[Land-speed] Bloodhound

Ray Buck rbuck at xmission.com
Thu Jul 22 17:54:48 MDT 2010


  This makes for some other interesting (to me anyway) questions.

What about cars where the front wheels are in in-line configuration and 
would only leave one track?  Maybe this is where the money starts to get 
verbose.

Would this only be for FIA records?  How about SCTA?

And how about the John Burk liner that was described as having 
everything in front of the front in-line wheels?  (That one sounds extra 
scary to me.)

RtR

Sent from my Dreadnought using that barely tolerable Thunderbird email program


On 7/22/2010 4:20 PM, drmayf wrote:
> Ray, I believe it does indeed invalidate the attempt. With only two 
> wheels on the ground it is not a car.   But, money talks.
>
> mayf
> Ray Buck wrote:
>
>>  The question of "how many wheels on the ground" has been discussed 
>> before and I'm not sure I ever saw a definitive answer.
>>
>> If a car is presented with 4 wheels but one (or even 2) of them 
>> happens to lift off the ground during a record run, is the record 
>> invalidated?  It might be seen as somewhat like outrigger (training?) 
>> wheels on a bike liner.  Some may start with 3 or 4 wheels, but at 
>> speed only 2 are in contact with the ground at speed.
>>
>> Just for the sake of argument, let's say that a car like the 
>> Bloodhound which has 2 front wheels with a much narrower track than 
>> the rear, finds itself in a state where the front wheels are off the 
>> ground for a period of time...maybe 100 yards, maybe a mile...???  
>> Would this then invalidate an FIA record?  Or could someone protest a 
>> record if they could show that only the rear wheels we in contact 
>> with the ground?  I think that's what Mayf's alluded to in the last 
>> sentence of his post, and it sure seems like a questionable area to me.
>>
>> RtR
>> (gonna be on the salt early for SW to photograph course setup)
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/2010 3:52 PM, drmayf wrote:
>>
>>> I am sure that their superior British engineering can come up with 
>>> power to over come  nearly double the drag to go from 762 to 1000 
>>> mph ( caveat...area needs to be considered).  Transonic drag is 
>>> gonna bee a bugger to overcome. Ever see a transonic drag vs speed 
>>> curve?  Now if drag is nearly double and it is likely to be way way 
>>> more then increased thrust needs will be significant. I am sure they 
>>> can do it, however.  I wonder how they are going to over coming 
>>> rolling resistance?  That also goes up as some power function of 
>>> speed.  Going to be interesting for sure.  I hope they can keep all 
>>> the tires on the ground as they set the record. Some manner of 
>>> objective evidence for that needs to be developed as the shock wave 
>>> is going to in all likely  obliterate the track marks from the wheels.


More information about the Land-speed mailing list