[Fot] dog box transmissions in SCCA racing
Bob Kramer
rkramer56 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 17:53:03 MDT 2024
Thanks Anthony. It took me a while to get around to it but I've now looked
up the current SCCA prep rules. In vintage racing, we have a lot of
cars with non-standard stuff like dog gear tranny's and Wilwood brakes. My
Texas club has a Rules Change process that requires a racer to submit a
proposal including documenting the need. We have approved some items over
the years. Often the reason is that parts are no longer available, or are
just crap. The problem is that it ends up as an upgrade. Once you do that
for one brand the competition, who didn't ask for or cannot document a need
is now miffed. Some of these improvements result in more HP, traction,
better gearing and create a new weakest link, which soon becomes a rules
change proposal. I'm on the Competition Committee in our club, the one that
works on the change proposals. I'm starting to wonder if we should look at
standardized weight penalties using a percentage of the approved weight
across the board to level the playing field.
[image: image.png]
Bob Kramer
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:16 PM Anthony Parker via Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
wrote:
> At least 20 years in Prod Prep Level 1. Probably much earlier.
> No need to run stock case.
> Number of forward gears are specified and most Triumphs can run 5 speeds
> because of stock overdrive option.
> Just can't be sequential.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net> on behalf of Bob Kramer via Fot <
> fot at autox.team.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 23, 2024 9:12 AM
> *To:* Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
> *Subject:* [Fot] dog box transmissions in SCCA racing
>
> Amici,
>
> I am researching this topic for my club's Competition Committee. We have a
> proposal on the table to allow an alternate dog box tranny in place of a
> Muncie with a weight penalty. We have multiple people running dog boxes in
> all production classes under the radar. I don't know if and when the SCCA
> made dog boxes legal for Production Cars. I have one of Sam Halkias's old
> TR6 racecars and it came with a dog box. Since it fit into the stock case I
> presume that it was legal, but maybe not?
>
> Can anyone enlighten me on dog box legality in Production cars and dates
> of same?
> Or, if it was a case by case rule change thing with the SCCA?
>
> TIA
>
> Bob Kramer
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
> Unsubscribe/Manage <http://www.team.net/pipermail/fotUnsubscribe/Manage>:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/rkramer56@gmail.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20240826/af3cdf8d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 367367 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20240826/af3cdf8d/attachment.png>
More information about the Fot
mailing list