[Shop-talk] 6 to 3 fuel saving
Jim Juhas
james.f.juhas at snet.net
Tue Jul 29 19:00:46 MDT 2008
That's the great thing about bar stools.
Elton E. (Tony) Clark wrote:
> *Okay, open your minds . . . the guy on the next bar stool opines that on
> his straight six '95 Jeep Cherokee work car, he is considering removing the
> rocker arms and pushrods on every other cylinder in the firing order and
> running it on three cylinders to save gas.. The closed cylinders would
> resist rotation on compression but rebound on downstroke with little loss
> except friction. *
> **
> *I'm thinking this would probably work for some saving but at a steady
> state throttle opening, won't it just require about the same fuel to achieve
> equilibrium with the wind resistance and rolling resistance? Also, won't
> it freak the ECU when 3 cylinders aren't working?*
> **
> *What do YOU think?*
> **
> *Tony*
> _______________________________________________
More information about the Shop-talk
mailing list