[Fot] Racing rod design
fubog1
fubog1 at aol.com
Thu Jul 23 13:29:56 MDT 2015
In addition to the rotating mass issues, the recip weight inertial forces create heavy tensile loads in the rods & bending loads in the crank @ TDC high rpm...
FWIW
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron <hpspitfire at gmail.com>
To: fot <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Thu, Jul 23, 2015 2:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Fot] Racing rod design
I guess I'm confused. How much worse is the stroke of a tr4.
In my spitfire 1500 we use stock rods and a stock crank shaft and shift point is 7200 rpm. Guys using the moldex cranks and forged rods are getting 8500 or so. And these are the pauter x style.
Are you sure the initial failure was the rod and not something before that?
AaronJohnson
H Prod spitfire 1500
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 23, 2015, at 07:40, John Hasty < jhasty at mhc-law.com> wrote:
Gee Whiz….you guys know a h- - - of a lot more about this than me, but I reason that if Manley etc. make a rod that withstands the rigors of a 800+ hp American V8 turning upwards of 9000 rpm and it costs ½ of what P and C are charging it makes sense to use them…..
John H. Hasty | MULLEN HOLLAND & COOPER P.A.
Attorney at Law
301 South York Street (zip: 28052)
P.O. Box 488
Gastonia, NC 28053-0488
Telephone: 704.864.6751 | Facsimile: 704.861.8394
JHasty at mhc-law.com | www.mhc-law.com
From: Fot [mailto:fot-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of John Styduhar
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Christian Marx; Triumph 'Friends of Triumph
Subject: Re: [Fot] Racing rod design
Pauter has been making this design for almost 30 years with zero cold failures. If it were a poor design they would have changed it out of necessity. According to a Pauter rep., the main reason they started manufacturing their own rods in the first place was due to the fact that the H beam and I beam rods they were using couldn’t put up with what they were throwing at them with their turbo charged 4cylinder engines.
If you spin a rod bearing, eventually you will break anything.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Christian Marx <tr4racing at googlemail.com> wrote:
I saw the pictures of Pauter.
This type has no material were it needs and too much were it doesn't make sense. Maybe for very short rods usable.
Am 23.07.2015 14:46 schrieb "John Styduhar" <johnstydo at gmail.com>:
The Pauter design is a cross-beam (an inside-out H beam) not an x-beam and shares H-beam design properties because of this.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:34 AM, MadMarx <tr4racing at googlemail.com> wrote:
Today I had a look to a book called race car design.
It also contains engines, and as detail rods and their designs. I, H, blade – no x-beam (seems they never got the idea that someone could get the idea of an x-beam rod)
They said that F1 uses I-beam rods because they have the best stiffness to weight ratio.
Also German DTM-cars use I-beam rods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Tourenwagen_Masters
Cheers
Chris
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/johnstydo@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/hpspitfire@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Donate:
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums:
http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fubog1@aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20150723/1010276d/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Fot
mailing list