[Fot] Fwd: Re: gearbox legality

[Jack W. Drews]

>Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:38:24 -0500
>To: Ernest Husmann <ehusmann53 at yahoo.com>
>From: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4 at geneseo.net>
>Subject: Re: [Fot] gearbox legality
>
>I agree that the subject was well thrashed, but at least it was on a 
>subject this list was intended for, instead of some of the subjects 
>discussed ad nauseum that really should be on the "big" Triumph 
>list. It provided some emails good for forwarding to VSCDA officers 
>who don't monitor these lists. One could argue that installing a 
>different transmission for better reliability is no different than 
>installing a Mallory distributor, the only purpose of which is to 
>replace Lucas stuff. Hey, all Lucas pieces can be made to work for a 
>little while.
>
>Ditto Southwick axles. We could force everybody to replace rear 
>axles every third race, just like Kastner did, to keep from rolling 
>over. His cars were pretty reliable doing things like that. Why 
>can't we do the same thing? If a car a year rolls over and nobody is 
>hurt, is it a small price to pay for authenticity?
>
>At 06:35 PM 9/22/2007, you wrote:
>>It's amazing how these threads get off the subject so quickly.
>
>uncle jack

uncle jack 



------------------------------------------------
No Virus Found In This Message
Scanned at barracuda.geneseo.net