[Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?

[Peter Vucinic]

Jason
If it hasn't got Timken on it? It's not Timken. 
If they won't replace it? They know it's not the real thing!



> On 1 Oct. 2016, at 12:21 am, Jason Sukey <jsukey at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Aaron,
>      Funny you should mention this, as I'm currently going round and round with RockAuto.  I ordered 6 of the Timken bearings (15123) - 5 of them look legit, but one of them is clearly different.  Although the box appears identical, the bearing came wrapped in plastic differently, doesn't actually say "Timken"; only says "China", and feels awful loose compared to the other 5.  Rockauto tells me that this is still a true Timken bearing.  It's obvious that it's not, but I may just have to write this one off as they won't replace it.  Glad I purchased extras.
> 
> May not be a true "counterfeit" bearing, might be a case of a dishonest customer return that was placed back in stock. 
> 
> Jason
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Aaron Johnson <hpspitfire at gmail.com> wrote:
>> How did you order the bearings?    There is a huge counterfit bearing manufacturing market.   I have lost count how many times over the last 6 years I've had to investigate them.  The last set of ball bearings I bought were skf but we're obviously not legitimate.  I took it with me to skf on a visit and confirmed it was not made in any of their factories.  
>> 
>> If you've got concerns of counterfit bearings send me some pictures and I can help. 
>> 
>> Aaron
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 29-Sep-2016, at 10:29 PM, Jason Sukey <jsukey at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> John,
>>>         Replacing the old bearings because they were worn out.  New Timkens seem to be the best available option.
>>> 
>>> Jason
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:52 PM, John Styduhar <johnstydo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Some of the USA-stamped Timkens even look cheap when you compare them to the England-made.  I wouldn't be surprised if they were made overseas. If there is nothing wrong with your old bearings, why replace them?
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Jason Sukey <jsukey at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Has anyone else noticed rather large variation in carrier bearing width's when rebuilding a spitfire differential?  The one I'm building right now, I've replaced what I suspect are the original bearings (Timken England) with brand new Timken USA bearings.  In order to reach the required .004" preload, it will require .012" LESS total shim than what was in there originally.  That seems like a big difference with the only variable being new bearings.  I'm using the same housing, same carrier, the bearings visually look to be fully pressed home.  Anyone else experience this?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jason Sukey
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> fot at autox.team.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.fot-racing.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>>>>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>>>>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>>>>> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/johnstydo@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fot at autox.team.net
>>> 
>>> http://www.fot-racing.com
>>> 
>>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>>> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/hpspitfire@gmail.com
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> <bearing3 (1024x871).jpg>
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
> 
> http://www.fot-racing.com
> 
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/pvucinic@netspace.net.au
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20161001/11b2dcf1/attachment-0001.htm>