From neil at dbelltech.com Sun Feb 1 09:50:23 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:50:23 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Plasma Cutter In-Reply-To: References: <6A971C48FD1645DAB5B3721A3871B45F@DBTech> Message-ID: Good advice, Keith-- thanks. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: Keith Turk [mailto:kturk at ala.net] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 8:38 PM To: neil at dbelltech.com; land Speed List Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Plasma Cutter Plasma cutters like supplies... so buy several for it as well as the center piece... ( I'd call it a tip ) One of the reasons to go with a name brand is the avalibility of expendable supplies these things eat... so if you can find the like equivelent unit... it would be GOOD... Keith From neil at dbelltech.com Sun Feb 1 09:52:35 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:52:35 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Plasma Cutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <450EAA27C16241DB977D00B0F9BEABA8@DBTech> Jim; I will need to check-Keith alerted me to this as well. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ _____ From: Jimwprice at aol.com [mailto:Jimwprice at aol.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:55 PM To: neil at dbelltech.com; land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Plasma Cutter Does HF sell the expendables? They are where the up keep bucks are. _____ >From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news . From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Mon Feb 2 12:21:37 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:21:37 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Plasma Cutter In-Reply-To: <450EAA27C16241DB977D00B0F9BEABA8@DBTech> References: <450EAA27C16241DB977D00B0F9BEABA8@DBTech> Message-ID: <498747C1.5010207@wildblue.net> Typically the Chinese will copy an American too. So if you can find out which one, it's no problem ------ if they're still in business. Bryan From drmayf at mayfco.com Tue Feb 3 09:46:18 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:46:18 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms Message-ID: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> Wow! I finally managed to connect with a room at the Rainbow. They are sure wanting to cut down the riff raff who show up! Good luck! mayf From speedtimer at beyondbb.com Tue Feb 3 10:06:26 2009 From: speedtimer at beyondbb.com (Glen Barrett) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:06:26 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms References: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> Message-ID: Define riff raff. Glen ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" To: "LSR" Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:46 AM Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms > Wow! I finally managed to connect with a room at the Rainbow. They are > sure wanting to cut down the riff raff who show up! Good luck! > > mayf > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as speedtimer at beyondbb.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From adin at frontier.net Tue Feb 3 10:25:18 2009 From: adin at frontier.net (adin at frontier.net) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:25:18 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms In-Reply-To: References: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <20090203102518.05efuf7yysg4k0w8@webmail.brainstorminternet.net> I would be interested if that was a "rainbow" term, or a Mayf term. Riff raff: generally anyone who would be seen in public with a person like myself. (my definition) Of course, if this term is applied to the type of people that took up a collection for old Mr. Munro - I would be proud to wear that t-shirt. David, can see through designer clothes to the heart Quoting Glen Barrett : > Define riff raff. > Glen > ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" > To: "LSR" > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:46 AM > Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms > > >> Wow! I finally managed to connect with a room at the Rainbow. They >> are sure wanting to cut down the riff raff who show up! Good luck! >> >> mayf >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as speedtimer at beyondbb.com >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as adin at frontier.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From drmayf at mayfco.com Tue Feb 3 11:49:55 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:49:55 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms In-Reply-To: References: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <498891D3.3080701@mayfco.com> I looked in the dictionary and there under riff raff was your picture, lol... I suspect it is to cut down on the rat rodders and car buffs who show up, then clutter up the fronts of the hotels with their impromptu care shows, beer guzzling, loud music, etc. My definition. mayf Glen Barrett wrote: > Define riff raff. > Glen > ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" > To: "LSR" > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:46 AM > Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms > > >> Wow! I finally managed to connect with a room at the Rainbow. They >> are sure wanting to cut down the riff raff who show up! Good luck! >> >> mayf >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as speedtimer at beyondbb.com >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From speedtimer at beyondbb.com Tue Feb 3 12:09:18 2009 From: speedtimer at beyondbb.com (Glen Barrett) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:09:18 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms References: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> <498891D3.3080701@mayfco.com> Message-ID: The next time you come down the course I will announce that Dr.riff-raff-mayf has it pointed the right way. GB ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" To: "Glen Barrett" Cc: "LSR" Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms >I looked in the dictionary and there under riff raff was your picture, >lol... I suspect it is to cut down on the rat rodders and car buffs who >show up, then clutter up the fronts of the hotels with their impromptu care >shows, beer guzzling, loud music, etc. My definition. > > mayf > Glen Barrett wrote: > >> Define riff raff. >> Glen >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" >> To: "LSR" >> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:46 AM >> Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms >> >> >>> Wow! I finally managed to connect with a room at the Rainbow. They are >>> sure wanting to cut down the riff raff who show up! Good luck! >>> >>> mayf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >>> >>> Land-speed mailing list >>> >>> You are subscribed as speedtimer at beyondbb.com >>> >>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From David.Parks at lfr.com Tue Feb 3 12:14:36 2009 From: David.Parks at lfr.com (Parks, David) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:36 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms In-Reply-To: References: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> <498891D3.3080701@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <2250EAF246F5BD4F944363A212DD3527058A9BA136@ca17exmbs1.arcadis-us.com> If he does... ;-) -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Glen Barrett Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: drmayf at mayfco.com Cc: LSR Subject: Re: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms The next time you come down the course I will announce that Dr.riff-raff-mayf has it pointed the right way. GB This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not a named addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you. From drmayf at mayfco.com Tue Feb 3 13:45:11 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:45:11 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms In-Reply-To: References: <498874DA.50309@mayfco.com> <498891D3.3080701@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <4988ACD7.7060904@mayfco.com> At the rate I been going trying to go backwards, that may be a plus! Hopefully my new secrets weapons will help that...now if I olnly knew how to drive... mayf Glen Barrett wrote: > The next time you come down the course I will announce that > Dr.riff-raff-mayf has it pointed the right way. > GB > ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" > To: "Glen Barrett" > Cc: "LSR" > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:49 AM > Subject: Re: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms > > >> I looked in the dictionary and there under riff raff was your >> picture, lol... I suspect it is to cut down on the rat rodders and >> car buffs who show up, then clutter up the fronts of the hotels with >> their impromptu care shows, beer guzzling, loud music, etc. My >> definition. >> >> mayf >> Glen Barrett wrote: >> >>> Define riff raff. >>> Glen >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "drmayf" >>> To: "LSR" >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:46 AM >>> Subject: [Land-speed] SpeedWeek Rooms >>> >>> >>>> Wow! I finally managed to connect with a room at the Rainbow. They >>>> are sure wanting to cut down the riff raff who show up! Good luck! >>>> >>>> mayf From lsr_man at yahoo.com Tue Feb 3 19:48:31 2009 From: lsr_man at yahoo.com (Dick J) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:48:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question Message-ID: <756393.6984.qm@web30706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six banger? DickJ From karhu at california.com Tue Feb 3 21:33:32 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:33:32 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question References: <756393.6984.qm@web30706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6FE8C4509E5B484C91CB944EFA85FA0C@BennsDesktop> my guess is '63, when the old 216/235 was retired. But it's only a guess. Benn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick J" To: "lsr list autox" Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 6:48 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question > When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six > banger? > > DickJ > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as karhu at california.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From saltracer at awwwsome.com Tue Feb 3 21:42:54 2009 From: saltracer at awwwsome.com (Tom Bryant) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:42:54 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question References: <756393.6984.qm@web30706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49891CCD.000001.00268@HOME> 1954 the first inserts -------Original Message------- From: Dick J Date: 2/3/2009 6:48:43 PM To: lsr list autox Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six banger? DickJ Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as saltracer at awwwsome.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed ____________________________________________________________ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.17/1933 - Release Date: 02/02/09 19:21:00 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of faint_grain.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of imstp_animation_butterflies_en_020908.gif] From sparky.2211 at cox.net Wed Feb 4 08:16:55 2009 From: sparky.2211 at cox.net (sparky.2211 at cox.net) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question In-Reply-To: <756393.6984.qm@web30706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090204101655.4ENB5.1058031.imail@fed1rmwml30> WAY to late!!!!!! ---- Dick J wrote: > When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six > banger? > > DickJ > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as sparky.2211 at cox.