From jolylance at earthlink.net Fri May 1 10:44:58 2009 From: jolylance at earthlink.net (Joe Lance) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA In-Reply-To: <000c01c9c9fc$e700f130$6401a8c0@S> Message-ID: In Pennsylvania if you: --- test your brakes (to see if the anti- locks are working properly, check for black ice, test grip on a wet road, etc) --- try a drift to check break loose limits under different road conditions --- do a acceleration test (to check your clutch, tranny, or traction control) --- do a burnout just for the fun of it (without exceeding or even nearing the speed limit) Even if you do any of the above way out in the boondocks where there are no other cars on the road and no other humans to witness your actions, a cop hidden in the weeds can still give you a ticket for staging an "exhibition" I suspect other states have similar provisions in their MV codes. Lance PS-This DOM can think of some other circumstances when seat belts on a bed might be useful -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Ed Weldon Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:34 PM To: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA Did you guys know that it is illegal and a moving violation to test your brakes on California roads at speeds over 25mph? This afternoon a fellow called Len Tillum's KGO legal talk show saying he was stopped on a recent night on I5 by a CHP officer for doing this and saying so when questioned. The officer gave him a warning; but ticketted his wife, who was laying down sleeping in the back of his minivan, for not wearing a seatbelt. The driver was a fairly mature sounding fellow with a very distinct East Indian accent. Say what? On I5 where there are two nighttime speeds, 59 in the right lane (truckers) and 95 in the left? Go figure... Anyway if you get stopped in CA and asked why you hit the brakes "I was just testing them" is the wrong answer. So everyone repeat after me: "I saw a critter trying to cross the road" or "I heard a strange noise inside the vehicle and slowed to investigate". Also, as kinky as it may sound seatbelts on the beds of your camper rig may not be such a bad idea. Ed Weldon From karhu at california.com Fri May 1 10:54:01 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:54:01 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA References: Message-ID: What about the wrist restraints? > I suspect other states have similar provisions in their MV codes. > Lance > PS-This DOM can think of some other circumstances when seat belts on a bed > might be useful From 23.weldon at comcast.net Fri May 1 11:37:04 2009 From: 23.weldon at comcast.net (Ed Weldon) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:37:04 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA (non-LSR) References: Message-ID: <004601c9ca83$739bb2c0$6401a8c0@S> Hmmmm......Maybe there is another use for that long out of date 5 point harness. Let's see......need a "G" rated ebay listing paragraph.....I think there's a product hidden in this line of thinking.... Ed Weldon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" To: Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA > What about the wrist restraints? > > I suspect other states have similar provisions in their MV codes. > > Lance > > PS-This DOM can think of some other circumstances when seat belts on a bed > > might be useful From dlodom at charter.net Fri May 1 12:35:34 2009 From: dlodom at charter.net (Doug Odom) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:35:34 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA (non-LSR) References: <004601c9ca83$739bb2c0$6401a8c0@S> Message-ID: <09da01c9ca8b$a0ce2860$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> List, My Ex son in law and race team crew member ( He divorced my Daughter not the race car ) is a Calif. Highway Patrolman. I will ask him about what the law says and how they deal with it. Big Ditch Doug > Hmmmm......Maybe there is another use for that long out of date 5 point > harness. > Let's see......need a "G" rated ebay listing paragraph.....I think there's > a > product hidden in this line of thinking.... > Ed Weldon > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benn" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA > > >> What about the wrist restraints? > >> > I suspect other states have similar provisions in their MV codes. >> > Lance >> > PS-This DOM can think of some other circumstances when seat belts on a > bed >> > might be useful From speedtimer at beyondbb.com Fri May 1 16:47:35 2009 From: speedtimer at beyondbb.com (Glen Barrett) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:47:35 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] Bob Pierson passes Message-ID: Dry lakes and Bonneville pioneer Bob Pierson (Pierson Bros. Coupe) passed away on 4-29-09. No services are planned at his request. Donations to save the salt in his name was his request. From NT788 at comcast.net Fri May 1 17:29:52 2009 From: NT788 at comcast.net (NT788 at comcast.net) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Land-speed] Bob Pierson passes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <670059987.3592891241220592089.JavaMail.root@sz0044a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> Bob Pierson was a good guy! Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Barrett" To: "landspeed at autox.team.net" Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 3:47:35 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [Land-speed] Bob Pierson passes Dry lakes and Bonneville pioneer Bob Pierson (Pierson Bros. Coupe) passed away on 4-29-09. No services are planned at his request. Donations to save the salt in his name was his request. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as nt788 at comcast.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From dlodom at charter.net Fri May 1 18:39:57 2009 From: dlodom at charter.net (Doug Odom) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:39:57 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA (non-LSR) References: <004601c9ca83$739bb2c0$6401a8c0@S> <09da01c9ca8b$a0ce2860$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> Message-ID: <0a2701c9cabe$856733e0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> OK, There is a California Vehicle code #26456 that states that no testing of brake performance at over 25mph is allowed on California highways. I have no idea why the law is there and written that way. If the vehicle is NOT registered as a Motorcoach all persons must be belted. If its a motorcoach anyone behind the driver can be not belted. It is considered a two part vehicle with the area behind the driver a coach. > Big Ditch Doug > > > >> Hmmmm......Maybe there is another use for that long out of date 5 point >> harness. >> Let's see......need a "G" rated ebay listing paragraph.....I think >> there's a >> product hidden in this line of thinking.... >> Ed Weldon >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Benn" >> To: >> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:54 AM >> Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Brake testing in CA >> >> >>> What about the wrist restraints? >> >>> > I suspect other states have similar provisions in their MV codes. >>> > Lance >>> > PS-This DOM can think of some other circumstances when seat belts on a >> bed >>> > might be useful From wester6935 at comcast.net Fri May 1 23:03:09 2009 From: wester6935 at comcast.net (Wester Potter) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:03:09 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] Bob Pierson passes Message-ID: Another of our racing icons has left us. Bob Pierson who with his brother Dick campaigned their revolutionary, record setting, radically chopped and channeled coupe died in his sleep. An email from his wife reads: Would you please do whatever is necessary to notify everyone of Roberts passing. In the early hours of April 29, 2009 he died peacefully in his sleep at home with me. He had not felt well for several months and was on oxygen. He had recently been advised not to travel to the Salt flats. Any donation in his name can be sent to Save the Salt. Bob truly appreciated all of his friends at the Flats and it was the highlight of his year. I too will personally miss our comradry. Thank you so much for your assistance and friendship. Sincerely, Sandra Pierson PS. Per Bobs request there will be no services. From wester6935 at comcast.net Sat May 2 12:35:20 2009 From: wester6935 at comcast.net (Wester Potter) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:35:20 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] SLC Rent-A-Wreck shuts down Message-ID: <79677EFF-8BD5-45AF-873B-6BF8E546E844@comcast.net> Tony and Todd have shut down the Rent-A-Wreck deal in SLC. Have to find a new source for transportation to and on the salt. Wes From saltfevr at q.com Mon May 4 19:23:17 2009 From: saltfevr at q.com (Tom Shannon) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:23:17 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] SLC Rent-A-Wreck shuts down In-Reply-To: <79677EFF-8BD5-45AF-873B-6BF8E546E844@comcast.net> References: <79677EFF-8BD5-45AF-873B-6BF8E546E844@comcast.net> Message-ID: Wes; Sorry to hear about the "salt" Livery Stable shutting down! "Duece" Tony helped aid many "salt addictions". Tom Shannon Magna, Utah > From: wester6935 at comcast.net > To: land-speed at autox.team.net > Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:35:20 -0600 > Subject: [Land-speed] SLC Rent-A-Wreck shuts down > > Tony and Todd have shut down the Rent-A-Wreck deal in SLC. Have to > find a new source for transportation to and on the salt. > > Wes > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as saltfevr at q.