However in the process of all that the 2 >> shouldered rubber grommet/washer things fell off and I can't figure >> out how they go back on. Each orientation leaks. So I bought a new >> motor from RepairClinic.com, because they had a page on the problem >> and fix of my particular DW. >> The old motor is 3 amps and about the size of an econobox starter. >> What arrived is a generic, one size fits all motor that clips into >> a sump that replaces my DW's sump. The motor is .65 amps and weighs >> about 3 oz. It doesn't feel like there's any metal in it at all. >> Should I even bother putting it in? I looks like it'd have trouble >> powering a goldfish tank. Are looks deceiving, and a motor that >> draws 1/6 the power can really do the job? >> thanks, >> jim_______________________________________________ From rustymetal at sbcglobal.net Mon Feb 2 10:02:35 2009 From: rustymetal at sbcglobal.net (Frank Vantacich) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:02:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] rats Message-ID: <396057.30847.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Well the rats have found my 2003 HD2500 Silverado. Yup they took a liking to the engine compartment and started eating the fire wall insullation and hood insullation. Can any one suggest a website that sells replacement insullation? I prefer not going to a dealer. Frank V. rustymetal at sbcglobal.net From jdinnis at gmail.com Mon Feb 2 10:16:24 2009 From: jdinnis at gmail.com (John Innis) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:16:24 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] rats In-Reply-To: <396057.30847.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <396057.30847.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Check LMC truck, they had the hood liner for my '95 Suburban. On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Frank Vantacich wrote: > Well the rats have found my 2003 HD2500 Silverado. Yup they took a liking to > the engine compartment and started eating the fire wall insullation and hood > insullation. Can any one suggest a website that sells replacement > insullation? I prefer not going to a dealer. > > > Frank V. > rustymetal at sbcglobal.net > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as jdinnis at gmail.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive > -- ================================= = Never offend people with style when you = = can offend with substance --- Sam Brown = ================================= From smarc at smarc.net Mon Feb 2 19:49:41 2009 From: smarc at smarc.net (Marc) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> References: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> Message-ID: <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> Doesn't the Hobart 140 have a Purge setting? My Hobart 180 does... Arvid Jedlicka wrote: > I have never worried about getting a perfect seal on any of the > fittings as I did not think there was much pressure in the line. After > all there is this big hole at the end of the gun so ... > > I have always just shut the cylinder valve when I was done and let it > go at that. I've been more worried about what might leak INTO the > lines after I shut it off and left it sit until the next weekend than > what the gas that was suppose to be in there did to the plumbing while > it was sitting. That is why I usually turn the wire speed down as low > as it will go and pull the trigger a few times if it has set unused > for a few days. This allows the preflow to purge the air or what ever > might have gotten in there while it was sitting unused out and I am > sure to get good shielding gas right at the start. From jandkstone99 at msn.com Mon Feb 2 20:15:11 2009 From: jandkstone99 at msn.com (Jim Stone) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:15:11 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> References: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> Message-ID: Not as far as I can tell. The owner's manual doesn't indicate anything about purging per se, but here's how it describes setting the gas flow rate: Flow Adjust Flow rate should be set when gas is flowing through welding power source and welding gun. Open feedhead pressure assembly so that wire will not feed. Press gun trigger to start gas flow. I could be wrong, but I assume that a purge valve could be used here, if the 140 had one. > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:49:41 -0500 > From: smarc at smarc.net > To: shop-talk at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions > > Doesn't the Hobart 140 have a Purge setting? My Hobart 180 does... > _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_012009 From smarc at smarc.net Mon Feb 2 20:41:00 2009 From: smarc at smarc.net (Marc) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: References: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> Message-ID: <4987BCCC.3050802@smarc.net> Well, there's a purge setting on the 180, which is basically just a wire feed speed of 0. I use the purge setting to set gas flow without wasting wire. Maybe you could rig up a switch to open the circuit to the feed motor... Jim Stone wrote: > Not as far as I can tell. The owner's manual doesn't indicate > anything about purging per se, but here's how it describes setting the > gas flow rate: > > Flow Adjust > Flow rate should be set when gas is > flowing through welding power > source and welding gun. Open > feedhead pressure assembly so > that wire will not feed. Press gun > trigger to start gas flow.* > > *I could be wrong, but I assume that a purge valve could be used here, > if the 140 had one. > > > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:49:41 -0500 > > From: smarc at smarc.net > > To: shop-talk at autox.team.net > > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions > > > > Doesn't the Hobart 140 have a Purge setting? My Hobart 180 does... From doug at dougbraun.com Mon Feb 2 23:04:08 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:04:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <4987BCCC.3050802@smarc.net> Message-ID: <297045.98156.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> My Lincoln SP-125 doesn't have a purge switch either. I have to open the lid and temporarily disengage the wire feed roller to purge it. Doug --- On Mon, 2/2/09, Marc wrote: > From: Marc > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions > To: "Shop Talk List" > Date: Monday, February 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > Well, there's a purge setting on the 180, which is > basically just a wire > feed speed of 0. I use the purge setting to set gas flow > without wasting > wire. Maybe you could rig up a switch to open the circuit > to the feed > motor... > > > Jim Stone wrote: > > Not as far as I can tell. The owner's manual > doesn't indicate > > anything about purging per se, but here's how it > describes setting the > > gas flow rate: From jibjib at att.net Mon Feb 2 23:34:53 2009 From: jibjib at att.net (Jack Brooks) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:34:53 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> References: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> Message-ID: Yes, my 140 Handler does. It's about 9 years old. It's on the wire feed (Voltage) control, on which I believe the lowest setting is called purge. Pulling the trigger provides gas, but no arc. Jack -----Original Message----- From: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Marc Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:50 PM To: Shop Talk List Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions Doesn't the Hobart 140 have a Purge setting? My Hobart 180 does... Arvid Jedlicka wrote: > I have never worried about getting a perfect seal on any of the > fittings as I did not think there was much pressure in the line. After > all there is this big hole at the end of the gun so ... > > I have always just shut the cylinder valve when I was done and let it > go at that. I've been more worried about what might leak INTO the > lines after I shut it off and left it sit until the next weekend than > what the gas that was suppose to be in there did to the plumbing while > it was sitting. That is why I usually turn the wire speed down as low > as it will go and pull the trigger a few times if it has set unused > for a few days. This allows the preflow to purge the air or what ever > might have gotten in there while it was sitting unused out and I am > sure to get good shielding gas right at the start. You are subscribed as jibjib at att.net Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From jniolon at bham.rr.com Tue Feb 3 04:12:45 2009 From: jniolon at bham.rr.com (john niolon) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:12:45 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions References: <297045.98156.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: come on guys ??? it's not like your wasting a hundred feet of wire ... just set your wire feed to lowest or zero and pull the trigger for a foot or so of feed.. a couple of seconds will purge the hose. It's under pressure and surely your hose is no longer than 10' or so. later John > My Lincoln SP-125 doesn't have a purge switch either. I have to open the > lid and temporarily disengage the wire feed roller to purge it. > > Doug From arvidj at visi.com Tue Feb 3 06:05:17 2009 From: arvidj at visi.com (Arvid Jedlicka) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:05:17 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions References: <297045.98156.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <40500DBB7E144BACB6907878D8FD89D8@dellc84024> My Lincoln PowerMig 300 doesn't have a purge setting but it does have preflow - two seconds of flow before the wire feeds - so by setting the wire feed down as far as it will go and pulling the trigger and then releasing it after a second - repeat four or five times - the plumbing is purged - I get to double check the flow on the gauge - and either zero or very little wire is wasted. From racegt6 at yahoo.com Tue Feb 3 21:40:55 2009 From: racegt6 at yahoo.com (Charlie Schlismann) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:40:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <297551.9293.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --- On Mon, 2/2/09, Jim Stone wrote: > Not as far as I can tell. The owner's manual > doesn't indicate anything about > purging per se, but here's how it describes setting the > gas flow rate: > > Flow Adjust > Flow rate should be set when gas is > flowing through welding power > source and welding gun. Open > feedhead pressure assembly so > that wire will not feed. Press gun > trigger to start gas flow. > > I could be wrong, but I assume that a purge valve could be > used here, if the > 140 had one. I teach my welderettes (I've found women to be superior welders, once trained) to keep the feed roll pressure to a minimum. Rollers slip when the wire hits a surface not connected to the work cable and gas purges the cablehose. And absolutely no birdnesting of the wire. As always, YMMV. Charlie #71 MiDiv F500 From eltonclark at gmail.com Tue Feb 3 22:07:47 2009 From: eltonclark at gmail.com (Elton E. (Tony) Clark) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:07:47 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <297551.9293.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <297551.9293.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: *The operation manual for my Micky Mouse Century short circuit mig has one adjust the wire feed to slip if pressed against a wood block, etc . . which prevents wire "nesting" and also would purge the hose without wire waste if one thought that necessary.* *Tony* From mark at sccaprepared.com Wed Feb 4 09:03:29 2009 From: mark at sccaprepared.com (Mark Andy) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:03:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <4987BCCC.3050802@smarc.net> References: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net> <4987BCCC.3050802@smarc.net> Message-ID: Howdy, On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Marc wrote: > Well, there's a purge setting on the 180, which is basically just a wire > feed speed of 0. I use the purge setting to set gas flow without wasting > wire. Maybe you could rig up a switch to open the circuit to the feed > motor... My lincoln SP175Plus has a purge setting. You activate it by flipping the feed roller clamp up. :-) Mark From kentsu at corvairkid.com Wed Feb 4 10:20:46 2009 From: kentsu at corvairkid.com (Kent Sullivan) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:20:46 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? Message-ID: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Hi, I keep used oily rags in a metal container designed for that sort of thing and it's getting full. I'd prefer to not send them to a landfill. I called some commercial laundering companies local to me that provide towels, uniforms, etc. and they don't have a way to accept a random assortment of rags from a residential user. I also talked to a couple of car-related businesses that I frequent and they rent their rags, so mine can't easily be added. I also spoke with my local hazardous waste collection site and they take oil and filters but not rags. Any suggestions? I don't really have a washing machine that I can use to wash and reuse them myself. I guess I could go to a Laundromat but that seems kind of unfair to anyone who might use that particular washer after me... Thanks. From arvidj at visi.com Wed Feb 4 10:31:24 2009 From: arvidj at visi.com (Arvid Jedlicka) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:31:24 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions References: <0D99AE14DA1342DDB273C3081B05833B@dellc84024> <4987B0C5.3020301@smarc.net><4987BCCC.3050802@smarc.net> Message-ID: <800F9957D3084FDE85B459B0D05BEA42@dellc84024> I must have missed it in the manual the first time I read it. Upon review I see that my Lincoln PowerMig 300 manual suggests: (1) Take all the stuff that you have allowed to accumulate on the the top of the welder and put it someplace else in the garage so that you can ... (2) Swing up and open the gull wing doors so that you can ... (3) Flip up the feed roller clamp so that you can ... (4) Purge the system so that you can ... (5) reverse step (3) so that you can ... (6) reverse step (2) so that you can ... (7) reverse step (1) so that you can .. (8) Now, if you can still remember what you were going to do in the first place, do it. (9) But next time you might consider using the Miller TIG machine because it does have a purge setting on it. > Howdy, > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Marc wrote: >> Well, there's a purge setting on the 180, which is basically just a wire >> feed speed of 0. I use the purge setting to set gas flow without wasting >> wire. Maybe you could rig up a switch to open the circuit to the feed >> motor... > > My lincoln SP175Plus has a purge setting. You activate it by flipping the > feed roller clamp up. > > :-) > > Mark From doug at dougbraun.com Wed Feb 4 11:11:37 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions In-Reply-To: <800F9957D3084FDE85B459B0D05BEA42@dellc84024> Message-ID: <567349.86511.qm@web607.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> You forgot step 1B: Carefully tip the welder to one side so that the bottom of the door will clear the lip on the side of the welder cart. Doug --- On Wed, 2/4/09, Arvid Jedlicka wrote: > From: Arvid Jedlicka > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Basic MIG Welding questions > To: "Mark Andy" , "Marc" > Cc: "Shop Talk List" > Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 12:31 PM > I must have missed it in the manual the first time I read > it. Upon review I see that my Lincoln PowerMig 300 manual > suggests: > > (1) Take all the stuff that you have allowed to accumulate > on the the top of the welder and put it someplace else in > the garage so that you can ... > > (2) Swing up and open the gull wing doors so that you can > ... > > (3) Flip up the feed roller clamp so that you can ... From strovato at optonline.net Wed Feb 4 12:03:24 2009 From: strovato at optonline.net (Steven Trovato) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:03:24 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> We seem to beat this one to death every few years. Search for "rags" in the archive. Anyway, as for me, I just wash them in my home washing machine. I have never had a problem with any carryover into the next load, but I'll run some of my work jeans or something as the next load just to be on the safe side. -Steve Trovato strovato at optonline.net From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Wed Feb 4 12:22:19 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:22:19 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <01fd01c986fd$e6618b50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > I guess I could go to a Laundromat but that > seems kind of unfair to anyone who might use that particular washer after > me... After you've cleaned the washer thoroughly by hand (I find that neat Simple Green on a rag works well), do a load of your own work clothes with a half cup or so of SG added to your usual detergent. That should clean the machine well enough to avoid soiling anyone else's clothes. It's also what I do with my home washer, works for me. Haven't found just the right formula for washing oily rags yet, but small quantities of rags in lots of hot water seems to be essential. Best recipe I've found so far is to let the machine fill and start agitating, then add Palmolive dish soap until you get an inch or so of bubbles. If I ever find the time, I'll try my grandmother's recipe: homemade lye soap Or just look for a community hazardous waste round-up. They usually aren't so picky about what they will accept. Randall From strovato at optonline.net Wed Feb 4 13:06:37 2009 From: strovato at optonline.net (Steven Trovato) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <01fd01c986fd$e6618b50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> <01fd01c986fd$e6618b50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <0KEK0080D578EL30@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> I just use hot water, regular laundry detergent and a bit of Lestoil. If they are stained, I don't care. They still work just fine as rags. And if there are any that I'm not happy with, I just throw them out. They're just rags, after all. For some things I use paper towels. They get thrown out without any special environmental handling. If your local hazardous waste program takes your rags, it would be interesting to know what they do with them. BTW, I find that those red rags must have the least colorfast dye on the planet. Put one white rag in there and it will come out almost as red as the red ones. At 02:22 PM 2/4/2009, Randall wrote: >Haven't found just the right formula for