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From rjdenton479 at gmail.com Wed Feb 4 08:44:36 2009 From: rjdenton479 at gmail.com (Robert J. Denton) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:44:36 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question In-Reply-To: <20090204101655.4ENB5.1058031.imail@fed1rmwml30> References: <756393.6984.qm@web30706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090204101655.4ENB5.1058031.imail@fed1rmwml30> Message-ID: <45ac72e90902040744q79af61e9ude814d04f6ef8c5d@mail.gmail.com> Guys, it was 1948. And that's it!!! On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:16 AM, wrote: > WAY to late!!!!!! > > > ---- Dick J wrote: >> When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six >> banger? >> >> DickJ >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as sparky.2211 at cox.net >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as rjdenton479 at gmail.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > -- ............................................................................................ Well, I have finally got my own website. Nothing fancy nor finished, however, it's www.bobdentonphotography.com also check this, http://bobdenton.photoworkshop.com ........................................................................................... From lsr_man at yahoo.com Wed Feb 4 08:55:38 2009 From: lsr_man at yahoo.com (Dick J) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:55:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question In-Reply-To: <45ac72e90902040744q79af61e9ude814d04f6ef8c5d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <290165.77204.qm@web30708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I found some info in my old Motors Manual. The changes were sequential through the 216 and 235 lifespan. - Main berings changed firs, then number of main bearings, then rod bearings. DickJ --- On Wed, 2/4/09, Robert J. Denton wrote: From: Robert J. Denton Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question To: sparky.2211 at cox.net Cc: lsr_man at yahoo.com, "lsr list autox" Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:44 AM Guys, it was 1948. And that's it!!! On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:16 AM, wrote: > WAY to late!!!!!! > > > ---- Dick J wrote: >> When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six >> banger? >> >> DickJ >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as sparky.2211 at cox.net >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as rjdenton479 at gmail.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > -- ............................................................................. ............... Well, I have finally got my own website. Nothing fancy nor finished, however, it's www.bobdentonphotography.com also check this, http://bobdenton.photoworkshop.com ............................................................................. .............. From jolylance at earthlink.net Wed Feb 4 09:56:48 2009 From: jolylance at earthlink.net (joseph lance) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question References: <756393.6984.qm@web30706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <49891CCD.000001.00268@HOME> Message-ID: <000601c986e9$979adb20$2101a8c0@WinXP> My info is that they went to inserts in 1954, except for 235 powerglides in 1953. Not sure when they got rid of those heavy cast iron pistons. Lance ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Bryant" To: "lsr list autox" ; Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question > 1954 the first inserts > > -------Original Message------- > > From: Dick J > Date: 2/3/2009 6:48:43 PM > To: lsr list autox > Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question > > When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six > banger? > > DickJ > Land-speed mailing list From karhu at california.com Wed Feb 4 10:04:11 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:04:11 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? Message-ID: The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering about when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth still was building them into 1960 or so... Benn From NT788 at comcast.net Wed Feb 4 10:40:58 2009 From: NT788 at comcast.net (NT788 at comcast.net) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <970143553.2281071233769258529.JavaMail.root@sz0044a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> Do you mean flathead engines? A "Flathead" is an old V8 built by Ford Motor Co! I'll bet Briggs and Stratton maybe Continental for big ones. jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" To: land-speed at autox.team.net Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 9:04:11 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering about when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth still was building them into 1960 or so... Benn _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as nt788 at comcast.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Wed Feb 4 11:09:41 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:09:41 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] Message-ID: <4989D9E5.9010608@wildblue.net> What do you call an inline 8 cyl Continental engine that has the valves in the block? An underhead 8 ??? Bryan -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Land-speed] last US flathead? Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:40:58 +0000 (UTC) From: NT788 at comcast.net To: Benn CC: land-speed at autox.team.net Do you mean flathead engines? A "Flathead" is an old V8 built by Ford Motor Co! I'll bet Briggs and Stratton maybe Continental for big ones. jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" To: land-speed at autox.team.net Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 9:04:11 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering about when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth still was building them into 1960 or so... Benn _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as nt788 at comcast.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as b.a.savage at wildblue.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From joyseydevil at comcast.net Wed Feb 4 11:19:36 2009 From: joyseydevil at comcast.net (John Burk) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question Message-ID: Which was the last year Ford flatheads had poured main bearings > When did Chevy switch over from babbitt bearings to inserts in the six > banger? From drmayf at mayfco.com Wed Feb 4 12:39:32 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:39:32 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Panel Fasteners... Message-ID: <4989EEF4.4060303@mayfco.com> We have all used the tried and true Dzus fasteners o hold stuff onto our vehicles. But what kind of quarter turn fastner do you use when you need a grip length longer than that available for a Dzus? Any suggestions? I have considered cutting a dzus button and making it longer to fit the need, but are there similar already available? mayf From neil at dbelltech.com Wed Feb 4 12:40:05 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:40:05 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] In-Reply-To: <4989D9E5.9010608@wildblue.net> References: <4989D9E5.9010608@wildblue.net> Message-ID: <5F850FAFF75C43FBB38180ADBE33140D@DBTech> I think it was called an "F-head", Bryan. No kidding. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Savage Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:10 AM To: List Land Speed Subject: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] What do you call an inline 8 cyl Continental engine that has the valves in the block? An underhead 8 ??? Bryan -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Land-speed] last US flathead? Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:40:58 +0000 (UTC) From: NT788 at comcast.net To: Benn CC: land-speed at autox.team.net Do you mean flathead engines? A "Flathead" is an old V8 built by Ford Motor Co! I'll bet Briggs and Stratton maybe Continental for big ones. jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" To: land-speed at autox.team.net Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 9:04:11 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering about when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth still was building them into 1960 or so... Benn _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as nt788 at comcast.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as b.a.savage at wildblue.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From jolylance at earthlink.net Wed Feb 4 13:09:09 2009 From: jolylance at earthlink.net (joseph lance) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? References: Message-ID: <001601c98704$7767cc80$2101a8c0@WinXP> Last flat head engines; Last Plymouth was 59, Maybe some Studebakers after 58 DeSoto and Chrysler ended 53 or 54 Last Hudson was 56 Last Packard and Pontiac in 54. Packard 1954 in-line flathead straight eight had 8.7 CR, nice quench area, think it was the highest stock CR of ANY production engine in 1954 including the "modern" OHV V8s. I think my 63 Corvette 327 cid, 340 HP still holds the CR record at 11.25 for U.S. production engines. Lance ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:04 PM Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? > The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering about > when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth > still > was building them into 1960 or so... > Benn > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as jolylance at earthlink.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From jolylance at earthlink.net Wed Feb 4 13:13:42 2009 From: jolylance at earthlink.net (joseph lance) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] References: <4989D9E5.9010608@wildblue.net> <5F850FAFF75C43FBB38180ADBE33140D@DBTech> Message-ID: <001c01c98705$1391d380$2101a8c0@WinXP> I thought F heads had OVH intakes and in-block exhaust valves---Some Jeep or Nash engines ? Lance ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "'Bryan Savage'" ; "'List Land Speed'" Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:40 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] >I think it was called an "F-head", Bryan. No kidding. > > Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ > > -----Original Message----- > From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net > [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Savage > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:10 AM > To: List Land Speed > Subject: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] > > What do you call an inline 8 cyl Continental engine that has the valves > in the block? > An underhead 8 ??? > > Bryan From joetimney at dol.net Wed Feb 4 13:31:53 2009 From: joetimney at dol.net (Joe Timney) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Panel Fasteners... In-Reply-To: <4989EEF4.4060303@mayfco.com> References: <4989EEF4.4060303@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <4989FB39.7000304@dol.net> Mayf, How thick do you need??? joe drmayf wrote: > We have all used the tried and true Dzus fasteners o hold stuff onto > our vehicles. But what kind of quarter turn fastner do you use when > you need a grip length longer than that available for a Dzus? Any > suggestions? I have considered cutting a dzus button and making it > longer to fit the need, but are there similar already available? > > mayf From 23.weldon at comcast.net Wed Feb 4 14:10:22 2009 From: 23.weldon at comcast.net (Ed Weldon) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:10:22 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Fw: Chevy Six Question Message-ID: <003401c9870d$00b44ab0$6401a8c0@S> FWD to list with edits. EW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon at comcast.net> To: "John Burk" Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Chevy Six Question > In the 85hp V-8's Ford phased in the insert main brarings with the LB blocks > sometime during the model year 1936. By `1937 they all used insert mains. > Ford made 4 cylinder variants of the Model B 4 banger in light trucks up til > around maybe 1941. I don't think they used insert main bearings; but I'm > not sure. > Ed Weldon > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Burk" > To: "LandSpeed List" > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 10:19 AM > > Which was the last year Ford flatheads had poured main bearings From saltracer at awwwsome.com Wed Feb 4 14:10:09 2009 From: saltracer at awwwsome.com (Tom Bryant) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:10:09 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Subject: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] References: <4989D9E5.9010608@wildblue.net> <5F850FAFF75C43FBB38180ADBE33140D@DBTech> Message-ID: <498A0430.00000D.03884@HOME> Fellows, I am losing it, but the 4-cylinder F-head was used in a Jeep with over-head intake valves and exhaust valve in the block. The in-line with valves in the block are L-heads as I remember. I did forget that Chevrolet 6 had the inserts in 1953 with Powerglide. It helps to be refreshed. Tom, Redding CA - #216D/FCC -------Original Message------- From: neil at dbelltech.com Date: 2/4/2009 12:03:11 PM To: 'Bryan Savage'; 'List Land Speed' Subject: Re: [Land-speed] [Fwd: Re: last US flathead?] I think it was called an "F-head", Bryan. No kidding. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of faint_grain.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of imstp_animation_butterflies_en_020908.gif] From v4gr at rcn.com Wed Feb 4 15:02:33 2009 From: v4gr at rcn.com (Rich Fox) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:02:33 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? References: <001601c98704$7767cc80$2101a8c0@WinXP> Message-ID: <447B56D46384474BB8E47DCC454FAD30@your55e5f9e3d2> Stude six went to OHV in 63 I believe. ----- Original Message ----- From: "joseph lance" To: "Benn" ; Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] last US flathead? > Last flat head engines; > > Last Plymouth was 59, Maybe some Studebakers after 58 > > DeSoto and Chrysler ended 53 or 54 > > Last Hudson was 56 > > Last Packard and Pontiac in 54. > > Packard 1954 in-line flathead straight eight had 8.7 CR, nice quench area, > think it was the highest stock CR of ANY production engine in 1954 > including the "modern" OHV V8s. > > I think my 63 Corvette 327 cid, 340 HP still holds the CR record at 11.25 > for U.S. production engines. > > Lance > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benn" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:04 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? > > >> The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering >> about >> when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth >> still >> was building them into 1960 or so... >> Benn >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as jolylance at earthlink.net >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as v4gr at rcn.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From dwarner230 at yahoo.com Wed Feb 4 17:15:34 2009 From: dwarner230 at yahoo.com (dan warner) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:15:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] Fw: Re: Panel Fasteners... Message-ID: <622185.8861.qm@web52508.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Cutting and extending a Dzus button is common. We had buttons 2" long to hold the tonneau on the Alfa. DW --- On Wed, 2/4/09, Joe Timney wrote: From: Joe Timney Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Panel Fasteners... To: drmayf at mayfco.com Cc: "LSR" Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 12:31 PM Mayf, How thick do you need??? joe drmayf wrote: > We have all used the tried and true Dzus fasteners o hold stuff onto our vehicles. But what kind of quarter turn fastner do you use when you need a grip length longer than that available for a Dzus? Any suggestions? I have considered cutting a dzus button and making it longer to fit the need, but are there similar already available? > > mayf Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as dwarner230 at yahoo.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From saltracer at awwwsome.com Wed Feb 4 18:22:53 2009 From: saltracer at awwwsome.com (Tom Bryant) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:22:53 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? References: <001601c98704$7767cc80$2101a8c0@WinXP> <447B56D46384474BB8E47DCC454FAD30@your55e5f9e3d2> Message-ID: <498A3F6C.000007.02404@HOME> It was first introduced in 1951 and used from 1952 in Studebaker. I don't know when the quit the L-head for sure. Tom -------Original Message------- From: Rich Fox Date: 2/4/2009 2:23:55 PM To: joseph lance; Benn; land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Land-speed] last US flathead? Stude six went to OHV in 63 I believe. ----- Original Message ----- From: "joseph lance" To: "Benn" ; Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] last US flathead? > Last flat head engines; > > Last Plymouth was 59, Maybe some Studebakers after 58 > > DeSoto and Chrysler ended 53 or 54 > > Last Hudson was 56 > > Last Packard and Pontiac in 54. > > Packard 1954 in-line flathead straight eight had 8.7 CR, nice quench area, > think it was the highest stock CR of ANY production engine in 1954 > including the "modern" OHV V8s. > > I think my 63 Corvette 327 cid, 340 HP still holds the CR record at 11.25 > for U.S. production engines. > > Lance > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benn" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:04 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] last US flathead? > > >> The adoption date for insert bearings in the Chev 6 got me wondering >> about >> when the last US mfr stopped building flatheads. Seems to me Plymouth >> still >> was building them into 1960 or so... >> Benn >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as jolylance at earthlink.net >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as v4gr at rcn.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as saltracer at awwwsome.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed ____________________________________________________________ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.18/1935 - Release Date: 02/03/09 17:48:00 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of faint_grain.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of imstp_animation_butterflies_en_020908.gif] From zoombot at cox.net Thu Feb 5 15:18:15 2009 From: zoombot at cox.net (Pile,Chris) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:18:15 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] last US Flathead? Message-ID: <21B04752D6314068B21FDF2CD3E4D41B@HomePC> Rich Fox & List - "Stude went to OHV in 63 I believe". If I remember correctly, some Larks had OHV conversions fitted to Studebaker's venerable old 170 c.i. "Champion Six" inline engine. When the South Bend plant closed in December of '63, production resumed in the Hamilton, Ontario plant using McKinnon "Chevy" inline engines. - Chris Pile aka aircap From v4gr at rcn.com Thu Feb 5 16:25:27 2009 From: v4gr at rcn.com (Rich Fox) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:25:27 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] last US Flathead? References: <21B04752D6314068B21FDF2CD3E4D41B@HomePC> Message-ID: My '62 Lark came with a 170 inch OHV 6. My Motors Manual shows '61 as the first year of OHV Studebaker 6 cylinder motors. I'm saving the original engine just in case I need it someday. RF ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pile,Chris" To: "Land Speed Digest" Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:18 PM Subject: [Land-speed] last US Flathead? > Rich Fox & List - > > "Stude went to OHV in 63 I believe". > > If I remember correctly, some Larks had OHV conversions fitted to > Studebaker's venerable old 170 c.i. "Champion Six" inline engine. When the > South Bend plant closed in December of '63, production resumed in the > Hamilton, Ontario plant using McKinnon "Chevy" inline engines. > > - Chris Pile aka aircap > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as v4gr at rcn.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From wester6935 at comcast.net Fri Feb 6 11:03:25 2009 From: wester6935 at comcast.net (Wester Potter) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:03:25 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Lake Gairdner salt conditions? Message-ID: <76B03814-44BA-4370-AC11-B33240E5B0D2@comcast.net> Anyone have an idea of what the salt is like at Lake Gairdner given the flooding in other parts of Australia? Wes From NT788 at comcast.net Fri Feb 6 11:27:19 2009 From: NT788 at comcast.net (NT788 at comcast.net) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Land-speed] Lake Gairdner salt conditions? In-Reply-To: <76B03814-44BA-4370-AC11-B33240E5B0D2@comcast.net> Message-ID: <1832546600.436391233944839770.JavaMail.root@sz0044a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> I hear the Assie smog nazi's won't allow speed trails there. jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wester Potter" To: "LAND SPEED LIST" Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 10:03:25 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [Land-speed] Lake Gairdner salt conditions? Anyone have an idea of what the salt is like at Lake Gairdner given the flooding in other parts of Australia? Wes _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as nt788 at comcast.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From drmayf at mayfco.com Fri Feb 6 18:08:22 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:08:22 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Lake Gairdner salt conditions? In-Reply-To: <76B03814-44BA-4370-AC11-B33240E5B0D2@comcast.net> References: <76B03814-44BA-4370-AC11-B33240E5B0D2@comcast.net> Message-ID: <498CDF06.9050607@mayfco.com> Well, given that they were having tribal stakeholder issues, may be a moot point? I wonder how that went? mayf Wester Potter wrote: > Anyone have an idea of what the salt is like at Lake Gairdner given > the flooding in other parts of Australia? > > Wes > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From dwarner230 at yahoo.com Sat Feb 7 08:45:19 2009 From: dwarner230 at yahoo.com (dan warner) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:45:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] 2009 Speedweek inspection dates Message-ID: <360962.58737.qm@web52503.mail.re2.yahoo.com> For those who do not visit www.landracing.com I posted this today: "Last night the combined SCTA-BNI boards made the decision to open the salt one day earlier than published for inpection and pit setup. The first day the salt will be available to entrants is Thursday August 6th. The salt will open at 7AM for pit setup, inspections will begin at approx. 