[Fot] What's the difference?

[TeriAnn J. Wakeman]

On 1/24/14, 10:30 AM, Terry Stetler wrote:
> Well, until you have to do a brake job or wheel bearings...
Been there and did both on the LR and TR.  The LR is a lot easier. AND 
the LR has full floating axles.  Six bolts and I can withdraw a LR rear 
axle for inspection without having to jack the vehicle up.

Of course I know nothing about about modern cars.  I suspect my vehicle 
expertise does not extend much past vehicles made after 1965 when new 
safety & SMOG laws started adding complexity to vehicles.  But I can 
compare TR & LR when both were built in 1960.  :)

TeriAnn
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* TeriAnn J. Wakeman <mailto:tjwakeman at gmail.com>
>     *To:* fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net>
>     *Sent:* Friday, January 24, 2014 11:16 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [Fot] What's the difference?
>
>     On 1/24/14, 9:06 AM, fubog1 wrote:
>     > yeah and add diff locks and free-wheeling hubs and 4WD stuff gets
>     > complicated...
>     > Glen
>     >
>     Oh I don't think it is all that complicated.  my 1960 Land Rover has
>     free-wheeling front hubs. a transfercase, air locker in the rear and
>     limited slip on the front.  It is more complicated than a TR3 but
>     not by
>     all that much.
>
>     TeriAnn
>     _______________________________________________
>     fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net>
>
>     http://www.fot-racing.com
>
>     Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>     Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>     Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>     Unsubscribe/Manage:
>     http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/tlizzard@msn.com