[Fot] Engine oil, Valvoline VV211 vs VV851

[Tim Murphy]

Nope, no reason at all.  I just couldn't find those pdf's on their web site. 
The difference seems to be the calcium.  Thanks.

Tim
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randall" <tr3driver at ca.rr.com>
To: "'FOT'" <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Fot] Engine oil, Valvoline VV211 vs VV851


> Is there some reason to not believe the info posted on Valvoline's web 
> site
> ?
>
> VV851 :
> http://www.valvoline.com/products/Specialty%20Racing%20Oils.pdf
>
> VV211 :
> http://www.valvoline.com/products/VR-1%20Racing%20Motor%20Oil.pdf
>
> Hard to see any difference in those numbers, tho.  The "Not for Racing"
> claims .12% while VR1 claims .13% ... if there's any functional difference
> at all, it doesn't appear to be in ZDDP.  Maybe it's in one of the newer
> "anti-wear" additives ?
>
> Randall
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot at autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>
> You are subscribed as timmurph at fastbytes.com