10AM. This will be a free day for everyone, no gate charges. The schedule for Friday August 7th will remain as published, Friday will also be a free day. At this time it has not been confirmed if the gas truck will be open on Thursday. It is hoped that this schedule change will help relieve the pressures and tensions of the tech lines for our entrants and inspectors. There is no need to change your room reservations, there is plenty of time to get all the work done before racing begins on Saturday, August 8th." DW From drmayf at mayfco.com Wed Feb 11 10:48:13 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:48:13 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Old Speed Records... Message-ID: <49930F5D.2080509@mayfco.com> Just sitting here and had an odd thought (well all my thoughts are considered odd by some, lol)... was there ever an instance when a car or bike was driven on the Daytona sand and then on the salt? Without a lot of mods in between? Curious as to how much the rolling resistance differences might have been. Seems like wet sand would have a lot. mayf From wester6935 at comcast.net Wed Feb 11 11:38:27 2009 From: wester6935 at comcast.net (Wester Potter) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:38:27 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Old Speed Records... In-Reply-To: <49930F5D.2080509@mayfco.com> References: <49930F5D.2080509@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <95280D74-DA43-47F4-9656-E34C0B23760A@comcast.net> mayf, It likely was John Cobb, he was the first Brit to run on the salt but as an endurance racer. He drove the Napier-Railton for 100 miles at a 152.95 average speed. I'm not sure where he had run before that July attempt. Malcolm Campbell was the first to set a straightaway speed record on the salt of over 300 mph. He had gone 273 at Daytona Beach in the Bluebird in the spring of 1935 and his two way average that summer at Bonneville was 301.13 mph. Wes On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:48 AM, drmayf wrote: > Just sitting here and had an odd thought (well all my thoughts are > considered odd by some, lol)... was there ever an instance when a > car or bike was driven on the Daytona sand and then on the salt? > Without a lot of mods in between? Curious as to how much the > rolling resistance differences might have been. Seems like wet sand > would have a lot. > > mayf > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as wester6935 at comcast.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From gmc6power at earthlink.net Wed Feb 11 12:35:24 2009 From: gmc6power at earthlink.net (James Tone) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:35:24 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Land-speed] Old Speed Records... Message-ID: <27195152.1234380924651.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Karol Miller did it with his 1956 Ford Victoria in the 50's. I believe he ran at Bonneville first and at a later date went to Daytona. When he first ran at Bonneville he used an unblown 300+ inch engine in "C" and ran near 150 mph. If you look up the old Hot Rod Magazines that was considered one of the best achievments when he did it. At Daytona he used a smaller cubic engine with a Latham blower and went 158. I have a copy of his speed at Daytona in 1958. He also ran that same combination at Bonneville but I don't have the speed. The speeds were very close to the same. Last year he was prepping to return to Bonneville with a clone of the original '56 Victoria. I haven't talked with him lately so I don't know how the car was coming along. He is still considered one of the greatest Ford Y-Block racers of all time and a hero in that fraternity. He is also one of my all time heros in racing. He also has a NHRA Championship ring when the Singer-Miller dragster won the championship during the nitro ban. It was powered by a big OHV Lincoln...JD > Seems like wet sand would have a lot. > >mayf >_______________________________________________ >Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > >Land-speed mailing list > >You are subscribed as gmc6power at earthlink.net > >http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From 23.weldon at comcast.net Wed Feb 11 17:55:05 2009 From: 23.weldon at comcast.net (Ed Weldon) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:55:05 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive References: <27195152.1234380924651.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <009001c98cac$8efae280$6401a8c0@S> My son , David, the mechanical engineer showed me how he uses this 3M 1357 adhesive to glue the heavy leather protective strips to the toes of his hockey skates. He says it's the only adhesive that works. When I saw it I thought of other uses, especially for last minute stuff on the race cars. It comes in 5 oz. tubes and pints and quarts. May be hard to find except on the internet or industrial adhesive suppliers in larger cities. Ed Weldon From jonwennerberg at nancyandjon.org Wed Feb 11 18:26:39 2009 From: jonwennerberg at nancyandjon.org (Jon Wennerberg) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive In-Reply-To: <009001c98cac$8efae280$6401a8c0@S> References: <27195152.1234380924651.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <009001c98cac$8efae280$6401a8c0@S> Message-ID: <74889C63-49BC-43EE-BB00-35A310DF5E7B@nancyandjon.org> On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Ed Weldon wrote: My son , David, the mechanical engineer showed me how he uses this 3M 1357 adhesive to glue the heavy leather protective strips to the toes of his hockey skates. He says it's the only adhesive that works. When I saw it I thought of other uses, especially for last minute stuff on the race cars. It comes in 5 oz. tubes and pints and quarts. May be hard to find except on the internet or industrial adhesive suppliers in larger cities. Ed Weldon You might be able to get it at a car parts store. I've found a good number of specialized 3M products at the local CarQuest, and I'd expect that Mike Crawford, the guy that owns and runs the CQ in Wendover, would be able to get and stock the stuff -- especially if someone requested him to do so. Worth a try. . . Jon Wennerberg Tall guy with moustache and a pair of 2 Club hats From dlodom at charter.net Wed Feb 11 18:47:17 2009 From: dlodom at charter.net (Doug Odom) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:47:17 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive References: <27195152.1234380924651.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <009001c98cac$8efae280$6401a8c0@S> Message-ID: <00bc01c98cb3$d683db50$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> Ed, I've used JB Weld for fixing my motorcycle racing boots and work boots. I will have to see if this stuff works as good or better. Doug Odom in big ditch > My son , David, the mechanical engineer showed me how he uses this 3M 1357 > adhesive to glue the heavy leather protective strips to the toes of his > hockey skates. He says it's the only adhesive that works. > When I saw it I thought of other uses, especially for last minute stuff on > the race cars. It comes in 5 oz. tubes and pints and quarts. May be hard > to find except on the internet or industrial adhesive suppliers in larger > cities. > Ed Weldon From 23.weldon at comcast.net Wed Feb 11 19:25:39 2009 From: 23.weldon at comcast.net (Ed Weldon) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:25:39 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive References: <27195152.1234380924651.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <009001c98cac$8efae280$6401a8c0@S> <00bc01c98cb3$d683db50$6401a8c0@YOUR588B4A13EA> Message-ID: <009b01c98cb9$349c0b90$6401a8c0@S> Doug -- It's a contact cement. Works different than JB weld , which is a filled 2 part epoxy and sets pretty hard without much flex. We've all had experience with contact cement. It usually allows some flex. It holds as long as nothing is continuously pulling on it. This 1357 stuff is a whole lot stronger, maybe a better description is tougher. Contact cement on nitro. If you've ever tried to use the ordinary shoe glue to repair leather on shoes you know that it can be pulled off. There was no way I could pull those leather protectors off David's skates without all my strength and a good pair of pliers to grip the heavy leather. David plays amatuer hockey in a league in San Jose that regularly uses the Shark's practice rink. It's a heavy contact sport and some of the palyers are not the best skaters. 1/8" thick Leather strips glued onto the outside of his skates at heel and toe to protect the main skate from being torn up by the blades and carbon fiber hockey sticks of the other players when the crash. If you've ever tried using double stick tape and been unhappy when it came loose, try this stuff. Just don't plan on taking it apart without wrecking any non-metallic that it is holding together. Ed Weldon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Odom" To: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon at comcast.net>; "LSR" Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive > Ed, I've used JB Weld for fixing my motorcycle racing boots and work boots. > I will have to see if this stuff works as good or better. > > Doug Odom in big ditch > > > > > My son , David, the mechanical engineer showed me how he uses this 3M 1357 > > adhesive to glue the heavy leather protective strips to the toes of his > > hockey skates. He says it's the only adhesive that works. > > When I saw it I thought of other uses, especially for last minute stuff on > > the race cars. It comes in 5 oz. tubes and pints and quarts. May be hard > > to find except on the internet or industrial adhesive suppliers in larger > > cities. > > Ed Weldon From neil at dbelltech.com Thu Feb 12 09:46:54 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:46:54 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive In-Reply-To: <74889C63-49BC-43EE-BB00-35A310DF5E7B@nancyandjon.org> References: <27195152.1234380924651.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net><009001c98cac$8efae280$6401a8c0@S> <74889C63-49BC-43EE-BB00-35A310DF5E7B@nancyandjon.org> Message-ID: <3386C6617F9743FA94708E2A1517D584@DBTech> Thanks, Ed-- I'll look for some of that stuff; it sounds vey helpful! Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Jon Wennerberg Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:27 PM To: Ed Weldon Cc: LSR Subject: Re: [Land-speed] 3m 1357 Scotch-Weld Neoprene High performance contact Adhesive On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Ed Weldon wrote: My son , David, the mechanical engineer showed me how he uses this 3M 1357 adhesive to glue the heavy leather protective strips to the toes of his hockey skates. He says it's the only adhesive that works. When I saw it I thought of other uses, especially for last minute stuff on the race cars. It comes in 5 oz. tubes and pints and quarts. May be hard to find except on the internet or industrial adhesive suppliers in larger cities. Ed Weldon You might be able to get it at a car parts store. I've found a good number of specialized 3M products at the local CarQuest, and I'd expect that Mike Crawford, the guy that owns and runs the CQ in Wendover, would be able to get and stock the stuff -- especially if someone requested him to do so. Worth a try. . . Jon Wennerberg Tall guy with moustache and a pair of 2 Club hats Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From yesford at clear.net.nz Thu Feb 12 15:36:29 2009 From: yesford at clear.net.nz (Chris Harris) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:36:29 +1300 Subject: [Land-speed] Really neat old footage Message-ID: <9ACBC6D3F3BF429695E59FC5BD59BFDF@ChrisHarrisPC> One of the best clips I've seen of early dirt track, dry lake racing......................enjoy. Chris Harris...........................NZed. From yesford at clear.net.nz Thu Feb 12 16:17:24 2009 From: yesford at clear.net.nz (Chris Harris) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:17:24 +1300 Subject: [Land-speed] Link to- Really neat old footage Message-ID: <69DE6BBD23044A4B888B61EAD3477D09@ChrisHarrisPC> Sorry people, link didn't appear, hope it's there this time. One of the best clips I've seen of early dirt track, dry lake racing......................enjoy. Chris Harris...........................NZed. http://video.yahoo.com/watch/12221/1578900 From adin at frontier.net Thu Feb 12 17:25:37 2009 From: adin at frontier.net (David in Durango) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:25:37 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Link to- Really neat old footage References: <69DE6BBD23044A4B888B61EAD3477D09@ChrisHarrisPC> Message-ID: <001801c98d71$9830ddd0$6401a8c0@ZTxp> that's great - those little puppies are eXpen$ive at the flea market. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Harris" To: "Land speed list" Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:17 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Link to- Really neat old footage > Sorry people, link didn't appear, hope it's there this time. > > One of the best clips I've seen of early dirt track, dry lake > racing......................enjoy. > > Chris Harris...........................NZed. > > http://video.yahoo.com/watch/12221/1578900 > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as adin at frontier.