[Healeys] Healeys

[WILLIAM B LAWRENCE]

You need to recall who the "they" was In the question. Austin management
thought a 2+2 would sell better to family men. So I doubt that was a Healey
decision.

I knew a couple who drove from Sturgis, South Dakota to Glenwood Springs,
Colorado and back (probably 1300 miles in all) in their BN4 with their luggage
and camping gear and their two small daughters in the jump seats. That takes
organization...

Bill Lawrence

> From: michael.oritt at gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 07:17:48 -0400
> To: rrengineer.mike at att.net
> CC: healeys at autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Healeys] Healeys
>
> I always preferred to drive my BN1 but the BN7 I bought my (now ex) wife
> was a very sweet car though the steering was quite heavy.  Opinions differ
> but to my mind Healeys devolved as time went on and when they went from
> roadsters to convertibles that was that.
>
> Why they ever came out with four-seaters is a mystery to me--the boots
> weren't much good for storing anything but ping pong balls and the space
> behind the seats was useless for anything except for storage of the baggage
> that should have been in the boot in the first place!
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Mike MacLean <rrengineer.mike at att.net>
> wrote:
>
> > A two seater 100-6 with a BJ8 engine is what they should have made. B It
> > would be a nice balance in my opinion for whatever that is worth.
> > Mike MacLean
> > 56 BN2 with the heavy transmission.
> > 60 AN5
> >
> > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Larry Varley <
> > varley at cosmos.net.au> </div><div>Date:07/06/2014  00:57  (GMT-08:00)
> > </div><div>To: healeys at autox.team.net </div><div>Subject: [Healeys]
> > Healeys </div><div>
> > </div>I think it's time that the list had a healthy debate, and some fun.
I
> > would propose that the only real Austin Healey was the BN1, designed by
> > Donald Healey and Gerry Coker. Everything after that was BMC, who never
> > made a decent car after the 50's, just using what they had to keep
> > producing the cars, that were for some part good ideas, but bad design.
> > The mini was a great idea, but mix the gearbox oil with the engine? Oh
> > dear. The BN2 with a extra gear in a much heavier gearbox that really
> > added no extra performance, then the 100-6 with that horribly heavy
> > engine and no more grunt. Why would anyone do that, and just ruin the
> > balance of the car? Ok after that they added the 12 port head to it, but
> > the sixes at their best are really ponderous in the steering department
> > relative to the BN1, which is a nibble well balance car. I'm going so
> > far as to use an alloy block in my BT7 to turn it back into a descend
> > handling car and restore the weight balance. BMC basically self
> > destructed, while the rest of the world moved forward, what a shame.
> > Cheers
> > Larry Varley
> > Suggested annual donation  $12.75
> > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> >
> > Healeys at autox.team.net
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
> >
> > Unsubscribe/Manage:
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/rrengineer.mike@att.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
> > Suggested annual donation  $12.75
> > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> >
> > Healeys at autox.team.net
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
> >
> > Unsubscribe/Manage:
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/michael.oritt@gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation  $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>
> Healeys at autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/ynotink@msn.com