[Fot] Weight Reduction TR3-4

Bud Rolofson levilevi at comcast.net
Sun Jul 1 17:39:37 MDT 2012


Barry,

Please send me a copy of your component table. I'm in the process of  
making similar type decisions on what parts to use and what race  
category it would put me in to use certain parts. Weight  
considerations are high priority part of that process so your timing  
for me could not be better.  Thanks for sharing.


Bud Rolofson

71TR6 CC57365 (Good 6)
66TR4A CTC57806 (The Wreck-Almost parts)
66TR4A CTC57529 (The Project)
71F-250 Camper Special (Triumph Support Vehicle)
Z-50A Hardly Davidson 1977 Honda Mini-Trail Bike (Triumph Pit Bike)
levilevi at comcast.net




On Jul 1, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Barry Munson wrote:

> Amici -
>
> As I have proceeded through Barnie's - 1959 TR3A -  evolutionary  
> process
> from a derelict barn-find to a vintage racer over the last two  
> years, one of
> the initial questions that I was faced with was related to the issue  
> of
> weight reduction. The question of how much and where could I reduce  
> the
> weight and remain compliant with the requirements for originality of  
> the
> majority of vintage racing organizations, while not compromising  
> either
> safety or performance, was forefront in making decisions. So things  
> like the
> addition of fiberglass components, changing the frame to a TR4,  
> increasing
> the width of the fenders or the addition of flares were not  
> considered. What
> I was looking for were areas that I could substitute alloy  
> components for
> stock iron ones, use of components that were available on later  
> models of
> the TR3 line and offered weight saving options. Over the last two  
> years I
> have been able to reduce the weight by 104 pounds simply by acquiring
> bolt-on parts. Of course knowing what is available, its source and  
> cost has
> been the key and I have to thank many from this list for that  
> knowledge.
>
> The 104 pounds was achieved in the following major component  
> breakdown:
>
> Engine - 61.0 lbs
>
> Chassis - 11.0 lbs
>
> Front Suspension - 16.0 lbs.
>
> Rear Suspension - 16.0 lbs.
>
> In addition to the weight reduction that was achieved, many of the
> components offered additional benefits in terms of safety and  
> performance.
>
>
>
> I have prepared a component by component table showing how and where  
> this
> reduction in weight was achieved, however it is much too long for  
> team.net
> therefore if anyone would like to receive a copy please just ask and  
> I will
> forward one immediately. I can also supply the source and cost for  
> any of
> the components. I have checked the archives for such a compilation and
> couldn't find one - that doesn't necessarily mean that it's not  
> there..
>
>
>
> Barry.
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/levilevi@comcast.net



More information about the Fot mailing list