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From jolylance at earthlink.net Sun May 3 12:00:28 2009 From: jolylance at earthlink.net (Joe Lance) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] NON -LSR Hemi Engine Problem Message-ID: Hi Team; I'm having some engine problems and could use your advice. It's a 2005 Chrysler 300C with the 5.7 L Hemi V8, AWD, 18,500 miles April 2nd---Stalled at a stop sign during return from local 30 mile trip, was able to restart repeatedly and limp home, dash engine light stays on, checked gas cap, undriveable, had car towed to Chrysler dealer who "updates PCM to latest software" Car picked up and runs okay. April 6th---Have accident with parking barrier, AC condenser, radiator, and fan motor assembly pushed back where fan motor wiring is rubbing engine pulleys and belt. Towed to same dealer who replaces condenser, radiator, fan motor & wiring, and all damaged body parts. Battery was disconnected during body repairs. April 23rd---Pick up car when body repairs are completed travel 35 miles to home with no problem. A few minutes later got on Turnpike and three miles later hear a "bong", engine hesitates like it's running out of gas, engine light goes on and stays on. Get off turnpike, repeatedly stalls, becomes undriveable, towed back to same dealer. Chrysler dealer service department has had the car since April 23rd and says he can't find any Code info that identifies the problem and can't duplicate the condition during test drives, says he is now consulting other Chrysler dealers thru some forum they have. This has been an excellent service department over the last 14 years, but I think they are hung up trying to identify something specific they can justify fixing under the emissions warranty. Warranty or not, some fix is needed even if I have to pay for it myself. Any suggestions ? Failures that would not be stored in the computer and/or leave no Code info behind ? Sensor degradation if not outright sensor failure ? Which sensors ? Thanks, Lance From jolylance at earthlink.net Mon May 4 09:05:47 2009 From: jolylance at earthlink.net (Joe Lance) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] NON -LSR Hemi Engine Problem Message-ID: Hi Team; I'm having some engine problems and could use your advice. It's a 2005 Chrysler 300C with the 5.7 L Hemi V8, AWD, 18,500 miles April 2nd---Stalled at a stop sign during return from local 30 mile trip, was able to restart repeatedly and limp home, dash engine light stays on, checked gas cap, undriveable, had car towed to Chrysler dealer who "updates PCM to latest software" Car picked up and runs okay. April 6th---Have accident with parking barrier, AC condenser, radiator, and fan motor assembly pushed back where fan motor wiring is rubbing engine pulleys and belt. Towed to same dealer who replaces condenser, radiator, fan motor & wiring, and all damaged body parts. Battery was disconnected during body repairs. April 23rd---Pick up car when body repairs are completed travel 35 miles to home with no problem. A few minutes later got on Turnpike and three miles later hear a "bong", engine hesitates like it's running out of gas, engine light goes on and stays on. Get off turnpike, repeatedly stalls, becomes undriveable, towed back to same dealer. Chrysler dealer service department has had the car since April 23rd and says he can't find any Code info that identifies the problem and can't duplicate the condition during test drives, says he is now consulting other Chrysler dealers thru some forum they have. This has been an excellent service department over the last 14 years, but I think they are hung up trying to identify something specific they can justify fixing under the emissions warranty. Warranty or not, some fix is needed even if I have to pay for it myself. Any suggestions ? Failures that would not be stored in the computer and/or leave no Code info behind ? Sensor degradation if not outright sensor failure ? Which sensors ? Thanks, Lance From wolcott_jl at yahoo.com Tue May 5 14:41:45 2009 From: wolcott_jl at yahoo.com (Joel Wolcott) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] NON -LSR Hemi Engine Problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200923.21760.qm@web110607.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Joe, I have the same engine in my truck - 2005 ram. I was having stalling problems with a code - no limp mode. I replaced the idle air valve and my troubles went away. The problem is well known enough that the parts guy at the stealership knew the part number off the top of his head and the year of my truck. I just said I need an idle air valve for a hemi - his response was 2005 - part number xxxxxx and i have it in stock. Joel ________________________________ From: Joe Lance To: "LAND SPEED @ AUTOX. TEAM" Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 11:05:47 AM Subject: [Land-speed] NON -LSR Hemi Engine Problem Hi Team; I'm having some engine problems and could use your advice. It's a 2005 Chrysler 300C with the 5.7 L Hemi V8, AWD, 18,500 miles April 2nd---Stalled at a stop sign during return from local 30 mile trip, was able to restart repeatedly and limp home, dash engine light stays on, checked gas cap, undriveable, had car towed to Chrysler dealer who "updates PCM to latest software" Car picked up and runs okay. April 6th---Have accident with parking barrier, AC condenser, radiator, and fan motor assembly pushed back where fan motor wiring is rubbing engine pulleys and belt. Towed to same dealer who replaces condenser, radiator, fan motor & wiring, and all damaged body parts. Battery was disconnected during body repairs. April 23rd---Pick up car when body repairs are completed travel 35 miles to home with no problem. A few minutes later got on Turnpike and three miles later hear a "bong", engine hesitates like it's running out of gas, engine light goes on and stays on. Get off turnpike, repeatedly stalls, becomes undriveable, towed back to same dealer. Chrysler dealer service department has had the car since April 23rd and says he can't find any Code info that identifies the problem and can't duplicate the condition during test drives, says he is now consulting other Chrysler dealers thru some forum they have. This has been an excellent service department over the last 14 years, but I think they are hung up trying to identify something specific they can justify fixing under the emissions warranty. Warranty or not, some fix is needed even if I have to pay for it myself. Any suggestions ? Failures that would not be stored in the computer and/or leave no Code info behind ? Sensor degradation if not outright sensor failure ? Which sensors ? Thanks, Lance Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as wolcott_jl at yahoo.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From neil at dbelltech.com Tue May 5 16:24:21 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:24:21 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] NON -LSR Hemi Engine Problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4406EE6E42D041DA8D102168A912330A@DBTech> Your problem sounds like what my brand- new 1975 VW Rabbit had. Without any warning the engine would quit and I'd go rolling to a stop. Driving across OK, the longest time the engine ever ran was 20 minutes. It was the worst car I ever had and I swore I'd never buy another VW. Good luck with your 300C; we have 200k miles on our 300M and it has been very reliable. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Joe Lance Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 11:00 AM To: LAND SPEED @ AUTOX. TEAM Subject: [Land-speed] NON -LSR Hemi Engine Problem Hi Team; I'm having some engine problems and could use your advice. It's a 2005 Chrysler 300C with the 5.7 L Hemi V8, AWD, 18,500 miles April 2nd---Stalled at a stop sign during return from local 30 mile trip, was able to restart repeatedly and limp home, dash engine light stays on, checked gas cap, undriveable, had car towed to Chrysler dealer who "updates PCM to latest software" Car picked up and runs okay. April 6th---Have accident with parking barrier, AC condenser, radiator, and fan motor assembly pushed back where fan motor wiring is rubbing engine pulleys and belt. Towed to same dealer who replaces condenser, radiator, fan motor & wiring, and all damaged body parts. Battery was disconnected during body repairs. April 23rd---Pick up car when body repairs are completed travel 35 miles to home with no problem. A few minutes later got on Turnpike and three miles later hear a "bong", engine hesitates like it's running out of gas, engine light goes on and stays on. Get off turnpike, repeatedly stalls, becomes undriveable, towed back to same dealer. Chrysler dealer service department has had the car since April 23rd and says he can't find any Code info that identifies the problem and can't duplicate the condition during test drives, says he is now consulting other Chrysler dealers thru some forum they have. This has been an excellent service department over the last 14 years, but I think they are hung up trying to identify something specific they can justify fixing under the emissions warranty. Warranty or not, some fix is needed even if I have to pay for it myself. Any suggestions ? Failures that would not be stored in the computer and/or leave no Code info behind ? Sensor degradation if not outright sensor failure ? Which sensors ? Thanks, Lance Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From mark at bradakis.com Wed May 6 00:13:22 2009 From: mark at bradakis.com (Mark J Bradakis) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:13:22 -0600 (MDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Team.Net status Message-ID: <20090506061322.C1DB42E08E@bradakis.com> Yes, there have been problems with the Team.Net mailing lists, related web pages, FTP stuff and such. And it ain't over yet. It should all be fine by next week, though. The current ISP