[Fot] Six cylinder cams

Sun Nov 1 12:45:34 MST 2015

I definitely agree with this.  All my trailers have gotten winches
soon after purchase once I realized how useful they are. 

John

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:59:45 -0400, Scott Janzen  wrote:

       Agree with the winch. Especially useful for hauling broken cars 
on. One of the best things I did for my trailer. 

Sent from my mobile device 

On Oct 31, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Spitfire Racing  wrote:

Putting a car on and off a trailer is what winches are made for. 
That’s the stuff that buggers clutches also. 

Russ

From: Fot [mailto:fot-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of McKearn McKearn
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 6:45 PM
To: Duncan Charlton
Cc: Mike Piggot (new); FOT list
Subject: Re: [Fot] Six cylinder cams

I can tell you that I already have a GT6 with a good flexible power 
band and good reliability. It lacks quickness however, due in part to 
the TR6 engine which is not highly tuned  and I'm sure the gearing 
could be better (3.27 rearend-Toyota T50 trans.)( Good for the 
highway.) My old car is pretty much to the point where I don't want 
to do anything more to it so I want to move on to another 
project.  This time I want to build a car that snorts . I do however 
need to put it on and off the trailer and I'm not thrilled about 
breaking parts with max. RPMs so I can't afford to go all out.  I'm 
looking for quickness through the gears and good handling. 

                                                         P.J. 

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Duncan Charlton  wrote:

Larry’s comments make me wonder the precise intended purpose of the 
engine mentioned by the original poster.  “Track days” might mean 
different things to different people.  Does P. J. want a good flexible 
power band, or does he need an ultimate dyno horsepower figure?  Does 
the motor have the gear set to be able to take advantage of an engine 
with very little low-end torque? How high among his priorities is the 
ability to be able to drive the car back on the trailer at the end of 
every track weekend?  Lack of sponsorship and cash prizes mean that I 
must find the setup that maximizes the fun/cost ratio. 

Duncan

> On Oct 31, 2015, at 1:34 PM, Larry Young  wrote:
>
> That is an interesting article, but only speaks to one side of the 
> issue.  I always say that you want to pick an intake duration for an 
> RPM range that you're willing and able to turn. We all know what 
> happens to a stock TR4 crank which sees >6,000 on a regular basis.  
> Some guys want a cam good beyond 7,000, but they are just not willing 
> to push it that far. Nowadays I'm more of a street car guy, but still 
> like to have power.  I don't believe the choices should be to do 
> nothing or go all the way to race specs.  From 1968 on Triumphs were 
> severely detuned to pass emissions.  Compression ratio and duration 
> and hence cam overlap at TDC were reduced.  For example, the early 
> TR250/6 had 193 degrees duration (measured at 0.050), while the TR4 
> was about 215 and the early PI TR5/6 was 226. It seems crazy to 
> rebuild a street car of this era to the original specs.  Bumping the 
> compression ratio by a point and increasing the duration to something 
> like 210-215 will make the engine the way it would have been without 
> emission restrictions.  I would not feel guilty about polluting the 
> planet, since most of these cars see few miles annually and most of 
> the other pollution controls (e.g. ignition retard) probably quit 
> working years ago. 
> - Larry
>
> On 10/29/2015 7:25 AM, Duncan Charlton wrote:
>> Cam specs and static CR are interactive.  This will give you a 
>> rundown if you are not already knowledgeable about this subject:
>>
>> http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/Cam_and_compression_ratio_compatibility
>>
>> Duncan
>> (Texas)
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/duncan.charlton54@gmail.com
>
>

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/mckearn2@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/sjanzen@me.com

-------------------------

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/rjl@gt-classics.com

--
Thanks,
John

rjl at gt-classics.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20151101/3e4d4c32/attachment.htm>