[Fot] Valve cover breather

[N197TR4 at cs.com]

Thanks, Jack W.

This is good to hear as it has always made great sense to me and my TR4.

Especially in a TR3/4 engine, with no apparent downside.

As a result, I have never used the lip seal conversion...dont need to.
 
Joe A. 

>In a message dated 12/29/2007 2:26:01 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>tony at tonydrews.com writes:
>
>Works,  but doesn't pass tech as vent lines need to go to a catch  tank.
>
>
>This would pass tech at an SVRA event. I think it is a viable device and  
>once used a similar idea in a BMC Fomula jr.
> 
>However, in that case the car had a faulty rear main seal design (BMC) that  
>always leaked on the clutch. We put a scavenger tube in the bell housing and 
>ran  it to the exhaust header. It sucked up whatever came out and burned it up 
>in the  exhaust.
> 
>I see nothing against the our rules if you vent the valve cover this way,  
>unless you start smoking so bad that it is a nuisance.
> 
>That call is always up to the Chief Steward.
> 
>Jack Woehrle
>SVRA Technical Director
> 
>
>
>
>**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
>(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
>Fot mailing list
>Fot at autox.team.net
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot