[Mgs] Mgs Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12

[Duvall Video Productions]

Max it is a scam in that the internet is a modern network of bad information
that marketers can take advantage of.  From a statistical standpoint a few
problems on the net is antidotal.

When the Society of Automotive Engineers publishes a paper saying 960 ppm is
enough  and everyone sells break in oils for new cam/tappets,  then marketers
are preying on you.


I'm curious if the study Barrie mentions below was published anywhere....


Message: 1
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:06:26 -0500
From: Barrie Robinson <barrie at look.ca>
To: "Stephen West-Fisher" <steve at coastaldatasystems.com>, "'MG List'"
	<mgs at autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Mgs] ZDDP
Message-ID: <E1TtQwc-00064p-El at gamma.look.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

I did a test for Shell and it showed that ZDDP was not needed
.....................unless you were at full bore for days....and
even with ZDDP that would wear things !!






On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:07 AM, mgs-request at autox.team.net wrote:

> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:46:01 -0800
> From: Max Heim <mvheim at sonic.net>
> To: MG List <mgs at autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: [Mgs] ZDDP scam?
> Message-ID: <CD14AED9.426F7%mvheim at sonic.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> How was it a "scam" when all motor oil produced over a period of a decade
or
> two included ZDDP as an antiwear additive, as a matter of course, without
> any particular advertising or marketing emphasis?