From h.duinhoven at planet.nl Mon May 3 03:28:47 2021 From: h.duinhoven at planet.nl (h.duinhoven at planet.nl) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:28:47 +0200 Subject: [Mgs] Mold In-Reply-To: <004a01d73dd2$a6451250$f2cf36f0$@ranteer.com> References: <01f501d73c42$1266e400$3734ac00$@centurytel.net> <009401d73ceb$db28bc20$917a3460$@planet.nl> <41cb65ab-7e59-c7f6-1b03-768019893f58@bell.net> <000901d73d27$ed998880$c8cc9980$@planet.nl> <004a01d73dd2$a6451250$f2cf36f0$@ranteer.com> Message-ID: <000001d73ffe$b85c2a90$29147fb0$@planet.nl> LOL Dave! Van: Mgs Namens dave Verzonden: vrijdag 30 april 2021 17:08 Aan: 'mglist' Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] Mold Years ago it was deemed incorrect to use rice in weddings because the birds would eat it, the rice would expand, and the birds would explode. Would this not also happen to mice? In which case we should spread it everywhere??? From: Mgs > On Behalf Of Max Heim Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 1:53 PM To: mglist > Subject: Re: [Mgs] Mold Also feeds mice very well? -- Max Heim '66 MGB On Apr 29, 2021, at 11:46 AM, > > wrote: Rice absorbs moist very well! Cheers, Hans Van: Mgs > Namens Barrie Robinson Verzonden: donderdag 29 april 2021 17:30 Aan: mgs at autox.team.net Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] Mold Absolutely - together with 2lbs of ham, a large cheese, peeled grapes and a partridge in a pear tree. To say nothing of a set of books, preferably Dickens! (well hell they must have something to read). But seriously if rice is your direction then it should be nasi biryani. I must stop wearing this clown's hat! Cheers Barrie On 4/29/2021 7:36 AM, h.duinhoven at planet.nl wrote: Have a bag full of rice placed in the car before have it hibernating. Funny Frank asked this. Frank and I have met in 2000, when I went to Boston. http://www.ttalk.info/Tech/hans_across_the_water.htm Cheers, Hans 71 BGT -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Mgs Namens David F. Darby Verzonden: woensdag 28 april 2021 17:21 Aan: 'Frank Krajewski' ; Mgs at autox.team.net Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] Mold Ventilation and maybe a dehumidifier. David -----Original Message----- From: Mgs [mailto:mgs-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Frank Krajewski Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 10:12 AM To: Mgs at autox.team.net Subject: [Mgs] Mold I keep my 1980 MGB LE stored and covered in my sop from about late September to now. I live in Rhode island and can?t risk driving it until the rain has washed away all the salt on the roads. This year I took it to Bassett?s Jaguar, just down the road from me as I know Bill Bassett and he has helped me out in the past. It needed some minor work which he was going to do. Bill called me later tat day and said he couldn?t touch the car due to extensive mold everywhere. Since then I have embarked on an extensive mold removal effort using white vinegar and several commercially available products. Is there something more I should be doing and is there some way to prevent this from happening in the future other than leaving the car uncovered? I am even having it professionally detailed next week. The detailer promised to thoroughly clean and demold the car. Frank Krajewski 1980 MGBLE 1991 Miata LE Sent from my iPad. _______________________________________________ Mgs at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/ddarby at centurytel.net _______________________________________________ Mgs at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/h.duinhoven at planet.nl _____ Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. www.avast.com _______________________________________________ Mgs at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net -- Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From h.duinhoven at planet.nl Mon May 3 03:30:58 2021 From: h.duinhoven at planet.nl (h.duinhoven at planet.nl) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:30:58 +0200 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height Message-ID: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> Is there info about the ride height of an MK2 1971 MGB GT? What distance is the centre of each wheel to the top of the wheel arch? TIA. Cheers, Hans -- Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Mon May 3 04:42:18 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:42:18 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> Have a look at http://www.mgb-stuff.org.uk/suspensiontext.htm#height CB is typically around 14-14.5" from the centre of the wheel hub to the underside of the bright trim strip. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- Is there info about the ride height of an MK2 1971 MGB GT? What distance is the centre of each wheel to the top of the wheel arch? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul at ece.rochester.edu Mon May 3 04:54:41 2021 From: paul at ece.rochester.edu (Osborne, Paul) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 10:54:41 +0000 Subject: [Mgs] [EXT] Ride height In-Reply-To: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: <6914E41B-7459-435E-9390-9BCCCFB4F292@ur.rochester.edu> Has, I own an early 74 BGT chrome bumper, but have never seen any info on that. Be glad to measure it if you like. Paul Paul Osborne Department of Electrical and Computer Eng University of Rochester 201 Hopeman Building RC Rochester NY 14627 585-275-5226 On May 3, 2021, at 5:30 AM, h.duinhoven at planet.nl wrote: Is there info about the ride height of an MK2 1971 MGB GT? What distance is the centre of each wheel to the top of the wheel arch? TIA. Cheers, Hans [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif] Virusvrij. www.avast.com _______________________________________________ Mgs at autox.team.net Donate: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.team.net_donate.html&d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aGq-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=7hIlXs2ZoEsAOL3-1VXPAnkCpl-3hRz9bIR4VKz-4h8&e= Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.team.net_pipermail_mgs&d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aGq-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=0YJUbk5L83zLzVxrhnH9nNwqzZ4InZuBabN7RP1atK0&e= https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__autox.team.net_archive&d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aGq-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=9k0H6veno07vWfY5iVYRS8ALH-dtEE6ekOX02XsI5-o&e= Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__autox.team.net_mailman_options_mgs_paul-40ece.rochester.edu&d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aGq-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=hSzOYMX9-i0sYvKGgvCu20fKvB1f9ZH0g4ckocSRe5M&e= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From h.duinhoven at planet.nl Mon May 3 05:46:32 2021 From: h.duinhoven at planet.nl (h.duinhoven at planet.nl) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 13:46:32 +0200 Subject: [Mgs] [EXT] Ride height In-Reply-To: <6914E41B-7459-435E-9390-9BCCCFB4F292@ur.rochester.edu> References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <6914E41B-7459-435E-9390-9BCCCFB4F292@ur.rochester.edu> Message-ID: <002501d74011$f6e60390$e4b20ab0$@planet.nl> Yes please Paul. If possible in centimetres, rather than inches. Hans Van: Mgs Namens Osborne, Paul Verzonden: maandag 3 mei 2021 12:55 Aan: h.duinhoven at planet.nl CC: mgs at autox.team.net Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] [EXT] Ride height Has, I own an early 74 BGT chrome bumper, but have never seen any info on that. Be glad to measure it if you like. Paul Paul Osborne Department of Electrical and Computer Eng University of Rochester 201 Hopeman Building RC Rochester NY 14627 585-275-5226 On May 3, 2021, at 5:30 AM, h.duinhoven at planet.nl wrote: Is there info about the ride height of an MK2 1971 MGB GT? What distance is the centre of each wheel to the top of the wheel arch? TIA. Cheers, Hans Virusvrij. www.avast.com _______________________________________________ Mgs at autox.team.net Donate: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.team.net_donate.html &d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aG q-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=7h IlXs2ZoEsAOL3-1VXPAnkCpl-3hRz9bIR4VKz-4h8&e= Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.team.net_pipermail_m gs&d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0 aGq-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s= 0YJUbk5L83zLzVxrhnH9nNwqzZ4InZuBabN7RP1atK0&e= https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__autox.team.net_archive&d =DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aGq- Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJICm-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=9k0H 6veno07vWfY5iVYRS8ALH-dtEE6ekOX02XsI5-o&e= Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__autox.team.net_mailman_o ptions_mgs_paul-40ece.rochester.edu&d=DwICAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl 9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=j_uK0-rtrtcKZ8O0aGq-Y5ZUDfHjCD_Cv57WMn_czag&m=6KJQpcGkFlJIC m-1ZeHooLkU5v9SKJlEXcARfaQyb34&s=hSzOYMX9-i0sYvKGgvCu20fKvB1f9ZH0g4ckocSRe5M &e= -- Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From h.duinhoven at planet.nl Mon May 3 05:53:29 2021 From: h.duinhoven at planet.nl (h.duinhoven at planet.nl) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 13:53:29 +0200 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> Message-ID: <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> Thanks Paul, Do springs (leaf springs especially) tend to sag is decades? Hans Van: PaulHunt73 Verzonden: maandag 3 mei 2021 12:42 Aan: h.duinhoven at planet.nl; mgs at autox.team.net Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] Ride height Have a look at http://www.mgb-stuff.org.uk/suspensiontext.htm#height CB is typically around 14-14.5" from the centre of the wheel hub to the underside of the bright trim strip. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- Is there info about the ride height of an MK2 1971 MGB GT? What distance is the centre of each wheel to the top of the wheel arch? -- Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgbobh at gmail.com Mon May 3 06:04:17 2021 From: mgbobh at gmail.com (Robert's New iPad) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 08:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: <3DB8B412-2EE7-46B2-BA78-12D3AC643503@gmail.com> Yes, the springs do sag over time, the leaf springs more visibly sagging than the front coils. Some years back, my GT?s rear springs were too sagged to tolerate. I bought new, from the large supplier in California. The car was raised, not unlike the off-road cars one sees. At a spring rebuild shop, one that had not dealt with little car springs in years, the owner, who was a former MGB owner, advised me to remove the bottom leaf, about four inches long, and the second leaf, possibly 12-14 inches. I did, but the rear was still up. He then told me that front coils sag too. I installed new front springs and finally got the ride height about right. This discussion causes me to think I should go measure all the corners again. It has been many years and many miles. Bob > On May 3, 2021, at 7:53 AM, wrote: > > Thanks Paul, > > Do springs (leaf springs especially) tend to sag is decades? > > Hans > > Van: PaulHunt73 > Verzonden: maandag 3 mei 2021 12:42 > Aan: h.duinhoven at planet.nl; mgs at autox.team.net > Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] Ride height > > Have a look at http://www.mgb-stuff.org.uk/suspensiontext.htm#height > > CB is typically around 14-14.5" from the centre of the wheel hub to the underside of the bright trim strip. > > PaulH. > ----- Original Message ----- > > Is there info about the ride height of an MK2 1971 MGB GT? > What distance is the centre of each wheel to the top of the wheel arch? > > Virusvrij. www.avast.com > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Mon May 3 06:25:41 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 13:25:41 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> Depends what load they are asked to carry! The factory only allowed for 150lb per person, I wonder how many of us are that weight these days. When I got my roadster I wondered if the springs had sagged as they were almost 'flat' with the car on the ground, replaced them and the new ones were almost the same. 30 years later no change, that's on a chrome bumper. They were OEM springs which have not been available for many years, first people in America and later here started talking about how much new springs jacked up the rear, to the extent that they had to put loads of weight in the boot to compress them enough to get the rebound straps fastened, which is completely wrong. rubber bumper springs are harder to carry the extra weight, and V8 springs harder still and they do have a curve with the car on its wheels, but I have never had to weight down the back to get new springs fitted to CB, RB or V8. The lower the car the better the handling, it's only a problem if the exhaust grounds and the suspension bottoms over typical road surfaces. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- Do springs (leaf springs especially) tend to sag is decades? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From h.duinhoven at planet.nl Mon May 3 09:11:55 2021 From: h.duinhoven at planet.nl (h.duinhoven at planet.nl) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:11:55 +0200 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> Message-ID: <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> Good information from you and Robert - thank you. Now the story. In the past my exhaust hit the speed bumps so often, that I did not consider a stainless exhaust because of the cost to replace. In the years I owned the GT the problem became worse. During my holiday trip to England in 2011 the exhaust severely was damaged by hitting a speed bump, when I turned on a parking spot at a hilltop of the Peak District - see picture below. At the end of the trip the exhaust support bracket broke of and I had to make a temp fix, before driving onto the ferry. 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. >From that moment on the car looks a bit like a dragster with the rear higher than the front. So I should look for replacement front coils. During the restoration job I have done the front suspension job before, so that is not a problem. P.S. U.S. lister may notice the Cape Cod Car Club emblem at the hatch handle. That was a gift I got from a nice lister visiting the Boston area in 2000. Cheers, Hans Van: PaulHunt73 Verzonden: maandag 3 mei 2021 14:26 Aan: h.duinhoven at planet.nl; mgs at autox.team.net Onderwerp: Re: [Mgs] Ride height Depends what load they are asked to carry! The factory only allowed for 150lb per person, I wonder how many of us are that weight these days. When I got my roadster I wondered if the springs had sagged as they were almost 'flat' with the car on the ground, replaced them and the new ones were almost the same. 30 years later no change, that's on a chrome bumper. They were OEM springs which have not been available for many years, first people in America and later here started talking about how much new springs jacked up the rear, to the extent that they had to put loads of weight in the boot to compress them enough to get the rebound straps fastened, which is completely wrong. rubber bumper springs are harder to carry the extra weight, and V8 springs harder still and they do have a curve with the car on its wheels, but I have never had to weight down the back to get new springs fitted to CB, RB or V8. The lower the car the better the handling, it's only a problem if the exhaust grounds and the suspension bottoms over typical road surfaces. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- Do springs (leaf springs especially) tend to sag is decades? -- Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 1144033 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Mon May 3 09:24:28 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 16:24:28 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: The high rear end after spring replacement is common and is part of the 'too hard' thing needing extra weight in the boot to get the rebound straps fastened. Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to match the rear, people spend inordinate amounts of time and money trying to lower MGBs! What you could try is lowering 'blocks' between the axle and the springs, as used with parabolic springs, but may need longer U-bolts. Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too low when fully laden, bottoming and grounding in country lanes, I ended up extending the rear shackles. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. From that moment on the car looks a bit like a dragster with the rear higher than the front. So I should look for replacement front coils. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgbobh at gmail.com Mon May 3 09:43:44 2021 From: mgbobh at gmail.com (Robert's New iPad) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: I was pleased with the results after the spring company suggested I remove a couple of leaves from the new rear springs. The owner of the shop knew the original height of front springs, as measured by the horizontal trim strip, and my front was low too, though it was not down as much as the rear. Two spring companies I have talked with about this told me that they do not work with automobile springs any more, and that after-market spring quality is quite variable. Spring shops around here work with commercial vehicles. One can make small lowering blocks, 1/2? thick, from the poly-plastic cutting boards sold in kitchen sundry department at Wal-Mart. Bob > On May 3, 2021, at 11:24 AM, PaulHunt73 wrote: > > The high rear end after spring replacement is common and is part of the 'too hard' thing needing extra weight in the boot to get the rebound straps fastened. > > Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to match the rear, people spend inordinate amounts of time and money trying to lower MGBs! What you could try is lowering 'blocks' between the axle and the springs, as used with parabolic springs, but may need longer U-bolts. > > Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too low when fully laden, bottoming and grounding in country lanes, I ended up extending the rear shackles. > > PaulH. > ----- Original Message ----- > 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. > From that moment on the car looks a bit like a dragster with the rear higher than the front. > > So I should look for replacement front coils. > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From barrob at bell.net Mon May 3 14:06:17 2021 From: barrob at bell.net (Barrie Robinson) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 16:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: <32e3e08a-5a4a-bc03-be74-230722ece770@bell.net> Hello Paul, I got my local Brit car shop to fit springs all round as I had a serious case of unequal saggynitis.?? They got them from Moss and all is perfectly fine now. Cheers Barrie On 5/3/2021 11:24 AM, PaulHunt73 wrote: > The high rear end after spring replacement is common and is part of > the 'too hard' thing needing extra weight in the boot to get the > rebound straps fastened. > Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to match the rear, people > spend inordinate amounts of time and money trying to lower MGBs!? What > you could try is lowering?'blocks' between the axle and the springs, > as used?with parabolic springs, but may need longer U-bolts. > Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too low when fully laden, > bottoming and grounding in country lanes, I ended up extending the > rear shackles. > PaulH. > > ----- Original Message ----- > 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on the sagged rear > springs, so these were replaced. > > From that moment on the car looks a bit like a dragster with the > rear higher than the front. > > So I should look for replacement front coils. > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/barrob at bell.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Tue May 4 01:32:13 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:32:13 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> <20210503180920.db8IltUneliJZdb8Jlc0dF@mx3.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> Message-ID: The lower mounting point for the rebound strap on an MGB (the car that was the subject of the original enquiry) is on the axle. So when you fit lowering blocks the body becomes lower relative to the axle and the rebound straps become slacker not more taut. The bump rubber on the body is now also closer to the pedestal on the axle, so the damper can't be 'compressed' any more than it was before. And with the same straps the damper can't be extended any more than previously either. Incorrect springs that give a very raised ride height may well cause the problem of picking up a rear tyre in a fast turn, but lowering blocks will reduce or eliminate that. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, but do not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassis frame. You can correct the ride height that way, but it will not correct the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are attached to the lower spring mounting plate). If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you will be royally screwed on handling when driving. It will pick a rear tire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe oversteer (very dangerous condition). And if you install longer rebound straps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From barneymg at mgaguru.com Tue May 4 07:42:34 2021 From: barneymg at mgaguru.com (Barney Gaylord) Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 09:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> <20210503180920.db8IltUneliJZdb8Jlc0dF@mx3.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> Message-ID: Yeah, good point. Sorry about the slip up. I forgot the lower pin for the rebound strap is on the axle housing. Still no excuse for new replacement springs being manufactured with too much arch (and too high spring rate). Theory of a leaf spring is that when fully loaded it should be straight, flat, no arch. This gives it the highest lateral stiffness and least tendency to twist and misalign the springs and axle in hard cornering. It just rubs me the wrong way to have to jury rig an perfectly good assembly to accommodate use of a faulty replacement part. At 03:32 AM 5/4/2021, PaulHunt73 wrote: >The lower mounting point for the rebound strap on an MGB (the car >that was the subject of the original enquiry) is on the axle. So >when you fit lowering blocks the body becomes lower relative to the >axle and the rebound straps become slacker not more taut. The bump >rubber on the body is now also closer to the pedestal on the axle, >so the damper can't be 'compressed' any more than it was >before. And with the same straps the damper can't be extended any >more than previously either. > >Incorrect springs that give a very raised ride height may well cause >the problem of picking up a rear tyre in a fast turn, but lowering >blocks will reduce or eliminate that. > >PaulH. >----- Original Message ----- >Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, but >do not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassis >frame. You can correct the ride height that way, but it will not >correct the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are >attached to the lower spring mounting plate). > >If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you >will be royally screwed on handling when driving. It will pick a >rear tire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe >oversteer (very dangerous condition). And if you install longer >rebound straps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Tue May 4 07:55:01 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:55:01 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> <20210503180920.db8IltUneliJZdb8Jlc0dF@mx3.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <20210504154301.dvKGlcPitwH1WdvKHlLKOt@mx11.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> Message-ID: Amen to that! ----- Original Message ----- Still no excuse for new replacement springs being manufactured with too much arch (and too high spring rate). Theory of a leaf spring is that when fully loaded it should be straight, flat, no arch. This gives it the highest lateral stiffness and least tendency to twist and misalign the springs and axle in hard cornering. It just rubs me the wrong way to have to jury rig an perfectly good assembly to accommodate use of a faulty replacement part. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jmartiniii at yahoo.com Tue May 4 14:22:46 2021 From: jmartiniii at yahoo.com (Joel Martin) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <530119625.263230.1620159766191@mail.yahoo.com> Moss rear springs lasted about 60K miles. ?Got a pair from buddy on a car with only 55K miles a few years ago. ?Back to normal. ?I have about 235K miles on car. ?Find someone to make or rear arch your original springs. ?The stuff today is just junk. On Tuesday, May 4, 2021, 02:01:32 PM EDT, mgs-request at autox.team.net wrote: Send Mgs mailing list submissions to ??? mgs at autox.team.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? mgs-request at autox.team.net You can reach the person managing the list at ??? mgs-owner at autox.team.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Mgs digest..." Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation? $12.75 Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums Today's Topics: ? 1. Re: Ride height (Barrie Robinson) ? 2. Re: Ride height (PaulHunt73) ? 3. Re: Ride height (Barney Gaylord) ? 4. Re: Ride height (PaulHunt73) Hello Paul, I got my local Brit car shop to fit springs all round as I had a serious case of unequal saggynitis.?? They got them from Moss and all is perfectly fine now. Cheers Barrie On 5/3/2021 11:24 AM, PaulHunt73 wrote: The high rear end after spring replacement is common and is part of the 'too hard' thing needing extra weight in the boot to get the rebound straps fastened. ? Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to match the rear, people spend inordinate amounts of time and money trying to lower MGBs!? What you could try is lowering?'blocks' between the axle and the springs, as used?with parabolic springs, but may need longer U-bolts. ? Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too low when fully laden, bottoming and grounding in country lanes, I ended up extending the rear shackles. ? PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. >From that moment on the car looks a bit like a dragster with the rear higher than the front. ? So I should look for replacement front coils. ? _______________________________________________ Mgs at autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/barrob at bell.net The lower mounting point for the rebound strap on?an MGB (the car that was the subject of the original enquiry) is on the axle.? So when you?fit lowering blocks the body becomes lower relative to the axle and?the rebound straps become slacker not more taut.? The bump rubber on the body is now also?closer to the pedestal on the axle, so the damper can't be 'compressed' any more than it was before.? And with the same straps?the damper?can't be extended any more?than previously either.?Incorrect springs that give a very raised ride height may well cause the problem of picking up a rear tyre in a fast turn, but lowering blocks will reduce or eliminate that.?PaulH.?----- Original Message ----- Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, but do not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassis frame.? You can correct the ride height that way, but it will not correct the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are attached to the lower spring mounting plate). If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you will be royally screwed on handling when driving.? It will pick a rear tire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe oversteer (very dangerous condition).? And if you install longer rebound straps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. - ? Yeah, good point.? Sorry about the slip up.? Iforgot the lower pin for the rebound strap is on the axlehousing. Still no excuse for new replacement springs being manufactured with toomuch arch (and too high spring rate).? Theory of a leaf spring isthat when fully loaded it should be straight, flat, no arch.? Thisgives it the highest lateral stiffness and least tendency to twist andmisalign the springs and axle in hard cornering.? It just rubs methe wrong way to have to jury rig an perfectly good assembly toaccommodate use of a faulty replacement part. At 03:32 AM 5/4/2021, PaulHunt73 wrote: The lowermounting point for the rebound strap on an MGB (the car that was thesubject of the original enquiry) is on the axle.? So when you fitlowering blocks the body becomes lower relative to the axle and therebound straps become slacker not more taut.? The bump rubber on thebody is now also closer to the pedestal on the axle, so the damper can'tbe 'compressed' any more than it was before.? And with the samestraps the damper can't be extended any more than previously either. ? Incorrect springs that give a very raised ride heightmay well cause the problem of picking up a rear tyre in a fast turn, butlowering blocks will reduce or eliminate that. ? PaulH. ----- OriginalMessage ----- - Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, butdo not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassisframe.? You can correct the ride height that way, but it will notcorrect the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are attachedto the lower spring mounting plate). - If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you willbe royally screwed on handling when driving.? It will pick a reartire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe oversteer(very dangerous condition).? And if you install longer reboundstraps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. Amen to that! ----- Original Message ----- Still no excuse for new replacement springs being manufactured with too much arch (and too high spring rate).? Theory of a leaf spring is that when fully loaded it should be straight, flat, no arch.? This gives it the highest lateral stiffness and least tendency to twist and misalign the springs and axle in hard cornering.? It just rubs me the wrong way to have to jury rig an perfectly good assembly to accommodate use of a faulty replacement part. - ? _______________________________________________ Mgs mailing list Mgs at autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From barneymg at mgaguru.com Mon May 3 10:07:53 2021 From: barneymg at mgaguru.com (Barney Gaylord) Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 12:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height In-Reply-To: References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> Message-ID: Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, but do not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassis frame. You can correct the ride height that way, but it will not correct the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are attached to the lower spring mounting plate). If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you will be royally screwed on handling when driving. It will pick a rear tire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe oversteer (very dangerous condition). And if you install longer rebound straps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. At 11:43 AM 5/3/2021, Robert's New iPad wrote: > I was pleased with the results after the > spring company suggested I remove a couple of > leaves from the new rear springs. The owner > of the shop knew the original height of front > springs, as measured by the horizontal trim > strip, and my front was low too, though it was not down as much as the rear. > Two spring companies I have talked with > about this told me that they do not work with > automobile springs any more, and that > after-market spring quality is quite > variable. Spring shops around here work with commercial vehicles. > One can make small lowering blocks, 1/2??? > thick, from the poly-plastic cutting boards > sold in kitchen sundry department at Wal-Mart. >Bob >On May 3, 2021, at 11:24 AM, PaulHunt73 ><paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com> wrote: > >>The high rear end after spring replacement is >>common and is part of the 'too hard' thing >>needing extra weight in the boot to get the rebound straps fastened. >> >>Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to >>match the rear, people spend inordinate amounts >>of time and money trying to lower MGBs! What >>you could try is lowering 'blocks' between the >>axle and the springs, as used with parabolic >>springs, but may need longer U-bolts. >> >>Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too >>low when fully laden, bottoming and grounding >>in country lanes, I ended up extending the rear shackles. >> >>PaulH. >>----- Original Message ----- >>3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on >>the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. >> >> From that moment on the car looks a bit like a >> dragster with the rear higher than the front. >> >>So I should look for replacement front coils. >>.... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Wed May 5 03:28:56 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 10:28:56 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] Ride height References: <000501d73fff$0613f2e0$123bd8a0$@planet.nl> <60C97754093B459FA728274E18E185F2@paul> <002a01d74012$ef2669a0$cd733ce0$@planet.nl> <704A89C4A86D4C8781D0B4B1F6C04F21@paul> <000001d7402e$a8001550$f8003ff0$@planet.nl> <20210503180920.db8IltUneliJZdb8Jlc0dF@mx3.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <20210504154301.dvKGlcPitwH1WdvKHlLKOt@mx11.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> Message-ID: Funny how things suddenly come to mind when you are doing something completely different. Whilst the rebound strap is on the axle the damper mount IS below the spring. If you fit 1" (say) lowering blocks between the axle and the spring, positioning the axle closer to the body (and so lowering the ride height), then the axle can move 1" further down before the STANDARD rebound strap stops it, hence the damper mounting plate has moved 1" further down than normal. It's this that could result in the damper hitting its lower limit before the rebound strap stops the axle. I think! Easy enough to check - when the strap is carrying the weight of the axle it should twang like a bow-string, and there should be a little more downward movement of the damper mounting plate below the spring. If not, then shorter webbing straps can be made up in the US and the UK, or it may be possible to 'shorten' one with some kind of clamp that puts a tight curve in it under tension instead of being straight. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- From: Barney Gaylord To: PaulHunt73 Cc: mgs at autox.team.net Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2021 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [Mgs] Ride height Yeah, good point. Sorry about the slip up. I forgot the lower pin for the rebound strap is on the axle housing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From weberstevej at aol.com Wed May 5 17:24:56 2021 From: weberstevej at aol.com (Steve Weber) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 19:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My MGA rebuild resulted in acquiring new rear leaf springs from Moss Motors, which turned out to be over arched. I took the over-arch out using a hydraulic press making small adjustments every three or so inches over the length of the spring. Been driving the car over ten years now at the correct ride height. > On May 5, 2021, at 4:30 PM, mgs-request at autox.team.net wrote: > > ?Send Mgs mailing list submissions to > mgs at autox.team.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > mgs-request at autox.team.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > mgs-owner at autox.team.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Mgs digest..." > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums > > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 3 (Joel Martin) > 2. Re: Ride height (Barney Gaylord) > 3. Re: Ride height (PaulHunt73) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:22:46 +0000 (UTC) > From: Joel Martin > To: > Subject: Re: [Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 3 > Message-ID: <530119625.263230.1620159766191 at mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Moss rear springs lasted about 60K miles. ?Got a pair from buddy on a car with only 55K miles a few years ago. ?Back to normal. ?I have about 235K miles on car. ?Find someone to make or rear arch your original springs. > ?The stuff today is just junk. > On Tuesday, May 4, 2021, 02:01:32 PM EDT, mgs-request at autox.team.net wrote: > > Send Mgs mailing list submissions to > ??? mgs at autox.team.