providing Team.Net connectivity along with several other domains and network related services is Qwest. Saturday, May 2nd, they cut off my network access. They have been recieving complaints about "malicious activity" from one of my servers. It has happened before. The first time I actually spent many hours on the phone over a period of several days and found out the nature of the "malicious activity." Someone too lazy or too stupid to click on the 'unsubscribe' link for one of the mailing lists was flagging all incoming Team.Net emails as spam. Once I finally managed to penetrate deep into the Qwest support to find someone with more than a single digit IQ, it took me just a few seconds to remove the braindead A-hole from the lists to which they subscribed. It happened again a while back, again I took the time and effort to finally get to the root of the problem and removed the whining piece of human debris from the appropriate list. This time I've had enough. It is so frustrating to have to go through their entire little debugging script *every time* I talk to a new person about it: Them: What operating system are you running? Me: Unix, FreeBSD 6.2 Them: No, I mean are you running Vista, XP or Windows 98? Me: Like I said, I'm running Unix, FreeBSD 6.2. I am NOT running Windows, just like I told all the other ... You know, a lot of people who just use computers as a basic appliance would not understand the details of that conversation, they have no need to. But tech support people working for a major company like Qwest? How do people that incompetent get through the first job interview? Do they have anyone on their staff who can even *spell* Unix?? At any rate, the problem that Qwest claims I have is still not resolved, they will most likely once again cut off my network access soon. As I said, I've had enough. On Friday, May 8th I will be changing from Qwest to XMission, located here in Salt Lake, for Team.Net ISP service. The changeover will result in Team.Net services being unavailable for a few days. IP addresses, nameserver data, etc. will take a day or two or so to percolate through the network. So expect sporadic service over the next few days, but it should all settle down by early next week. Thank you for your patience. mjb. From david_dymaxion at yahoo.com Wed May 6 16:07:46 2009 From: david_dymaxion at yahoo.com (David Dymaxion) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] SLC Rent-A-Wreck shuts down In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <469579.59146.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> When I travel to San Diego, Fox Rent-a-Car is a good bargain (usually about 1/2 of Hertz in my experience), and they have a Salt Lake City location now: https://www.foxrentacar.com From saltfever at comcast.net Wed May 6 21:25:20 2009 From: saltfever at comcast.net (Kirkwood) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:25:20 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Net status (Mark J Bradakis) Message-ID: <001501c9cec3$73e371c0$5baa5540$@net> Good luck with Xmission, Mark. I think "Ray the Rat" uses them. (rbuck at xmission.com) "We" had a little issue with random "denial of service" earlier this year. Ray reached a knowledgeable support level and the problem was identified quickly. He may have useful insider information for you. From rbuck at xmission.com Wed May 6 23:25:12 2009 From: rbuck at xmission.com (Ray Buck) Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 23:25:12 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] Net status (Mark J Bradakis) In-Reply-To: <001501c9cec3$73e371c0$5baa5540$@net> References: <001501c9cec3$73e371c0$5baa5540$@net> Message-ID: You got it right. I'm on a Qwest DSL line and have Xmission as my isp. They're very good. I highly recommend them. I sent Mark an email of sympathy. I know what he's going thru. I'll be happy to help if there's any way I can. RtR At 09:25 PM 5/6/2009, Kirkwood wrote: >Good luck with Xmission, Mark. I think "Ray the Rat" uses them. >(rbuck at xmission.com) "We" had a little issue with random "denial of service" >earlier this year. Ray reached a knowledgeable support level and the problem >was identified quickly. He may have useful insider information for you. >_______________________________________________ >Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > >Land-speed mailing list > >You are subscribed as rbuck at xmission.com > >http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From saltracer at awwwsome.com Thu May 7 09:01:03 2009 From: saltracer at awwwsome.com (Tom Bryant) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:01:03 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Subject: [Land-speed] Update Message-ID: <4A02F7AF.000024.06496@D3DP98F1> I don't know how many out there knows George Fields with the #125 Comp Coupe but for those who know him should know about his wife, Gretchen's health issues that have consumed him for a couple of years. They would appreciate our prayers. This is an update from Gail & Ron Tesinsky forwarded to me. BELOW IS ANOTHER UPDATE ON GETCHEN FROM LYDIA.............HOPE EVERYONE IS DOING WELL & STAYING HEALTHY. G&R Today I was with my Mom and Dad while she had an endoscopy to look for the cause of her swallowing issue. Well, they determined that the cancer has nearly closed off her esophagus except for a 1/2 inch which food is having a very difficult time passing through. She didn't tolerate the procedure well, she would stop breathing and they would have to wait for her to be able to tolerate it again before proceeding. They tried to "stretch" the area, but it is all scar tissue so the concern was tearing her esophagus. So they did a barium swallow afterwards to see if there was any tearing. It revealed that there was a small tear and she does have some barium floating around outside her esophagus next to her lung. The hope is that it will wall itself off while she is being treated with antibiotics. The thought is: if she was going to have a serious reaction to it, it would've happened already. In the meantime, the Decatur Hospital she was at did not have a cardio-thoracic surgeon on staff, so she is being transferred to Dallas Methodist. The issue of nutrition is bigger now than ever, so she will be seeing a surgeon there to have a G-tube placed tomorrow. We are still trying to determine what can be done about her esophagus. It is twisted in such a way around the cancer that it was a miracle that her medications were making it any where near her stomach to be absorbed. So we're awaiting the schedule for tomorrow. She has been transferred to Methodist now. Please pray for her to have strength and protection during this time. She received 2 units of blood this morning and was definitely feeling better this afternoon. Will update again tomorrow. Lydia Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of faint_grain.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of imstp_animation_butterflies_en_020908.gif] From bobbyhotrods at comcast.net Sun May 10 08:11:33 2009 From: bobbyhotrods at comcast.net (bobbyhotrods at comcast.net) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Land-speed] Battery info In-Reply-To: <1157020240.5884451241963817989.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <1664146629.5886391241964693605.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> I had a problem with a $240 Optima battery, and the more I research what maybe went wrong and what the solution might be, the less inclined I am to replace the battery with the same type. Not only are there alot of "don'ts" involved with the maintainance of the things, the manufacturer doesn't provide timely support when things go wrong, possibly because the batteries are problematic. It appears that the 30 amp generator in the car could croak a low charged Optima that can only accept a 10 amp charge. This particular battery has been installed on it's side, hung off the inside of a 32 Ford frame, so it's replacement has to mount on it's side, where it's width is only about 5 inches. This limits my options. Also, the car won't see regular service, so it may need a charge before I take the car out, and it would be good if the charge could be applied quickly. I think what I need is "dry" Odyssey battery, a puny one in the Summit catalog would fit, and has 680 amps. The car doesn't need alot of cranking power. Does anyone have any ideas or experiance with this? Thanks, BJ in Beantown, with the Volvo Ocean boats From gmc6power at earthlink.net Sun May 10 08:54:34 2009 From: gmc6power at earthlink.net (J.D. Tone) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:54:34 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Battery info References: <1664146629.5886391241964693605.