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From jpszalay01 at insightbb.com Mon Feb 16 09:44:32 2009 From: jpszalay01 at insightbb.com (John Szalay) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] TV/VCR/Tivo/DVR Alert Message-ID: Feb 17, 10:00 pm (60 minutes) Rebroadcast: Feb 18, 2:00 am Wreckreation Nation with Dave Mordal Bonneville TV-PG (LV) it's off to the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah, where people come from all over the world to break land speed records on everything from a barstool to a big-rig. Second segment of the program, on Bonneville, from the description I would say it was filmed during USFRA World of Speed. ====================================================== Be Alert, America needs more Lerts....................... From jpszalay01 at insightbb.com Mon Feb 16 09:48:53 2009 From: jpszalay01 at insightbb.com (John Szalay) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] OOPS: correction to last post. TV/DVR/VCR/Tivo Alert Message-ID: Feb 17, 10:00 pm EST Discovery Channel....... (60 minutes) Rebroadcast: Feb 18, 2:00 am Wreckreation Nation with Dave Mordal Bonneville TV-PG (LV) it's off to the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah, where people come from all over the world to break land speed records on everything from a barstool to a big-rig. Second segment of the program, on Bonneville, from the description I would say it was filmed during USFRA World of Speed. ============================================================ Be Alert, America needs more Lerts.. Guess I wasn't Alert enough forgot the time zone and channel... From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Mon Feb 16 10:46:10 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:46:10 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Honda Insight Message-ID: <4999A662.8050800@wildblue.net> I forgot who on the list was working on a Honda Insight. I'd like to know the status of that project. Thanks, Bryan From jpszalay01 at insightbb.com Mon Feb 16 11:08:31 2009 From: jpszalay01 at insightbb.com (John Szalay) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Honda Insight References: <4999A662.8050800@wildblue.net> Message-ID: <51E0AEC296A04DC4BFF57D07B5B4D11E@531W> -------------------------------------------------- From: "Bryan Savage" Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 12:46 PM To: "List Land Speed" Subject: [Land-speed] Honda Insight > I forgot who on the list was working on a Honda Insight. > I'd like to know the status of that project. > > Thanks, > Bryan > Bob W, #343 2000 Honda Insight... BWANA343 at aol.com; From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Mon Feb 16 11:20:25 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:20:25 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Thank to all Message-ID: <4999AE69.5080800@wildblue.net> Thank you Gentlemen. I knew I could depend on you, Bryan From lsr_man at yahoo.com Mon Feb 16 15:30:05 2009 From: lsr_man at yahoo.com (Dick J) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:30:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC Message-ID: <840628.88828.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> How can you visually tell a 327 from a 350 small block Chevy motor? DickJ In East Texas From neil at dbelltech.com Mon Feb 16 16:06:20 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:06:20 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC In-Reply-To: <840628.88828.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <840628.88828.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2F3DAF78BB024DBEB6BDEEA4297416C1@DBTech> Dick; I always rely on the casting number. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Dick J Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:30 PM To: lsr list autox Subject: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC How can you visually tell a 327 from a 350 small block Chevy motor? DickJ In East Texas Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From rbuck at xmission.com Mon Feb 16 18:12:58 2009 From: rbuck at xmission.com (Ray Buck) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:12:58 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC In-Reply-To: <840628.88828.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <840628.88828.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: If I recall correctly, 350 blocks and 327 blocks are identical. It's the stroke that makes the difference. I thought all 327s were small-journal motors, but there may have been one year where a large journal 327 was made. I've also been told that one can create a 327 from a 350 by using a 307 crank and rods. I've never tried it, but it seemed logical at the time I heard it. RtR At 03:30 PM 2/16/2009, Dick J wrote: >How can you visually tell a 327 from a 350 small block Chevy motor? >DickJ >In East Texas From Mike.Meierle at alcatel-lucent.com Mon Feb 16 18:19:53 2009 From: Mike.Meierle at alcatel-lucent.com (MEIERLE Mike) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:19:53 -0600 Subject: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC In-Reply-To: References: <840628.88828.qm@web30707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <7C6E77E36A1EAD4BAD7F02E98294BDB20B9A8350@USDALSMBS01.ad3.ad.alcatel.com> Good chevy notes with information links at the bottom of the page http://www.mortec.com/notepg1.htm Mike Meierle #847 F/BMMP SCTA-BNI/Gear Grinders/Sidewinders/ECTA ECTA Record Holder -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Ray Buck Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 8:13 PM To: lsr_man at yahoo.com; lsr list autox Subject: Re: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC If I recall correctly, 350 blocks and 327 blocks are identical. It's the stroke that makes the difference. I thought all 327s were small-journal motors, but there may have been one year where a large journal 327 was made. I've also been told that one can create a 327 from a 350 by using a 307 crank and rods. I've never tried it, but it seemed logical at the time I heard it. RtR At 03:30 PM 2/16/2009, Dick J wrote: >How can you visually tell a 327 from a 350 small block Chevy motor? >DickJ >In East Texas Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as mike.meierle at alcatel-lucent.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From saltfever at comcast.net Tue Feb 17 22:43:24 2009 From: saltfever at comcast.net (Elon) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:43:24 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] 327 - 350 SBC Message-ID: As Neil said the only exact way is to look at the serial number. But even then you can't be sure unless you check the bore and stroke because of the ease of changing cranks during a rebuild. Not sure of the reason for your question but it is just too general to answer. If you want a particular block for a "numbers matching" deal then you have to have the correct serial number. If you want the displacement then any 4 inch bore chevy with 3.25 crank will do it. Chevy made only three cranks. 3, 3.25, and 3.48 stroke (in both large and small journal). The 262, 307, 327, all had the 3.25 stroke. In early years there were engine mount holes on the front. Later, when they used side mounts, they continued with the unused front holes. In '86 they went with a one piece seal crank. (smaller round flywheel mounting flange). So visually you can tell if it is a pre or post '86 block if you can see the crank rear. When EFI came in, the mechanical fuel pump boss went away on some. There are only two absolutes! . . . (2) If you want the block you HAVE to use the serial number (2) if you want the displacement then pull a head and check bore/stroke. From saltfever at comcast.net Tue Feb 17 22:58:28 2009 From: saltfever at comcast.net (Elon) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] 327-350 SBC Message-ID: <8F1AB0C86E5E42DB9378F22412384A82@dim8100> Opps, I think I am wrong about the V-8, 262. Maybe it was a 3.10 crank? From drmayf at mayfco.com Fri Feb 20 13:44:23 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:44:23 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection.. Message-ID: <499F1627.6080107@mayfco.com> I have added fender wells to the SUnbeam. As a consequence it is gonna get hot in the engine room. My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I would like some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat protection. Yeah, I know I can get firesleeve or some such, but the cost is similar in dollar size to the bailout package for the length I need. So what else can I slide over the line? mayf From neil at dbelltech.com Fri Feb 20 14:30:29 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:30:29 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection.. In-Reply-To: <499F1627.6080107@mayfco.com> References: <499F1627.6080107@mayfco.com> Message-ID: <7F8E4A2ABBBF4AB3968DE24E253E1D61@DBTech> Mayf; Providing your "air line" is not plastic, I wouldn't worry about it. Reinforced neoprene can take a fair amount of heat. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of drmayf Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:44 PM To: LSR Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection.. I have added fender wells to the SUnbeam. As a consequence it is gonna get hot in the engine room. My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I would like some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat protection. Yeah, I know I can get firesleeve or some such, but the cost is similar in dollar size to the bailout package for the length I need. So what else can I slide over the line? mayf Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From neil at dbelltech.com Fri Feb 20 14:32:04 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:32:04 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Jaguar At Bonneville Video Message-ID: FWIW: http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2009/01/26/jaguar-rockets-past-22 5-mph.aspx Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ From joyseydevil at comcast.net Fri Feb 20 15:31:21 2009 From: joyseydevil at comcast.net (John Burk) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection.. Message-ID: <09B396C7EA07403BA1BA3AE34D087ECF@john> Mayf In '68? When Pontiac was working on the transam trim package the ac people objected to the hood scoop maybe raising the underhood temp . The styling dept checked and found that at cruising speed the upper engine compartment was 2 deg warmer than ambient . The guy who advised them on the spoilers told me that . >I have added fender wells to the SUnbeam. As a consequence it is gonna get >hot in the engine room. My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air >line. I would like some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it >some heat protection. Yeah, I know I can get firesleeve or some such, but >the cost is similar in dollar size to the bailout package for the length I >need. So what else can I slide over the line? > > mayf > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as joyseydevil at comcast.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From saltfever at comcast.net Sat Feb 21 17:46:26 2009 From: saltfever at comcast.net (Elon) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:46:26 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection Message-ID: Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for home insulation if a rigid line is ok. From: drmayf . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I would like some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat protection. From karhu at california.com Sat Feb 21 18:29:28 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:29:28 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection References: Message-ID: I don't think that foam stuff for pipes is gonna have sufficient high-temp and radiation resistance--might even be rather flamable. I'd guess the subject lines go near the exhaust, perhaps? You then need radiation shielding as much as or more than insulation. So I'd be thinking metal (with some sort of liner/spacer just to keep the metal out of contact with the line). Benn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elon" To: "land-speed submit" Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:46 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection > Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from > freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for > home insulation if a rigid line is ok. > > > > From: drmayf > > . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I would > like > some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat > protection. From drmayf at mayfco.com Sat Feb 21 18:37:50 2009 From: drmayf at mayfco.com (drmayf) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:37:50 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49A0AC6E.2050701@mayfco.com> Guys, thanks for all the possible solutions. I think I have one that is good enough. I am just gonna fold over a piece of header wrap material, have the crew chief sew it closed on the open side, slide my tubing into it and be done with it. Many thanks, mayf Benn wrote: > I don't think that foam stuff for pipes is gonna have sufficient > high-temp and radiation resistance--might even be rather flamable. > I'd guess the subject lines go near the exhaust, perhaps? You then > need radiation shielding as much as or more than insulation. So I'd > be thinking metal (with some sort of liner/spacer just to keep the > metal out of contact with the line). > Benn > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elon" > To: "land-speed submit" > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:46 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection > > >> Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from >> freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for >> home insulation if a rigid line is ok. >> >> >> >> From: drmayf >> >> . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I >> would like >> some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat >> protection. > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From neil at dbelltech.com Sat Feb 21 18:46:52 2009 From: neil at dbelltech.com (neil at dbelltech.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:46:52 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection In-Reply-To: <49A0AC6E.2050701@mayfco.com> References: <49A0AC6E.2050701@mayfco.com> Message-ID: Mayf; Your crew chief is a keeper! Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of drmayf Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:38 PM To: Benn Cc: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Heat Protection Guys, thanks for all the possible solutions. I think I have one that is good enough. I am just gonna fold over a piece of header wrap material, have the crew chief sew it closed on the open side, slide my tubing into it and be done with it. Many thanks, mayf Benn wrote: > I don't think that foam stuff for pipes is gonna have sufficient > high-temp and radiation resistance--might even be rather flamable. > I'd guess the subject lines go near the exhaust, perhaps? You then > need radiation shielding as much as or more than insulation. So I'd > be thinking metal (with some sort of liner/spacer just to keep the > metal out of contact with the line). > Benn > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elon" > To: "land-speed submit" > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:46 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection > > >> Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from >> freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for >> home insulation if a rigid line is ok. >> >> >> >> From: drmayf >> >> . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I >> would like >> some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat >> protection. > > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as drmayf at mayfco.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as neil at dbelltech.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From fosterap at flash.net Sun Feb 22 08:31:16 2009 From: fosterap at flash.net (JERRY FOSTER) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:31:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <649320.87225.qm@web80601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> How about the spark plug wire shielding. MSD, Moroso, and a number of ignition people sell it. It should cover your quarter inch lines perfectly. Jerry in Dallas --- On Sat, 2/21/09, Benn wrote: From: Benn Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Heat Protection To: land-speed at autox.team.net Date: Saturday, February 21, 2009, 7:29 PM I don't think that foam stuff for pipes is gonna have sufficient high-temp and radiation resistance--might even be rather flamable. I'd guess the subject lines go near the exhaust, perhaps? You then need radiation shielding as much as or more than insulation. So I'd be thinking metal (with some sort of liner/spacer just to keep the metal out of contact with the line). Benn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elon" To: "land-speed submit" Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:46 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection > Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from > freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for > home insulation if a rigid line is ok. > > > > From: drmayf > > . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I would like > some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat > protection. Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as fosterap at flash.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From fosterap at flash.net Sun Feb 22 08:31:37 2009 From: fosterap at flash.net (JERRY FOSTER) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:31:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <864323.67729.qm@web80607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> How about the spark plug wire shielding. MSD, Moroso, and a number of ignition people sell it. It should cover your quarter inch lines perfectly. Jerry in Dallas --- On Sat, 2/21/09, Benn wrote: From: Benn Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Heat Protection To: land-speed at autox.team.net Date: Saturday, February 21, 2009, 7:29 PM I don't think that foam stuff for pipes is gonna have sufficient high-temp and radiation resistance--might even be rather flamable. I'd guess the subject lines go near the exhaust, perhaps? You then need radiation shielding as much as or more than insulation. So I'd be thinking metal (with some sort of liner/spacer just to keep the metal out of contact with the line). Benn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elon" To: "land-speed submit" Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:46 PM Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection > Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from > freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for > home insulation if a rigid line is ok. > > > > From: drmayf > > . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I would like > some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat > protection. From saltrat at pahrump.com Sun Feb 22 08:44:43 2009 From: saltrat at pahrump.com (Skip Higginbotham) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:44:43 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection In-Reply-To: <864323.67729.qm@web80607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <864323.67729.qm@web80607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090222154447.77585187660@autox.team.net> Excellent idea Jerry! I can use some. Thanks, Skip At 07:31 AM 2/22/2009, JERRY FOSTER wrote: >How about the spark plug wire shielding. MSD, Moroso, and a number of >ignition people sell it. It should cover your quarter inch lines perfectly. >Jerry in Dallas From joyseydevil at comcast.net Sun Feb 22 18:21:22 2009 From: joyseydevil at comcast.net (John Burk) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] Rolly Free Message-ID: Rolly Free 1900 1980 http://www.rolliefreebook.com/excerpts.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Free John Burk From ed at vetteracing.com Sun Feb 22 21:51:28 2009 From: ed at vetteracing.com (Ed Van Scoy) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:51:28 +0000 Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection Message-ID: I guess that's two of us that have a crew chief that also knows the inner workings of a Singer...... Ed V -----Original Message----- From: neil at dbelltech.com [mailto:neil at dbelltech.com] Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 06:46 PM To: drmayf at mayfco.com, ''Benn'' Cc: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Heat Protection Mayf; Your crew chief is a keeper! Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of drmayf Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:38 PM To: Benn Cc: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Heat Protection Guys, thanks for all the possible solutions. I think I have one that is good enough. I am just gonna fold over a piece of header wrap material, have the crew chief sew it closed on the open side, slide my tubing into it and be done with it. Many thanks, mayf Benn wrote: > I don't think that foam stuff for pipes is gonna have sufficient > high-temp and radiation resistance--might even be rather flamable. > I'd guess the subject lines go near the exhaust, perhaps? You then > need radiation shielding as much as or more than insulation. So I'd > be thinking metal (with some sort of liner/spacer just to keep the > metal out of contact with the line). > Benn > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elon" > To: "land-speed submit" > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:46 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] Heat Protection > > >> Local hardware store for the stuff used to keep your water pipes from >> freezing. Or lay it in a tray and pour the 2-part foam in a can used for >> home insulation if a rigid line is ok. >> >> >> >> From: drmayf >> >> . . . My water injection line is 1/4 od high quality air line. I >> would like >> some suggestions for sliding something over it to gie it some heat >> protection. From DavidAdin at mercydurango.org Thu Feb 26 08:30:58 2009 From: DavidAdin at mercydurango.org (Adin, David) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:30:58 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? Message-ID: This looks like fun . . . http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video_player.shtml?vid=944641 David in Durango From karhu at california.com Thu Feb 26 10:28:33 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:28:33 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding Message-ID: Planning the rollcage for the MR2, and want to plant the main hoop as far outboard as possible. BUT, since it's behind the door opening, there is no way to weld the horizontal side (door) bars fully to the main hoop if it is hard against the interior body panel. So, the question is, what is the minimum clearance I can get away with and allow a good welder (not me) to still be able to weld the bars around their full circumference? A half inch? full inch? Benn From ddahlgren at snet.net Thu Feb 26 11:22:53 2009 From: ddahlgren at snet.net (Dave Dahlgren) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <85812A55B64F429D826A9B07D3494F3E@DaveSatellite> Couldn't you tack everything to the main hoop but don't permanantly mount it in the car. Pop it out or slide it forward do the outside welds then drop it back in or slide it back with the door bars attached to the hoop? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" To: Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:28 PM Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding > Planning the rollcage for the MR2, and want to plant the main hoop as far > outboard as possible. BUT, since it's behind the door opening, there is > no > way to weld the horizontal side (door) bars fully to the main hoop if it > is > hard against the interior body panel. So, the question is, what is the > minimum clearance I can get away with and allow a good welder (not me) to > still be able to weld the bars around their full circumference? A half > inch? > full inch? > Benn > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as ddahlgren at snet.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From jpszalay01 at insightbb.com Thu Feb 26 11:58:00 2009 From: jpszalay01 at insightbb.com (John Szalay) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? References: Message-ID: -------------------------------------------------- From: "Adin, David" > This looks like fun . . . > > http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video_player.shtml?vid=944641 > > David in Durango > We were doing the older Stereolithography and looking at the sintered metal spray process about 9 years ago, to do the same type of work. then they closed our design shop down and moved the work to India and China. I'm glad to see the field has continued to evolve, the Stereolithography machine we had was close to $300,000, the $2,000 price they talked about in that video might have help keep the work here... wonder what the price on the solid modeling machine was ? From jpszalay01 at insightbb.com Thu Feb 26 12:02:36 2009 From: jpszalay01 at insightbb.com (John Szalay) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? References: Message-ID: <9E2995ACF51240158BC879D0FD685E58@531W> > This looks like fun . . . > > http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video_player.shtml?vid=944641 > > > > David in Durango > Just answered my own question, the Personal 3D Printer machine is listed at $14,000 heck of a price for what it does... From karhu at california.com Thu Feb 26 12:09:07 2009 From: karhu at california.com (Benn) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:09:07 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding References: <85812A55B64F429D826A9B07D3494F3E@DaveSatellite> Message-ID: <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21@BennsDesktop> Thanks for the response, Dave. I don't think it'll be possible to get more than the main bar with some sleeve stubs removed from the car temporarily--any significant extensions just won't have enough room to maneuver. I do kinda like the "slide it forward" approach: But I'm trying to get the main hoop as tall as possible, and that means it fits behind the roof reinforcement at the rear of the T-tops. I also only can move it forward about 4" (need up to 8" to get the main hoop into the door opening) without moving the front hoop closer to the main hoop, since the front hoop will othewise run into the A-pillar. Hmm, maybe the main hoop could be pivoted about its top without the front hoop attached. Some puzzle-fitting may work by moving some bar positions a few inches... Thanks for the thoughts--I may need to use some combination of all these approaches. So is the implication that I'd need at least "several" inches clearance to a wall to get a good weld around the circumference of the side bars? Benn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Dahlgren" To: "Benn" ; Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] rollcage welding > Couldn't you tack everything to the main hoop but don't permanantly mount > it in the car. Pop it out or slide it forward do the outside welds then > drop it back in or slide it back with the door bars attached to the hoop? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benn" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:28 PM > Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding > > >> Planning the rollcage for the MR2, and want to plant the main hoop as far >> outboard as possible. BUT, since it's behind the door opening, there is >> no >> way to weld the horizontal side (door) bars fully to the main hoop if it >> is >> hard against the interior body panel. So, the question is, what is the >> minimum clearance I can get away with and allow a good welder (not me) to >> still be able to weld the bars around their full circumference? A half >> inch? >> full inch? >> Benn >> _______________________________________________ >> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >> >> Land-speed mailing list >> >> You are subscribed as ddahlgren at snet.net >> >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From DavidAdin at mercydurango.org Thu Feb 26 12:10:10 2009 From: DavidAdin at mercydurango.org (Adin, David) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:10:10 -0700 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hmmmmm. If you google "nextengine 3d scanner" you will learn more. It seems now, invention is more a matter of applying science to problems. I guess rather than filling a need w/ science and application. ??? David -----Original Message----- From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of John Szalay Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:58 AM To: land-speed at autox.team.net Subject: Re: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? -------------------------------------------------- From: "Adin, David" > This looks like fun . . . > > http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video_player.shtml?vid=944641 > > David in Durango > We were doing the older Stereolithography and looking at the sintered metal spray process about 9 years ago, to do the same type of work. then they closed our design shop down and moved the work to India and China. I'm glad to see the field has continued to evolve, the Stereolithography machine we had was close to $300,000, the $2,000 price they talked about in that video might have help keep the work here... wonder what the price on the solid modeling machine was ? Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as davidadin at mercydurango.org http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From delsolid at gmail.com Thu Feb 26 13:38:05 2009 From: delsolid at gmail.com (Del Solid) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:38:05 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We actually have that exact machine here at my work (the printer, not the scanner). It's very cool but with options and stuff it was closer to $27-28K. The real benefit is to make prototype tooling before committing to a casting. It is very nice but the surface is not very smooth and it is subject to some dimensional shift if you model a very tall part. But still very much worth the money if you do that sort of thing. It is pricy to run as it uses lots of media and it's not cheap. It also uses a plastic tray that the model is formed on and they are not reusable either. Our machine probably runs 75+ hours a week. I think the desktop scanner is very cool indeed. We make alot of connectors where a sample is available but they are not available to purchase in quantity, forcing us to reverse engineer a mating connector (think car ECU's). That scanner would be a godsend if it did what they say. We currently use a 3D FARO arm but it is not well suited for small parts. John On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Adin, David wrote: > Hmmmmm. > If you google "nextengine 3d scanner" you will learn more. > > It seems now, invention is more a matter of applying science to > problems. I guess rather than filling a need w/ science and application. > ??? > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net > [mailto:land-speed-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of John Szalay > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:58 AM > To: land-speed at autox.team.net > Subject: Re: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Adin, David" >> This looks like fun . . . >> >> http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video_player.shtml?vid=944641 >> > David in Durango >> > > We were doing the older Stereolithography and looking at the sintered > metal spray process about 9 years ago, to do the same type of work. > then they closed our design shop down and moved the work to India and > China. > > I'm glad to see the field has continued to evolve, the > Stereolithography machine we had was close to $300,000, the $2,000 > price they talked about in that video might have help keep the work > here... wonder what the price on the solid modeling machine was ? > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as davidadin at mercydurango.org > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as delsolid at gmail.com > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From joetimney at dol.net Thu Feb 26 13:58:35 2009 From: joetimney at dol.net (Joe Timney) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding In-Reply-To: <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21@BennsDesktop> References: <85812A55B64F429D826A9B07D3494F3E@DaveSatellite> <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21@BennsDesktop> Message-ID: <49A7027B.4010402@dol.net> Benn, It is not necessary to weld it all the way around the tube but you will need to gusset it. You can get about all but a 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch if you leave a 1/2 inch of side clearance by 'Hanging out' the tungsten from the cup. This type of thing happens all the time in chassis construction. joe Benn wrote: > Thanks for the response, Dave. > I don't think it'll be possible to get more than the main bar with > some sleeve stubs removed from the car temporarily--any significant > extensions just won't have enough room to maneuver. > > I do kinda like the "slide it forward" approach: But I'm trying to > get the main hoop as tall as possible, and that means it fits behind > the roof reinforcement at the rear of the T-tops. I also only can > move it forward about 4" (need up to 8" to get the main hoop into the > door opening) without moving the front hoop closer to the main hoop, > since the front hoop will othewise run into the A-pillar. > > Hmm, maybe the main hoop could be pivoted about its top without the > front hoop attached. Some puzzle-fitting may work by moving some bar > positions a few inches... Thanks for the thoughts--I may need to use > some combination of all these approaches. > > So is the implication that I'd need at least "several" inches > clearance to a wall to get a good weld around the circumference of the > side bars? > Benn > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Dahlgren" > To: "Benn" ; > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:22 AM > Subject: Re: [Land-speed] rollcage welding > > >> Couldn't you tack everything to the main hoop but don't permanantly >> mount it in the car. Pop it out or slide it forward do the outside >> welds then drop it back in or slide it back with the door bars >> attached to the hoop? >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benn" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:28 PM >> Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding >> >> >>> Planning the rollcage for the MR2, and want to plant the main hoop >>> as far >>> outboard as possible. BUT, since it's behind the door opening, >>> there is no >>> way to weld the horizontal side (door) bars fully to the main hoop >>> if it is >>> hard against the interior body panel. So, the question is, what is the >>> minimum clearance I can get away with and allow a good welder (not >>> me) to >>> still be able to weld the bars around their full circumference? A >>> half inch? >>> full inch? >>> Benn >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html >>> >>> Land-speed mailing list >>> >>> You are subscribed as ddahlgren at snet.net >>> >>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed > _______________________________________________ > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html > > Land-speed mailing list > > You are subscribed as joetimney at dol.net > > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed From 23.weldon at comcast.net Thu Feb 26 16:49:10 2009 From: 23.weldon at comcast.net (Ed Weldon) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:49:10 