[Roadsters] 1600 v 2000?

[Daniel Solomon]

i guess i'd have to disagree with #2.......

Dave Stoll wrote:
> 1. because my 1600 has slim chance of a death rattle coming from  the timing 
> chain....
> 2. once the tires start squealing in a corner the engine size doesn't 
> matter....
> daveS
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gregory S. Morrison" <gsm at gregorysmorrison.com>
> To: <datsun-roadsters at autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:18 PM
> Subject: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000?
>
>
>   
>> I've seen several ground up restorations of 1600s and 2000s. All things
>> being equal, the cost is very similar. So, other than "because it's been 
>> in
>> my family for years", or "because I like 1600s better than 2000s", why are
>> some people pouring a ton of money into restoring a stock 1600? Why not go
>> with a 2000? Same car, but with more gears and more power.
>>     
> ________________________________________
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> You are subscribed as d-solomon at comcast.net
>
> Datsun-roadsters mailing list
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
>
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/datsun-roadsters