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <5FDBFF1E93B5468AA5C2EBA576BA6D9F@mydf7618c59bbf> I run an Odyssey and a 60 amp alternator and have never had a problem. It's the next size up from the one you are looking at. Good Luck >I had a problem with a $240 Optima battery, and the more I research what >maybe went wrong and what the solution might be, the less inclined I am to >replace the battery with the same type. Not only are there alot of "don'ts" >involved with the maintainance of the things, the manufacturer doesn't >provide timely support when things go wrong, possibly because the batteries >are problematic. > It appears that the 30 amp generator in the car could croak a low charged > Optima that can only accept a 10 amp charge. > This particular battery has been installed on it's side, hung off the > inside of a 32 Ford frame, so it's replacement has to mount on it's side, > where it's width is only about 5 inches. This limits my options. Also, the > car won't see regular service, so it may need a charge before I take the > car out, and it would be good if the charge could be applied quickly. > I think what I need is "dry" Odyssey battery, a puny one in the Summit > catalog would fit, and has 680 amps. The car doesn't need alot of cranking > power. > Does anyone have any ideas or experiance with this? Thanks, BJ in > Beantown, with the Volvo Ocean boats From advo at comcast.net Fri May 15 09:54:02 2009 From: advo at comcast.net (Greg Meyers) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Entry due date! In-Reply-To: <4A02F7AF.000024.06496@D3DP98F1> Message-ID: Just thought I'd remind everybody that today is the last day you can register to race for $400. Postmark after the 15th is $600 I think....... Greg From drmayf at mayfco.com Sat May 16 08:37:09 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 07:37:09 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... Message-ID: <4A0ECF95.7060006@mayfco.com> I am bemused by the fact that the Brits, with their steam car, are going to be/may be allowed to use the lake surface at Edwards AFB. How come the SCTA and it afiliates are not screaming bloody murder at this? Foreigners can use it but not Americans? Something stinks there. mayf From lsr_man at yahoo.com Sat May 16 08:58:59 2009 From: lsr_man at yahoo.com (Dick J) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 07:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... Message-ID: <767269.99598.qm@web30705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I think it would just take a significant amount of liaison and coordination by the right people in SCTA to arrange a yearly meet there. Conduct a little research on which staff officer at Edwards would be most approachable, then look at the package that was presented by the Brits and use a similar approach. The USAF and Edwards AFB is not a big, closed, impregnable machine, it is an organization of individuals, any number of whom, with the right approach, could be the key to gaining entry and support. DickJ in East Texas --- On Sat, 5/16/09, drmayf wrote: From: drmayf Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... To: "LSR" Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 9:37 AM I am bemused by the fact that the Brits, with their steam car, are going to be/may be allowed to use the lake surface at Edwards AFB. How come the SCTA and it afiliates are not screaming bloody murder at this? Foreigners can use it but not Americans? Something stinks there. mayf From 23.weldon at comcast.net Sat May 16 09:32:47 2009 From: 23.weldon at comcast.net (Ed Weldon) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:32:47 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... References: <767269.99598.qm@web30705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <001601c9d63b$947e9cf0$6501a8c0@S> Makes some sense. Times are different now. One can visualize how after 911 the base security operation at Edwards was overwhelmed with work to deal with enhanced security requirements and somewhere up the chain of command they were told that it was OK to eliminate the workload attendant to the SCTA meet. Typically the word comes down from the public affairs officer couched in as simple and credible words as possible. That was 7 years ago and this is now. Most of the hysteria has died down, for better or for worse. On the other hand the SCTA and all it's volunteers have their plates pretty full with El Mirage and Bonneville operations and may not be real hot on gearing up for a third venue. I suspect the Air Force would need a lot more convincing if another presumably new and unexperienced organization were to propose LSR meets at Edwards. Personally I didn't like Muroc dry lake. The dust there makes the stuff at El Mirage look like coarse gravel. Ed Weldon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick J" To: "LSR" <>; Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 7:58 AM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... > I think it would just take a significant amount of liaison and coordination by > the right people in SCTA to arrange a yearly meet there. Conduct a little > research on which staff officer at Edwards would be most approachable, then > look at the package that was presented by the Brits and use a similar > approach. The USAF and Edwards AFB is not a big, closed, impregnable machine, > it is an organization of individuals, any number of whom, with the right > approach, could be the key to gaining entry and support. > DickJ in East Texas From landspeed at columbus.rr.com Sat May 16 10:30:49 2009 From: landspeed at columbus.rr.com (Don McMeekin) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] Racing venues Message-ID: Mayf, Doesn't bother me that the Brits may be allowed to use Edwards..........................My impression is, that if you are willing to pay the bill...................... What puzzles me is why they would choose to do so in the first place? Perhaps they have never been there in person. I'm with Ed on the surface there. I've never seen anything like it, and then the wind starts blowing. Whew, what a deal. Don From Saltrat at pahrump.com Sat May 16 11:27:12 2009 From: Saltrat at pahrump.com (Skip Higginbotham) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 10:27:12 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Speedweek rooms Message-ID: <20090516172704.AB9B8187663@autox.team.net> We have decided that we are not going to be able to go to Speedweek this year. We have 3 rooms at "America's Best Value Inn" (used to be Super 8 and has the same phone number). Drop me a note if you want them and I'll see that you get them. Skip From drmayf at mayfco.com Sat May 16 11:39:20 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 10:39:20 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Racing venues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A0EFA48.6@mayfco.com> I think it is the long runway they want to use. Paying the bill is not the issue although today it might be , lol. Administration needs money to give away. The problem is control of the people attending. Access and inspections, and bomb dogs and such. mayf mayf Don McMeekin wrote: >Mayf, > Doesn't bother me that the Brits may be allowed to use >Edwards..........................My impression is, that if you are >willing to pay the bill...................... What puzzles me is why >they would choose to do so in the first place? Perhaps they have >never been there in person. I'm with Ed on the surface there. I've >never seen anything like it, and then the wind starts blowing. Whew, >what a deal. > Don >_______________________________________________ From saltrat at pahrump.com Sat May 16 12:39:39 2009 From: saltrat at pahrump.com (Skip Higginbotham) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:39:39 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Speedweek rooms In-Reply-To: References: <20090516172704.AB9B8187663@autox.team.net> Message-ID: <20090516183931.4EE8A187874@autox.team.net> Neil, of course you can have one. I haven't said anything to the hotel yet. Just letting folks know that they (the rooms) are going to be available. I was going to call them tomorrow. Wanted to give some time to see about interest. Hotel has been good to us and I want to assure them of reservations if possible. Now there are 2 rooms available....as far as I'm concerned. Skip At 11:08 AM 5/16/2009, you wrote: >That sounds reasonable; could I have one room or are you only releasing them >in a block of three? > >Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ > >-----Original Message----- >From: Skip Higginbotham [mailto:saltrat at pahrump.com] >Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 11:05 AM >To: neil at dbelltech.com >Subject: RE: Speedweek rooms > > >Neil, I don't know. Last year they were $104 per night.....including tax. >Skip > > > > >At 10:32 AM 5/16/2009, neil at dbelltech.com wrote: > >Skip; > > > >How much for one room? > > > >Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ From drmayf at mayfco.com Sat May 16 13:43:27 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:43:27 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Inertia Switch for Electric Fuel Pump Cutoff Message-ID: <4A0F175F.6040305@mayfco.com> Thumbing my way through the book, I again see that the 2010 season will require an inertia fuel pump cut off for electric fuel pumps. So, I have a question regarding the preferred wiring. Anyone on the safety inspection crew listening? Dan? Here is the question: the inertia switch can be located in two different manners. One, it can interrupt a relay control signal and turn off power that way, or two, it can be mounted in the fule pump power lead directly to turn it off. The absolute safest woul dbe in the power lead but the other way is also pretty satisfactory. In that case I would just put the inertia switch in line with the power switch which turn on the relay. A final thought...will it need to be tested or is the owner's word good enough that it worlks? After all we don't fire the safety system to see it it works, lol... Any thoughts or comments on this, especially from an inspector type? mayf From neil at dbelltech.com Sat May 16 14:26:10 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:26:10 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Inertia Switch for Electric Fuel Pump Cutoff In-Reply-To: <4A0F175F.6040305@mayfco.com> References: <4A0F175F.6040305@mayfco.com> Message-ID: Mayf; I'm not an official but I see no problem with using a relay to switch off the fuel pump as long as the relay is a NO (normally OFF) type. Inertia switches can be tested by whacking it with a big rubber hammer. Hmmm... with mallets aforethought? Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of drmayf Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 12:43 PM To: LSR Subject: [Land-speed] Inertia Switch for Electric Fuel Pump Cutoff Thumbing my way through the book, I again see that the 2010 season will require an inertia fuel pump cut off for electric fuel pumps. So, I have a question regarding the preferred wiring. Anyone on the safety inspection crew listening? Dan? Here is the question: the inertia switch can be located in two different manners. One, it can interrupt a relay control signal and turn off power that way, or two, it can be mounted in the fule pump power lead directly to turn it off. The absolute safest woul dbe in the power lead but the other way is also pretty satisfactory. In that case I would just put the inertia switch in line with the power switch which turn on the relay. A final thought...will it need to be tested or is the owner's word good enough that it worlks? After all we don't fire the safety system to see it it works, lol... Any thoughts or comments on this, especially from an inspector type? mayf Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Sun May 17 01:42:37 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 00:42:37 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... In-Reply-To: <4A0ECF95.7060006@mayfco.com> References: <4A0ECF95.7060006@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <4A0FBFED.6000906@wildblue.net> I wonder if it has to do with all of the USAF bases in England (They are all disguised as RAF bases for political reasons). Maybe there are a bunch of USAF guys on the team. Good way to get a free visit at home. I'd go for it to see my wife and kids. Bryan drmayf wrote: > I am bemused by the fact that the Brits, with their steam car, are > going to be/may be allowed to use the lake surface at Edwards AFB. > How come the SCTA and it afiliates are not screaming bloody murder at > this? Foreigners can use it but not Americans? Something stinks there. > > mayf > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as b.a.savage at wildblue.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From jdincau at qnet.com Sun May 17 21:22:20 2009 From: jdincau at qnet.com (Jim Dincau) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:22:20 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Trans popping out of high gear Message-ID: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc> Stock Borg Warner super T-10 aluminum case with a Hurst H pattern shifter. Under load from a 300 HP 4 banger at 6,500 RPM. No traction problems and the driver says he wasn't putting any pressure on the shifter. What's the most likely cause? Linkage? Synchros? From gmc6power at earthlink.net Sun May 17 22:45:44 2009 From: gmc6power at earthlink.net (J.D. Tone) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:45:44 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Trans popping out of high gear References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc> Message-ID: <56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf> Did you center the bellhousing to the crank. It's the major reason transmission pop ot of gear.....GoodLuck > Stock Borg Warner super T-10 aluminum case with a Hurst H pattern shifter. > Under load from a 300 HP 4 banger at 6,500 RPM. No traction problems and > the driver says he wasn't putting any pressure on the shifter. From dlodom at charter.net Mon May 18 08:04:52 2009 From: dlodom at charter.net (Doug Odom) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:04:52 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Trans popping out of high gear References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc> <56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf> Message-ID: <007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> I agree with JD. 99% of the time the problem is its not going all the way into gear ( linkage ) or not indexed ( centered ) properly. Big ditch Doug > Did you center the bellhousing to the crank. It's the major reason > transmission pop ot of gear.....GoodLuck > > > >> Stock Borg Warner super T-10 aluminum case with a Hurst H pattern >> shifter. Under load from a 300 HP 4 banger at 6,500 RPM. No traction >> problems and the driver says he wasn't putting any pressure on the >> shifter. From dwarner230 at yahoo.com Mon May 18 09:37:59 2009 From: dwarner230 at yahoo.com (dan warner) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... Message-ID: <921140.38327.qm@web52505.mail.re2.yahoo.com> After the last experience why would you want to run there? The 911 deal aside, the surface is junk, completely different than El Mirgae. The ground is a pea gravel type of rock, limited traction. The wind comes up around 10:30 or 11:00 AM and does not go down, you are done for the day. Checking weather pattern history we have found that the lowest wind conditions are in December. The temps in the high desert at that time of year are rarely above freezing at night some times with dusting snow. See the El Mirage sign post picture on landracing.com. When the wind does blow the surface pepples will injure exposed parts of your body, its like so many pellets fired from a shot gun. The stuff that gets into the nooks and cranies of your truck and race car. Water tuns it into mud unlike the El Mirage stuff that will flush out. DW --- On Sat, 5/16/09, drmayf wrote: From: drmayf Subject: [Land-speed] Racing Venues... To: "LSR" Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 7:37 AM I am bemused by the fact that the Brits, with their steam car, are going to be/may be allowed to use the lake surface at Edwards AFB. How come the SCTA and it afiliates are not screaming bloody murder at this? Foreigners can use it but not Americans? Something stinks there. mayf Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as dwarner230 at yahoo.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From MPittwood at compuserve.com Mon May 18 14:31:56 2009 From: MPittwood at compuserve.com (MPittwood at compuserve.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] Drivers with disabilities Message-ID: <200905181632_MC3-2-21A0-DE2B@compuserve.com> I did not think that I would need a rule book this year so I need a contact name and e mail please from this List. Who can I discuss the entry of a driver with visual disability into an SCTA or USFRA event on Bonneville? The driver needs a passenger with vision - so this may not be something encountered by either club before. The team is South African and the realistic goal is 200 MPH (over 320 kph). Thanks Malcolm UK From dwarner230 at yahoo.com Mon May 18 15:03:43 2009 From: dwarner230 at yahoo.com (dan warner) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Drivers with disabilities Message-ID: <757287.12051.qm@web52508.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Contact the USFRA thru their website. Won't happen at Speedweek. Tough sell to the SCTA/BNI, reference the issue at El Mirage this weekend. Mike Cook would be another contact to arrange for private time. DW --- On Mon, 5/18/09, MPittwood at compuserve.com wrote: From: MPittwood at compuserve.com Subject: [Land-speed] Drivers with disabilities To: "Land Speed List" Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 1:31 PM I did not think that I would need a rule book this year so I need a contact name and e mail please from this List. Who can I discuss the entry of a driver with visual disability into an SCTA or USFRA event on Bonneville? The driver needs a passenger with vision - so this may not be something encountered by either club before. The team is South African and the realistic goal is 200 MPH (over 320 kph). Thanks Malcolm UK Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as dwarner230 at yahoo.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From mike_lackey at yahoo.com Tue May 19 14:33:10 2009 From: mike_lackey at yahoo.com (Mike Lackey) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? In-Reply-To: <007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc> <56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf> <007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> Message-ID: <307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 Or maybe not... Mike From dlodom at charter.net Tue May 19 14:46:34 2009 From: dlodom at charter.net (Doug Odom) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:46:34 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc><56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf><007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> <307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <02af01c9d8c2$e650f490$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> As there is no B/BFMS record now, it looks like a gimme. Doug in big ditch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lackey" To: "land Speed List" Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:33 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? > http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 > > Or maybe not... > > Mike > _______________________________________________ From karhu at california.com Tue May 19 15:52:06 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:52:06 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc><56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf><007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> <307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5B8C654F756C48B283C8EC31339C6062@BennsDesktop> Lessee...150-0 in two seconds, huh? That would be about 3.4 G's--does it have retro-rockets? Benn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lackey" To: "land Speed List" Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:33 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? > http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 > > Or maybe not... > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as karhu at california.