washing oily rags yet, but small >quantities of rags in lots of hot water seems to be essential. Best recipe >I've found so far is to let the machine fill and start agitating, then add >Palmolive dish soap until you get an inch or so of bubbles. From dmscheidt at gmail.com Wed Feb 4 14:10:19 2009 From: dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <2400a5d40902041310x44143dof9f5fc0f0afdb93b@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Kent Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > I keep used oily rags in a metal container designed for that sort of thing > and it's getting full. I'd prefer to not send them to a landfill. I called > some commercial laundering companies local to me that provide towels, > uniforms, etc. and they don't have a way to accept a random assortment of > rags from a residential user. I also talked to a couple of car-related > businesses that I frequent and they rent their rags, so mine can't easily be > added. I also spoke with my local hazardous waste collection site and they > take oil and filters but not rags. > > Any suggestions? I don't really have a washing machine that I can use to > wash and reuse them myself. I guess I could go to a Laundromat but that > seems kind of unfair to anyone who might use that particular washer after > me... > I soak them in a plastic bucket. Hot water (to start), detergent, and oxygen bleach. Allow to soak for a while (at least overnight, at least, but I'll do a week or more. Stir occasionally.), then skim off the scum that rises to the top. Wash normally, or just rinse thourghly and dry. -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Wed Feb 4 14:27:27 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:27:27 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> <0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Message-ID: <021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > Anyway, as for me, I just wash them in my home > washing machine. I have never had a problem with any carryover into > the next load, Hmm, what brand of detergent do you use? I pretty much always get some portion of black crud plated onto the inside of the drum ... what I've been looking for is a solution that prevents that. Have not tried Lestoil, but I will (if the new wife lets me experiment with "her" machine ). > If your local hazardous waste program takes your rags, it would be > interesting to know what they do with them. I'd guess they burn them, with a suitable stack scrubber to hopefully keep most of the heavy metals out of the air. The stuff that gets scrubbed out probably does wind up back in the ground (which after all is where it came from), hopefully such that it won't leak into drinking water in the future. But since the EPA doesn't classify oily rags as hazardous waste (even when the oil is used), perhaps they do just dump them in the landfill anyway. Randall From kvacek at ameritech.net Wed Feb 4 14:42:26 2009 From: kvacek at ameritech.net (Karl Vacek) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:42:26 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com><01fd01c986fd$e6618b50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <0KEK0080D578EL30@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Message-ID: <8D222301AF424725A117DAFED34ED387@KARL> I've found the same thing with the red rags you buy today. I won't use one for solvent wiping anything, or for washing anything either. Kinda limits their usefulness. But in the 60's and 70's we used rental rags in the printing business, and they were bright orange. We sent them back in a 55-gallon barrel, all glopped up with ink and solvents - real mean stuff, none of today's OSHA-approved materials ;-) The rags came back pretty and orange again, and only very occasionally was there any hint of a stain. They'fade a bit over many cycles, but the color was very durable considering. Eventually they stopped the orange color and sent white rags, which became a dirty gray after one cycle. Maybe that was about the time that OSHA began, and so many solvents and pigments became restricted. I've always wondered what in the world they used to clean those rags... Karl > BTW, I find that those red rags must have the least colorfast dye on the > planet. Put one white rag in there and it will come out almost as red as > the red ones. From kturk at ala.net Wed Feb 4 15:12:40 2009 From: kturk at ala.net (Keith Turk) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:12:40 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] [BULK]Re: What to do with oily rags? References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com><0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <225E7D634A9C4BE898B8C67F51D98D8C@keithhrijwmm4p> y'all just think to much.... Wash the things in the sink with dish soap and then wash them in your washer or the one at the quarter laundry... move on... Hazardous waste talk is simply crap... more left wing dribble... ( sorry it was just sounding a bit to tree huggerish to me ) The waste water is going to get scrubbed at the local plant if it ever makes it that far without clogging up your sewer line first... ( much more fun and expensive ).... Or just pitch them in the trash.... Personally... I actually do wash them at home in the above discribed manner... and move on... ( but I pitch the really nasty ones ) Keith From strovato at optonline.net Wed Feb 4 15:33:10 2009 From: strovato at optonline.net (Steven Trovato) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> <0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <0KEK008BSC41FJC0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Detergent is just liquid Tide. I do put them in a 5 gal pail with some Lestoil to soak until I have enough to wash. I think maybe the difference is that these rags are dirty, but not soaked through and through with grease. It's not like they're dripping with grease and oil. As for the local hazardous waste program, I think they hire some outside company to run it. I don't think they're likely to do more than they are required to do, if it costs more money. Where I live (no sewers) everything that comes out in the washer ends up back in the ground too. At 04:27 PM 2/4/2009, Randall wrote: > > Anyway, as for me, I just wash them in my home > > washing machine. I have never had a problem with any carryover into > > the next load, > >Hmm, what brand of detergent do you use? I pretty much always get some >portion of black crud plated onto the inside of the drum ... what I've been >looking for is a solution that prevents that. > >Have not tried Lestoil, but I will (if the new wife lets me experiment with >"her" machine ). > > > If your local hazardous waste program takes your rags, it would be > > interesting to know what they do with them. > >I'd guess they burn them, with a suitable stack scrubber to hopefully keep >most of the heavy metals out of the air. The stuff that gets scrubbed out >probably does wind up back in the ground (which after all is where it came >from), hopefully such that it won't leak into drinking water in the future. > >But since the EPA doesn't classify oily rags as hazardous waste (even when >the oil is used), perhaps they do just dump them in the landfill anyway. From kturk at ala.net Wed Feb 4 15:44:17 2009 From: kturk at ala.net (Keith Turk) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:44:17 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] [BULK]Re: What to do with oily rags? References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com><01fd01c986fd$e6618b50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com><0KEK0080D578EL30@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <8D222301AF424725A117DAFED34ED387@KARL> Message-ID: <94ED686F8A104712B54B634A1122117B@keithhrijwmm4p> They use dry cleaning solutions... ( I got some a while back and it wasn't much more then Mineral spirits ) K From gil.fuqua at cci-ir.com Wed Feb 4 15:54:25 2009 From: gil.fuqua at cci-ir.com (Gil Fuqua) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:54:25 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com><0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <15C2B55292D4494EAAB4557F5BCEC0D201AB35BE@bnaexg01.cci-ir.com> I put dirty/oily rags in a bucket filled with water and a combination of dishwashing detergent (to cut the grease) and Tide. The combination serves two purposes. It soaks the rags with water so they are no longer flammable and it serves as a long pre-soak to washing them. This process seems to release a lot of the dirt and grease and makes them easier to clean. The downside is a very heavy bucket full of wet rags to tote to the washing machine. Gil Nashville You are subscribed as gil.fuqua at cci-ir.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From bobkegel at seanet.com Wed Feb 4 15:55:56 2009 From: bobkegel at seanet.com (Bob Kegel) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:55:56 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <880BA92072374E2B9061B3648C189A12@8sv5f01> I've always washed my rags and coveralls in the family washer without problems. As noted, a long presoak helps. I've get good results on really dirty stuff by adding a scoop of automatic dishwasher detergent along with the recommended amount of laundry detergent. Reminds me of when I was kid. I had my own personal washer, an old wringer model that was in the house when we moved in. Used it to get my togs from filthy to merely dirty. Bob K From cak at dimebank.com Wed Feb 4 16:04:21 2009 From: cak at dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:04:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? Message-ID: <200902042304.n14N4LcT031100@moose.dimebank.com> Back on the racefab or hotrod list, I recall the description of storing these rags, when they were too oily to use, in a 5 gallon bucket of soapy water. That did a lot to loosen the worst of the sludge before putting it into the washer. From bjzwissler at gmail.com Wed Feb 4 16:24:07 2009 From: bjzwissler at gmail.com (Ben Zwissler) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <498A2397.3040402@gmail.com> I have a large "wash tub" and just fill it with hot water and degreaser (Simple Green or whatever Sam's Club is selling). Let them soak, stir them up once in a while and then drain. Rinse. Repeat. That's makes them clean enough. If the suds go away and oil starts to show on the top of the water, add more degreaser. I dare not use my wife's new Whirlpool front loader washer. I'd be blamed for every grease spot on something for the next two years. ;-) Ben..... On 2/4/2009 12:20 PM, Kent Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > I keep used oily rags in a metal container designed for that sort of thing > and it's getting full. I'd prefer to not send them to a landfill. I called > some commercial laundering companies local to me that provide towels, > uniforms, etc. and they don't have a way to accept a random assortment of > rags from a residential user. I also talked to a couple of car-related > businesses that I frequent and they rent their rags, so mine can't easily be > added. I also spoke with my local hazardous waste collection site and they > take oil and filters but not rags. > > Any suggestions? I don't really have a washing machine that I can use to > wash and reuse them myself. I guess I could go to a Laundromat but that > seems kind of unfair to anyone who might use that particular washer after > me... > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as bjzwissler at gmail.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From mark at nashvilletn.org Wed Feb 4 17:07:31 2009 From: mark at nashvilletn.org (Mark) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:07:31 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com><0KEK0074O2CFFR30@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net><021f01c9870f$61e4e5e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <0KEK008BSC41FJC0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Message-ID: <56B57D43E27A40F7AEA3194AB44A6EE2@Dell9200> Here in the land of the free we just use them to get the wood pile started. We do need a burn permit if the fire is going to last more than two hours or if we get caught. We will have the cleanest county dumps in the country. Tires are another story, can't burn them unless you are a builder..... Mark Nashville From mark at nashvilletn.org Wed Feb 4 17:11:06 2009 From: mark at nashvilletn.org (Mark) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:11:06 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] [BULK]Re: What to do with oily rags? References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com><01fd01c986fd$e6618b50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com><0KEK0080D578EL30@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net><8D222301AF424725A117DAFED34ED387@KARL> <94ED686F8A104712B54B634A1122117B@keithhrijwmm4p> Message-ID: Hey Keith, You still "goin" fast? Haven't heard any updates in a couple years.... Mark Nashville From bspidell at comcast.net Wed Feb 4 17:58:54 2009 From: bspidell at comcast.net (Bob Spidell) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Shop-talk] [BULK]Re: What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <225E7D634A9C4BE898B8C67F51D98D8C@keithhrijwmm4p> Message-ID: <1116557920.3468781233795534693.JavaMail.root@sz0054a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> re: 'The waste water is going to get scrubbed at the local plant if it ever makes it that far without clogging up your sewer line first.' In the SF Bay Area, the street drains flow directly to the Bay. Fortunately, all my toxic waste ends up in my neighbor's flower bed ;) bs (not a tree hugger, but don't like to mess up the environment either) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Turk" To: "Randall" , shop-talk at autox.team.net Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 2:12:40 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] [BULK]Re: What to do with oily rags? y'all just think to much.... Wash the things in the sink with dish soap and then wash them in your washer or the one at the quarter laundry... move on... Hazardous waste talk is simply crap... more left wing dribble... ( sorry it was just sounding a bit to tree huggerish to me ) The waste water is going to get scrubbed at the local plant if it ever makes it that far without clogging up your sewer line first... ( much more fun and expensive ).... Or just pitch them in the trash.... Personally... I actually do wash them at home in the above discribed manner... and move on... ( but I pitch the really nasty ones ) Keith _______________________________________________ From kturk at ala.net Wed Feb 4 18:27:48 2009 From: kturk at ala.net (Keith Turk) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:27:48 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] [BULK]Re: What to do with oily rags? References: <1116557920.3468781233795534693.JavaMail.root@sz0054a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: Betcha he's got GREAT flowers... LOL I was cleaning something with Bleach one time and the dang Grass LOVED it... funny deal... K From cornerexit at gmail.com Wed Feb 4 19:39:18 2009 From: cornerexit at gmail.com (cornerexit) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:39:18 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <9C688CBD9D8C4A79A7D66FED26B03BD5@Waynehouseputer> I use them to start the burn piles with. The quality of the "red rags" these days is so craptastic that I find it not worth trying to clean them. Having a rapidly still growing 18 year old son, I pretty much have a lifetime of cotton t-shirt rags. -----Original Message----- From: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Kent Sullivan Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:21 AM To: shop-talk at autox.team.net Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? From cavanadd at verizon.net Wed Feb 4 19:44:39 2009 From: cavanadd at verizon.net (David C.) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:44:39 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> Message-ID: <498A5297.6000001@verizon.net> Merely dirty rags get recycled to wipe grease off the tractor and backhoe. Then they go in the burn barrel. At Horrible Freight on sale they are too cheap to wash. Dave C Kent Sullivan wrote: > Any suggestions? I From jibjib at att.net Wed Feb 4 23:08:02 2009 From: jibjib at att.net (Jack Brooks) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:08:02 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] What to do with oily rags? In-Reply-To: <880BA92072374E2B9061B3648C189A12@8sv5f01> References: <004d01c986ec$eacf2e60$c06d8b20$@com> <880BA92072374E2B9061B3648C189A12@8sv5f01> Message-ID: I use some of Costco's Oil Eater in the washer. No issues. I also use a bit of it in the windshield washers on my cars. It cuts the smearing down immensely. Jack From brad.kahler at 141.com Wed Feb 11 18:55:53 2009 From: brad.kahler at 141.com (Brad Kahler) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners Message-ID: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> Since moving into our new home in Richmond Ky we've come to realize the water is very hard. I'm just starting to look into water softeners. When I lived in Nebraska I had one and always found it a pain to have to deal with the salt. So, is anyone familiar with the "no salt" water conditioners that are on the market? I like the concept but would prefer to hear good and/or bad stories relating to their use, effectiveness and cost. Here is one such system: http://www.easywater.com/ Thanks! Brad From brad.kahler at 141.com Wed Feb 11 19:01:00 2009 From: brad.kahler at 141.com (Brad Kahler) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> References: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> Message-ID: <499382DC.8000704@141.com> Since moving into our new home in Richmond Ky we've come to realize the water is very hard. I'm just starting to look into water softeners. When I lived in Nebraska I had one and always found it a pain to have to deal with the salt. So, is anyone familiar with the "no salt" water conditioners that are on the market? I like the concept but would prefer to hear good and/or bad stories relating to their use, effectiveness and cost. Here is one such system: http://www.waterfilter-usa.com/saltfree-water-softeners-c-75.html Thanks! Brad From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Wed Feb 11 21:01:48 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:01:48 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <499382DC.8000704@141.com> Message-ID: <20090212040148.MSHI21761.