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ??? http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ??? mgs-request at autox.team.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ??? mgs-owner at autox.team.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Mgs digest..." > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation? $12.75 > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums > > Today's Topics: > > ? 1. Re: Ride height (Barrie Robinson) > ? 2. Re: Ride height (PaulHunt73) > ? 3. Re: Ride height (Barney Gaylord) > ? 4. Re: Ride height (PaulHunt73) > Hello Paul, > > I got my local Brit car shop to fit springs all round as I had a serious case of unequal saggynitis.?? They got them from Moss and all is perfectly fine now. > > Cheers > Barrie > >> On 5/3/2021 11:24 AM, PaulHunt73 wrote: >> >> The high rear end after spring replacement is common and is part of the 'too hard' thing needing extra weight in the boot to get the rebound straps fastened. ? Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to match the rear, people spend inordinate amounts of time and money trying to lower MGBs!? What you could try is lowering?'blocks' between the axle and the springs, as used?with parabolic springs, but may need longer U-bolts. ? Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too low when fully laden, bottoming and grounding in country lanes, I ended up extending the rear shackles. ? PaulH. >> ----- Original Message ----- 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. >>> From that moment on the car looks a bit like a dragster with the rear higher than the front. >> >> ? >> >> So I should look for replacement front coils. >> >> ? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mgs at autox.team.net >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Suggested annual donation $12.75 >> >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/barrob at bell.net >> >> >> The lower mounting point for the rebound strap on?an MGB (the car that was the subject of the original enquiry) is on the axle.? So when you?fit lowering blocks the body becomes lower relative to the axle and?the rebound straps become slacker not more taut.? The bump rubber on the body is now also?closer to the pedestal on the axle, so the damper can't be 'compressed' any more than it was before.? And with the same straps?the damper?can't be extended any more?than previously either.?Incorrect springs that give a very raised ride height may well cause the problem of picking up a rear tyre in a fast turn, but lowering blocks will reduce or eliminate that.?PaulH.?----- Original Message ----- >> >> Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, but do not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassis frame.? You can correct the ride height that way, but it will not correct the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are attached to the lower spring mounting plate). >> >> If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you will be royally screwed on handling when driving.? It will pick a rear tire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe oversteer (very dangerous condition).? And if you install longer rebound straps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. >> >> >> >> - ? >> >> >> >> Yeah, good point.? Sorry about the slip up.? Iforgot the lower pin for the rebound strap is on the axlehousing. >> >> Still no excuse for new replacement springs being manufactured with toomuch arch (and too high spring rate).? Theory of a leaf spring isthat when fully loaded it should be straight, flat, no arch.? Thisgives it the highest lateral stiffness and least tendency to twist andmisalign the springs and axle in hard cornering.? It just rubs methe wrong way to have to jury rig an perfectly good assembly toaccommodate use of a faulty replacement part. >> >> >> At 03:32 AM 5/4/2021, PaulHunt73 wrote: >> >> The lowermounting point for the rebound strap on an MGB (the car that was thesubject of the original enquiry) is on the axle.? So when you fitlowering blocks the body becomes lower relative to the axle and therebound straps become slacker not more taut.? The bump rubber on thebody is now also closer to the pedestal on the axle, so the damper can'tbe 'compressed' any more than it was before.? And with the samestraps the damper can't be extended any more than previously either. >> ? >> Incorrect springs that give a very raised ride heightmay well cause the problem of picking up a rear tyre in a fast turn, butlowering blocks will reduce or eliminate that. >> ? >> PaulH. >> >> >> >> ----- OriginalMessage ----- >> >> - Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation to the springs, butdo not change the spring height in relation to the body or chassisframe.? You can correct the ride height that way, but it will notcorrect the gross misalignment for the rebound straps (which are attachedto the lower spring mounting plate). >> >> >> - If the rebould straps are close to taught when at rest, they you willbe royally screwed on handling when driving.? It will pick a reartire completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing severe oversteer(very dangerous condition).? And if you install longer reboundstraps, you will get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. >> >> Amen to that! >> ----- Original Message ----- Still no excuse for new replacement springs being manufactured with too much arch (and too high spring rate).? Theory of a leaf spring is that when fully loaded it should be straight, flat, no arch.? This gives it the highest lateral stiffness and least tendency to twist and misalign the springs and axle in hard cornering.? It just rubs me the wrong way to have to jury rig an perfectly good assembly to accommodate use of a faulty replacement part. >> >> >> - ? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mgs mailing list >> Mgs at autox.team.net >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 12:07:53 -0400 >> From: Barney Gaylord >> To: Robert's New iPad , PaulHunt73 >> >> Cc: h.duinhoven at planet.nl,mgs at autox.team.net >> Subject: Re: [Mgs] Ride height >> Message-ID: >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" >> >> Lowering blocks raise the rear axle in relation >> to the springs, but do not change the spring >> height in relation to the body or chassis >> frame. You can correct the ride height that way, >> but it will not correct the gross misalignment >> for the rebound straps (which are attached to the lower spring mounting plate). >> >> If the rebould straps are close to taught when at >> rest, they you will be royally screwed on >> handling when driving. It will pick a rear tire >> completely off the ground in a fast turn, causing >> severe oversteer (very dangerous condition). And >> if you install longer rebound straps, you will >> get damage to the lever arm shocks from overtravel. >> >> >> At 11:43 AM 5/3/2021, Robert's New iPad wrote: >> I was pleased with the results after the >> spring company suggested I remove a couple of >> leaves from the new rear springs. The owner >> of the shop knew the original height of front >> springs, as measured by the horizontal trim >> strip, and my front was low too, though it was not down as much as the rear. >> Two spring companies I have talked with >> about this told me that they do not work with >> automobile springs any more, and that >> after-market spring quality is quite >> variable. Spring shops around here work with commercial vehicles. >> One can make small lowering blocks, 1/2??? >> thick, from the poly-plastic cutting boards >> sold in kitchen sundry department at Wal-Mart. >> Bob > > >> On May 3, 2021, at 11:24 AM, PaulHunt73 >> <paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com> wrote: >> >>> The high rear end after spring replacement is >>> common and is part of the 'too hard' thing >>> needing extra weight in the boot to get the rebound straps fastened. >>> >>> Personally I wouldn't jack up the front to >>> match the rear, people spend inordinate amounts >>> of time and money trying to lower MGBs! What >>> you could try is lowering 'blocks' between the >>> axle and the springs, as used with parabolic >>> springs, but may need longer U-bolts. >>> >>> Even with new OEM rears my CB roadster was too >>> low when fully laden, bottoming and grounding >>> in country lanes, I ended up extending the rear shackles. >>> >>> PaulH. > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> 3 years ago I got an MOT safety test fail on >>> the sagged rear springs, so these were replaced. >>> >>> From that moment on the car looks a bit like a >>> dragster with the rear higher than the front. >>> >>> So I should look for replacement front coils. >>> .... > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 10:28:56 +0100 > From: "PaulHunt73" > To: "Barney Gaylord" > Cc: > Subject: Re: [Mgs] Ride height > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Funny how things suddenly come to mind when you are doing something completely different. > > Whilst the rebound strap is on the axle the damper mount IS below the spring. If you fit 1" (say) lowering blocks between the axle and the spring, positioning the axle closer to the body (and so lowering the ride height), then the axle can move 1" further down before the STANDARD rebound strap stops it, hence the damper mounting plate has moved 1" further down than normal. It's this that could result in the damper hitting its lower limit before the rebound strap stops the axle. > > I think! > > Easy enough to check - when the strap is carrying the weight of the axle it should twang like a bow-string, and there should be a little more downward movement of the damper mounting plate below the spring. If not, then shorter webbing straps can be made up in the US and the UK, or it may be possible to 'shorten' one with some kind of clamp that puts a tight curve in it under tension instead of being straight. > > PaulH. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Barney Gaylord > To: PaulHunt73 > Cc: mgs at autox.team.net > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2021 2:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Mgs] Ride height > > > Yeah, good point. Sorry about the slip up. I forgot the lower pin for the rebound strap is on the axle housing. > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Mgs mailing list > Mgs at autox.team.net > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 4 > *********************************** From frankk12 at verizon.net Thu May 6 15:06:33 2021 From: frankk12 at verizon.net (Frank Krajewski) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 17:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Mold, part 2 References: <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6.ref@verizon.net> Message-ID: <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6@verizon.net> I have received many great suggestions from the list. A simple start will be to create a moisture barrier between the concrete floor, which at present has a carpet, and the MGB. This will be in the form of a tarp or plastic sheet. Excuse my na?vet? but what prevents moisture from forming on the tarp or plastic? Frank Krajewski 1980 MGB LE 1991 Mazda Miata SE 2003 RAV4 2021 Subaru Outback Limited Sent from my iPad From mvheim at sonic.net Thu May 6 15:20:46 2021 From: mvheim at sonic.net (Max Heim) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 14:20:46 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] Mold, part 2 In-Reply-To: <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6@verizon.net> References: <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6.ref@verizon.net> <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6@verizon.net> Message-ID: Theoretically it will form on the underside of the plastic? which will not be good for your carpet, which should be removed. Leave the cover off for ventilation, as much as possible (obviously you might want to cover the car if you are running the saw or the belt sander, or spraying paint). If you could leave the windows down, at least a few inches, it would help. Surely mice can?t climb up sheer glass? -- Max Heim '66 MGB > On May 6, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Frank Krajewski wrote: > > I have received many great suggestions from the list. A simple start will be to create a moisture barrier between the