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From yesford at clear.net.nz Tue May 19 16:40:39 2009 From: yesford at clear.net.nz (Chris Harris) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:40:39 +1200 Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc> <56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf> <007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> <307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Now that is a serious piece of kit. One question, is the Alpine DVD for LSR use or for Michael at the track. I would think driving the car would be entertainment enough ! LOL. Chris H.................NZed. > http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 > > Or maybe not... > > Mike From drmayf at mayfco.com Tue May 19 18:40:02 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:40:02 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? In-Reply-To: <5B8C654F756C48B283C8EC31339C6062@BennsDesktop> References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc><56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf><007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> <307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5B8C654F756C48B283C8EC31339C6062@BennsDesktop> Message-ID: <4A135162.5040200@mayfco.com> Oh, heck, That's easy to do! Just rev it up, drop the hammer and instant tire spin to 150 mph. Doesn't go forward at all. Just sits ther with the rear wheels spinning at 150 mph.... mayf Benn wrote: > Lessee...150-0 in two seconds, huh? That would be about 3.4 G's--does > it have retro-rockets? > Benn > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lackey" > To: "land Speed List" > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:33 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? > > >> http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 >> >> Or maybe not... >> >> Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as karhu at california.com >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From neil at dbelltech.com Tue May 19 19:41:32 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:41:32 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? In-Reply-To: <4A135162.5040200@mayfco.com> References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc><56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf><007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA><307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com><5B8C654F756C48B283C8EC31339C6062@BennsDesktop> <4A135162.5040200@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <69474EBA29EF4C27B765342A312716F7@DBTech> Mayf; Don't expect to see one on the salt any time soon............ Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of drmayf Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:40 PM To: Benn Cc: land Speed List Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? Oh, heck, That's easy to do! Just rev it up, drop the hammer and instant tire spin to 150 mph. Doesn't go forward at all. Just sits ther with the rear wheels spinning at 150 mph.... mayf Benn wrote: > Lessee...150-0 in two seconds, huh? That would be about 3.4 G's--does > it have retro-rockets? > Benn > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lackey" > To: "land Speed List" > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:33 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? > > >> http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 >> >> Or maybe not... >> >> Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as karhu at california.com >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From ddahlgren at snet.net Wed May 20 15:31:45 2009 From: ddahlgren at snet.net (Dave Dahlgren) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? In-Reply-To: <69474EBA29EF4C27B765342A312716F7@DBTech> References: <3171051610C44DED925507FCB0F92C91@denpc><56A3C232689B462AB05E3F25E1D265F5@mydf7618c59bbf><007d01c9d7c1$9d9298a0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA><307668.19649.qm@web30003.mail.mud.yahoo.com><5B8C654F756C48B283C8EC31339C6062@BennsDesktop><4A135162.5040200@mayfco.com> <69474EBA29EF4C27B765342A312716F7@DBTech> Message-ID: <708BD858B7C6431C92AF264012C39F9A@DaveSatellite> ROTFLMAO ----- Original Message ----- From: To: ; "'Benn'" Cc: "'land Speed List'" Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:41 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? > Mayf; > > Don't expect to see one on the salt any time soon............ > > Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ > > -----Original Message----- > From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net > [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of drmayf > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:40 PM > To: Benn > Cc: land Speed List > Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? > > Oh, heck, That's easy to do! Just rev it up, drop the hammer and instant > tire spin to 150 mph. Doesn't go forward at all. Just sits ther with the > rear wheels spinning at 150 mph.... > > mayf > Benn wrote: > >> Lessee...150-0 in two seconds, huh? That would be about 3.4 G's--does >> it have retro-rockets? >> Benn >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lackey" >> To: "land Speed List" >> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:33 PM >> Subject: [Land-speed] Production car to set B/BFMS record? >> >> >>> http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=19883 >>> >>> Or maybe not... >>> >>> Mike >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >>> >>> Land-speed mailing list >>> >>> You are subscribed as karhu at california.com >>> >>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as ddahlgren at snet.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From advo at comcast.net Thu May 21 13:35:05 2009 From: advo at comcast.net (Greg Meyers) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Scatter shield question Message-ID: I have what I9m told is a Lakewood shield for a small block Ford, drilled to take a top-loader. I would like to drill it to accept the bolt pattern on an 8BA flathead. The rulebook indicates that If a shield is aftermarket and fulfills the SFI 6.1 we are good to go. The shield is definitely aftermarket, but is 0.232 thick. It appears to be hydro-formed. Should I expect to find any markings on it somewhere To confirm that it is 6.1? Do shields less than 0.252 attain SFI 6.1 status. The testing is not based on thickness Is it, but the actual ability to contain an explosion......The rulebook, as I interpret it, says that if a shield must be fabricated, it must be 0.252 thick. So, do aftermarket shields necessarily need to also be that thick? Thanks Greg From gmc6power at earthlink.net Thu May 21 22:41:40 2009 From: gmc6power at earthlink.net (J.D. Tone) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 21:41:40 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Scatter shield question References: Message-ID: <405BA719907D40AFB37A269DBA9C807B@mydf7618c59bbf> I think you answered your own question. If you make it, it must be a minimum of 1/4" thick. If the one you are willing to redrill to fit your block meets the SFI spec then it still will after you redrill it. I've never measured the thickness of a Lakewood, McCleod or any other "can". In my experience most SFI bellhousings just a sticker on them.. Good Luck ----- Original Message ----- > If a shield is aftermarket and fulfills the SFI 6.1 we are good to go. > The > shield is definitely aftermarket, > but is 0.232 thick. It appears to be hydro-formed. Should I expect to > find > any markings on it somewhere The rulebook, as > I interpret it, says that if a shield must be > fabricated, it must be 0.252 thick. From saltfever at comcast.net Fri May 22 22:19:06 2009 From: saltfever at comcast.net (Kirkwood) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:19:06 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Scatter shield question Message-ID: <000001c9db5d$9dc7faa0$d957efe0$@net> There is always a theoretical and a practical side to things :-) The SFI approval is for an exact specification. Each, original "system" design was proof tested as a complete assembly including the bolts, block plate and the hydroformed bellhousing. That means the alloy (ductility) of the metal and its thickness is as critical as the bolt grade, quantity of bolts and hole locations. As soon as you modify the assembly (i.e., drill one or more holes in different locations or add or remove bolts; you no longer meet the original spec (or the "as tested" configuration) and theoretically you are not approved. Even welding on a simple bracket will disqualify the system. Each SFI configuration part number has either passed an explosion proof test or has the engineering analysis to qualify it. Even changing the motor type will disqualify the part number. However, there is no hydro formed system for any flathead. And since the material properties of a hydroformed part are superior to a welded, homemade, untested design; you will likely be looked at more favorably with a modified Lakewood than the latter. I'm sure you plan on running the block-plate as well! From v4gmr at yahoo.com Sat May 23 06:55:57 2009 From: v4gmr at yahoo.com (Rich Fox) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 05:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] I'm back Message-ID: <211326.41122.qm@web51003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> It looks like I'm back on the list. For those who may care my email is now V4GMR at yahoo.com From lsr_man at yahoo.com Sun May 24 15:19:12 2009 From: lsr_man at yahoo.com (Dick J) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed Message-ID: <250459.8894.qm@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Does anybody know where I can find a master cylinder brake pedal push rod (manual brakes) for a 1978 Firebird. I have looked all over the intenet and in every catalog I can find. My local dealer get's a "deer in the