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@randall> > Here is one such system: > http://www.waterfilter-usa.com/saltfree-water-softeners-c-75.html Wild. I had never even heard of such a thing. But I note that it's only effective against calcium carbonate; which while likely the most common source of hardness is by no means the only one. So how effective it is depends on just what is in your water. If it's magnesium, iron, sulfur, etc, this isn't the softener for you. Not quite sure what's in my water, but it doesn't seem to be calcium carbonate. Randall From matt.lists at trebelhorn.com Wed Feb 11 21:09:12 2009 From: matt.lists at trebelhorn.com (Matt Trebelhorn) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <20090212040148.MSHI21761.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@randall> References: <20090212040148.MSHI21761.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <25A831D2-FEA3-4211-B2E0-51D4FCFC1668@trebelhorn.com> Central Kentucky is mostly limestone. Lots of caves, lots of very hard water. I'll go out on a limb and say that most of the mineral content of our water is calcium carbonate. Matt, in Lexington On 11 Feb, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Randall wrote: >> Here is one such system: >> http://www.waterfilter-usa.com/saltfree-water-softeners-c-75.html > > Wild. I had never even heard of such a thing. > > But I note that it's only effective against calcium carbonate; > which while > likely the most common source of hardness is by no means the only > one. So > how effective it is depends on just what is in your water. If it's > magnesium, iron, sulfur, etc, this isn't the softener for you. > > Not quite sure what's in my water, but it doesn't seem to be calcium > carbonate. > > Randall > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as matt.lists at trebelhorn.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From pat at hornesystemstx.com Thu Feb 12 06:53:21 2009 From: pat at hornesystemstx.com (Pat Horne) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:53:21 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <499382DC.8000704@141.com> References: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> <499382DC.8000704@141.com> Message-ID: <499429D1.700@hornesystemstx.com> Before I tried an alternate to the salt-based softeners I would do a lot of research. There are many "new" methods of softening water on the market that seem like snake oil, some (most?) soften water without making any detectable changes to the water content, and only have glowing reports of their effectiveness by labs where the manufacturer paid for the testing. I'm not saying that it IS snake oil, but that it MAY BE snake oil. More research is definitely called for before purchasing. Peace, Pat Thusly spake Brad Kahler, On 2/11/2009 8:01 PM: > Since moving into our new home in Richmond Ky we've come to realize > the water is very hard. I'm just starting to look into water > softeners. When I lived in Nebraska I had one and always found it a > pain to have to deal with the salt. > > So, is anyone familiar with the "no salt" water conditioners that are > on the market? I like the concept but would prefer to hear good > and/or bad stories relating to their use, effectiveness and cost. > > Here is one such system: > http://www.waterfilter-usa.com/saltfree-water-softeners-c-75.html > > Thanks! > > Brad > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as pat at hornesystemstx.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.234 / Virus Database: 270.10.20/1944 - Release Date: 02/10/09 17:44:00 > > -- --- Pat Horne 512.797.7501 Owner, Horne Systems pat at hornesystemstx.com 5026 FM 2001 Lockhart, TX 78644-4443 --We support Habitat for Humanity, a hand UP, not a hand OUT-- From brad.kahler at 141.com Thu Feb 12 08:03:03 2009 From: brad.kahler at 141.com (Brad Kahler) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:03:03 GMT Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! Message-ID: <200902120803611.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> Matt, thanks for the info.B We need to get our water tested to see what its composed of.B If it is mainly calcium carbonate I'll have to look closer at the process. Randall, while I was in Pasadena I found the water to be reasonable, definitely not hard compared to what we have in Richmond. Thanks, Brad -----Original Message----- From: "Matt Trebelhorn" Sent 2/11/2009 9:09:12 PM To: "Randall" Cc: shop-talk at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time!Central Kentucky is mostly limestone. Lots of caves, lots of very hard water. I'll go out on a limb and say that most of the mineral content of our water is calcium carbonate. Matt, in Lexington On 11 Feb, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Randall wrote: >> Here is one such system: >> http://www.waterfilter-usa.com/saltfree-water-softeners-c-75.html > > Wild. I had never even heard of such a thing. > > But I note that it's only effective against calcium carbonate; > which while > likely the most common source of hardness is by no means the only > one. So > how effective it is depends on just what is in your water. If it's > magnesium, iron, sulfur, etc, this isn't the softener for you. > > Not quite sure what's in my water, but it doesn't seem to be calcium > carbonate. > > Randall > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as matt.lists at trebelhorn.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive You are subscribed as brad.kahler at 141.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talkhttp://www.team.net/archive From brad.kahler at 141.com Thu Feb 12 08:06:21 2009 From: brad.kahler at 141.com (Brad Kahler) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:06:21 GMT Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! Message-ID: <20090212080680.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> Pat, I'm leary of the process as well and snake oil may be an apt description.B Thats why I posted to the shop-talk list, hoping someone might have tried it and could give an honest review of the process and how well it works or doesn't work. At our house the water is hard enough that the soaps aren't breaking down properly and we get a greasy gooy mess in the drain pipes, spots on the stainless sink, etc.B One way or another I'm going to have to condition the water.B Thanks, Brad -----Original Message----- From: "Pat Horne" Sent 2/12/2009 6:53:21 AM To: "Brad Kahler" Cc: shop-talk at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time!Before I tried an alternate to the salt-based softeners I would do a lot of research. There are many "new" methods of softening water on the market that seem like snake oil, some (most?) soften water without making any detectable changes to the water content, and only have glowing reports of their effectiveness by labs where the manufacturer paid for the testing. I'm not saying that it IS snake oil, but that it MAY BE snake oil. More research is definitely called for before purchasing. Peace, Pat Thusly spake Brad Kahler, On 2/11/2009 8:01 PM: > Since moving into our new home in Richmond Ky we've come to realize > the water is very hard. I'm just starting to look into water > softeners. When I lived in Nebraska I had one and always found it a > pain to have to deal with the salt. > > So, is anyone familiar with the "no salt" water conditioners that are > on the market? I like the concept but would prefer to hear good > and/or bad stories relating to their use, effectiveness and cost. > > Here is one such system: > http://www.waterfilter-usa.com/saltfree-water-softeners-c-75.html > > Thanks! > > Brad > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as pat at hornesystemstx.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.234 / Virus Database: 270.10.20/1944 - Release Date: 02/10/09 17:44:00 > > -- --- Pat Horne 512.797.7501 Owner, Horne Systems pat at hornesystemstx.com 5026 FM 2001 Lockhart, TX 78644-4443 --We support Habitat for Humanity, a hand UP, not a hand OUT-- From wmc_st at xxiii.com Thu Feb 12 08:34:59 2009 From: wmc_st at xxiii.com (Wayne) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <200902120803611.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> References: <200902120803611.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> Message-ID: <499441A3.3010707@xxiii.com> Brad Kahler wrote: > Matt, thanks for the info.B We need to get our water tested to see what its > composed of.B If it is mainly calcium carbonate I'll have to look closer at I'd definitely get it tested first. As a child, I remember my nutty grandfather constantly tending to his water softener that he (erroneously) thought was going to remove the iron in his water... I used these guys for a test a couple years ago: http://www.ewatertest.com/ I can forward a copy of their report to anyone interested. It shows what they [supposedly] test for and the limits. -wayne From pethier at comcast.net Thu Feb 12 08:51:21 2009 From: pethier at comcast.net (pethier at comcast.net) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <20090212080680.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> Message-ID: <1793361578.547381234453881798.JavaMail.root@sz0119a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> ----- "Brad Kahler" wrote: > At our house the water is hard enough that the soaps aren't breaking > down > properly and we get a greasy gooy mess in the drain pipes, spots on > the > stainless sink, etc. Maybe you should be buying different soaps. Talk to your neighbors about what works in your area. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L 1979 Caterham 7 1993 Suburban 1994 Miata C-package 2007 Saturn Ion 3 2.4 pethier [at] comcast [dot] net http://forum.mnautox.com/forums http://www.flickr.com/photos/pethier From pat at hornesystemstx.com Thu Feb 12 08:56:43 2009 From: pat at hornesystemstx.com (Pat Horne) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:56:43 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <20090212080680.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> References: <20090212080680.SM07520@[166.70.182.40]> Message-ID: <499446BB.2090909@hornesystemstx.com> Brad, I've known folks who have sold the magnetic water softener systems, and they swear by them. Testing does not show that there is any change in the water, but they claim that it is on the molecular level, which I can't see. I saw an ad for a company that sells an electronic softener that wraps a wire around the outside of the pipe, no coil since the wire is only hooked up on one end. I can't see how that would do anything useful either. As far as the catalytic means of converting a particular component, I can't say, that is not my field. I am quite skeptical of any "new" technology that is a large departure from the norm. If, after research, they appear to be on the up and up, I'll consider trying it if I have an overwhelming need. Here in Central Texas we have very hard water also. Glassware has spots that won't come off, sink faucets get really cruddy and are a bitch to clean, etc. I haven't looked to see what the offending material is, buy probably should. We use a standard water softener and are pleased with it. Peace, Pat Thusly spake Brad Kahler, On 2/12/2009 9:06 AM: Pat, I'm leary of the process as well and snake oil may be an apt description.B Thats why I posted to the shop-talk list, hoping someone might have tried it and could give an honest review of the process and how well it works or doesn't work. At our house the water is hard enough that the soaps aren't breaking down properly and we get a greasy gooy mess in the drain pipes, spots on the stainless sink, etc.B One way or another I'm going to have to condition the water.B Thanks, Brad -- --- Pat Horne 512.797.7501 Owner, Horne Systems pat at hornesystemstx.com 5026 FM 2001 Lockhart, TX 78644-4443 --We support Habitat for Humanity, a hand UP, not a hand OUT-- From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Thu Feb 12 10:58:25 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:58:25 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <499429D1.700@hornesystemstx.com> References: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> <499382DC.8000704@141.com> <499429D1.700@hornesystemstx.com> Message-ID: <056a01c98d3b$80fe34e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > some (most?) soften water without making any detectable > changes to the water content, Hmm, that's an interesting question. The site Brad linked to claims that their unit removes the calcium carbonate (aka temporary hardness) from solution and turns it into "micro crystals" that are left in the water as suspended solids. It seems reasonable to me that, if that is true, the resulting water would act "soft", eg lather easily and leave fewer deposits on fixtures and such. You'd probably still get just as much scale when boiling it in a pan, though. But I wonder if you could tell the difference with a home hardness testing kit (or with a laboratory test)? Randall From mikey at b2systems.com Wed Feb 11 19:53:34 2009 From: mikey at b2systems.com (mike rambour) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:53:34 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <056a01c98d3b$80fe34e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> <499382DC.8000704@141.com> <499429D1.700@hornesystemstx.com> <056a01c98d3b$80fe34e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <1234407214.8569.37.camel@WebBrowser> Not saying it does not work but that link for easywater reminds of the magnets you tie-wrap around your fuel line to increase HP and MPG... Not a scientist but seems to me that if you change the water using their magic electrical field, you would need to keep that magic field on the water to prevent it from returning to its natural (hard) state. I for one would LOVE to find out I am wrong and would be one of the first to buy one of these if they really worked, I am tired of salt ! but I think I will buy the wife some roses for valentines day with my money instead of one of these units, the returns are guaranteed in a way that I can confirm it works. From dmscheidt at gmail.com Thu Feb 12 11:20:08 2009 From: dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Water softeners - wrong link the first time! In-Reply-To: <056a01c98d3b$80fe34e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <499381A9.5050203@141.com> <499382DC.8000704@141.com> <499429D1.700@hornesystemstx.com> <056a01c98d3b$80fe34e0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <2400a5d40902121020i43aed857n7d64b987ad1bcd1c@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Randall wrote: >> some (most?) soften water without making any detectable >> changes to the water content, > > Hmm, that's an interesting question. The site Brad linked to claims that > their unit removes the calcium carbonate (aka temporary hardness) from > solution and turns it into "micro crystals" that are left in the water as > suspended solids. > > It seems reasonable to me that, if that is true, the resulting water would > act "soft", eg lather easily and leave fewer deposits on fixtures and such. > You'd probably still get just as much scale when boiling it in a pan, > though. > > But I wonder if you could tell the difference with a home hardness testing > kit (or with a laboratory test)? Calcium carbonate has a number of crystal species. Best known are marble, chalk, and lime (the scaly stuff hard water leaves.) it's possible to discourage the formation of scale with magnetic fields, but the effect doesn't last very long. You'll still have scale building up in your water heater, your pots, and any where else water spends time after going through the descaler. (That includes pipes of fixtures that don't get used much.) Good quality modern water softeners are much nicer to deal with than old ones. Tell them what the hardness of your water is, and they use a flow meter to tell when they should regenerate the matrix. So instead of having a timer that regenerates on a fixed schedule, they regenerate only when they need to. That saves salt, possibly quite a lot, depending on how poorly the timer matched your actual use of water. If you've got room, you can also get huge brine tanks. (A friend recently had a tank that holds 800 lbs of salt put in.) You still have to schlep the salt to the basement, of course, but if you've got a 300 or 400 lb tank, you only have to do once or twice a year. (and you can get it delivered, and let the delivery guy do the schleping!) -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com From jniolon at bham.rr.com Sun Feb 15 17:22:29 2009 From: jniolon at bham.rr.com (john niolon) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:22:29 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] drill chuck keys Message-ID: ok... everyone but me probably knows the answer to this question so I'll show how dumb I am and ask... how do you fid the size of drill chuck keys ??? I've seen reference to pilot hole size and seen keys that are #1 or #4...but what does that mean... do all drill chucks with a 1/4" pilot hole have the same number of teeth ?? or does it differ by manufacturer... I've got a drill press at work that is missing a key... the numbers/words on the chuck have been obliterated and I'd like to find a key to fit it... help educate the dummy please ??? thanks John "One of the things we have to be thankful for is that we don't get as much government as we pay for." (Charles Kettering) From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sun Feb 15 18:52:07 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:52:07 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] drill chuck keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090216015207.GYDI4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> > how do you fid the size of drill chuck keys ??? I've seen > reference to pilot hole size and seen keys that are #1 or > #4...but what does that mean... For Jacobs chucks, Jacobs defines a series of chucks keys, K1, K2 ... but I don't know their measurements. > do all drill chucks with a 1/4" pilot hole have the same > number of teeth ?? Nope. And the size and angle of the teeth can vary as well. > or does it differ by manufacturer... Yes, but the chuck is almost certainly not made by the same people that made the rest of the tool. Probably the majority of chucks are made by Jacobs, but there are others around (or at least were). > I've got a drill press at work that is missing a key... the > numbers/words on the chuck have been obliterated and I'd like > to find a key to fit it... Easiest IMO would be to dismount the chuck and take it to a supplier that will let you try keys in it. BTW, I believe the "as much government as we pay for" quote is generally attributed to Will Rogers. It certainly seems much more his style than the inventor of the points ignition system (and founder of Delco). Randall From dmscheidt at gmail.com Sun Feb 15 19:16:24 2009 From: dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] drill chuck keys In-Reply-To: <20090216015207.GYDI4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> References: <20090216015207.GYDI4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <2400a5d40902151816u358d8f4apb8f875e5cd96e6da@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Randall wrote: > > Easiest IMO would be to dismount the