[Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4

[Larry Young]

I think that is the same software I used.  I did not find an appreciable 
difference between the two methods (shortening the A arms or moving the 
pivots inwards).  You don't really need suspension software to look at 
this simple stuff.  I found a spreadsheet agreed with it and was not as 
cumbersome.

On 3/10/2013 7:06 PM, Bill Babcock wrote:I
> According to the analysis I did with my suspension software (SuspPro) the most useful way to change camber on a TR3 is to move the upper arms inward and kee.p them the same length. I use the TR6 bits to get caster and cut the upper arms to add heim joints to make an adjustable arm, but the length is close to stock, just has the pivot moved inwards.
>
> If you shorten the upper A arms you wind up with a lot of camber at full bump. It's also pretty hard to get the bump steer out with shorter arms, the outer pivot point moves well inside the lower pivot.