headlights stare" when I mention a model older that 2005! thanks, DickJ In east Texas From neil at dbelltech.com Sun May 24 16:21:55 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:21:55 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed In-Reply-To: <250459.8894.qm@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <250459.8894.qm@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <996CE9D109FE4AA7A028F3CA0DF79DF1@DBTech> Dick; A trip to your local junkyard is in your future. :) Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Dick J Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 2:19 PM To: lsr list autox Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed Does anybody know where I can find a master cylinder brake pedal push rod (manual brakes) for a 1978 Firebird. I have looked all over the intenet and in every catalog I can find. My local dealer get's a "deer in the headlights stare" when I mention a model older that 2005! thanks, DickJ In east Texas Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From dlodom at charter.net Sun May 24 16:26:26 2009 From: dlodom at charter.net (Doug Odom) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:26:26 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed References: <250459.8894.qm@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <006401c9dcbe$add871b0$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> Dick, Just make your own. If you can't, just send me a drawing and I will make you one. You can spend more time messing around looking for one than it takes to make one. Doug in big ditch Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed > Does anybody know where I can find a master cylinder brake pedal push rod > (manual brakes) for a 1978 Firebird. I have looked all over the intenet > and > in every catalog I can find. My local dealer get's a "deer in the > headlights > stare" when I mention a model older that 2005! > > thanks, > DickJ > In east Texas From lsr_man at yahoo.com Sun May 24 16:37:37 2009 From: lsr_man at yahoo.com (Dick J) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed Message-ID: <904817.64569.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> That was going to be my next step. I figured I could use a female heims joint for the pedal end, and a cut-off grade 8 bolt with a jam nut for the rod itself. Looks like a trip to Ace Hardware on Tuesday. DickJ --- On Sun, 5/24/09, Doug Odom wrote: From: Doug Odom Subject: Re: [Land-speed] brake part needed To: "Dick J" , "lsr list autox" Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 5:26 PM Dick, Just make your own. If you can't, just send me a drawing and I will make you one. You can spend more time messing around looking for one than it takes to make one. Doug in big ditch Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed > Does anybody know where I can find a master cylinder brake pedal push rod > (manual brakes) for a 1978 Firebird. I have looked all over the intenet and > in every catalog I can find. My local dealer get's a "deer in the headlights > stare" when I mention a model older that 2005! > > thanks, > DickJ > In east Texas From adin at frontier.net Sun May 24 17:48:05 2009 From: adin at frontier.net (David in Durango) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:48:05 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed References: <904817.64569.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Open 9-5 in observance of the holiday. YMMV (your mileage may vary) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick J" To: "lsr list autox" ; "Doug Odom" Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] brake part needed > That was going to be my next step. I figured I could use a female heims > joint > for the pedal end, and a cut-off grade 8 bolt with a jam nut for the rod > itself. Looks like a trip to Ace Hardware on Tuesday. > > DickJ > > --- On Sun, 5/24/09, Doug Odom wrote: > > > From: Doug Odom > Subject: Re: [Land-speed] brake part needed > To: "Dick J" , "lsr list autox" > > Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 5:26 PM > > > Dick, Just make your own. If you can't, just send me a drawing and I will > make > you one. You can spend more time messing around looking for one than it > takes > to make one. Doug in big ditch > > Subject: [Land-speed] brake part needed > > >> Does anybody know where I can find a master cylinder brake pedal push rod >> (manual brakes) for a 1978 Firebird. I have looked all over the intenet > and >> in every catalog I can find. My local dealer get's a "deer in the > headlights >> stare" when I mention a model older that 2005! >> >> thanks, >> DickJ >> In east Texas > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as adin at frontier.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From adin at frontier.net Mon May 25 13:03:58 2009 From: adin at frontier.net (David in Durango) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:03:58 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question Message-ID: We want to supply cold air to a motor. Is HP or displacement the determining factor in "how big a pipe do we need so the motor doesn't starve for air?" A carb is what? 4" or less of flow at wot? I am supposing the length of pipe would matter at some point . . . at what length? Thanks for playing . . . David From neil at dbelltech.com Mon May 25 13:53:56 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:53:56 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1C5F9226AB7E403086F785AC1B9B64EF@DBTech> David; As long as you are not creating drag by adding a cold air inlet, why not make it as big as possible? I think CFM (air flow) is the key question; air flow velocity is a problem if the cross- sectional area gets small. Pressure drop increases greatly as the velocity increases. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of David in Durango Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:04 PM To: LandSpeed list Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question We want to supply cold air to a motor. Is HP or displacement the determining factor in "how big a pipe do we need so the motor doesn't starve for air?" A carb is what? 4" or less of flow at wot? I am supposing the length of pipe would matter at some point . . . at what length? Thanks for playing . . . David Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From saltrat at pahrump.com Mon May 25 19:36:48 2009 From: saltrat at pahrump.com (Skip Higginbotham) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:36:48 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question In-Reply-To: <1C5F9226AB7E403086F785AC1B9B64EF@DBTech> References: <1C5F9226AB7E403086F785AC1B9B64EF@DBTech> Message-ID: <20090526013645.C4E7118AB97@autox.team.net> David, Is your planned speed high enough for installation of a diffuser? If so, it could guide the design of your inlet. As Neil says, with the proper size inlet, air velocity is lower and manifold pressure is higher. If this is a street installation.....never mind the diffuser....... Skip At 12:53 PM 5/25/2009, neil at dbelltech.com wrote: >David; > >As long as you are not creating drag by adding a cold air inlet, why not >make it as big as possible? I think CFM (air flow) is the key question; air >flow velocity is a problem if the cross- sectional area gets small. Pressure >drop increases greatly as the velocity increases. > >Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ > > >-----Original Message----- >From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net >[mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of David in Durango >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:04 PM >To: LandSpeed list >Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question > >We want to supply cold air to a motor. Is HP or displacement the >determining >factor in "how big a pipe do we need so the motor doesn't starve for air?" > >A carb is what? 4" or less of flow at wot? From ddahlgren at snet.net Mon May 25 20:49:41 2009 From: ddahlgren at snet.net (Dave Dahlgren) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Cold air gains 1% for every 7 degrees F more ore less drag for inlet is V^3 how fast do you go and where do you think the trades are ? here is a hint if you get colder air with an inlet that is just big enough that the engine uses all the air and basically sucks a hole in the air where the scoop is it could be a winner if it builds static pressure it is drag.. dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "David in Durango" To: "LandSpeed list" Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 3:03 PM Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question > We want to supply cold air to a motor. Is HP or displacement the > determining > factor in "how big a pipe do we need so the motor doesn't starve for air?" > > A carb is what? 4" or less of flow at wot? > > I am supposing the length of pipe would matter at some point . . . at what > length? > > Thanks for playing . . . > > David > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as ddahlgren at snet.