chuck and take it to a supplier that > will let you try keys in it. > Easiest, I'd think, would to be trying a four way chuck key. I've got one that's fit every drill i've ever tried it on. (though I've used some big drill presses it wouldn't have fit) It also works as a key on the #$@#@# acetylene tanks that require such. You can then take the four-way key to a supplier and get one just for that drill, if you need. Saves having to dismantle and align the chuck. -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sun Feb 15 19:47:48 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:47:48 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] drill chuck keys In-Reply-To: <2400a5d40902151816u358d8f4apb8f875e5cd96e6da@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090216024749.HVYC4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> > I've got one that's fit every drill i've ever tried it on. Maybe I'm just unlucky then. Mine only fits about half my chucks. In fact, I think I've got 5 chucks that each take a different key; plus some keys that came with the lathe that don't fit anything. Randall From mark at sccaprepared.com Sun Feb 15 21:32:00 2009 From: mark at sccaprepared.com (Mark Andy) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:32:00 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Shop-talk] drill chuck keys In-Reply-To: <2400a5d40902151816u358d8f4apb8f875e5cd96e6da@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090216015207.GYDI4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> <2400a5d40902151816u358d8f4apb8f875e5cd96e6da@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Howdy, On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, David Scheidt wrote: >> Easiest IMO would be to dismount the chuck and take it to a supplier that >> will let you try keys in it. >> > > Easiest, I'd think, would to be trying a four way chuck key. I've got > one that's fit every drill i've ever tried it on. (though I've used > some big drill presses it wouldn't have fit) It also works as a key > on the #$@#@# acetylene tanks that require such. You can then take > the four-way key to a supplier and get one just for that drill, if you > need. Saves having to dismantle and align the chuck. If the drill press is like mine, its just a morse taper and you can remove and reinstall the chuck in about ten seconds with the wedges. I'd try a four way, just because its likely to work and is cheap, but I've also got a drill press that took me _forever_ to find the proper size key for. I still couldn't tell you what the actual chuck key spec is, I just found a drillpress with a similar chuck at HF and ordered a replacement key for it. Mark From eltonclark at gmail.com Sun Feb 15 22:07:02 2009 From: eltonclark at gmail.com (Elton E. (Tony) Clark) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:07:02 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] drill chuck keys In-Reply-To: <20090216024749.HVYC4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> References: <2400a5d40902151816u358d8f4apb8f875e5cd96e6da@mail.gmail.com> <20090216024749.HVYC4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: *My experience exactly . . I bought a stupid poorly cast 4 way which fits nothing well and jams in a few . . I threw it over the back fence! * On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Randall wrote: > > I've got one that's fit every drill i've ever tried it on. > > Maybe I'm just unlucky then. Mine only fits about half my chucks. In > fact, > I think I've got 5 chucks that each take a different key; plus some keys > that came with the lathe that don't fit anything. > > Randall > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as eltonclark at gmail.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From cavanadd at verizon.net Fri Feb 20 20:57:29 2009 From: cavanadd at verizon.net (David C.) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:57:29 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Anyone there? In-Reply-To: <297551.9293.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <297551.9293.qm@web30807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <499F7BA9.5020209@verizon.net> Has there been any traffic on the list, or have I been unsubed? Been quiet lately. Dave C From eric at megageek.com Fri Feb 20 20:45:15 2009 From: eric at megageek.com (eric at megageek.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Anyone there? In-Reply-To: <499F7BA9.5020209@verizon.net> Message-ID: Yes it has been. I just got home for 2 weeks leave from Iraq. I REALLY missed my shop! Most amazing thing, my truck started right up after almost a year of sitting. Moose Everything I know about knots, I learned from Alexander the Great. "David C." Sent by: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net 02/20/2009 22:47 To shop-talk at autox.team.net cc Subject [Shop-talk] Anyone there? Has there been any traffic on the list, or have I been unsubed? Been quiet lately. Dave C You are subscribed as eric at megageek.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Fri Feb 20 22:00:56 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:00:56 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot Message-ID: <20090221050056.JJTC12934.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> Since it has been so quiet, thought I'd share something I recently learned. I have several overhead light fixtures in my home, with multiple incandescent bulbs and a dimmer. Most CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) say in the fine print not to use them with dimmers; and don't work well at all if you ignore the warning. Until very recently, all the dimmable CFLs I've seen were more expensive than I was willing to pay, like $12 each. But the local Home Depot has just started carrying them at $7.50 for a 2-pack, so I picked up a couple of packs. They seem to work very well, dim quite nicely, and track the brightness of the remaining incandescents reasonably well, except at very low light levels where the incandescents have gone yellow. Light output at full power looks to my eye to actually be a bit more than the 100w incandescents, with a bit higher color temperature too. My only complaint so far is that they are a bit longer than standard bulbs, which means they stick out of my glass shades by an inch or so. But at 23 watts instead of 100 (per bulb), I think I'm going to start loading all of my dimmable fixtures with them. Given my family's tendency to leave the big lights on when not in use, I expect that to knock at least 10% off my monthly electric bill. They are from FEIT Electric (which is a CA company, tho the bulbs are made in China) and the box says the price includes a discount from my local electric company; so they may not be found in all stores. But it might be worth a look, if you need them. Not really shop talk, since my shop already has all fluorescent (except the spot lighting on the drill press & mill); but we've discussed (and recussed) them before. Randall From jblair1948 at cox.net Sat Feb 21 05:36:47 2009 From: jblair1948 at cox.net (John T. Blair) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Anyone there? In-Reply-To: References: <499F7BA9.5020209@verizon.net> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.1.20090221073512.01fd0090@cox.net> At 10:45 PM 2/20/2009, eric at megageek.com wrote: >Yes it has been. >I just got home for 2 weeks leave from Iraq. I REALLY missed my shop! >Most amazing thing, my truck started right up after almost a year of sitting. Moose, Welcome back! Grab a pizza and beer, and enjoy your leave. When you go back, our prayers will be with you. And remember to keep you head down. John John T. Blair WA4OHZ email: jblair1948 at cox.net Va. Beach, Va Phone: (757) 495-8229 48 TR1800 48 #4 Midget 65 Morgan 4/4 Series V (B1106) 75 Bricklin SV1 (#0887) 77 Spitfire 71 Saab Sonett III 65 Rambler Classic Morgan: www.team.net/www/morgan Bricklin: www.bricklin.org If you can read this - Thank a teacher! If you are reading it in English - Thank a Vet!! From gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Sat Feb 21 07:14:26 2009 From: gerrybraz at cablespeed.com (Gerald Brazil) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <20090221050056.JJTC12934.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <0DCA8F7E62A243FAA83477E7F4F5C253@DADSTOY> Will these work with any dimmer or does it require a special type? I have finally found some CFLs I like but it seems that what they rate as equivalent of a 100 watt doesn't produce the same light in the room as a 100w incandescent. I have generally stepped up one level to get the same brightness, but I am still probably saving money. -----Original Message----- From: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Randall Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:01 AM To: Shop-Talk Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot Since it has been so quiet, thought I'd share something I recently learned. I have several overhead light fixtures in my home, with multiple incandescent bulbs and a dimmer. Most CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) say in the fine print not to use them with dimmers; and don't work well at all if you ignore the warning. Until very recently, all the dimmable CFLs I've seen were more expensive than I was willing to pay, like $12 each. But the local Home Depot has just started carrying them at $7.50 for a 2-pack, so I picked up a couple of packs. They seem to work very well, dim quite nicely, and track the brightness of the remaining incandescents reasonably well, except at very low light levels where the incandescents have gone yellow. Light output at full power looks to my eye to actually be a bit more than the 100w incandescents, with a bit higher color temperature too. My only complaint so far is that they are a bit longer than standard bulbs, which means they stick out of my glass shades by an inch or so. But at 23 watts instead of 100 (per bulb), I think I'm going to start loading all of my dimmable fixtures with them. Given my family's tendency to leave the big lights on when not in use, I expect that to knock at least 10% off my monthly electric bill. They are from FEIT Electric (which is a CA company, tho the bulbs are made in China) and the box says the price includes a discount from my local electric company; so they may not be found in all stores. But it might be worth a look, if you need them. Not really shop talk, since my shop already has all fluorescent (except the spot lighting on the drill press & mill); but we've discussed (and recussed) them before. Randall You are subscribed as gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From doug at dougbraun.com Sat Feb 21 08:48:22 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:48:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <20090221050056.JJTC12934.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> When we moved to a new house ~3 years ago, it had zillions of those ceiling-mounted 65-watt reflector bulbs. Then I saw that the local hardware store had a real good subsidized price on "Feit" brand reflector bulbs, so I bought a dozen. At this point, there are only one or two left in servixe, the rest have all burned out. I had left incandescent bulbs in s few places, and I found that the Feit bulbs burned out about as often as the incandescents. Since then I have generally bought GE or Philips, and they seem to last longer. Of course, they are all made in China... Doug > They are from FEIT Electric (which is a CA company, tho the > bulbs are made > in China) and the box says the price includes a discount > from my local > electric company; so they may not be found in all stores. > But it might be > worth a look, if you need them. From parkanzky at gmail.com Sat Feb 21 09:29:24 2009 From: parkanzky at gmail.com (Paul Parkanzky) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20090221050056.JJTC12934.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: We bought our brand new home around two years ago and the first thing I did was replace every bulb in the house that didn't dim or was a spotlight with a compact fluorescent. In those two years I've only had to replace two failed bulbs. Both were Feits. We bought the more expensive "Daylight" or whatever bulbs for the more important areas and they look great, light up much faster, and seem to last better as well. We didn't replace the four spotlights in the kitchen because, at the time, the fluorescent replacements for those bulbs were really expensive. I should do some shopping and see if the prices have come down a bit. I also bought three 300W incandescent bulbs for the garage to add some light out there. At the time they didn't sell super-bright compact fluorescent bulbs. They do now, so I'll replace those with CF as they burn out. That is if I don't do a garage lighting project with several fluorescent tube fixtures first. Obviously, I'm a big fan of efficient lighting. I can't wait for the LED options to get more cost effective. -Paul On 2/21/09, Doug Braun wrote: > When we moved to a new house ~3 years ago, it had zillions of those ceiling-mounted 65-watt reflector bulbs. Then I saw that the local hardware store had a real good subsidized price on "Feit" brand reflector bulbs, so I bought a dozen. At this point, there are only one or two left in servixe, the rest have all burned out. I had left incandescent bulbs in s few places, and I found that the Feit bulbs burned out about as often as the incandescents. > > Since then I have generally bought GE or Philips, and they seem to last longer. Of course, they are all made in China... > > > Doug > > > > They are from FEIT Electric (which is a CA company, tho the > > bulbs are made > > in China) and the box says the price includes a discount > > from my local > > electric company; so they may not be found in all stores. > > But it might be > > worth a look, if you need them. > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as parkanzky at gmail.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Sat Feb 21 09:59:01 2009 From: gerrybraz at cablespeed.com (Gerald Brazil) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <0F44800E1C58407B95A82F4BD0F45152@DADSTOY> I've put a CFL equal to a 150w in my garage. In cold weather (Michigan) it is very dim when you first turn it on but after a while it comes up to the proper level. At least it doesn't flicker like my old tube fluorescent shop lights do in cold weather. -----Original Message----- From: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Paul Parkanzky Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:29 AM To: Doug Braun Cc: Randall; Shop-Talk Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot We bought our brand new home around two years ago and the first thing I did was replace every bulb in the house that didn't dim or was a spotlight with a compact fluorescent. In those two years I've only had to replace two failed bulbs. Both were Feits. We bought the more expensive "Daylight" or whatever bulbs for the more important areas and they look great, light up much faster, and seem to last better as well. We didn't replace the four spotlights in the kitchen because, at the time, the fluorescent replacements for those bulbs were really expensive. I should do some shopping and see if the prices have come down a bit. I also bought three 300W incandescent bulbs for the garage to add some light out there. At the time they didn't sell super-bright compact fluorescent bulbs. They do now, so I'll replace those with CF as they burn out. That is if I don't do a garage lighting project with several fluorescent tube fixtures first. Obviously, I'm a big fan of efficient lighting. I can't wait for the LED options to get more cost effective. -Paul On 2/21/09, Doug Braun wrote: > When we moved to a new house ~3 years ago, it had zillions of those ceiling-mounted 65-watt reflector bulbs. Then I saw that the local hardware store had a real good subsidized price on "Feit" brand reflector bulbs, so I bought a dozen. At this point, there are only one or two left in servixe, the rest have all burned out. I had left incandescent bulbs in s few places, and I found that the Feit bulbs burned out about as often as the incandescents. > > Since then I have generally bought GE or Philips, and they seem to > last longer. Of course, they are all made in China... > > > Doug > > > > They are from FEIT Electric (which is a CA company, tho the > > bulbs are made > in China) and the box says the price includes a > discount > from my local > > electric company; so they may not be found in all stores. > > But it might be > > worth a look, if you need them. > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as parkanzky at gmail.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive You are subscribed as gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From dirtbeard at pacbell.net Sat Feb 21 11:43:18 2009 From: dirtbeard at pacbell.net (old dirtbeard) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:43:18 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot References: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> It has been my experience that CFL's don't like to be turned off/on (seems to dramatically shorten their lives). I put them in the bathrooms where they are turned off and on many times a day (no windows) and they seem to die frequently even though the total number of hours on are very low compared to the ones in the living room that get many hours of use but are turned off/on once a day. Perhaps it could be the humidity, too, I suppose. As far as Feit CFL's, I bought a bunch a couple years ago and almost all of them failed -- I think they put out a bad batch. To their credit, when I emailed them to complain (I had no receipt or proof of purchase), they agreed to send me replacements for free even without a receipt. Then someone in their shipping dept. screwed up and they sent me the replacements twice. I contacted them to let them know that they sent me twice as many bulbs as they should have and I offered to send them back if they would give me a shipping address, and they told me to keep them and they were sorry for the failures. I don't think any of the replacements have failed, so I am thinking they just had a bad batch.With these mass-produced consumable coming from China, there could be millions of them in the supply chain (in containers on ships, in warehouses, etc.) before they find out that there was a engineering/manufacturing flaw. I am impressed at how well Feit stood behind their products, though. Initially I thought I would never buy another Feit, but they changed my mind. best, doug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Braun" To: "Shop-Talk" ; "Randall" Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 7:48 AM Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > When we moved to a new house ~3 years ago, it had zillions of those > ceiling-mounted 65-watt reflector bulbs. Then I saw that the local > hardware store had a real good subsidized price on "Feit" brand reflector > bulbs, so I bought a dozen. At this point, there are only one or two left > in servixe, the rest have all burned out. I had left incandescent bulbs > in s few places, and I found that the Feit bulbs burned out about as often > as the incandescents. > > Since then I have generally bought GE or Philips, and they seem to last > longer. Of course, they are all made in China... > > Doug > >> They are from FEIT Electric (which is a CA company, tho the >> bulbs are made >> in China) and the box says the price includes a discount >> from my local >> electric company; so they may not be found in all stores. >> But it might be >> worth a look, if you need them. > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as dirtbeard at pacbell.net > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sat Feb 21 15:16:50 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:16:50 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> Message-ID: <20090221221650.ZLWO21761.