vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GPS receivers? Accuracy Needed..

To: Marcel Chichak <chichm@telusplanet.net>
Subject: Re: GPS receivers? Accuracy Needed..
From: "Dr. Stuart Strickland" <stuart@strickland.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:50:29 +0100
I responded directly the other day, but thought I would post to the list 
as well.  I'm a GPS engineer and spend most of my working time analyzing 
data from GPS receivers.  I've also tried to use these things for 
surveying projects with very limited success.

While it is true that the removal of "selective availability" greatly 
increased the reliability of civilian gps, it still requires a great 
deal of patience to use this technology for anything like surveying. 
 What you generally see as a location fix on your hand-held gps receiver 
is the result of filtering a large number of individual raw fixes.  This 
works very well if you are driving down the highway, reasonably well if 
you are driving at lower speeds, and tolerably well if you are on foot 
or standing still.  Even if you dismiss rogue fixes, you're still going 
to have a fairly wide circle of uncertainty as you could see if you have 
a look at the link below.

A lot of people may tell you different and may have used gps under 
conditions where these errors average out, but this is definitely not 
the ideal technology for your application.  On the positive side, if you 
know the precise altitude of your location (which you would usually be 
able to determine if your site is also an airfield), you can get a good 
fix with fewer satellites and so more quickly or under a wider range of 
conditions.  But the closest you will still be able to come is probably 
setting up the "average position" setting on a Garmin receiver and 
spending quite a long time with it at each pylon location.

But I encourage you to try a simple experiment.  Take your receiver out 
somewhere this afternoon and mark a spot with it.  Then come back 
tomorrow and mark the spot where the receiver says you were the day 
before.  Measure the distance between them and think about whether this 
would be good enough for setting up a course.

Regards,
Stuart

http://www.visualgps.net/VisualGPS/VisualGPSprt.pdf

Marcel Chichak wrote:

>Quoting Phil Buttolph <pb1@humboldt.edu>:
>
>  
>
>>We use GPS to locate dive sites for research...my information may be dated,
>>    
>>
>
>I think your information is past its best before date. The military selective 
>availability error was turned off about 2 years ago, thereby allowing metre 
>horizontal accuracy. 

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/vintage-race


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>