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? References: Message-ID: <003d01c9986c$d6660570$6401a8c0@S> The NextEngine 3d scanner is fascinating. Especially the $5K price. In another area I won't go into here it looks to have good uses for small enterprises for which the investment of 30K or more for a larger scanner is out of the question. But I'm having a hard time coming up with useful applications in what we do to build race cars, even for the guys who are professional chassis or engine builders. One possibility is reproducing an unreplaceable rocker arm. Scan it and use a 3d printer to give you a wax model for investment casting. Then cast it in an alloy like 17-4 Ph stainless steel, which is fairly strong. We have a foundry here in northern CA that investment casts that alloy on a regular basis. Might be some possibilities for the street rod or restorer world to replace OEM white metal parts. Say something like a 34 Ford Greyhound. I can see where the FARO arm wouldn't be of much use for a hood ornament although for the engine builder who has reached a level of sophistication whare he has a granite surface plate in his shop big enough to hold an engine block the FARO arm could be very useful. Ed Weldon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Del Solid" To: Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:38 PM Subject: Re: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? > We actually have that exact machine here at my work (the printer, not > the scanner). It's very cool but with options and stuff it was closer > to $27-28K. > The real benefit is to make prototype tooling before committing to a > casting. It is very nice but the surface is not very smooth and it is > subject to some dimensional shift if you model a very tall part. But > still very much worth the money if you do that sort of thing. > It is pricy to run as it uses lots of media and it's not cheap. It > also uses a plastic tray that the model is formed on and they are not > reusable either. > Our machine probably runs 75+ hours a week. > I think the desktop scanner is very cool indeed. We make alot of > connectors where a sample is available but they are not available to > purchase in quantity, forcing us to reverse engineer a mating > connector (think car ECU's). That scanner would be a godsend if it did > what they say. > We currently use a 3D FARO arm but it is not well suited for small parts. > John From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Thu Feb 26 19:30:41 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:30:41 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding In-Reply-To: <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21@BennsDesktop> References: <85812A55B64F429D826A9B07D3494F3E@DaveSatellite> <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21@BennsDesktop> Message-ID: <49A75051.4010703@wildblue.net> Buy a good 3" hole saw and get a Milwaukee 1/2" drill. Drill holes, save metal, have welder stick the holes back before he's done. Screw the body, the cage is 100 times more valuable and important. Just my opinion, Bryan PS: pay a GOOD welder to help solve the problem. Benn wrote: > Thanks for the response, Dave. > I don't think it'll be possible to get more than the main bar with > some sleeve stubs removed from the car temporarily--any significant > extensions just won't have enough room to maneuver. > > I do kinda like the "slide it forward" approach: But I'm trying to > get the main hoop as tall as possible, and that means it fits behind > the roof reinforcement at the rear of the T-tops. I also only can > move it forward about 4" (need up to 8" to get the main hoop into the > door opening) without moving the front hoop closer to the main hoop, > since the front hoop will othewise run into the A-pillar. > > Hmm, maybe the main hoop could be pivoted about its top without the > front hoop attached. Some puzzle-fitting may work by moving some bar > positions a few inches... Thanks for the thoughts--I may need to use > some combination of all these approaches. > > So is the implication that I'd need at least "several" inches > clearance to a wall to get a good weld around the circumference of the > side bars? > Benn From david_dymaxion at yahoo.com Fri Feb 27 12:20:53 2009 From: david_dymaxion at yahoo.com (David Dymaxion) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:20:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding References: Message-ID: <820535.41619.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> This might help (apologies if this has already been mentioned): o Cut holes in the floor o Drop the tubes done the holes, lowering things for working room o Weld things up o Raise the cage o Slide the pads under the tubes, covering the holes Message: 2 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:09:07 -0800 From: "Benn" Subject: Re: [Land-speed] rollcage welding To: Message-ID: <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21 at BennsDesktop> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Thanks for the response, Dave. I don't think it'll be possible to get more than the main bar with some sleeve stubs removed from the car temporarily--any significant extensions just won't have enough room to maneuver. I do kinda like the "slide it forward" approach: But I'm trying to get the main hoop as tall as possible, and that means it fits behind the roof reinforcement at the rear of the T-tops. I also only can move it forward about 4" (need up to 8" to get the main hoop into the dooropening) without moving the front hoop closer to the main hoop, since the front hoop will othewise run into the A-pillar. Hmm, maybe the main hoop could be pivoted about its top without the front hoop attached. Some puzzle-fitting may work by moving some bar positions a few inches... Thanks for the thoughts--I may need to use some combination of all these approaches. So is the implication that I'd need at least "several" inches clearance to a wall to get a good weld around the circumference of the side bars? From NT788 at comcast.net Fri Feb 27 12:36:59 2009 From: NT788 at comcast.net (NT788 at comcast.net) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Land-speed] rollcage welding In-Reply-To: <820535.41619.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <910118129.6806541235763419103.JavaMail.root@sz0044a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> Benn Cut off the bottom, weld the top, sleeve and re-weld the bottom piece. Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Dymaxion " < david_dymaxion @yahoo.com> To: land-speed@ autox .team.net Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 11:20:53 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [Land-speed] rollcage welding This might help (apologies if this has already been mentioned): o Cut holes in the floor o Drop the tubes done the holes, lowering things for working room o Weld things up o Raise the cage o Slide the pads under the tubes, covering the holes Message: 2 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:09:07 -0800 From: "Benn" < karhu @ california .com> Subject: Re: [Land-speed] rollcage welding To: Message-ID: <2BE417A28E6E4308BB8A7B664D872A21@ BennsDesktop > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset ="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Thanks for the response, Dave. I don't think it'll be possible to get more than the main bar with some sleeve stubs removed from the car temporarily--any significant extensions just won't have enough room to maneuver. I do kinda like the "slide it forward" approach: But I'm trying to get the main hoop as tall as possible, and that means it fits behind the roof reinforcement at the rear of the T-tops. I also only can move it forward about 4" (need up to 8" to get the main hoop into the dooropening ) without moving the front hoop closer to the main hoop, since the front hoop will othewise run into the A-pillar. Hmm , maybe the main hoop could be pivoted about its top without the front hoop attached. Some puzzle-fitting may work by moving some bar positions a few inches... Thanks for the thoughts--I may need to use some combination of all these approaches. So is the implication that I'd need at least "several" inches clearance to a wall to get a good weld around the circumference of the side bars? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http :// www .team.net/donate. html Land-speed mailing list You are subscribed as nt788 at comcast.net http :// autox .team.net/mailman/ listinfo /land-speed From saltfever at comcast.net Sat Feb 28 00:36:46 2009 From: saltfever at comcast.net (Elon) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:36:46 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] roll cage welding Message-ID: <5CFA172B61D8434A9C4E4AD71C46B880@dim8100> To expand on Bryan's point a bit . . . you drop the cage through the holes, to the garage floor. If the car is elevated you can usually drop the cage that amount. The 3" diameter holes are sufficiently large enough to allow you to tilt the cage from one side or the other. That gives you clearance to finish that side of the cage and then you tilt it the other way. The cage is then moved back to it correct location and the holes are welded shut with sheet metal. The base plates should already be preformed to fit their location. When you lift the cage back up, there should be enough clearance to weld the tubes to the base plates before moving the whole thing into its final resting place. Welding the base plates to the structure should not have a clearance problem. -Elon From: Bryan Savage b.a.savage at wildblue.net Buy a good 3" hole saw and get a Milwaukee 1/2" drill. Drill holes, save metal, (snip . . . ) From jpszalay01 at insightbb.com Sat Feb 28 12:42:05 2009 From: jpszalay01 at insightbb.com (John Szalay) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? References: <003d01c9986c$d6660570$6401a8c0@S> Message-ID: <9C0295F90DB54EF6B411FC0F03555BC3@531W> FWIW: I forwarded the information on the scanner and the printer to a friend that is still in the business, they are seriously looking at purchasing both to help their operation. the output of the scanner can be in XYZ or IGES (among others) so they are looking into feeding that into their MasterCam software to allow them to cut parts on the CNC machine tools. Thanks for the link..... -------------------------------------------------- From: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon at comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 6:49 PM To: "Del Solid" ; Subject: Re: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? > The NextEngine 3d scanner is fascinating. Especially the $5K price. In > another area I won't go into here it looks to have good uses for small > enterprises for which the investment of 30K or more for a larger scanner > is > out of the question. > But I'm having a hard time coming up with useful applications in what we > do > to build race cars, From b.a.savage at wildblue.net Sat Feb 28 13:53:14 2009 From: b.a.savage at wildblue.net (Bryan Savage) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:53:14 -0800 Subject: [Land-speed] new toy- 3D scanner? In-Reply-To: <9C0295F90DB54EF6B411FC0F03555BC3@531W> References: <003d01c9986c$d6660570$6401a8c0@S> <9C0295F90DB54EF6B411FC0F03555BC3@531W> Message-ID: <49A9A43A.3010805@wildblue.net> Just to add something I found interesting. An old friends son has new a setup that can scan, through a microscope a virus(SARS), and produce a model, about 6" by 2". He has a lab at UCSF. I'm working on him to produce about 20 different samples to use in a High School Biology class. Should be neat... More fun, Bryan John Szalay wrote: > FWIW: > I forwarded the information on the scanner and the printer to a friend > that is still in the business, > they are seriously looking at purchasing both to help their operation. > the output of the scanner can be in XYZ or IGES (among others) so > they are looking into > feeding that into their MasterCam software to allow them to cut parts > on the CNC machine tools. > > Thanks for the link.....