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@randall> > It has been my experience that CFL's don't like to be turned > off/on (seems to dramatically shorten their lives). I put > them in the bathrooms where they are turned off and on many > times a day (no windows) and they seem to die frequently even > though the total number of hours on are very low compared to > the ones in the living room that get many hours of use but > are turned off/on once a day. Perhaps it could be the > humidity, too, I suppose. I've had the same CFLs in one bathroom and the utility room (which likewise gets flipped on and off many times a day) since maybe 2004 with no failures yet. Might not be FEIT brand though. The very first fluorescent replacements for screw-in incandescents I bought over 10 years ago are FEIT, and all they have needed is bulb replacement. Not "compact" though, the bulbs are perhaps 6" long and the ballast adds a couple inches to that, so only useful in very limited situations (like the range hood and a floor lamp). > As far as Feit CFL's, I bought a bunch a couple years ago and > almost all of them failed -- I think they put out a bad batch. Makes sense to me. A very common problem with goods sourced from China; apparently no matter who does the importing. But I've had a lot of Sylvania bulbs that didn't last very long either, in my experience FEIT products are at least as good and likely better. Of course I could be prejudiced. Years ago I worked for a company that belonged to the same company that owns the Sylvania name. When they insisted that we start using Sylvania bulbs in our plant, our facilities manager complained that the bulbs failed at least twice as often as the GE bulbs he had been using. Randall From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sat Feb 21 15:23:39 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:23:39 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <0DCA8F7E62A243FAA83477E7F4F5C253@DADSTOY> Message-ID: <20090221222339.TNEK28844.cdptpa-omta06.mail.rr.com@randall> > Will these work with any dimmer or does it require a special type? AFAIK, will work with any dimmer. Certainly nothing on the box about any required dimmer, and there is nothing special about the dimmers I have tried them with. > I have finally found some CFLs I like but it seems that what > they rate as equivalent of a 100 watt doesn't produce the > same light in the room as a 100w incandescent. It does seem like they tend to cheat. Should have mentioned, the ones I got are rated at 23 watts. And to my eye they are a bit brighter than my existing 100 watt bulbs (tho the existing bulbs are not new and their light output does decrease with time). The light seems harsher, though, which might bother some people. Randall From rlwhitetr3b at hotmail.com Sat Feb 21 17:37:20 2009 From: rlwhitetr3b at hotmail.com (Rich White) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:37:20 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> References: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> Message-ID: I've heard or read that CFL do not like heat. They last longer when pointed up instead of pointing down like from a ceiling light fixture. Most of the lights in our house are can lights, so they would be confined and thus hot. I have a few of them but not many. I plan to readdress this at some point. Rich White St. Joseph, IL USA '63 TR3B TCF587L That ain't a scrap pile, that is my car! See it moves! From cornerexit at gmail.com Sun Feb 22 00:59:27 2009 From: cornerexit at gmail.com (cornerexit) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 23:59:27 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Removable chain link fence post? Message-ID: <7A2F1FD811CD4213807A9DCD5BA5BD22@Waynehouseputer> I am putting in a short section of chain link fence and a 5' gate to span the distance between the corner of my house and the wood perimeter fence. The 5' gate will work 95% of the time as I can get a riding lawnmower, wheelbarrow etc through it. However, there "might" be times where I need to get a larger item (tractor, pickup) through this span to get into the backyard. I don't really want to put two larger gates in across this span since I have the 5 footer already from a previous project. My thought was that if I ever needed a larger opening I could unfasten the chain link mesh from the chain link gate post and just roll it back to where it is fastened to the wood fence. However, it looks like the span from the chain link gate post to the wood fence is a little too long to make it without another chain link post put in the middle of that distance to properly support the mesh. I'm wonder about the possibility of sinking some type of sleeve or pipe in the ground and slipping the middle chain link post into that pipe. The theory being that the post could be lifted out and removed if I ever need to roll the mesh back and open a passageway. Has anybody done something like this? How did it work out? I wonder if there is already a properly sized sleeve or pipe just for this purpose. I think the chain link posts are 2.25" or so in diameter but I will have to double check that. Thanks Wayne From cornerexit at gmail.com Sun Feb 22 01:09:19 2009 From: cornerexit at gmail.com (cornerexit) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:09:19 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? Message-ID: <6458D229409D427BABB8BE1BEB0FF800@Waynehouseputer> My shop is of pole building construction (t-girt/perlin). I finished the inside which included putting in vertical studs on 16" centers, sheetrock etc. These studs do not have the exterior metal siding fastened to them so I can't just go by where screws are located to id the stud locations. I have a situation where I need to mount a fairly stout bracket to the exterior of the building and I need to find one of those studs to do so. I anticipate needing to sink some good sized lag-screws to mount the bracket. Further, the approximate area of where I need to mount this bracket includes an area of the wall that has a bunch of electrical wiring running through it (romex through holes in the studs). I was wondering if the stud finders would work through the metal skin to find the studs? Do some of the stud finders also detect electrical wires? Thanks Wayne From doug at dougbraun.com Sun Feb 22 07:25:28 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:25:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? In-Reply-To: <6458D229409D427BABB8BE1BEB0FF800@Waynehouseputer> Message-ID: <611065.16605.qm@web604.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> If the studs are touching the metal siding, can't you just tap on it until you feel the presence of a stud? Doug --- On Sun, 2/22/09, cornerexit wrote: > From: cornerexit > Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? > To: "'Shop Talk'" > Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 3:09 AM > > I was wondering if the stud finders would work through the > metal skin to > find the studs? Do some of the stud finders also detect > electrical wires? From kvacek at ameritech.net Sun Feb 22 07:28:48 2009 From: kvacek at ameritech.net (Karl Vacek) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:28:48 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? References: <611065.16605.qm@web604.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <249B740C35F54F2890C6628477D386E9@KARL> Or loosen and pull back an edge of the steel siding to look ?? Karl > If the studs are touching the metal siding, can't you just tap on it until > you feel the presence of a stud? > > Doug > > > --- On Sun, 2/22/09, cornerexit wrote: > >> From: cornerexit >> Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? >> To: "'Shop Talk'" >> Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 3:09 AM >> >> I was wondering if the stud finders would work through the >> metal skin to >> find the studs? Do some of the stud finders also detect >> electrical wires? From eric at megageek.com Sun Feb 22 07:28:24 2009 From: eric at megageek.com (eric at megageek.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? In-Reply-To: <249B740C35F54F2890C6628477D386E9@KARL> Message-ID: Maybe mine is different, but doesn't your siding have screws going into the studs from that side? Can't you just use the existing screw lines to identify where the studs are? Moose Everything I know about knots, I learned from Alexander the Great. "Karl Vacek" Sent by: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net 02/22/2009 09:17 Please respond to Karl Vacek To "cornerexit" , "Shop-Talk List" cc Subject Re: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? Or loosen and pull back an edge of the steel siding to look ?? Karl > If the studs are touching the metal siding, can't you just tap on it until > you feel the presence of a stud? > > Doug > > > --- On Sun, 2/22/09, cornerexit wrote: > >> From: cornerexit >> Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? >> To: "'Shop Talk'" >> Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 3:09 AM >> >> I was wondering if the stud finders would work through the >> metal skin to >> find the studs? Do some of the stud finders also detect >> electrical wires? You are subscribed as eric at megageek.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From jblair1948 at cox.net Sun Feb 22 07:54:58 2009 From: jblair1948 at cox.net (John T. Blair) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:54:58 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.1.20090222095442.01c8ca28@cox.net> At 03:09 AM 2/22/2009, Wayne wrote: >I have a situation where I need to mount a fairly stout bracket to the exterior of >the building and I need to find one of those studs to do so.... >Further, the approximate area of where I need to mount this bracket includes >an area of the wall that has a bunch of electrical wiring running through it >(romex through holes in the studs). >I was wondering if the stud finders would work through the metal skin to >find the studs? Do some of the stud finders also detect electrical wires? Wayne, I have an old Craftsman one, probably 15 yrs old at least. It doesn't. Your best bet would be a fox & hound wire tracer like: http://cableorganizer.com/triplett/tone-generator/fox2-hound2kit.htm#features I've seen some no name brand ones at one of the large box hardware stores. I just looked on home depot and didn't see it thought. This Triplet is a little expensive @ about $100 where the no name ones are about $60ish. If you know anyone that does telephone work, or network cable installations, they usually have one. Maybe you could borrow one. You'll probably have to trip the mains or at least the circuit you want to trace. We had a problem at my dad's house, one of the circuit breakers would trip instantly after being set. I got a buddy on mine, that used to do telephone work, who had one. We pulled the panel, tripped the main, and then removed the breaker for the circuit that was bad. We connected the fox and hound and traced the wiring through the house. Turns out that the fellow that installed dad's new dish washer, took one leg of a 220 V wire and connected it to ground. Also had to use it on another friends house the the phone got all screwed up. They had had 2 or 3 different phone companies. Each one ran their own phone lines, not using the existing ones. Anyway, there are pretty handy if you're doing electrical (either house hold, or auto) or phone work. John John T. Blair WA4OHZ email: jblair1948 at cox.net Va. Beach, Va Phone: (757) 495-8229 48 TR1800 48 #4 Midget 65 Morgan 4/4 Series V (B1106) 75 Bricklin SV1 (#0887) 77 Spitfire 71 Saab Sonett III 65 Rambler Classic Morgan: www.team.net/www/morgan Bricklin: www.bricklin.org If you can read this - Thank a teacher! If you are reading it in English - Thank a Vet!! From gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Sun Feb 22 08:09:15 2009 From: gerrybraz at cablespeed.com (Gerald Brazil) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Removable chain link fence post? In-Reply-To: <7A2F1FD811CD4213807A9DCD5BA5BD22@Waynehouseputer> Message-ID: <05CF2BE4C9454D34BB5694F26E092CF7@DADSTOY> Sound like a good plan....I'd try to find a piece of PVC pipe that your fence post would fit in and then set it in cement. This way you would avoid having two steel pipes rusting together. Also, pipe generally has a seam on the inside that means you can't get a slip fit. -----Original Message----- From: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of cornerexit Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 2:59 AM To: 'Shop Talk' Subject: [Shop-talk] Removable chain link fence post? I am putting in a short section of chain link fence and a 5' gate to span the distance between the corner of my house and the wood perimeter fence. The 5' gate will work 95% of the time as I can get a riding lawnmower, wheelbarrow etc through it. However, there "might" be times where I need to get a larger item (tractor, pickup) through this span to get into the backyard. I don't really want to put two larger gates in across this span since I have the 5 footer already from a previous project. My thought was that if I ever needed a larger opening I could unfasten the chain link mesh from the chain link gate post and just roll it back to where it is fastened to the wood fence. However, it looks like the span from the chain link gate post to the wood fence is a little too long to make it without another chain link post put in the middle of that distance to properly support the mesh. I'm wonder about the possibility of sinking some type of sleeve or pipe in the ground and slipping the middle chain link post into that pipe. The theory being that the post could be lifted out and removed if I ever need to roll the mesh back and open a passageway. Has anybody done something like this? How did it work out? I wonder if there is already a properly sized sleeve or pipe just for this purpose. I think the chain link posts are 2.25" or so in diameter but I will have to double check that. Thanks Wayne You are subscribed as gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From paul.mele at usermail.com Sun Feb 22 08:12:51 2009 From: paul.mele at usermail.com (Paul Mele) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <20090221222339.TNEK28844.cdptpa-omta06.mail.rr.com@randall> References: <0DCA8F7E62A243FAA83477E7F4F5C253@DADSTOY> <20090221222339.TNEK28844.cdptpa-omta06.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <017301c99500$0852c2f0$18f848d0$@mele@usermail.com> anybody make note of the lumens for the incandescent vs CFL comparison in brightness? > I have finally found some CFLs I like but it seems that what > they rate as equivalent of a 100 watt doesn't produce the > same light in the room as a 100w incandescent. It does seem like they tend to cheat. Should have mentioned, the ones I got are rated at 23 watts. And to my eye they are a bit brighter than my existing 100 watt bulbs (tho the existing bulbs are not new and their light output does decrease with time). The light seems harsher, though, which might bother some people. Randall _______________________________________________ From brabel at comcast.net Sun Feb 22 10:08:28 2009 From: brabel at comcast.net (Bill Rabel) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:08:28 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Stud finder work with metal siding? In-Reply-To: <6458D229409D427BABB8BE1BEB0FF800@Waynehouseputer> References: <6458D229409D427BABB8BE1BEB0FF800@Waynehouseputer> Message-ID: Wayne - I would figure out the what height to mount the bracket and measure the height of one of the mounting holes. Locate a stud on the inside and mark the appropriate height. Then drill a 1/4" hole from the inside, clear through the stud and through the metal. You could drill any additional holes from the outside. Now just use 5/16" or 3/8" lag screws to mount the bracket. Strong, weathertight, and accurate. Some stud finders will help locate electrical wires ("deep scan"), but I've never been totally sure of them, so I might even open up the sheetrock and peek before proceeding. - Bill Rabel Anacortes, WA > My shop is of pole building construction (t-girt/perlin). I finished > the > inside which included putting in vertical studs on 16" centers, > sheetrock > etc. These studs do not have the exterior metal siding fastened to > them so I > can't just go by where screws are located to id the stud locations. > > I have a situation where I need to mount a fairly stout bracket to the > exterior of the building and I need to find one of those studs to do > so. I > anticipate needing to sink some good sized lag-screws to mount the > bracket. > Further, the approximate area of where I need to mount this bracket > includes > an area of the wall that has a bunch of electrical wiring running > through it > (romex through holes in the studs). > > I was wondering if the stud finders would work through the metal > skin to > find the studs? Do some of the stud finders also detect electrical > wires? From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sun Feb 22 11:27:10 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:27:10 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <017301c99500$0852c2f0$18f848d0$@mele@usermail.com> Message-ID: <20090222182711.JJFL8036.