Subject: [Fot] rod bearing clearances

From: Lorne Fritz via Fot <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:18:53 -0500

--===============7913376454075788589==

--000000000000fd11340627eb832b

Hi.  What is everyone using for rod bearing clearances on the TR3/4
engines.  The competition manual says .001 extra.  The workshop manual
specs. says 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a  wear limit clearnce of   .005.   That
would me to  that 2.0801(2.0861 -.005,-.001 0) would be acceptable.  What
does the group think?  Thanks in advance.   Lorne Fritz

--000000000000fd11340627eb832b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi.=C2=A0 What is everyone using for rod bearing clearance=
s on the TR3/4 engines.=C2=A0 The competition manual says .001 extra.=C2=A0=
 The workshop manual specs. says 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a=C2=A0 wear limit =
clearnce of =C2=A0 .005. =C2=A0 That would me to=C2=A0 that 2.0801(2.0861 -=
.005,-.001 0) would be acceptable.=C2=A0 What does the group think?=C2=A0 T=
hanks in advance.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Lorne Fritz<br></div>

--000000000000fd11340627eb832b--

--===============7913376454075788589==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
[email-masked]

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot

--===============7913376454075788589==--

---

From: tr4 via Fot <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:03:59 -0600

--===============1255794160335142968==

----_com.samsung.android.email_5972756620257480
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

----_com.samsung.android.email_5972756620257480
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

----_com.samsung.android.email_5972756620257480--

--===============1255794160335142968==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--===============1255794160335142968==--

---

From: yellow04 via Fot <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:35:42 -0500

--===============1535762713021608919==
 boundary="=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e"

--=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 format=flowed

This is what I use as well, .002 to .0025. It works.  

Henry Frye
2025 Kastner Cup Chair
[email-masked] 

On 2024-11-27 17:03, Steve Yott via Fot wrote:

> .002" -0 + .0005 
> 
> -------- Original message -------- 
> From: Lorne Fritz via Fot <[email-masked]> 
> Date: 11/27/24 3:45 PM (GMT-06:00) 
> To: [email-masked] 
> Subject: [Fot] rod bearing clearances 
> 
> Hi.  What is everyone using for rod bearing clearances on the TR3/4 engines.  The competition manual says .001 extra.  The workshop manual specs. says 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a  wear limit clearnce of   .005.   That would me to  that 2.0801(2.0861 -.005,-.001 0) would be acceptable.  What does the group think?  Thanks in advance.   Lorne Fritz
--=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=
=3DUTF-8" /></head><body style=3D'font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Gen=
eva,sans-serif'>
<p>This is what I use as well, .002 to .0025. It works.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Henry Frye<br />2025 Kastner Cup Chair<br />[email-masked]</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p id=3D"v1reply-intro">On 2024-11-27 17:03, Steve Yott via Fot wrote:</p>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2=
px solid; margin: 0">
<div id=3D"v1replybody1">
<div dir=3D"auto">
<div dir=3D"auto">.002" -0 + .0005</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size: 100%; color: #000000;" align=3D"left"=
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: Lorne Fritz via Fot &lt;[email-masked]&gt;</div>
<div>Date: 11/27/24 3:45 PM (GMT-06:00)</div>
<div>To: [email-masked]</div>
<div>Subject: [Fot] rod bearing clearances</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi.&nbsp; What is everyone using for rod bearing clearance=
s on the TR3/4 engines.&nbsp; The competition manual says .001 extra.&nbsp;=
 The workshop manual specs. says 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a&nbsp; wear limit =
clearnce of &nbsp; .005. &nbsp; That would me to&nbsp; that 2.0801(2.0861 -=
=2E005,-.001 0) would be acceptable.&nbsp; What does the group think?&nbsp;=
 Thanks in advance.&nbsp;&nbsp; Lorne Fritz</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>

--=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e--

--===============1535762713021608919==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--===============1535762713021608919==--