[Fot] TR4 Valve spring - pressure, assembled height, suppliers

Larry Young cartravel at pobox.com
Thu May 10 12:55:45 MDT 2012


If I remember right, 70 lbs is pretty close to the seat force 
recommended for a stock cam.   Most racing cams use more.  I recommend 
95 lbs for my cams, but you will see others recommend much more.  The 
more I look at this stuff the more I believe this is due to some of 
these cams not having or not using a ramp.   The ramp is a low rate of 
lift (velocity) area where the lash is taken up and the impact occurs.  
I recently looked at a cam (not for a Triumph) from a big name 
manufacturer.  With the recommended valve lash, the impact velocity was 
about half the maximum velocity and more than 5 times what it should 
have been.  This is like hitting the valve with a hammer to open it and 
slamming it down on the seat when you close it.  Under these 
circumstances the valve will bounce unless you have strong spring 
force.  I have never looked at the G3 cam, so can't say anything about 
it, but I have observed this problem on other racing cams (Triumph and 
non-Triumph) and I believe it is the reason for such large spring forces 
even for our little engines with light valve trains.

see http://www.tildentechnologies.com/Cams/Tip_Lash.html

On 5/8/2012 4:50 PM, Tim Murphy wrote:
> The cam is a Kastner G3 and the rockers are stock TR4 with 1.55:1 ratio.
> The measured cam lift is 0.342 giving a measured valve lift of 0.480 with
> 0.016 tappet clearance.  This gives an actual ratio of 1.45:1, valve lift +
> tappet clearance to cam lift.  We use a "red line" of 6000 RPM.
>
>
>
> I checked Good Parts but he only lists TR6 parts, at least that I saw.  Are
> the TR6 and TR4 valve springs, retainers, keepers and spring seats
> interchangeable?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Tim and Ryan
>
> 1961 TR4 #317
>
>
>
> From: hotmail_b17abf0a244adefd at live.com
> [mailto:hotmail_b17abf0a244adefd at live.com] On Behalf Of Kas Kastner
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:54 PM
> To: timmurph at fastbytes.com
> Subject: RE: [Fot] TR4 Valve spring - pressure, assembled height, suppliers
>
>
>
> i cannot help you with a parts without a lot of photos which I might not
> recognize anyway, BUT, that is way way to low a seat pressrue.  I don' know
> your cam, but if it is high lifter from Larry or something like my old G-3
> then you want about 125 pounds on the seat.
>
> Never be beaten by equipment
>
>
>> From: timmurph at fastbytes.com
>> To: fot at autox.team.net
>> Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 13:40:23 -0500
>> CC: ryan.murphy at fdlco.wi.gov
>> Subject: [Fot] TR4 Valve spring - pressure, assembled height, suppliers
>>
>> The machinist doing the work on our cylinder head tells me that we only
> have
>> about 70 pounds of pressure on the seats. He thinks this is pretty low, in
>> his experience with other engines. He also asked if I had the assembled
>> height of the springs, i.e. how much compression when assembled to the
> head.
>> He usually has this spec and shims the spring to obtain the specified
>> height. Lastly, the alloy retainers are pretty beat up and the origin of
>> the springs are unknown and he thinks they look questionable. Who are the
>> suppliers of valve springs, retainers, keepers and spring seat hardened
>> washers for racing purposes?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tim and Ryan
>>
>> 1961 TR4 #317
>> _______________________________________________
>> fot at autox.team.net
>>
>> http://www.fot-racing.com
>>
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/kaskas@cox.net
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/cartravel@pobox.com



More information about the Fot mailing list