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@randall> > anybody make note of the lumens for the incandescent vs CFL > comparison in brightness? Only the rated value; I don't have any way to measure actual lumens. GE Soft White 100w rated 1690 lumens ACE Standard 100w rated 1710 lumens FEIT 23w dimmable CFL rated 1600 lumens But I don't put a lot of faith in those numbers. If I recall correctly, the lumen does not take into account the response of the human eye. Checking online just now, I couldn't even find a bandwidth definition, only a single frequency. Much like "hp" of an air compressor, that leaves a lot of wiggle room. Randall From markmiller at threeboysfarm.com Sun Feb 22 16:08:34 2009 From: markmiller at threeboysfarm.com (Mark Miller) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:08:34 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] CFLs Message-ID: FYI: they don't work well with magnetic dimmers. These are the fancy and pricey ones that can dim from multiple locations. The bulbs blink a bit when set to off. The FEIT dimmables are often sold here with a PGE subsidy and sell for $1. Even with a shorter life they are a good deal. I second seeing a shortened life when burning base up. Mark. From markmiller at threeboysfarm.com Sun Feb 22 18:55:55 2009 From: markmiller at threeboysfarm.com (Mark Miller) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:55:55 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] CFLs, a correction Message-ID: <9B071A23314C42E5806FBC6ADB1DA2F2@OFFICEPC> Just saw the box they came in: not FEIT, but ULA (U lighting America [product of China]). They work really well, except for the one dud I got just a day out of. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Miller [mailto:markmiller at threeboysfarm.com] Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 3:09 PM To: 'shop-talk at autox.team.net' Subject: RE: CFLs FYI: they don't work well with magnetic dimmers. These are the fancy and pricey ones that can dim from multiple locations. The bulbs blink a bit when set to off. The FEIT dimmables are often sold here with a PGE subsidy and sell for $1. Even with a shorter life they are a good deal. I second seeing a shortened life when burning base up. Mark. From trevor at boicey.com Sun Feb 22 20:23:14 2009 From: trevor at boicey.com (Trevor Boicey) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable flourescent question... In-Reply-To: <9B071A23314C42E5806FBC6ADB1DA2F2@OFFICEPC> References: <9B071A23314C42E5806FBC6ADB1DA2F2@OFFICEPC> Message-ID: <49A216A2.5080201@boicey.com> While we are on the topic... I just moved to a new house, and one of the dimmers also controls a tube fluorescent. The tube seems to dim normally, and shows no sign of trouble. Could it be a dimmable fluorescent fixture or is it just a DPO mistake that hasn't exploded yet? From dirtbeard at pacbell.net Sun Feb 22 20:44:03 2009 From: dirtbeard at pacbell.net (old dirtbeard) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:44:03 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable flourescent question... References: <9B071A23314C42E5806FBC6ADB1DA2F2@OFFICEPC> <49A216A2.5080201@boicey.com> Message-ID: Dear Trevor, Well this is interesting -- I have never heard of a tube fluorescent on a dimmer. I did not know it was possible... best, shook ____________________ '72 BSA B50SS '74 Triumph TR6 '01 HD XLH 883 '03 GMC Cargo Van ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Boicey" To: Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:23 PM Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable flourescent question... > While we are on the topic... > > I just moved to a new house, and one of the dimmers also controls a tube > fluorescent. > > The tube seems to dim normally, and shows no sign of trouble. > > Could it be a dimmable fluorescent fixture or is it just a DPO mistake > that hasn't exploded yet? > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as dirtbeard at pacbell.net > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sun Feb 22 21:11:07 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:11:07 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable flourescent question... In-Reply-To: <49A216A2.5080201@boicey.com> Message-ID: <20090223041107.EDQ27443.cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com@randall> > Could it be a dimmable fluorescent fixture or is it just a > DPO mistake that hasn't exploded yet? Such things do exist; and I think you would see problems pretty much instantly if it were not a dimmable fixture/ballast. I have a couple of fluorescent floor lamps that came with an integral dimmer, and the bulb is basically a convoluted tube. Randall From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Mon Feb 23 10:08:58 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:08:58 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: References: <20090221050056.JJTC12934.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@randall> <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <04ab01c995d9$6af4a6b0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > We didn't replace the four spotlights in the kitchen because, at the > time, the fluorescent replacements for those bulbs were really > expensive. I should do some shopping and see if the prices have come > down a bit. Costco yesterday had "65w equivalent" reflector fluorescents. The "dimmable" ones were $20/3 pack; while I think the non-dimmable were about $18/6 pack. Sorry, I've forgotten the brand already, but I think it was FEIT. The non-dimmable ones also had a note about being OK in hot locations. Didn't buy any, although I do have one fixture in the hall that would probably work better with a reflector bulb. But we did pick up a Garmin GPS with free traffic updates for $250. Marginally cheaper on-line, but Costco has a 90 day return policy with no restocking charge. The wife gets lost easily on detours, and the freeway she drives almost every day is being torn up for repairs/improvements so big traffic jams are common. Having the GPS figure quickest route based on current traffic should be worth it just in frustration and missed appointments. YMMV Randall From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Mon Feb 23 11:21:56 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:21:56 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] CFLs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <04cc01c995e3$9cb0ff50$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > FYI: they don't work well with magnetic dimmers. I give up, what's a magnetic dimmer? Are we talking moving core? Saturable core? Something else? Randall From Tim.Mullen at ngc.com Mon Feb 23 13:08:42 2009 From: Tim.Mullen at ngc.com (Mullen, J T (IT)) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:08:42 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: References: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> Message-ID: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> > I've heard or read that CFL do not like heat. > > They last longer when pointed up instead of pointing down > like from a ceiling light fixture. I remember reading about this a while back. They make two kinds, of CFLs - ones meant to point up, and ones meant to point down. Unfortunately, the "point down" ones are hard to find (and more expensive if you do find them). It has to do with the electronics packed in the base, and the heat traveling "up". One problem I have with CFLs is the base. I have a garage door opener with sockets for a light bulb on each side. I'd like to put CFLs in them, but the socket has a tappered opening that confirms to a normal bulb - the CFLs won't screw into them and make contact. I've looked for a short extension - some thing to screw into the socket that the CFL then screws into, but so far no luck. I have a couple of "pull string" sockets that I'll use, but they extend the assembly out to far - allowing for more vibrations and preventing the cover from fitting... Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA From Tim.Mullen at ngc.com Mon Feb 23 13:22:10 2009 From: Tim.Mullen at ngc.com (Mullen, J T (IT)) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:22:10 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Removable chain link fence post? In-Reply-To: <7A2F1FD811CD4213807A9DCD5BA5BD22@Waynehouseputer> References: <7A2F1FD811CD4213807A9DCD5BA5BD22@Waynehouseputer> Message-ID: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A10C@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> > However, there "might" be times where I need to get a > larger item (tractor, pickup) through this span to get > into the backyard. I don't really want to put two larger > gates in across this span I needed a similar "occasional" gate at one time. I bought four right angle corner pieces, two vertical pipes, a pair of hinges, and the bars that slip into the end of the chain link to attach it to the ends. I then removed the 10 foot chunk of fence and bolted it all together. I then had a "gate" that looked like the regular part of the fence, but when needed, I could unlatch the end away from the hinge, and lift it up and swing my 10 foot wide "gate" open by hand (I had to "carry" it as it didn't swing freely). If worked just fine and was cheap to make. These are the "corner pieces": http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=productDetail&productId=92187-264- 87088&detail=&lpage=none The tension bar that slips into the end of the chain link: http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=productDetail&productId=92175-264- 13605&lpage=none Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA From dmscheidt at gmail.com Mon Feb 23 14:49:26 2009 From: dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> References: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Message-ID: <2400a5d40902231349p5a6a6a4elb419d41c7b8787a0@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Mullen, J T (IT) wrote: >> > > One problem I have with CFLs is the base. I have a garage door opener > with sockets for a light bulb on each side. I'd like to put CFLs in > them, but the socket has a tappered opening that confirms to a normal > bulb - the CFLs won't screw into them and make contact. That's not a problem with CFLs. The problem here is that the person who designed the socket is a moron. I wouldn't have thought you could screw up something as well defined as an edison screw base, but I guess I've underestimated the morons they let design stuff. Yet again. -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com From gerrybraz at cablespeed.com Mon Feb 23 15:34:22 2009 From: gerrybraz at cablespeed.com (Gerald Brazil) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] A really off topic question...... Message-ID: <95C7652BB7B447B19D7FF95D77BB0C7B@DADSTOY> Last weekend I visited my brother in law who had recently purchased a Toshiba Regza LCD TV. Since he is "technologically challenged" he asked me to set it up for him. I'm still in the CRT non HD mode but I can at least find my way around a menu. I did manage to get it pretty well adjusted except for one annoying problem. Regardless of what format I set it to I could not adjust it so that the banners at the top and bottom displayed fully. This was particularly annoying watching a basketball game because you couldn't see the scores, the clock or the shot clock. On old tech CRT TVs there use to be and adjustment that you could make with a screwdriver to "scrunch" the vertical enough to get everything in. Does anybody have a suggestion? From eric at megageek.com Mon Feb 23 15:37:17 2009 From: eric at megageek.com (eric at megageek.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] A really off topic question...... In-Reply-To: <95C7652BB7B447B19D7FF95D77BB0C7B@DADSTOY> Message-ID: It's funny, I just bought one of those TVs last week. (I bought that model and a Sony Bravida.) I came home to two broken TVs. Anyway, what I'm finding out is that there are multiple places where you can set the screen size. Many Satellite and cable boxes also do this so you need to check many places. What you are trying to do is not "scrunch" the picture down. Welcome to the next generation of TV. The words "aspect ratio" will haunt us for decades to come. Many TV shows were shot in the old aspect ratio and your new TV wants to play them in the new ratio. You are looking for button on your remote that say "pic size" scroll though the choices. There are about 4 modes (but your cable box may be sending the mode incorrectly as well.) I hope this helps. Moose Everything I know about knots, I learned from Alexander the Great. "Gerald Brazil" Sent by: shop-talk-bounces at autox.team.net 02/23/2009 17:23 To "shop-talk" cc Subject [Shop-talk] A really off topic question...... Last weekend I visited my brother in law who had recently purchased a Toshiba Regza LCD TV. Since he is "technologically challenged" he asked me to set it up for him. I'm still in the CRT non HD mode but I can at least find my way around a menu. I did manage to get it pretty well adjusted except for one annoying problem. Regardless of what format I set it to I could not adjust it so that the banners at the top and bottom displayed fully. This was particularly annoying watching a basketball game because you couldn't see the scores, the clock or the shot clock. On old tech CRT TVs there use to be and adjustment that you could make with a screwdriver to "scrunch" the vertical enough to get everything in. Does anybody have a suggestion? You are subscribed as eric at megageek.com Shop-talk mailing list http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk http://www.team.net/archive From scott.hall at comcast.net Mon Feb 23 16:10:44 2009 From: scott.hall at comcast.net (scott.hall at comcast.net) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <2400a5d40902231349p5a6a6a4elb419d41c7b8787a0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <711220061.390491235430644006.JavaMail.root@sz0146a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> "When you make something idiot-proof, somebody will just make a better idiot." ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Scheidt" To: "J T Mullen (IT)" Cc: "shop-talk List" Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:49:26 PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Mullen, J T (IT) wrote: >> > > One problem I have with CFLs is the base. I have a garage door opener > with sockets for a light bulb on each side. I'd like to put CFLs in > them, but the socket has a tappered opening that confirms to a normal > bulb - the CFLs won't screw into them and make contact. That's not a problem with CFLs. The problem here is that the person who designed the socket is a moron. I wouldn't have thought you could screw up something as well defined as an edison screw base, but I guess I've underestimated the morons they let design stuff. Yet again. From jem at milleredp.com Mon Feb 23 17:11:33 2009 From: jem at milleredp.com (John Miller) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:11:33 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <2400a5d40902231349p5a6a6a4elb419d41c7b8787a0@mail.gmail.com> References: <76515.68136.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <01F62FA1A5D142549A150BDCDD1DB431@B50SS> <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> <2400a5d40902231349p5a6a6a4elb419d41c7b8787a0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49A33B35.8080804@milleredp.com> David Scheidt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Mullen, J T (IT) wrote: >> One problem I have with CFLs is the base. I have a garage door opener >> with sockets for a light bulb on each side. I'd like to put CFLs in >> them, but the socket has a tappered opening that confirms to a normal >> bulb - the CFLs won't screw into them and make contact. > > That's not a problem with CFLs. The problem here is that the person > who designed the socket is a moron. I wouldn't have thought you could > screw up something as well defined as an edison screw base, but I > guess I've underestimated the morons they let design stuff. Yet > again. I think what he means is that the silo into which the bulb is inserted is conical, conforming to the typical taper of an incandescent bulb, with a conventional Edison socket at the bottom, while the CF bulb tends to be more cylindrical in shape with the transformer at the bottom and won't fit all the way into the silo (and in such tight quarters might cook the transformer even if it did.) John. From doug at dougbraun.com Mon Feb 23 18:46:14 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:46:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Message-ID: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I wouldn't consider a garage door opener to be a good application for CF bulbs. When the door opens, you want the illumination right away, instead of having to wait a minute for a CF bulb to reach a reasonable brightness. Also, I can't imagine a garage door opener light being on for more than 15 minutes a day, so it would take a long time for the CF to pay for itself. In my house, I put CF bulbs in places like the kitchen and family room, which tend to stay lit for a while. But the hallways, stairs, and bathrooms still have regular bulbs, since when you turn those lights on, you need to be able to see right away, and they are likely to be off again in a minute or two. Doug --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Mullen, J T (IT) wrote: > > One problem I have with CFLs is the base. I have a garage > door opener > with sockets for a light bulb on each side. I'd like > to put CFLs in > them, but the socket has a tappered opening that confirms > to a normal > bulb - the CFLs won't screw into them and make contact. > I've looked for > a short extension - some thing to screw into the socket > that the CFL > then screws into, but so far no luck. I have a couple of > "pull string" > sockets that I'll use, but they extend the assembly out > to far - > allowing for more vibrations and preventing the cover from > fitting... From doug at dougbraun.com Mon Feb 23 18:49:37 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:49:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <809824.31330.qm@web603.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> One other point: The classic non-compact fluorescent fixture with tube bulbs has immediate full brightness AND higher efficiency than CFs. I've got two jumbo fluorescent fixtures in my garage, which replaced the two hanging incandescent bulbs that it had when I bought the place. Doug From dmscheidt at gmail.com Mon Feb 23 18:52:33 2009 From: dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2400a5d40902231752t27b6b0a3tef004c009b42ab7e@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Doug Braun wrote: > I wouldn't consider a garage door opener to be a good application for CF bulbs. B When the door opens, you want the illumination right away, instead of having to wait a minute for a CF bulb to reach a reasonable brightness. B Also, I can't imagine a garage door opener light being on for more than 15 minutes a day, so it would take a long time for the CF to pay for itself. > Good CFLs are at full brightness in much less time than a minute. And they're putting out light instantly. (I have CFLs in my garage door openers because the plastic case of the one I replaced last year was charred and melted. It never had a bulb brighter than 60W in it, either. The replacement opener (which is nearly identical, but 10 years newer) had a metal sticker behind the bulb. -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Mon Feb 23 19:40:07 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:40:07 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <809824.31330.qm@web603.