triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

[TR] TR4 Trunk Picture Request

To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: [TR] TR4 Trunk Picture Request
From: "Jim Henningsen" <tr6guy@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:06:40 -0500
Happy New Year List!  Anyone out there with a 61 or early 62 TR4 with the
trunk stay rod rather than the telescopic arm?  I need pictures of the early
assembly including the mount to the trunk support tube and the bottom mount
to the rear fender. Many thanks!  We finished our move and are now in Ocala,
FL.  Happy New Year to all!
Jim Henningsen
Ocala, FL
62 TR4
75 TR6

-----Original Message-----
From: triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net
[mailto:triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of John Macartney
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 2:42 PM
To: Randall; triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] 63 TR 4 engine red

Engines that failed for whatever reason on the two 'run' dynos after leaving
engine assembly and found to be defective were stripped of their ancillaries
and scrapped. Simply, the cost of "teardown, investigate and rectify"
exceeded
the raw material and direct labour cost of producing another new unit.
Engines
returned to the factory by the global dealer network for reconditioning were
rebuilt by a Standard-Triumph subsidiary called Beans Industries. They were
always painted a less than attractive blue and took the form of a short or
long motor - i.e. with or without a cylinder head and valve cover but devoid
of other equipment. The engine number was completely different from normal
production numbers and always had an 'R' as the leading prefix to indicate
"reconditioned" The famous 'Gold Star' engine was a slightly uprated
Standard
(Triumph) Ten and used the surplus paint from the Ferguson Grey and Gold
units
from 1956 onwards - and that's because the Purchasing Dept couldn't get out
of
its supply contract with Pinchin & Johnson. The red engine referred to by
Darren might have come out of Engineering for some obscure reason but I
doubt
the company ever used red in post-war production, at least in the UK. The
twelve other overseas assembly plants
 might have done something completely different?

Jonmac
http://standard-triumph-books.co.uk/ 


>________________________________
>
From: Randall <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
>To: triumphs@autox.team.net 
>Sent:
Saturday, 31 December 2011, 19:16
>Subject: Re: [TR] 63 TR 4 engine red
> 
>> 
He claimed that he had owned this Triumph from  new 
>> and the engine was 
>>
always factory red. 
>
>One theory I've heard is that re-worked engines (those
found defective in
>some manner and repaired by the factory before delivery)
were painted red.
>Dunno if that's true, but it makes sense to me.
>
>--
Randall  
>
>** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>
>Donate:
http://www.team.net/donate.html
>Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>Forums:
http://www.team.net/forums
>Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/flywheelcoventry1@yahoo.co.uk

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/tr6guy@cox.net

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>