[Fot] alternatives to the SCCA?

[BOB KRAMER]

Jack is right. Vintage rules are stuck in time and that is what make it 
great. Having said that there are some worries that vintage race 
organizations will suffer membership losses over time as the racer 
population ages. If NASA or some other yet to be formed post-historic race 
organizer puts together races for mid 70's and later cars we may lose 
racers. From the Triumph crowd there could be a great interest in racing 
later model Spitfires, TR6's and TR7's. Put them on the track with Celica's, 
early RX7's etc. and you would have a pretty interesting crowd.

Bob Kramer
rkramer3 at austin.rr.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <JWoesvra at aol.com>
To: <jaxonracing at yahoo.com>; <REK46 at aol.com>; <fpspitfire at comcast.net>; 
<fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Fot] alternatives to the SCCA?


> In a message dated 6/1/2008 6:23:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> jaxonracing at yahoo.com writes:
>
> I could build a SVRA compliant car and then the rules could  change 
> because
> you are the MAN
>
>
> The point is,our rules DON'T change!
>
> The MAN is not me...the MAN is your organization. Your MAN change YOUR 
> rules.
>
> My rules don't change. Vintage is by definition, locked in time.
>
> I'm sorry to have to make it so blunt.
>
> jw
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with
> Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
> (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot at autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>
> You are subscribed as rkramer3 at austin.rr.com