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <809824.31330.qm@web603.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <008801c99629$353b6400$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > One other point: The classic non-compact fluorescent fixture with > tube bulbs has immediate full brightness AND higher efficiency than CFs. Are you sure about that? Those old magnetic ballasts weren't very good and there are still a lot of them around. Their power consumption doesn't usually get included in the fixture rating; while the CFL does. Also had lousy power factor, which means the loss in the wires is higher than it would be otherwise. Or by "classic fixture", did you mean one with a modern, electronic ballast and high efficiency bulbs? I'm slowly changing out the magnetic ballasts in my garage/shop, and it's not unusual to find discolored paint from the ballast getting hot. Randall From doug at dougbraun.com Mon Feb 23 20:27:58 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:27:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Fw: Re: Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot Message-ID: <274769.93009.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I got this information from a DOE publication that benchmarked a lot of different LED, CF and incandescent light sources: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/caliper_round_5_summary_final.pdf It does not seem to mention anything about ballasts, though. I suspect that a cheapo HD fluorescent fixture will be quite a bit less efficient than a high-quality, high-efficiency model. Doug > --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Randall > wrote: > > > From: Randall > > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > > To: "'shop-talk List'" > > > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 9:40 PM > > > One other point: The classic non-compact > fluorescent > > fixture with > > > tube bulbs has immediate full brightness AND > higher > > efficiency than CFs. > > > > Are you sure about that? Those old magnetic ballasts > > weren't very good and > > there are still a lot of them around. Their power > > consumption doesn't > > usually get included in the fixture rating; while the > CFL > > does. From doug at dougbraun.com Mon Feb 23 20:29:11 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:29:11 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <008801c99629$353b6400$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <785171.59873.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Here is a good treatise on fluorescent light efficiency: http://nemesis.lonestar.org/reference/electricity/fluorescent/efficiency.html It seems to be written for people who have to buy and maintain commercial lighting. Doug From pethier at comcast.net Mon Feb 23 20:59:10 2009 From: pethier at comcast.net (pethier at comcast.net) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Shop-talk] A really off topic question...... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1893455696.1856681235447950505.JavaMail.root@sz0119a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> > You are looking for button on your remote that say "pic size" Or "zoom". From nogera2 at att.net Mon Feb 23 21:33:42 2009 From: nogera2 at att.net (nogera2 at att.net) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:33:42 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Double glass pack mufflers Message-ID: The glass pack muffler I have been using needs to be replaced. I'd also like to make the exhaust note a bit quieter. If I use two 18" glass pack mufflers end to end for a 36" long muffler, will I achieve a quieter exhaust note ? ( I've got the room for two glass packs but not enough room for a conventional oval muffler) Bob Nogueira From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Mon Feb 23 23:50:29 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:50:29 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <785171.59873.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090224065028.KQFA20000.cdptpa-omta03.mail.rr.com@randall> > Here is a good treatise on fluorescent light efficiency: > > http://nemesis.lonestar.org/reference/electricity/fluorescent/ > efficiency.html > > It seems to be written for people who have to buy and > maintain commercial lighting. But it still ignores the subject of ballast efficiency for conventional fluorescents; while implicitly including it for CFLs. Probably you (and they) are correct, the straight tubes are more efficient. But it bugs me when people make claims like that, without comparing apples to apples. Strikes me a lot like boasting how 'green' a hydrogen or electric-powered vehicle is, while ignoring how much CO2 was produced creating it's fuel. To make a real comparison, you have to compare the entire system. Randall From dmscheidt at gmail.com Tue Feb 24 07:22:27 2009 From: dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Fw: Re: Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <274769.93009.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <274769.93009.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2400a5d40902240622h3510c1ebuc7a976758c2fdfbd@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Doug Braun wrote: >aliper_round_5_summary_final.pdf > > It does not seem to mention anything about ballasts, > though. > I suspect that a cheapo HD fluorescent fixture will be > quite a bit less efficient than a high-quality, > high-efficiency model. > A cheapie from HD with an electronic ballast will be more effecient than an expensive 20 year old fixture with magnetic ballasts. And the electronic ballast will drive T-8 tubes, while the magnetic one won't -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com From wmc_st at xxiii.com Tue Feb 24 09:58:22 2009 From: wmc_st at xxiii.com (Wayne) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <008801c99629$353b6400$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <809824.31330.qm@web603.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <008801c99629$353b6400$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <49A4272E.7030003@xxiii.com> Randall wrote: > I'm slowly changing out the magnetic ballasts in my garage/shop, and it's > not unusual to find discolored paint from the ballast getting hot. What do you do with the old ones? Is there any scrap metal or recycle value to them? I assumed they were just a transformer and had a good bit of copper in them. But having just studied up, I'm not real sure what's in 'em: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_ballast -Wayne From Tim.Mullen at ngc.com Tue Feb 24 10:02:35 2009 From: Tim.Mullen at ngc.com (Mullen, J T (IT)) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:02:35 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> >> That's not a problem with CFLs. The problem here is that >> the person who designed the socket is a moron. I wouldn't >> have thought you could screw up something as well defined >> as an Edison screw base, > I think what he means is that the silo into which the bulb > is inserted is conical, conforming to the typical taper of > an incandescent bulb, with a conventional Edison socket at < the bottom, while the CF bulb tends to be more cylindrical > in shape with the transformer at the bottom and won't fit > all the way into the silo Exactly what I was meaning. The shape of the "silo" probably supports the Edison bulb better, but the CFLs won't fit into it. > I wouldn't consider a garage door opener to be a good application > for CF bulbs. When the door opens, you want the illumination > right away, instead of having to wait a minute for a CF bulb > to reach a reasonable brightness. I don't really worry about the opener's light when I open the door - it's the other times I need the light. My opener has an "over-ride" on the control that turns on the light. Since I don't have other lighting (or outlets/circuits to add additional lighting) I use the opener lights as my work lights in the garage. Besides saving electricity, the CFLs should last longer - the regular bulbs tend to fail often (vibrations possibly?). I swapped out my regular bulb on my trouble light (hangs from a reel on the ceiling) to a CFL years ago, and it's still going strong. A regular bulb would only last a short time before it would get jolted a bit too much and fail. And before anyone mentions it, yes, I've used the "ruggedized" bulbs, but they really didn't last much longer (but cost considerably more). Anyway, that's why I want to install CFLs in my opener... Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Tue Feb 24 11:30:30 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:30:30 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Message-ID: <017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > Since I don't have other lighting > (or outlets/circuits to add additional lighting) I use the opener lights > as my work lights in the garage. Just a thought, could you put an adapter in the existing socket, and plug a standalone fluorescent fixture into it? Mount it to the opener housing, a nearby joist, or even on chains hanging from the rafters. Randall From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Tue Feb 24 11:43:42 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:43:42 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <49A4272E.7030003@xxiii.com> References: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><809824.31330.qm@web603.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><008801c99629$353b6400$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <49A4272E.7030003@xxiii.com> Message-ID: <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > What do you do with the old ones? Not sure if I should admit this in public, I've been just tossing them in the trash. > Is there any scrap metal or recycle > value to them? Some, probably. But they are potted in a very unpleasant tarry substance and I doubt there is more than a pound of copper in each one (if it's copper at all). Most of the weight is probably the iron cores. The price of scrap copper does appear to be up, it's now some $1.60/pound ... still not worth it to me to try to salvage the copper from them. And if I saved them up and sold them as-is to a scrap dealer for barely enough to cover my cost of transporting them; they would probably set fire to the tar, which would likely be just as bad as in the landfill. That's the usual way of recycling copper wire and so on. Randall From pethier at comcast.net Tue Feb 24 11:49:07 2009 From: pethier at comcast.net (pethier at comcast.net) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <1132470137.2086621235501347498.JavaMail.root@sz0119a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> That would give you a larger light source for brighter and softer illumination, both a big win. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L 1979 Caterham 7 1993 Suburban 1994 Miata C-package 2007 Saturn Ion 3 2.4 pethier [at] comcast [dot] net http://forum.mnautox.com/forums http://www.flickr.com/photos/pethier ----- "Randall" wrote: > From: "Randall" > To: "shop-talk List" > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:30:30 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > > > Since I don't have other lighting > > (or outlets/circuits to add additional lighting) I use the opener > lights > > as my work lights in the garage. > > Just a thought, could you put an adapter in the existing socket, and > plug a > standalone fluorescent fixture into it? Mount it to the opener > housing, a > nearby joist, or even on chains hanging from the rafters. > > Randall From Tim.Mullen at ngc.com Tue Feb 24 12:11:57 2009 From: Tim.Mullen at ngc.com (Mullen, J T (IT)) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:11:57 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> <017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A5D0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Randall wrote: > > Just a thought, could you put an adapter in the existing > socket, and plug a standalone fluorescent fixture into > it? Mount it to the opener housing, a nearby joist, or > even on chains hanging from the rafters. Well, yea, that would work and even be logical. But I'm trying to go cheap and easy... Actually, I never figured I'd be in the house for very long, so I never got around to it. 15 years later, and I still haven't gotten around to setting things up properly. I did things right in my last house - wired lots of circuits in conduits along the walls, extra circuits on the ceiling for the many fluorescents, etc. Then my project was canceled, my job disappeared, and we moved about 6 months later. Which helps to explain why I haven't gotten around to doing thing right in the "new" house... Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA From doug at dougbraun.com Tue Feb 24 12:29:38 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:29:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <197074.54368.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> What's a good source of reasonably-priced well-made ballasts? I assume you are replacing magnetic ones with electronic ones. My garage has a couple of fluorescent fixtures that each have two 8-foot high-output bulbs. There is tons of light, but the cheapo ballasts get pretty warm. I wonder if it is cheaper to replace just the ballasts, or just get new fixtures with better ballasts. The fixtures themselves are quite basic, just a long skinny metal box with a couple of sockets at each end. There is no reflector, which is OK because the ceiling is bright white. Doug --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Randall wrote: > From: Randall > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > To: "'Shop Talk List'" > Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 1:43 PM > > What do you do with the old ones? > > Not sure if I should admit this in public, I've been > just tossing them in > the trash. > > > Is there any scrap metal or recycle > > value to them? > > Some, probably. But they are potted in a very unpleasant > tarry substance > and I doubt there is more than a pound of copper in each > one (if it's copper > at all). Most of the weight is probably the iron cores. > > The price of scrap copper does appear to be up, it's > now some $1.60/pound > ... still not worth it to me to try to salvage the copper > from them. And if > I saved them up and sold them as-is to a scrap dealer for > barely enough to > cover my cost of transporting them; they would probably set > fire to the tar, > which would likely be just as bad as in the landfill. > That's the usual way > of recycling copper wire and so on. > > Randall > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > You are subscribed as doug at dougbraun.com > > Shop-talk mailing list > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk > > http://www.team.net/archive From pat at hornesystemstx.com Tue Feb 24 12:43:07 2009 From: pat at hornesystemstx.com (Pat Horne) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:43:07 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><809824.31330.qm@web603.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><008801c99629$353b6400$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <49A4272E.7030003@xxiii.com> <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <49A44DCB.4090805@hornesystemstx.com> Just be sure that the ballasts are marked "NO PCBs" These can be thrown away, the ballasts that don't say that have to go to hazardous waste collection. Even though ballasts for the last decade or so have been PCB free, there are quite a few older units out there that are not. Peace, Pat Thusly spake Randall, On 2/24/2009 12:43 PM: >> What do you do with the old ones? >> > > Not sure if I should admit this in public, I've been just tossing them in > the trash. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 02/24/09 06:43:00 > > -- --- Pat Horne 512.797.7501 Owner, Horne Systems pat at hornesystemstx.com 5026 FM 2001 Lockhart, TX 78644-4443 --We support Habitat for Humanity, a hand UP, not a hand OUT-- From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Tue Feb 24 12:43:32 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:43:32 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <197074.54368.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <197074.54368.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <018f01c996b8$2d281440$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > What's a good source of reasonably-priced well-made ballasts? I assume you > are replacing magnetic ones with electronic ones. I don't recall the exact price offhand, but I've been getting them at Home Depot. Checked some other sources and HD was the best. They do come up on eBay from time to time, but on the rare occasions when they are what I want (two F96T12 bulbs, 120v electronic), the prices are no better than HD. Not a whole lot cheaper than a new fixture (there isn't much else to a fixture), but a bit. And installing an 8' fixture overhead by yourself is a bit of a challenge (especially with cars and/or equipment under it), I'd rather change the ballast. No doubt I'd save money in the long run by converting to T8 fixtures, but I want to use up my case of T12s first The electronic ballasts don't use the switches built into the lamp sockets, so the wiring is a bit different. I just join the wires together, as that's easier than tying them back. Randall From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Tue Feb 24 13:12:14 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:12:14 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A5D0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A5D0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Message-ID: <019f01c996bc$321f9b40$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > Actually, I never figured I'd be in the house for very long, so I never > got around to it. 15 years later, and I still haven't gotten around to > setting things up properly. I'm the same way, mostly, even though I'm pretty sure I'll still be there for another 5-10 years. Always something more entertaining than home improvement. Which is why my garage lights are all run through extension cords But it's not hard to find cheap garage-grade fluorescent fixtures; HD, K-mart etc frequently have a (2)F48 "shop light" complete with reflector and hanging chains on sale for around $10 or so and a pair of bulbs shouldn't be more than $5 or so. I think the last one I got even came with a cord, but if not, you should be able to scrounge an old lamp cord or similar, and run it through a Romex clamp. Not as cheap as a CFL, but still under $20. And hanging by a chain generally doesn't count as a "permanent improvement", so if you move, you can take the new fixture with you if you want. If an inspector hassles you, just unplug it. Randall From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Tue Feb 24 13:15:23 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:15:23 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <018f01c996b8$2d281440$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com><197074.54368.