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From drmayf at mayfco.com Mon May 25 22:47:55 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:47:55 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A1B747B.7000105@mayfco.com> Dave, depends on where the inlet is. If for instance it was in a headlight bucket receptacle (ie remove the headlight and put a bell inlet there) that was already a high pressure point then there would be no drag increase but would have some pressure assist. And with a proper designed ductwork at the termionation slow the air down for presssure recovery as well.. The inlet could be anywhere where there is alrady a high dynamic pressure... But if you stick a big old scoop up in the air then you gonna spill air and it will increase drag... Anyway, trundling off to bed... what's happening in your neck of the woods? Oh, watched an antique roadshow program from Ct this evening. Had some old Pub signs that were worth in the hundreds of thousands of dollars... get huntin" mayf Dave Dahlgren wrote: > Cold air gains 1% for every 7 degrees F more ore less drag for inlet > is V^3 how fast do you go and where do you think the trades are ? here > is a hint if you get colder air with an inlet that is just big enough > that the engine uses all the air and basically sucks a hole in the air > where the scoop is it could be a winner if it builds static pressure > it is drag.. > dave > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David in Durango" > To: "LandSpeed list" > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 3:03 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] cold air supply question > > >> We want to supply cold air to a motor. Is HP or displacement the >> determining >> factor in "how big a pipe do we need so the motor doesn't starve for >> air?" >> >> A carb is what? 4" or less of flow at wot? >> >> I am supposing the length of pipe would matter at some point . . . at >> what >> length? >> >> Thanks for playing . . . >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as ddahlgren at snet.net >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From v4gmr at yahoo.com Thu May 28 20:50:11 2009 From: v4gmr at yahoo.com (Rich Fox) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Test Message-ID: <330182.68723.qm@web51005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Working/ From v4gmr at yahoo.com Fri May 29 13:07:28 2009 From: v4gmr at yahoo.com (Rich Fox) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Land-speed] Fw: RE: Test Message-ID: <771965.96871.qm@web51005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Rich Fox wrote: From: Rich Fox Subject: RE: [Land-speed] Test To: gary at hensleys.us Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 9:31 AM Seems like this test is the most exciting thing happening on the list lately. I just put the access plate back on the firewall of the Vega. Jack emailed that he will be down here pretty soon to pick it up for his effort at WoS. And I am slowly getting a poor boy FI together for a Buick straight eight that is supposed to run at Speedweek. Anybody else have anything for show and tell? --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Gary C. Hensley wrote: From: Gary C. Hensley Subject: RE: [Land-speed] Test To: "'Rich Fox'" Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 9:12 AM Back at you Gary C Hensley 1957 Berkeley Modified Sports #569 Fix What You Know is Wrong First -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Rich Fox Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:50 PM To: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: [Land-speed] Test Working/ Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as gary at hensleys.us http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From neil at dbelltech.com Fri May 29 18:27:34 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:27:34 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Fw: RE: Test In-Reply-To: <771965.96871.qm@web51005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <771965.96871.qm@web51005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <26E96F57E6A4491E83B8202967CF67AF@DBTech> Rich; " Anybody else have anything for show and tell?" Lots of cutting, grinding & welding but nothing photogenic. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Rich Fox Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:07 PM To: land-speed Subject: [Land-speed] Fw: RE: Test --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Rich Fox wrote: From: Rich Fox Subject: RE: [Land-speed] Test To: gary at hensleys.us Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 9:31 AM Seems like this test is the most exciting thing happening on the list lately. I just put the access plate back on the firewall of the Vega. Jack emailed that he will be down here pretty soon to pick it up for his effort at WoS. And I am slowly getting a poor boy FI together for a Buick straight eight that is supposed to run at Speedweek. Anybody else have anything for show and tell? --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Gary C. Hensley wrote: From: Gary C. Hensley Subject: RE: [Land-speed] Test To: "'Rich Fox'" Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 9:12 AM Back at you Gary C Hensley 1957 Berkeley Modified Sports #569 Fix What You Know is Wrong First -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Rich Fox Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:50 PM To: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: [Land-speed] Test Working/ Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as gary at hensleys.us http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From bobbyhotrods at comcast.net Fri May 29 21:41:46 2009 From: bobbyhotrods at comcast.net (bobbyhotrods at comcast.net) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 03:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Land-speed] Test In-Reply-To: <479917605.10919761243653345710.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <1139042130.10921961243654906972.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> I miss the list! Whilst trying to overcome the economy, I'm working with Bwana on the Loring effort. Then I have to get on the car so I don't flunk tech at our meet. It's never "run" before, except on the rollers. There are some thermo-dynamic questions to be resolved with the heavy stainless header growing in it's restricted space I fear. What's gonna melt, leak boost, etc.. I 'm going to redo some stuff that I think isn't good enough in another week or so. From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Sat May 30 07:28:33 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:28:33 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Test In-Reply-To: <1139042130.10921961243654906972.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> References: <1139042130.10921961243654906972.JavaMail.root@sz0018a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <4A213481.4070008@wildblue.net> Well I think that it's reasonable and sensible at this point for you to go completely paranoid about heat. It worked for me and I discovered that if you go fast enough, _*nobody*_ laughs. Bryan bobbyhotrods at comcast.net wrote: > I miss the list! > Whilst trying to overcome the economy, I'm working with Bwana on the Loring effort. > Then I have to get on the car so I don't flunk tech at our meet. > It's never "run" before, except on the rollers. There are some thermo-dynamic questions to be resolved with the heavy stainless header growing in it's restricted space I fear. What's gonna melt, leak boost, etc.. I 'm going to redo some stuff that I think isn't good enough in another week or so. From drmayf at mayfco.com Sun May 31 16:41:32 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:41:32 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Sunbeam Alignment Stuff Message-ID: <4A23079C.6050801@mayfco.com> Ok, so today I put the car down on its feet and decided to do some tinkering regarding alignment parameters. I first built a couple of tools to make it easier for me to measure camber and toe angles. When I measured the camber I found that the drivers side was at 1 degree negative (leans in toward the motor) while the passenger side is neutral at 0 degrees. I can adjust the the camber reasonably easy to make it pretty much what is required. But there is the rub. This is a completely custom chassis. So given that the wheel base on this puppy is really short at 90 inches, what the consensus for a good toe measurement? I am running a 24 inch diameter front runner. Is there a relationship between wheelbase, track width, tire diameter and toe measurements? Is the old standard of about 1/8 toe appropriate for a short narrow car? The Sunbeam Tiger toe is supposed to be 1/8 inch. Does speed affect the toe requirements? Also, what should camber be? I tend to like some negative camber (leaning in towards the motor) although not much. I wouldn't mind 3 degrees negative camber but, again, what is a fair number? Here lately some of us locals have been chatting about scrub radius. Scrub radius is the distance from the Suspension angle (ie the angle made by a line drawwn through the upper and lower ball joints when viewed from the front) where an imaginary line intersects the road surface and the centerline of the tire tread. While I have not generally measured many of these, I suspect that most cars have somewhere in the 2 to 3 inch range of radius. That would mean the the forces developed by the tire at the center of the tread would act on a 3 inch radius making torque trying to move the tire into a turning movement, left on the drivers side, right on the passenger side. When going dead straight those two forces cancel out. When making a turn, say left then things can go strange. In cars like mine with lots of caster a turn left is trying to lift the drivers sideof the car adding more load to that tire while on the other side it is trying to raise the tire lessining the load. Since the left wheel has more load then the force balance is upset and that would seem to make it seem like it has power steering. Easier to turn. Maybe too much so, lol. But with very small corrective turns on the course to keep it between the lines, I suspect that the effect is neglible. And yet, the faster you go the more it probably seems it is moving. A small twitch must seem like a monstrous movement at 300 plus mph. Again, what is considered a good suspension angle as well as an acceptable scrub radius? Any rationale floating around out there? Any discussion on any of these items? mayf