[Land-speed] "Sanctioning Bodies"

[Skip Higginbotham]

What do you think is a solution? Or do you think that a solution is 
not needed to coordinate record rules?

Skip



At 12:18 AM 6/26/2009, Bryan Savage wrote:

>What we really need is a sanctioning body for sanctioning bodies.
>It would be made up of sanctioning body Oversight Bodies.
>Members of an Oversight Body would qualify for the position
>by passing a very rigorous Self Importance examination.
>I'm sure glad that's taken care of. Now we can get back to some
>real stuff.
>
>Cheers all,
>Bryan
>
>
>
>
>NT788 at comcast.net wrote:
>>Skip
>>
>>When the word world, gets over used, then we will have to deal with
>>"universal".That should be easy to fix!
>>
>>Jack
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Skip Higginbotham " < saltrat @ pahrump .com>
>>To: "Rich Fox" <v4gmr at yahoo.com>, "land-speed" <land-speed@ autox .team.net>
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:39:20 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
>>Subject: [Land-speed] Records
>>
>>Rich,
>>Exactly the same point that I was trying to make......apples and
>>oranges.....thank you.