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <018f01c996b8$2d281440$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <01a001c996bc$a01887b0$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > I don't recall the exact price offhand, but I've been getting them at Home > Depot. Checked some other sources and HD was the best. Oops, make that "best for me". There is a HD about a mile from my house, which makes buying from them more attractive than Lowe's etc just because of the distance and travel time involved. YMMV Randall From strovato at optonline.net Tue Feb 24 13:38:19 2009 From: strovato at optonline.net (Steven Trovato) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <018f01c996b8$2d281440$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <017501c996af$d156ce20$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <197074.54368.qm@web605.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <018f01c996b8$2d281440$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <0KFL002S8801OLG1@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> The cheap home depot 4' shoplights say they will work with either T8s or T12s. Go to www.homedepot.com and search for 100253578. I don't know if there are 8' lights that work on both. I've always found that the 8' lights cost more than twice what the 4' ones do. Probably just because the 4' lights are marketed to the homeowner while the 8' ones are more of a commercial item. -Steve Trovato strovato at optonline.net At 02:43 PM 2/24/2009, Randall wrote: >No doubt I'd save money in the long run by >converting to T8 fixtures, but I want to use up my case of T12s first From Tim.Mullen at ngc.com Tue Feb 24 13:53:14 2009 From: Tim.Mullen at ngc.com (Mullen, J T (IT)) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:53:14 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <019f01c996bc$321f9b40$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com><9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A5D0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> <019f01c996bc$321f9b40$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A6A0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Randall wrote: > > Which is why my garage lights are all run through extension cords Well, I mounted a retractable hose reel for my air compressor in the middle of the ceiling in the garage. But the "hard lines" running to it is still a "temporary" length of 50 foot air hose hanging from some nails. One of these days I'm going to do it right. One other reason for not getting to the lights is the "project car" that doesn't get moved on one side of the garage. Kind of hard to install new lights without access. One of these days... Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA From doug at dougbraun.com Tue Feb 24 14:31:26 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:31:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <0KFL002S8801OLG1@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Message-ID: <658966.93714.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> My lights have the "HO" type bulbs, which are almost 100 watts each, and have a special recessed 2-pin connector on each end. I think the ballasts for those are less common (and more expensive). The next time I go to Lowe's or HD, I'll look around. Thanks to whoever started this thread! I've learned a lot about fluorescent lamps the last day or so (when I should have been doing something else). Doug --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Steven Trovato wrote: > From: Steven Trovato > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > To: "Randall" , "'Shop Talk List'" > Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 3:38 PM > The cheap home depot 4' shoplights say they will work > with either T8s or T12s. Go to www.homedepot.com and search > for 100253578. I don't know if there are 8' lights > that work on both. I've always found that the 8' > lights cost more than twice what the 4' ones do. > Probably just because the 4' lights are marketed to the > homeowner while the 8' ones are more of a commercial > item. From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Tue Feb 24 15:57:12 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:57:12 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A6A0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> References: <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A0F4@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><363497.40297.qm@web608.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com><9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A4CB@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><017101c996ad$f921a490$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com><9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A5D0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com><019f01c996bc$321f9b40$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> <9C2F69BA6FB69F43ABCDBCFFC282C7970299A6A0@XMBIL103.northgrum.com> Message-ID: <01ea01c996d3$3b5c7270$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> > But the "hard lines" running to it > is still a "temporary" length of 50 foot air hose hanging from some > nails. > > One of these days I'm going to do it right. Probably the day after it breaks, and goes whipping all around I know that's how long it would wait for me! (Actually, my retracting hose reel is still in its box, for just that reason. I'll run some hard lines up there Real Soon Now but until then, the soft lines are laying the floor where I will hopefully replace them before one breaks again.) Randall From doug at dougbraun.com Tue Feb 24 18:00:40 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:00:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <01ea01c996d3$3b5c7270$275636cc@jdnet.deere.com> Message-ID: <857023.98867.qm@web606.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I got one of those 50-foot retractable hose reels a couple of years ago. (I got a good deal at a swap meet just before packing-up time). It has worked very well, and I am very glad I got it. So get yours installed! Doug --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Randall wrote: > From: Randall > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > To: "'shop-talk List'" > Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 5:57 PM > > > (Actually, my retracting hose reel is still in its box, for > just that > reason. I'll run some hard lines up there Real Soon > Now but until then, the > soft lines are laying the floor where I will hopefully > replace them before > one breaks again.) > > Randall > _______________________________________________ From jem at milleredp.com Tue Feb 24 20:11:19 2009 From: jem at milleredp.com (John Miller) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:11:19 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <857023.98867.qm@web606.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <857023.98867.qm@web606.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49A4B6D7.9070307@milleredp.com> Doug Braun wrote: > I got one of those 50-foot retractable hose reels a couple of years > ago. (I got a good deal at a swap meet just before packing-up time). > It has worked very well, and I am very glad I got it. I've got a 50ft hosereel and a 40ft cordreel (both Harbor Freight items) way up on the wall next to the door at the back of the garage. It's very nice to have them there. The hosereel works fine; the cordreel isn't all that good, but it gets the job done. John. From doug at dougbraun.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:57 2009 From: doug at dougbraun.com (Doug Braun) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:48:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot In-Reply-To: <49A4B6D7.9070307@milleredp.com> Message-ID: <747534.78364.qm@web602.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I have a Sears work light reel (the old-skool incandescent kind) that is about 10 years old, and a few years ago it started getting sluggish about reeling up. I pulled out all the cord, cleaned it well, and gave the cord a coating of Armor-All. After that treatment, it worked much better, since the cord was less likely to bind on the inside of the housing. Doug --- On Tue, 2/24/09, John Miller wrote: > From: John Miller > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Dimmable CFLs at Home Depot > To: "Doug Braun" > Cc: "Randall" , "Shop-Talk List" > Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 10:11 PM > I've got a 50ft hosereel and a 40ft cordreel (both > Harbor Freight items) way up on the wall next to the door at > the back of the garage. > > It's very nice to have them there. The hosereel works > fine; the cordreel isn't all that good, but it gets the > job done. From rlwhitetr3b at hotmail.com Wed Feb 25 14:43:04 2009 From: rlwhitetr3b at hotmail.com (Rich White) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:43:04 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] 3d drawing package needed In-Reply-To: <276330.37015.qm@web57004.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <276330.37015.qm@web57004.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Brian, It looks like the maximum size of an object in this CAD program is 14". Is there a way to change the scale, or are you just scaling it in your own mind. Rich White St. Joseph, IL USA '63 TR3B TCF587L That ain't a scrap pile, that is my car! See it moves! > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:46:21 -0800 > From: battmain at yahoo.com > To: shop-talk at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] 3d drawing package needed > > I've been toying with a free one from > > http://www.emachineshop.com/ > > It is rather basic and I don't recall having to do so many > steps with the autocad software I used to use in college, > but it does do a rather nice 3-d drawing of all my > screwups while I learn how to use it. ;p > > Brian > battmain at yahoo.com From dirtbeard at pacbell.net Sat Feb 28 12:18:03 2009 From: dirtbeard at pacbell.net (old dirtbeard) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:18:03 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] tube fluorescent wattage Message-ID: <51C89075829D4511BE0F4F83C6F6978E@B50SS> Hi shop talkers. All that compact fluorescent and tube fluorescent discussion got me thinking about the wattage consumed so I got the old Kill A Watt out and tested a two tube 4' fixture with solid-state ballast and a one tube 4' fixture with a magnetic ballast (all with 40 watt bulbs). At the time of the testing my line voltage was 122 VAC. Interesting results, I think. The old single tube magnetic fixture started off with the normal flickering at about 22 watts and slowly crept up to 34 watts consumption at full brilliance after about 30 seconds. The twin tube solid state started off immediately at 68 and did not vary. The fixtures consume about 85% as much wattage as the bulbs are rated. I actually expected them to consume more than the bulbs were rated assuming some inefficiency in the ballast, and I expected the old magnetic ballast to consume more than the solid state one. I always wondered what was happening power-wise when magnetic ballasts were flickering upon startup -- they are using very little power until they warm up and reach full-illumination. I tested a couple compact 15 watt CFL reflector replacements for the R30 incandescent bulbs, too. They start off about 9 watts and then gradually creep up to 13 watts after a few minutes. Just because I had it out, I tested a half dozen old incandescent 130 volt R30 65 watt bulbs. They actually drew 57 watts which is less than the 122 line voltage/130 VAC rating would have suggested (61 watts). They all were used so they may draw more when new. Just to see if my Kill A Watt was reading low, I tested a new 75 watt incandescent, and it showed 77 watts, so I think it probably is close. best, doug ____________________ '72 BSA B50SS '74 Triumph TR6 '01 HD XLH 883 '03 GMC Cargo Van From brad.kahler at 141.com Sat Feb 28 12:39:34 2009 From: brad.kahler at 141.com (Brad Kahler) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] culverts Message-ID: <49A992F6.9070203@141.com> Since we moved into our new house in Kentucky a few months ago I've been watching how rain water flows across the yard, driveway and pastures. In one place on the driveway the previous owners had put a culvert. This culvert was open on the uphill side but for some reason they covered up the downstream side with dirt. Oddly enough the water doesn't flow over the top of the driveway like I would have expected so I went searching for the reason. What I found was over the years the water flow has created a couple of underground passages that travel for 5 or 6 feet (probably more) before working their way to the surface. We're going to be doing some grading of the land in the general area of where the culvert is for placement of a new shop so I'm going to have to find a way to extend the existing culvert maybe 20' or more. I've purchased a couple of 20' plastic culverts but I unsure how to tie the existing steel culvert to the new plastic culvert. Any suggestions on a means to accomplish this feat? Thanks! Brad From tr3driver at ca.rr.com Sat Feb 28 12:50:10 2009 From: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:50:10 -0800 Subject: [Shop-talk] tube fluorescent wattage In-Reply-To: <51C89075829D4511BE0F4F83C6F6978E@B50SS> Message-ID: <20090228195011.XEXC15930.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@randall> > (all with 40 watt bulbs) Regular start, rapid start or instant start? > Interesting results, I think. That is interesting. Thanks for the report. > I actually expected them to consume > more than the bulbs were rated assuming some inefficiency in > the ballast, and I expected the old magnetic ballast to > consume more than the solid state one. Me too. But it makes sense to me that old bulbs draw less current, so I'm still wondering how much power was actually making it to the bulbs. That seems to me to be the way they usually fail, apparently the bulbs lose gas and the current drops until the ballast can no longer hold a plasma through the tube. For bulbs with filaments, then the filament burns out from the ballast having to constantly restart the tube (hence the flicker of a dying fluorescent). Instant start bulbs just keep restarting until either the ballast dies (from the constant restarting) or the bulb finally won't light at all. > I always wondered what was happening power-wise when magnetic > ballasts were flickering upon startup -- they are using very > little power until they warm up and reach full-illumination. Depends on the bulb type, I think. Regular start bulbs (the ones with a separate starter to replace) should be drawing filament power; while I think the others would be drawing nothing at all. > Just to see if my Kill A Watt was reading low, I tested a new > 75 watt incandescent, and it showed 77 watts, so I think it > probably is close. Agreed. But it would be interesting to test a larger selection of new bulbs, to see how much variation there is. I doubt they worry much about getting it exact. Randall From kvacek at ameritech.net Sat Feb 28 17:58:59 2009 From: kvacek at ameritech.net (Karl Vacek) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:58:59 -0600 Subject: [Shop-talk] tube fluorescent wattage References: <20090228195011.XEXC15930.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <4B186C9EE5EA4680999B047592358030@KARL> > Just to see if my Kill A Watt was reading low, I tested a new > 75 watt incandescent, and it showed 77 watts, so I think it > probably is close. 75-watt incandescent bulbs are usually labeled as 77 initial watts nowadays - sounds right to me. Karl From nases at verizon.net Sat Feb 28 20:19:27 2009 From: nases at verizon.net (Phil Nase) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Shop-talk] tube fluorescent wattage In-Reply-To: <20090228195011.XEXC15930.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@randall> References: <20090228195011.XEXC15930.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@randall> Message-ID: <0B25C932-D23C-4F96-A42A-3E4DE26418ED@verizon.net> Just a note to thank Randall and the rest of you frequent posters for all your professional responses to these posts. I barely understand most of the things you folks talk about but I wanted to thank you for your advice. Maybe someday, if I live long enough, I will understand some of what you guys already forgot. It's mostly Greek to me but I appreciate learning what you guys seem to take for common knowledge. This is a great list and I wanted to show some appreciation for the knowledge that gets handed out for free. Just a dumba$$ accountant and part time Sprite mechanic. Can you tell anything more than simple auto wiring confuses me? Phil Nase Quakertown, PA http://home.comcast.net/~philnasecpa/ On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Randall wrote: >> (all with 40 watt bulbs) > > Regular start, rapid start or instant start? > >> Interesting results, I think. > > That is interesting. Thanks for the report. > >> I actually expected them to consume >> more than the bulbs were rated assuming some inefficiency in >> the ballast, and I expected the old magnetic ballast to >> consume more than the solid state one. > > Me too. But it makes sense to me that old bulbs draw less current, > so I'm > still wondering how much power was actually making it to the bulbs. > That > seems to me to be the way they usually fail, apparently the bulbs > lose gas > and the current drops until the ballast can no longer hold a plasma > through > the tube. For bulbs with filaments, then the filament burns out > from the > ballast having to constantly restart the tube (hence the flicker of > a dying > fluorescent). Instant start bulbs just keep restarting until either > the > ballast dies (from the constant restarting) or the bulb finally > won't light > at all. > >> I always wondered what was happening power-wise when magnetic >> ballasts were flickering upon startup -- they are using very >> little power until they warm up and reach full-illumination. > > Depends on the bulb type, I think. Regular start bulbs (the ones > with a > separate starter to replace) should be drawing filament power; while > I think > the others would be drawing nothing at all. > >> Just to see if my Kill A Watt was reading low, I tested a new >> 75 watt incandescent, and it showed 77 watts, so I think it >> probably is close. > > Agreed. But it would be interesting to test a larger selection of new > bulbs, to see how much variation there is. I doubt they worry much > about > getting it exact. > > Randall