<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">The later Smiths/Jaeger gauges in many
      UK cars, and in the later AH for that matter, are bimetal operated
      gauges, a current regulated by the variable resistor in the sender
      heats a bimetal which will react in bending, driving the needle
      pointer, however it reacts very slowly hence a stable reading.
      These are fed by 10V provided by a small regulator somewhere
      behind the dash. They have a ca. 90º window over the scale.<br>
      The early ones are coil operated which react instantly. A
      capacitor to damped the reading is a good idea.<br>
      Kees Oudesluijs<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Op 10-2-2017 om 23:29 schreef <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dwflagg@juno.com">dwflagg@juno.com</a>:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:20170210.172958.22737.0@webmail13.dca.untd.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <div>Hey Simon,</div>
      <div> </div>
      <div>The Triumph Spitfires and GT6, I believe, had voltage
        stabilizers for the fuel gauge. Maybe they could be used in a
        Healey? I would defer to Michael for an answer.</div>
      <div> </div>
      <div>Cheers,</div>
      <div> </div>
      <div>Doug<br>
        <br>
        Hi Simon, I  think that keeping any sort of energy storage
        device well away from the fuel gauge circuit is sage advice.</div>
      <div dir="auto">I would suggest that you try this:<br>
        <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netbug.net/blogmichael/2015/09/06/smiths-and-jaegar-fuel-gauge-solution/">http://www.netbug.net/blogmichael/2015/09/06/smiths-and-jaegar-fuel-gauge-solution/</a><br>
        Michael S<br>
        BN1 #174</div>
      <div><br>
        <br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 7:29 AM +1300,
        "Simon Lachlan" <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:simon.lachlan@homecall.co.uk" target="_blank">simon.lachlan@homecall.co.uk</a>></span>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="3D"ltr"">
            <div class="WordSection1">
              <div class="MsoNormal">Hi,</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">I’d saved something relating to
                damping the fluctuations in my fuel gauge. I don’t
                recall if it was originally posted here or if I trawled
                it off the net. I’d made a few notes and filed it
                appropriately against some day in the future when I
                might get round to actually doing it.</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">So, my nephew’s fuel gauge bounces
                around far more than mine and this prompted me to dig
                out the article/notes.</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">First off, I agree that there’s no
                sense in putting the capacitor anywhere near the fuel
                tank.</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">Having said that, I read the advice
                that I’d stored so carefully and began to wonder if I’d
                understood it correctly.</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">Is the capacitor really supposed to
                be wired across the two terminals on the gauge? Would it
                have any effect? To put it crudely, but in the language
                that I can understand, wouldn’t the fluctuations still
                come down the Green/Black wire from the sender unit and
                hit the gauge’s terminal T? And wouldn’t those
                fluctuations still register as such on the gauge,
                totally unaffected by the capacitor?</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">Shouldn’t the capacitor be wired in
                such a fashion that the fluctuations cannot bypass it?</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">Maybe I’m over complicating things
                and should just try it without understanding it. Maybe I
                think too much.</div>
              <div class="MsoNormal">Simon</div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <br>
      ____________________________________________________________<br>
      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/589e3f1488ffe3f140c41st03duc"
        target="_blank"><b>College Student Discovers The Fastest Way To
          Lose Weight!</b><br>
        Capitalizing Calories<br>
      </a><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/589e3f1488ffe3f140c41st03duc"
        target="_blank">http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/589e3f1488ffe3f140c41st03duc</a><br>
      <img moz-do-not-send="true" alt="SponsoredBy Content.Ad">
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.team.net/donate.html">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a>
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.team.net/archive">http://www.team.net/archive</a>
Forums: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.team.net/forums">http://www.team.net/forums</a>

<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Healeys@autox.team.net">Healeys@autox.team.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys">http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys</a>

Unsubscribe/Manage: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/coudesluijs@chello.nl">http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/coudesluijs@chello.nl</a>

</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>