[Land-speed] Land-speed Digest, Vol 2, Issue 101

jimwebb jimwebb at nutsracing.com
Wed Mar 12 14:29:42 MST 2008


So I just have to ask... is your real last name Dymaxion? Were you born to mess with odd-ball cars or did you grow into it? <grin> Will your electric Porsche have three wheels? Don't try that Dymaxion rear-wheel sterring routine <chuckle>.
Seriously, I think you arrived at the right conclusion. So far with the solar racers, endurance and low aero drag are the issues, not high speed. For safety, pay attention to keeping the air out from underneath the high speed car.

Jim Webb

 -------Original Message-------
 From: David Dymaxion <david_dymaxion at yahoo.com>
 Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Land-speed Digest, Vol 2, Issue 101
 Sent: Mar 12 '08 06:15
 
 I've had several questions and great comments off-list, so I thought it worth a public reply.
 
 I'm currently converting a old Porsche 911 to electric power, and plan to run it on the Salt at World of Speed. My goals are just getting it to run this year, 130 club this and maybe next year, then 150 club, and then all out. If it breaks 130 mph I'll be very happy, and if it breaks 150 mph I'll be ecstatic! So one origin of my question was thinking whether it is better to lower the car and put on an air dam, or to leave it higher and smooth the underside. The 100% consensus has been low + air dam. BTW, I love my Camaro and really wanted to do an electric Camaro, but moving the extra 1000 pounds quickly enough would have doubled the project cost.
 
 The 2nd line of thought was I thought the new electrathon class for USFRA was really neat. One went 89 mph last year, with exposed wheels, on just 67 pounds of battery. I think it would be fun, and cost effective, someday to build an electrathon streamliner, but I need to limit myself to one project at a time! Here's a link with some pictures and videos:
 
 http://www.explodingdinosaurs.com/saltflats/2007worldofspeed/electrathon/index.html
 
 So why do some of the most successful solar and electrathon cars go high? Thanks to some of the off-list insights I think I might have figured out why. First, they go slow enough, and speed up and slow down enough, that weight is as much of an issue as aero drag. It makes sense to me you could build a vehicle at axle height lighter than one low to the ground (less bodywork).


More information about the Land-speed mailing list