[Healeys] Healeys Digest, Vol 4, Issue 566

[HealeyRick]

Ultimately it's Mark's decision, but I'm not getting any heartburn over this. 
(Maybe from the Ipswich Fried Clam Roll for lunch, but not this)  Lister asked
a question, Marty gave him some advice.  I'm happy when the pros, especially
the independents trying to make a living catering to our cars, weigh in. 
Marty has developed a product that has saved quite a few Healeys, I'm not even
a little concerned if he throws in a plug at the end.  BTW, no financial
interest, no Jule frame, never met Marty.

Rick


Follow My Nasty Boy Build:  http://tinyurl.com/yj52fwo

--- On Wed, 8/18/10, Editorgary at aol.com <Editorgary at aol.com> wrote:

From: Editorgary at aol.com <Editorgary at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Healeys Digest, Vol 4, Issue 566
To: healeys at autox.team.net
Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 10:50 AM

In a message dated 8/17/10 10:55:11 PM, healeys-request at autox.team.net
writes:




Do we really condone advertorials on this list? This is nothing but an
advertise masquerading as advice. I realized that Marty at Jule beleives that
his replacement design to the original Healey frame is what Donald and Geoff
would have done had they been as smart as him, but the fact is that there are
excellent replacement frames available done to the original design. In any
case, just because a frame sags doesn't prima facie prove that it must be
replaced. Many restorer/rebuilders do excellent jobs of repairing frames to
original specifications if they aren't too far gone.
That having been said, I think there is general agreement that patches are
not the way to go.
Gary
_______________________________________________
Healeys at autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/healeyrick@yahoo.com