concrete floor, which at present has a carpet, and the MGB. This will be in the form of a tarp or plastic sheet. Excuse my na?vet? but what prevents moisture from forming on the tarp or plastic? > Frank Krajewski > 1980 MGB LE > 1991 Mazda Miata SE > 2003 RAV4 > 2021 Subaru Outback Limited > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgbobh at gmail.com Thu May 6 16:34:37 2021 From: mgbobh at gmail.com (Robert's New iPad) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 18:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Mold, part 2 In-Reply-To: References: <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6.ref@verizon.net> <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6@verizon.net> Message-ID: Concrete may, if thick enough, be _water_proof (think dams) but when used as a floor it is not _vapour_proof. Vapour comes right through six inches of concrete, almost as readily as through bare earth. A responsible installer of tile, vinyl, carpet or anything else will tape a pane of glass down onto a concrete floor that is poured on ground, then check for condensation on underside of the glass a day later. One should not place a bet that there will be no condensation; there almost always is. That?s why carpets on lower-level of houses will smell musty after a year or so; it is because they are musty. Any conscientious home builder will put a layer of 10-mil plastic sheeting on top of the crushed rock before he pours the concrete. I read about one once; have never met one. There are ways to seal the concrete, ways of greater or lesser effectiveness. One commonly-used product in USA is ?DryLock?, a coating for concrete that is pretty effective at stopping moisture vapour seeping through the concrete. It is simple to apply, but hard work, as the thick material must be scrubbed into the concrete floor and walls to achieve the sealing effect wanted. It works; I used it on the lower level of my raised-ranch house and found the dehumidifier ran half as much. In a garage, I would work at improving ventilation before messing around with concrete sealer. Code for a house is one sq foot of ventilation per 1000 square ft of house. That is entirely inadequate, especially so when one realises that ordinary window screen reduces air flow by 50%. A 12x20 ft garage is 240 sq feet, and really should have a vent at each end, or ridge vent its entire length. That is way in excess of code requirements, but will reduce considerably condensation from moisture through the floor. Bob > On May 6, 2021, at 5:20 PM, Max Heim wrote: > > Theoretically it will form on the underside of the plastic? which will not be good for your carpet, which should be removed. > > Leave the cover off for ventilation, as much as possible (obviously you might want to cover the car if you are running the saw or the belt sander, or spraying paint). If you could leave the windows down, at least a few inches, it would help. Surely mice can?t climb up sheer glass? > > > -- > Max Heim > '66 MGB > >> On May 6, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Frank Krajewski wrote: >> >> I have received many great suggestions from the list. A simple start will be to create a moisture barrier between the concrete floor, which at present has a carpet, and the MGB. This will be in the form of a tarp or plastic sheet. Excuse my na?vet? but what prevents moisture from forming on the tarp or plastic? >> Frank Krajewski >> 1980 MGB LE >> 1991 Mazda Miata SE >> 2003 RAV4 >> 2021 Subaru Outback Limited >> >> Sent from my iPad >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mgs at autox.team.net >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Suggested annual donation $12.75 >> >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mvheim at sonic.net Thu May 6 16:41:06 2021 From: mvheim at sonic.net (Max Heim) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:41:06 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] Mold, part 2 In-Reply-To: References: <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6.ref@verizon.net> <961E5935-6B4B-4241-A513-A63C3450ACB6@verizon.net> Message-ID: <46B05E89-8B1B-4D6B-B6A2-984C3C399524@sonic.net> Bob is right, in that ventilation is the key. My car is outdoors in a carport all winter, but even though I am near the coast it doesn?t get moldy because of the free air circulation. It?s under a cover, but the windows are cracked, and I do drive it from time to time (it would be driven regularly in a normal year). -- Max Heim '66 MGB > On May 6, 2021, at 3:34 PM, Robert's New iPad wrote: > > Concrete may, if thick enough, be _water_proof (think dams) but when used as a floor it is not _vapour_proof. Vapour comes right through six inches of concrete, almost as readily as through bare earth. > A responsible installer of tile, vinyl, carpet or anything else will tape a pane of glass down onto a concrete floor that is poured on ground, then check for condensation on underside of the glass a day later. One should not place a bet that there will be no condensation; there almost always is. That?s why carpets on lower-level of houses will smell musty after a year or so; it is because they are musty. > Any conscientious home builder will put a layer of 10-mil plastic sheeting on top of the crushed rock before he pours the concrete. I read about one once; have never met one. > There are ways to seal the concrete, ways of greater or lesser effectiveness. One commonly-used product in USA is ?DryLock?, a coating for concrete that is pretty effective at stopping moisture vapour seeping through the concrete. It is simple to apply, but hard work, as the thick material must be scrubbed into the concrete floor and walls to achieve the sealing effect wanted. It works; I used it on the lower level of my raised-ranch house and found the dehumidifier ran half as much. > In a garage, I would work at improving ventilation before messing around with concrete sealer. Code for a house is one sq foot of ventilation per 1000 square ft of house. That is entirely inadequate, especially so when one realises that ordinary window screen reduces air flow by 50%. A 12x20 ft garage is 240 sq feet, and really should have a vent at each end, or ridge vent its entire length. That is way in excess of code requirements, but will reduce considerably condensation from moisture through the floor. > Bob > > > On May 6, 2021, at 5:20 PM, Max Heim > wrote: > >> Theoretically it will form on the underside of the plastic? which will not be good for your carpet, which should be removed. >> >> Leave the cover off for ventilation, as much as possible (obviously you might want to cover the car if you are running the saw or the belt sander, or spraying paint). If you could leave the windows down, at least a few inches, it would help. Surely mice can?t climb up sheer glass? >> >> >> -- >> Max Heim >> '66 MGB >> >>> On May 6, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Frank Krajewski > wrote: >>> >>> I have received many great suggestions from the list. A simple start will be to create a moisture barrier between the concrete floor, which at present has a carpet, and the MGB. This will be in the form of a tarp or plastic sheet. Excuse my na?vet? but what prevents moisture from forming on the tarp or plastic? >>> Frank Krajewski >>> 1980 MGB LE >>> 1991 Mazda Miata SE >>> 2003 RAV4 >>> 2021 Subaru Outback Limited >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Mgs at autox.team.net >>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >>> Suggested annual donation $12.75 >>> >>> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive >>> >>> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mgs at autox.team.net >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Suggested annual donation $12.75 >> >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thgun at comporium.net Thu May 13 15:57:17 2021 From: thgun at comporium.net (Thomas Gunderson) Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] MGA GLOVE BOX Message-ID: <5B4009EA-0233-4265-BF63-A61D7BCF865E@comporium.net> Anybody seen the radio mounting hole used as a glove box? Maybe the cover plate would flip open and a USB or 12v port mounted behind the cover. 1957 MGA rst 1500 Sent from my iPhone X From mvheim at sonic.net Thu May 13 16:24:37 2021 From: mvheim at sonic.net (Max Heim) Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:24:37 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] MGA GLOVE BOX In-Reply-To: <5B4009EA-0233-4265-BF63-A61D7BCF865E@comporium.net> References: <5B4009EA-0233-4265-BF63-A61D7BCF865E@comporium.net> Message-ID: <387B371E-642D-42F3-B4D3-63459D5C9824@sonic.net> I used to have a pull-out stereo unit in my MGB. The removable unit slid into a box the size of a stock radio mounted in the standard location. I rigged an MG radio blanking plate with clips so it would snap in and fill the hole when the stereo was removed. If I had wanted to I could have used this little cubby for storage (one problem was that it had a lot of random holes in it that would let small objects fall out; another was the massive plug at the rear that ate up a lot of the depth). But you could certainly build your own optimized box out of cardboard, plastic or sheet metal and do the same trick with the blanking plate. My ?clip? was merely a wide piece of thin sheet metal bent into a C and secured by the regular pins, that relied on friction and spring tension to stay in place. But I could easily see a hinge system attached to the lip of the box, with a cabinet-style magnetic or friction closure, or even a spring-loaded hinge. One problem with this space as a glovebox is that the opening is so narrow that you can?t reach inside it with your hand very easily. It would be hard to retrieve a pen that rolled to the back, for instance. On my current MGB I took a different tack. Since I didn?t install a radio, I removed the speaker and grill from the console and cut out the plastic to match the chrome octagon surround. I put in a laminate back wall with a cigar lighter for my USB charger, and lined the bottom and sides with carpet. The resulting open cubby is tall and wide but shallow ? just big enough to hold a sunglass case and my iPhone (which it conveniently supports in a vertical position, if I need to use the nav features), with a pair of driving gloves for padding. Pictures here: https://www.mgexp.com/journal/Max-Heims-MGB-Journal.4100/Cockpit-Is-Done.16927/ I realize the MGA doesn?t have this feature? -- Max Heim '66 MGB > On May 13, 2021, at 2:57 PM, Thomas Gunderson wrote: > > Anybody seen the radio mounting hole used as a glove box? Maybe the cover plate would flip open and a USB or > 12v port mounted behind the cover. > 1957 MGA rst 1500 > > Sent from my iPhone X > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul at ece.rochester.edu Fri May 14 05:25:57 2021 From: paul at ece.rochester.edu (Osborne, Paul) Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:25:57 +0000 Subject: [Mgs] MGA Door Pockets In-Reply-To: <5B4009EA-0233-4265-BF63-A61D7BCF865E@comporium.net> References: <5B4009EA-0233-4265-BF63-A61D7BCF865E@comporium.net> Message-ID: <459F82B5-A093-4242-9AE5-69F9F97C7303@ur.rochester.edu> Door pockets in MGAs seem to get lost over the years. There are a few suppliers that have them available, at a rather high cost and shipping. Who has made them, what did you use, or have you found a reasonable outlet? Paul > Paul Osborne > Department of Electrical and Computer Eng > University of Rochester > 201 Hopeman Building RC > Rochester NY 14627 > 585-275-5226 From barneymg at mgaguru.com Fri May 14 08:30:56 2021 From: barneymg at mgaguru.com (Barney Gaylord) Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] MGA Door Pockets In-Reply-To: <459F82B5-A093-4242-9AE5-69F9F97C7303@ur.rochester.edu> References: <5B4009EA-0233-4265-BF63-A61D7BCF865E@comporium.net> <459F82B5-A093-4242-9AE5-69F9F97C7303@ur.rochester.edu> Message-ID: Paul, -- If you are thinking about making your own, see here: http://mgaguru.com/mgtech/interior/int103e.htm -- Click for drawings and templates. http://mgaguru.com/mgtech/interior/int103f.htm -- Fabricating http://mgaguru.com/mgtech/interior/int103g.htm -- Loose edges At 07:25 AM 5/14/2021, Osborne, Paul wrote: >Door pockets in MGAs seem to get lost over the years. There are a >few suppliers that have them available, at a rather high cost and >shipping. Who has made them, what did you use, or have you >found a reasonable outlet? > >Paul > > Paul Osborne > > Department of Electrical and Computer Eng > > University of Rochester > > 201 Hopeman Building RC > > Rochester NY 14627 > > > 585-275-5226 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From britfan1 at epix.net Sun May 16 18:09:08 2021 From: britfan1 at epix.net (S.Carr) Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal Message-ID: The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one unit. Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the gearbox in place? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and he fears the block will too. Thanks, Sarah Carr ?71 B/GT in PA Sent from Mail for Windows 10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgbobh at gmail.com Sun May 16 18:38:12 2021 From: mgbobh at gmail.com (Robert's New iPad) Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal In-Reply-To: <20210517000957.41D5DA1110@autox.team.net> References: <20210517000957.41D5DA1110@autox.team.net> Message-ID: I have assisted in engine-only engine removal, and know those who have done it both ways. I have done only engine&gearbox together, a one-person job. If friend really can remove all bolts, then the engine is slid forward off the input shaft to the gearbox, taking car that gearbox and engine are on the same plane, else clutch disc gets bent.. Installation requires similarly careful alignment. To do engine & gearbox together, it is not necessary to remove carpet, and I have seen it done with console sections left in place. Gearshift lever is held in with three bolts, easily accessible after the knob, boot and the chrome ring are removed. > On May 16, 2021, at 8:09 PM, S.Carr wrote: > > The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one unit. Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the gearbox in place? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and he fears the block will too. > > Thanks, > Sarah Carr > ?71 B/GT in PA > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dcouncill at karamursel.org Sun May 16 19:04:54 2021 From: dcouncill at karamursel.org (dcouncill) Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 18:04:54 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal In-Reply-To: <20210517000940.5EB27A1107@autox.team.net> Message-ID: I have done it both ways. But there was an issue with the engine only method - getting the engine mated again with the transmission. It took a lot of struggling to line them up straight enough to pull together when I did it. So is a choice between that and removing the transmission with the engine. I usually remove them both together - a little more work but a lot less struggling.?David Councill64B72B67BGT -------- Original message --------From: "S.Carr" Date: 5/16/21 5:09 PM (GMT-08:00) To: MGs Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and he fears the block will too.?Thanks,Sarah Carr?71 B/GT in PA?Sent from Mail for Windows 10? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com Mon May 17 02:01:34 2021 From: paulhunt73 at virginmedia.com (PaulHunt73) Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 09:01:34 +0100 Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal References: <20210517000954.CF95CA1100@autox.team.net> Message-ID: I've done it both ways and it all depends on how much space, how many bodies are available, and how big a hoist you have. Single-handed in a single-width garage and with a folding hoist I've done engines three times including a V8, and even when the V8 gearbox needed to come out I did the engine first and got the gearbox out afterwards which makes dealing with the gearbox crossmember easier. But if all you need is access to the engine or clutch then engine only is far easier as dealing with the gearbox crossmember and the speedo cable (when on an OD) is the big problem getting it out with the engine, and everything else you list is extra work that isn't needed. Getting the two back together is the same whether they are both out or the gearbox is out as well - with one exception I'll come on to. With the gearbox out both need to be held to get them back together or they wriggle about like small children in the bath, doing that on two occasions with two people it took longer than getting engines back in on their own. With the gearbox wedged at the top of the tunnel that is held still while you are manipulating the engine and only needs one person. The exception is that on chrome bumper models you can't lower the engine in then push it straight back onto the gearbox as the crossmember is in the way, it has to be done at a steeper angle until the end of the first motion shaft is inside the clutch cover, then reduce the angle and it will go back. With rubber bumper models as in your case with the body sitting higher on the crossmember the engine can be lowered in and pushed straight back. Believe me, it is far easier doing engine only, and that is how the pros do it. PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one unit. Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the gearbox in place? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and he fears the block will too. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mghirsch at netzero.net Tue May 18 10:08:02 2021 From: mghirsch at netzero.net (mghirsch at netzero.net) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:08:02 GMT Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal Message-ID: <20210518.110802.8881.0@webmail10.dca.untd.com> It is possible. But I have found it easier to pull Both together. Especially when mating it up to the tranny. ---------- Original Message ---------- From: S.Carr To: MGs Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and he fears the block will too. Thanks, Sarah Carr ?€˜71 B/GT in PA Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ____________________________________________________________ Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more Proposed Capital Attack Probe Dealt 'Serious Setback' http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac428e366ab7755st01duc1 Andrew Giuliani: 'I Am Going to Be Governor of New York' http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac630c766ab7755st01duc2 As Judge Reads Verdict, Convict Kills Himself http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac83de066ab7755st01duc3 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mvheim at sonic.net Tue May 18 10:29:00 2021 From: mvheim at sonic.net (Max Heim) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:29:00 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal In-Reply-To: <20210518.110802.8881.0@webmail10.dca.untd.com> References: <20210518.110802.8881.0@webmail10.dca.untd.com> Message-ID: <281BED60-687A-435D-A4B6-610DC263773F@sonic.net> Obviously, both methods are possible; they have different advantages and problems. The workshop manual knows what it is talking about and lays out all the steps. If you choose another method it is up to you to work out the order of assembly issues. Yes, if you pull both there are few extra items to remove, but not many: shift lever, reverse switch wire, OD wires if present, crossmember & trans mount bolts, speedo cable. You also need to raise the car enough for the tailshaft to tilt in. If you pull just the engine, you have to do all the fiddly stuff (aligning the clutch, undoing and refitting the engine-trans bolts) under the car with limited access, so you have to raise the car anyway. Sometimes it works like a charm, but on occasion the clutch just won't align and you can spend hours mucking with it, squandering any time you ?saved?. I just did an engine install with the transmission in place (not on an MG), and it took almost two hours to get the engine aligned to the torque converter. We did it that way at the insistence of my buddy (it was his garage and his lift, although it was my car), but I really think we would have been better off doing it my way, with both together. The reason I went along was I was afraid his hoist couldn?t lift the combo high enough to clear the nose of the car. That isn?t really a problem with the low slung MG. -- Max Heim '66 MGB > On May 18, 2021, at 9:08 AM, mghirsch at netzero.net wrote: > > It is possible. But I have found it easier to pull Both together. Especially when mating it up to the tranny. > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: S.Carr > To: MGs > Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 > > > The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and he fears the block will too. > > > Thanks, > > Sarah Carr > > ???71 B/GT in PA > > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Top News - Sponsored By Newser > Proposed Capital Attack Probe Dealt 'Serious Setback' > Andrew Giuliani: 'I Am Going to Be Governor of New York' > As Judge Reads Verdict, Convict Kills Himself _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ejrussell61 at gmail.com Tue May 18 12:15:47 2021 From: ejrussell61 at gmail.com (Eric Russell) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 14:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have done it both ways (MGA & MGB). Generally, unless I need to have the transmission out, I'll take out just the engine. Two tips I can offer. 1) Remove the crank pulley before pulling the engine (and replace it after re-installation). This can give you an extra inch of maneuvering room in the engine bay. B) Use a good clutch alignment tool or a spare first motion shaft (doesn't everyone have a bin of spare first motion shafts?!?). And - most important, even when using a good alignment tool - you must not slide it in and let it hang. There is enough play in the assembly that the clutch will not be perfectly aligned unless you hold the tool perpendicular to the clutch. EjR On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:01 PM wrote: > Send Mgs mailing list submissions to > mgs at autox.team.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > mgs-request at autox.team.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > mgs-owner at autox.team.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Mgs digest..." > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums > > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: 1980 MGB engine removal (mghirsch at netzero.net) > 2. Re: 1980 MGB engine removal (Max Heim) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:08:02 GMT > From: "mghirsch at netzero.net" > To: britfan1 at epix.net > Cc: mgs at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > Message-ID: <20210518.110802.8881.0 at webmail10.dca.untd.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > It is possible. But I have found it easier to pull Both together. > Especially when mating it up to the tranny. > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: S.Carr > To: MGs > Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 > > > The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one > unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the > gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend > would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, > driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and > he fears the block will too. > > Thanks, > Sarah Carr > ?€˜71 B/GT in PA > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > ____________________________________________________________ > Sponsored by > https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more > > Proposed Capital Attack Probe Dealt 'Serious Setback' > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac428e366ab7755st01duc1 > Andrew Giuliani: 'I Am Going to Be Governor of New York' > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac630c766ab7755st01duc2 > As Judge Reads Verdict, Convict Kills Himself > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac83de066ab7755st01duc3 > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://autox.team.net/pipermail/mgs/attachments/20210518/a86eb777/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:29:00 -0700 > From: Max Heim > To: Mga List > Subject: Re: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > Message-ID: <281BED60-687A-435D-A4B6-610DC263773F at sonic.