[Fot] Fw: Ross Pistons?

[jason at multivintage.com]

Whoops, Sorry, premature launch of response. I cannot comment on Ross, but for the GT6, Our many year loyalty lies with Venolia. Fresh ugrades still on the shelf for the next oversized upgrade.
Jason Ostrowski
Friendly Ghost Racing
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: jason at multivintage.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:51:11 
To: Scott Janzen<sjanzen at me.com>; <fot-bounces at autox.team.net>; 'Friends of Triumph' Triumph<fot at autox.team.net>
Reply-To: jason at multivintage.com
Subject: Re: [Fot] Ross Pistons?

You all know by now that I typically vote for what is best by track proven authority .  
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Janzen <sjanzen at me.com>
Sender: fot-bounces at autox.team.netDate: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:29:45 
To: 'Friends of Triumph' Triumph<fot at autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fot] Ross Pistons?

I am building up a second (primary?) engine for the GT6.  I have a set of
barely used Ross pistons that currently have a gapless top ring, a traditional
second ring and an oil ring (third). I will be installing new rings and honing
the block.
The pistons weigh about 40 grams less than the Venolia pistons I have
historically used with no troubles.  Seems like the lighter weight should be a
plus, unless they are more prone to breakage . . .
I'm looking for feedback, positive or negative, with Ross pistons.  I'm not
looking to throw money at new pistons, but hate to build up a motor and skimp
somewhere that will cost me down the road.

Anybody?
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jason@multivintage.com