<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>This is what I use as well, .002 to .0025. It works. </p>
<p>Henry Frye<br />2025 Kastner Cup Chair<br />fot@kastnercup.com</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p id="v1reply-intro">On 2024-11-27 17:03, Steve Yott via Fot wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div id="v1replybody1">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">.002" -0 + .0005</div>
<div> </div>
<div dir="auto" style="font-size: 100%; color: #000000;" align="left">
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: Lorne Fritz via Fot <fot@autox.team.net></div>
<div>Date: 11/27/24 3:45 PM (GMT-06:00)</div>
<div>To: fot@autox.team.net</div>
<div>Subject: [Fot] rod bearing clearances</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Hi. What is everyone using for rod bearing clearances on the TR3/4 engines. The competition manual says .001 extra. The workshop manual specs. says 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a wear limit clearnce of .005. That would me to that 2.0801(2.0861 -.005,-.001 0) would be acceptable. What does the group think? Thanks in advance. Lorne Fritz</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>