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Obviously, both methods are possible; they have different advantages and > problems. > > The workshop manual knows what it is talking about and lays out all the > steps. If you choose another method it is up to you to work out the order > of assembly issues. > > Yes, if you pull both there are few extra items to remove, but not many: > shift lever, reverse switch wire, OD wires if present, crossmember & trans > mount bolts, speedo cable. You also need to raise the car enough for the > tailshaft to tilt in. > > If you pull just the engine, you have to do all the fiddly stuff (aligning > the clutch, undoing and refitting the engine-trans bolts) under the car > with limited access, so you have to raise the car anyway. > > Sometimes it works like a charm, but on occasion the clutch just won't > align and you can spend hours mucking with it, squandering any time you > ?saved?. > > I just did an engine install with the transmission in place (not on an > MG), and it took almost two hours to get the engine aligned to the torque > converter. We did it that way at the insistence of my buddy (it was his > garage and his lift, although it was my car), but I really think we would > have been better off doing it my way, with both together. The reason I went > along was I was afraid his hoist couldn?t lift the combo high enough to > clear the nose of the car. That isn?t really a problem with the low slung > MG. > > -- > Max Heim > '66 MGB > > > > > On May 18, 2021, at 9:08 AM, mghirsch at netzero.net wrote: > > > > It is possible. But I have found it easier to pull Both together. > Especially when mating it up to the tranny. > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > From: S.Carr > > To: MGs > > Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 > > > > > > The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one > unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the > gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a friend > would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, > driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, and > he fears the block will too. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sarah Carr > > > > ???71 B/GT in PA > > > > > > Sent from Mail for > Windows 10 > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > > Top News - Sponsored By Newser < > https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more > > > > Proposed Capital Attack Probe Dealt 'Serious Setback' < > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3242/60a3e6ac428e366ab7755st01duc1> > > Andrew Giuliani: 'I Am Going to Be Governor of New York' < > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3242/60a3e6ac630c766ab7755st01duc2> > > As Judge Reads Verdict, Convict Kills Himself < > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3242/60a3e6ac83de066ab7755st01duc3 > >_______________________________________________ > > > > Mgs at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://autox.team.net/pipermail/mgs/attachments/20210518/dc1b550e/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Mgs mailing list > Mgs at autox.team.net > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 9 > *********************************** > -- Eric Russell Mebane, NC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From frankk12 at verizon.net Tue May 18 14:15:28 2021 From: frankk12 at verizon.net (Frank Krajewski) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Tranny removal References: Message-ID: It?s always a good idea to replace the pilot bushing as well when you replace the clutch disc and pressure plate. Remember to lube it, the bushing that is and the end of the input or first motion shaft. Frank Krajewski Sent from my iPad From nadelson at alum.mit.edu Wed May 19 12:12:49 2021 From: nadelson at alum.mit.edu (Jay Nadelson) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: MGA RACE Car for Auction. https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1960-mg-mga-42/ On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:01 PM wrote: > Send Mgs mailing list submissions to > mgs at autox.team.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > mgs-request at autox.team.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > mgs-owner at autox.team.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Mgs digest..." > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums > > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 9 (Eric Russell) > 2. Tranny removal (Frank Krajewski) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 14:15:47 -0400 > From: Eric Russell > To: mgs at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 9 > Message-ID: > hcTPeGhp_M4L20ccqebb7iA at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have done it both ways (MGA & MGB). Generally, unless I need to have the > transmission out, I'll take out just the engine. Two tips I can offer. > > 1) Remove the crank pulley before pulling the engine (and replace it after > re-installation). This can give you an extra inch of maneuvering room in > the engine bay. > > B) Use a good clutch alignment tool or a spare first motion shaft (doesn't > everyone have a bin of spare first motion shafts?!?). And - most important, > even when using a good alignment tool - you must not slide it in and let it > hang. There is enough play in the assembly that the clutch will not be > perfectly aligned unless you hold the tool perpendicular to the clutch. > > EjR > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:01 PM wrote: > > > Send Mgs mailing list submissions to > > mgs at autox.team.net > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > mgs-request at autox.team.net > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > mgs-owner at autox.team.net > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Mgs digest..." > > > > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive > > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums > > > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: 1980 MGB engine removal (mghirsch at netzero.net) > > 2. Re: 1980 MGB engine removal (Max Heim) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:08:02 GMT > > From: "mghirsch at netzero.net" > > To: britfan1 at epix.net > > Cc: mgs at autox.team.net > > Subject: Re: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > > Message-ID: <20210518.110802.8881.0 at webmail10.dca.untd.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > > It is possible. But I have found it easier to pull Both together. > > Especially when mating it up to the tranny. > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > From: S.Carr > > To: MGs > > Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 > > > > > > The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one > > unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the > > gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a > friend > > would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, > > driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, > and > > he fears the block will too. > > > > Thanks, > > Sarah Carr > > ?€˜71 B/GT in PA > > > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Sponsored by > > > https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more > > > > Proposed Capital Attack Probe Dealt 'Serious Setback' > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac428e366ab7755st01duc1 > > Andrew Giuliani: 'I Am Going to Be Governor of New York' > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac630c766ab7755st01duc2 > > As Judge Reads Verdict, Convict Kills Himself > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/60a3e6ac83de066ab7755st01duc3 > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > > > http://autox.team.net/pipermail/mgs/attachments/20210518/a86eb777/attachment-0001.htm > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:29:00 -0700 > > From: Max Heim > > To: Mga List > > Subject: Re: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > > Message-ID: <281BED60-687A-435D-A4B6-610DC263773F at sonic.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > Obviously, both methods are possible; they have different advantages and > > problems. > > > > The workshop manual knows what it is talking about and lays out all the > > steps. If you choose another method it is up to you to work out the order > > of assembly issues. > > > > Yes, if you pull both there are few extra items to remove, but not many: > > shift lever, reverse switch wire, OD wires if present, crossmember & > trans > > mount bolts, speedo cable. You also need to raise the car enough for the > > tailshaft to tilt in. > > > > If you pull just the engine, you have to do all the fiddly stuff > (aligning > > the clutch, undoing and refitting the engine-trans bolts) under the car > > with limited access, so you have to raise the car anyway. > > > > Sometimes it works like a charm, but on occasion the clutch just won't > > align and you can spend hours mucking with it, squandering any time you > > ?saved?. > > > > I just did an engine install with the transmission in place (not on an > > MG), and it took almost two hours to get the engine aligned to the torque > > converter. We did it that way at the insistence of my buddy (it was his > > garage and his lift, although it was my car), but I really think we would > > have been better off doing it my way, with both together. The reason I > went > > along was I was afraid his hoist couldn?t lift the combo high enough to > > clear the nose of the car. That isn?t really a problem with the low slung > > MG. > > > > -- > > Max Heim > > '66 MGB > > > > > > > > > On May 18, 2021, at 9:08 AM, mghirsch at netzero.net wrote: > > > > > > It is possible. But I have found it easier to pull Both together. > > Especially when mating it up to the tranny. > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > > From: S.Carr > > > To: MGs > > > Subject: [Mgs] 1980 MGB engine removal > > > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 20:09:08 -0400 > > > > > > > > > The workshop manual recommends removing the engine and gearbox as one > > unit.? Has anyone had success removing the engine while leaving the > > gearbox in place?? All bell housing bolts appear accessible, and a > friend > > would love to not have to remove the console, carpet, gearshift, > > driveshaft, etc., to get the engine out--the head has serious problems, > and > > he fears the block will too. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Sarah Carr > > > > > > ???71 B/GT in PA > > > > > > > > > Sent from Mail for > > Windows 10 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Top News - Sponsored By Newser < > > > https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more > > > > > > Proposed Capital Attack Probe Dealt 'Serious Setback' < > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3242/60a3e6ac428e366ab7755st01duc1> > > > Andrew Giuliani: 'I Am Going to Be Governor of New York' < > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3242/60a3e6ac630c766ab7755st01duc2> > > > As Judge Reads Verdict, Convict Kills Himself < > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3242/60a3e6ac83de066ab7755st01duc3 > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > > > Mgs at autox.team.net > > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > > > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > > > > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs > http://autox.team.net/archive > > > > > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > > > http://autox.team.net/pipermail/mgs/attachments/20210518/dc1b550e/attachment-0001.htm > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Subject: Digest Footer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs mailing list > > Mgs at autox.team.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > End of Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 9 > > *********************************** > > > > > -- > Eric Russell > Mebane, NC > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://autox.team.net/pipermail/mgs/attachments/20210518/33af1c3d/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:15:28 -0400 > From: Frank Krajewski > To: Mgs at autox.team.net > Subject: [Mgs] Tranny removal > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > It?s always a good idea to replace the pilot bushing as well when you > replace the clutch disc and pressure plate. Remember to lube it, the > bushing that is and the end of the input or first motion shaft. > Frank Krajewski > > Sent from my iPad > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Mgs mailing list > Mgs at autox.team.net > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Mgs Digest, Vol 168, Issue 10 > ************************************ > -- 917-952-4664 (cell) nadelson at alum.mit.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From david_breneman at yahoo.com Thu May 20 09:13:14 2021 From: david_breneman at yahoo.com (David Breneman) Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Mgs] MG Club T Souvenir Beer Mug References: <675886779.764021.1621523594793.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <675886779.764021.1621523594793@mail.yahoo.com> I don't know how I got it, but I have an ~12 oz glass beer mugfrom the MG Club "T" 6th Rendezvous 1985 at Silver Falls StatePark (in Oregon). Picture here: http://tildebang.com/images/mg_mug.jpg If someone would like it, pick up postage and it's yours.? Tiegoes to someone who attended the event.? I certainly didn't.I was in college at the time, and I've never owned an MGT. David Breneman david_breneman at yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ddarby at centurytel.net Thu May 20 10:03:09 2021 From: ddarby at centurytel.net (David F. Darby) Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Mgs] MG Club T Souvenir Beer Mug In-Reply-To: <675886779.764021.1621523594793@mail.yahoo.com> References: <675886779.764021.1621523594793.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <675886779.764021.1621523594793@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <018e01d74d91$a1add640$e50982c0$@centurytel.net> That?s cool. I hope someone who attended will claim it. David From: Mgs [mailto:mgs-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of David Breneman Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:13 AM To: MGList List Subject: [Mgs] MG Club T Souvenir Beer Mug I don't know how I got it, but I have an ~12 oz glass beer mug from the MG Club "T" 6th Rendezvous 1985 at Silver Falls State Park (in Oregon). Picture here: http://tildebang.com/images/mg_mug.jpg If someone would like it, pick up postage and it's yours. Tie goes to someone who attended the event. I certainly didn't. I was in college at the time, and I've never owned an MGT. David Breneman david_breneman at yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From springer.mike51 at gmail.com Sun May 30 01:36:33 2021 From: springer.mike51 at gmail.com (Michael MacLean) Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 00:36:33 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] Removal of Oil Pressure Switch Message-ID: How do I remove the oil pressure switch in my 1969 MGB GT? I was reaching in from behind to replace the old light bulb with an LED type bulb. Half of the LED bulb broke off in the gauge and I can't get it out while it's in place in the dash. Do I have to remove the whole dash? Mike MacLean -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From springer.mike51 at gmail.com Sun May 30 02:46:51 2021 From: springer.mike51 at gmail.com (Michael MacLean) Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 01:46:51 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] Correction Message-ID: It is the oil pressure gauge I need to remove, not the switch. Mike MacLean 1969 MGB GT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From barneymg at mgaguru.com Sun May 30 07:47:58 2021 From: barneymg at mgaguru.com (Barney Gaylord) Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 08:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Mgs] Removal of Oil Pressure Switch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Been there. For the later model MGB with recessed dash panel and limited space behind, and the console in place, Left Hand Drive, You may need to remove the large instrument next door to the left before you can get to the oil pressure gauge. If you can't get to that iunstrument, then you may have to remove the next instrument to the left first. Different model years have different instruments, and some of them may have been swapped in positions. In a pinch, you may have to start at the left end of the dash and remove all of the instruments in sequence until you get to the smaller gauge you want. Then reach in through the larger hole for access to the smaller gauge connections and mounting bracket. Reassembly is the reverse of disassembly. Barney Gaylord 1958 MGA with an attitude http://MGAguru.com At 02:36 AM 5/30/2021, Michael MacLean wrote: >How do I remove the oil pressure switch in my >1969 MGB GT?? I was reaching in from behind to >replace the old light bulb with an LED type >bulb.? Half of the LED? bulb broke off in the >gauge and I can't get it out while it's in place >in the dash.? Do I have to remove the whole dash? >Mike MacLean >.... At 03:46 AM 5/30/2021, Michael MacLean wrote: >It is the oil pressure gauge I need to remove, not the switch. >Mike MacLean >1969 MGB GT >.... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From springer.mike51 at gmail.com Sun May 30 21:26:18 2021 From: springer.mike51 at gmail.com (Michael MacLean) Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 20:26:18 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] Broken LED Lamp in Oil Gauge Message-ID: Finally got the "electric" oil gauge out of my MGB GT today many little cuts in my hands later. Here's a picture showing the part of the LED bulb that broke off in the gauge. We think it was caused by the cheap sheet metal thread in the bulb holder. The LED bulb was seated at a slight angle when screwed into the holder casing the bulb to break in half. Kind of fragile at $5 a pop. A lot of work and new four letter expletives I didn't even know there were. Would have been impossible to remove with the gauge in situ. Came out easily with a pair of needle nose pliers.. Just something to consider if you're thinking of converting to an LED dash. Mike MacLean 69 MGB GT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20210530_194817.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2074315 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mgbobh at gmail.com Mon May 31 05:10:46 2021 From: mgbobh at gmail.com (Robert's New iPad) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 07:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Broken LED Lamp in Oil Gauge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for showing that the job can be done, with assurances by Barney that it is not impossible. I am slightly more eager to attempt the task now. Other instruments have been changed to LEDs, but this one had me hesitant. Bob > On May 30, 2021, at 11:26 PM, Michael MacLean wrote: > > Finally got the "electric" oil gauge out of my MGB GT today many little cuts in my hands later. Here's a picture showing the part of the LED bulb that broke off in the gauge. We think it was caused by the cheap sheet metal thread in the bulb holder. The LED bulb was seated at a slight angle when screwed into the holder casing the bulb to break in half. Kind of fragile at $5 a pop. A lot of work and new four letter expletives I didn't even know there were. Would have been impossible to remove with the gauge in situ. Came out easily with a pair of needle nose pliers.. Just something to consider if you're thinking of converting to an LED dash. > Mike MacLean > 69 MGB GT > <20210530_194817.jpg> > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com From barrob at bell.net Mon May 31 13:06:15 2021 From: barrob at bell.net (Barrie Robinson) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Broken LED Lamp in Oil Gauge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <70042664-43d7-5f4e-936d-e71c7f352061@bell.net> Hello Robert, I changed my MGB GT V8 tacho and speedo to SpeedHut ones because my car is not 'original' as I built if from parts - souped up Rover engine from UK !!!?? But the new instruments are LED and I discovered were not too happy with the rheostat dimmer.?? So I installed an LED dimmer for the new SpeedHut gauges and kept the 'old' rheostat one for the remaining gauges.? So I have two knobs for dimming which is actually very convenient - small gauges low and tacho and speedo brighter.?? Incidentally, the SpeedHut ones are awesome - the speedo is run off GPS so no mechanical connection to car and deadly accurate plus all sorts of options. Cheers Barrie On 5/31/2021 7:10 AM, Robert's New iPad wrote: > Thanks for showing that the job can be done, with assurances by Barney that it is not impossible. I am slightly more eager to attempt the task now. Other instruments have been changed to LEDs, but this one had me hesitant. > Bob > > >> On May 30, 2021, at 11:26 PM, Michael MacLean wrote: >> >> Finally got the "electric" oil gauge out of my MGB GT today many little cuts in my hands later. Here's a picture showing the part of the LED bulb that broke off in the gauge. We think it was caused by the cheap sheet metal thread in the bulb holder. The LED bulb was seated at a slight angle when screwed into the holder casing the bulb to break in half. Kind of fragile at $5 a pop. A lot of work and new four letter expletives I didn't even know there were. Would have been impossible to remove with the gauge in situ. Came out easily with a pair of needle nose pliers.. Just something to consider if you're thinking of converting to an LED dash. >> Mike MacLean >> 69 MGB GT >> <20210530_194817.jpg> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mgs at autox.team.net >> Donate:http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Suggested annual donation $12.75 >> >> Archive:http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe:http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate:http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive:http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe:http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/barrob at bell.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thgun at comporium.net Mon May 31 13:38:09 2021 From: thgun at comporium.net (Thomas Gunderson) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Positive gnd alt. Message-ID: <77CD02E2-60DF-44E3-9EA2-64CA63154749@comporium.net> Can a replacement Alt be used for a positive ground car? Sent from my iPhone X From mgbobh at gmail.com Mon May 31 13:43:16 2021 From: mgbobh at gmail.com (Robert's New iPad) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Mgs] Positive gnd alt. In-Reply-To: <77CD02E2-60DF-44E3-9EA2-64CA63154749@comporium.net> References: <77CD02E2-60DF-44E3-9EA2-64CA63154749@comporium.net> Message-ID: <22CFED7B-5585-4A3D-8F5E-A749D90715E7@gmail.com> Unless someone knows of specific alternators that are pos earth, the answer is NO. Changing from Pos to Neg is easy, though, and most owners have made the change for ease of radio and other electrical equipment. Bob > On May 31, 2021, at 3:38 PM, Thomas Gunderson wrote: > > Can a replacement Alt be used for a positive ground car? > > Sent from my iPhone X > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com From mvheim at sonic.net Mon May 31 16:21:50 2021 From: mvheim at sonic.net (Max Heim) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:21:50 -0700 Subject: [Mgs] Positive gnd alt. In-Reply-To: <22CFED7B-5585-4A3D-8F5E-A749D90715E7@gmail.com> References: <22CFED7B-5585-4A3D-8F5E-A749D90715E7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8CCC2581-51E0-468F-8147-D546165D356A@sonic.net> It?s not that there is some electrical reason that you couldn?t have a positive ground alternator, it?s just that nobody ever saw fit to make one. You can?t just flash an alternator to reverse the polarity like you can a generator. The awkward part of going negative is modifying the tachometer. Otherwise it?s straightforward. Sent from my iPad > On May 31, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Robert's New iPad wrote: > > ? Unless someone knows of specific alternators that are pos earth, the answer is NO. > Changing from Pos to Neg is easy, though, and most owners have made the change for ease of radio and other electrical equipment. > Bob > > >> On May 31, 2021, at 3:38 PM, Thomas Gunderson wrote: >> >> Can a replacement Alt be used for a positive ground car? >> >> Sent from my iPhone X >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mgs at autox.team.net >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Suggested annual donation $12.75 >> >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgbobh at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > > Mgs at autox.team.net > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Suggested annual donation $12.75 > > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/mgs http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mvheim at sonic.net >